Kris Book wrote:
chorline will soon go the way
that saccharin and DDT did, no accepting of responsibility
by its manufacturers.
Ummm. Saccharin is safe and has finally been delisted by the FDA. In Dec
of 2000, Bill Clinton signed long overdue legislation that finally
removed the warning
Doug Foskey wrote:
When you use reverse Osmosis, the water is de-mineralised. This tends
to strip trace elements from the body, which is detrimental to health.
How do you protect against that? regards Doug
You have got to be kidding me. Are you photosynthetic or something? If
not,
I guess if you like chemicals in your diet. If the government really had
our health in mind when they did this stuff, stevia would not have been
banned in 1990 and would be allowed as an ingrediant in food. It only has
a 3000 year history of no harm, it is a calorie free sweetner that as a
Hello Kim
I guess if you like chemicals in your diet.
I guess... And no matter what the WHO or FDA or the entire medical
profession might say, sensitized folks (doesn't exist, right?) and
people with CFS, ME, fybromyalgia, systemic candidiasis, and all the
other non-existent modern plagues
On Tue, 20 May 2003 01:40, you wrote:
paul van den bergen wrote:
This is robert's comment:
I'll get off my soap box now. . .
To which Paul replied:
We have a five stage filtration system in my house. The last part is a
reverse osmosis membrane. I really like reverse
I think you all missed my point.
the social benefits of both fluorine and chlorine in drinking water are
enourmous compared with the costs of not doing so - let me be clear oin this
- the benefits of chlorine are very low levels of disentry and diahorea, not
to mention cholera, etc., the
On Sun, 18 May 2003 11:25 am, robert luis rabello wrote:
Kris Book wrote:
Can someone please explain to me why all of Europe and more
recently so many U.S. water districts are using ozone to
purify drinking water instead of chlorine/chloramine. I
just searched for an hour to find an
paul van den bergen wrote:
[snip]
but consider for a moment another poison we add to drinking water...
Chemically similar to Fluorine (and similarly toxic), we add it in much
larger quantities, especially in large public areas where children are the
most susceptable to it's effects - which
purify drinking water.
Kirk
-Original Message-
From: Alan Petrillo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2003 12:57 AM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Fwd: [prep2003discuss2] Toothpaste
as poison
paul van den bergen wrote:
[snip]
but consider
Kris Book wrote:
Can someone please explain to me why all of Europe and more
recently so many U.S. water districts are using ozone to
purify drinking water instead of chlorine/chloramine. I
just searched for an hour to find an article I had read
which stated that one chlorine molecule
On Mon, 5 May 2003 03:31 am, Kris Book wrote:
Does anyone one on the list know enough about this subject
to confirm or deny this article's validity?
Toothpaste is poison
And we thought the fluoride in toothpaste was
bad...
In the interests of rumour contriol, I feel I must
Does anyone one on the list know enough about this subject
to confirm or deny this article's validity?
Toothpaste is poison
And we thought the fluoride in toothpaste was
bad...
http://www.rense.com/general37/toth.htm
Is Hidden True Cause Of
Alzheimer's Your
13 matches
Mail list logo
