Re: [biofuel] air car's indirect pollution vs EV's

jerry dycus wrote: Hi Harmon and All, --- Harmon Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jerry dycus wrote: snip Plus you have to figure a major amount of pollution just to manufacture the battery for an EV, to replace it, and to recycle or landfill it. Ev'ers recycle

Re: [biofuel] air car's indirect pollution vs EV's

Hi Dick, Harmon, David and All, David, Since you are wrong, who is the wanker? There is an old saying, it's better to let people think you are a fool than to open you mouth and remove all doubt. If you don't know and are guessing it's better to ask. There are no dumb

RE: [biofuel] air car's indirect pollution vs EV's

Has anyone penciled cryogenic storage versus compressed air? Kirk -Original Message- From: jerry dycus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2001 6:46 PM To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [biofuel] air car's indirect pollution vs EV's Hi Dick, Harmon, David

Re: [biofuel] air car's indirect pollution vs EV's

jerry dycus wrote: For a given power storage there is little difference in weight needed between air and battery systems when everything is included with the better battery systems like ni-cads. Not much difference with lead acid either. Can you give us an example of a 5

Re: [biofuel] air car's indirect pollution vs EV's

Hi Harmon and All, --- Harmon Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jerry dycus wrote: For a given power storage there is little difference in weight needed between air and battery systems when everything is included with the better battery systems like ni-cads. Not much