Re: [Biofuel] Solar PV Is Cheaper Than Gasoline

2005-06-13 Thread Jeffrey Kumjian
How do you buy a electric Car or van?? Jeffrey

--- MH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Solar PV Is Cheaper Than Gasoline 
  By Stephen Killough 
 
  Charging an electric vehicle with sunlight
  costs less than running a vehicle on gasoline 
  May 31, 2005 
 

http://www.evworld.com/view.cfm?section=articlestoryid=856
 
 
  Are solar cells a waste of money?
  Not if you compare them to gasoline. 
 
  Most people consider solar cells to be impractical.
  They always make comments like solar cells are too
 expensive,
  useless at night, ugly, undependable because of
 clouds, and
  would require cutting down trees. For the typical
 home application,
  these are unfortunately valid complaints, mainly
 because solar cells
  have to compete against cheap coal. However,
 compared with gasoline,
  solar cells can be quite competitive. 
 
  This example deals with one of the largest users of
 gasoline,
  people driving to work. Of course I am talking
 about
  battery-electric cars recharged by solar cells, but
 for a
  different twist I am proposing that the cells be
 located
  not at the owners home, but instead in the parking
 lot where
  the owner works. Why at work? Because when the sun
 shines,
  that’s where the car is. In addition, expansive
 employee parking
  lots are not shaded by trees, and shade from cells
 mounted above
  the car keep the car from becoming hot on summer
 days, and
  can reduce rust and paint fading caused by rain and
 sunshine.
  And nobody will accuse you of harming the
 appearance of their
  beautiful asphalt lot. The nine-hour stay in the
 parking lot is
  compatible with the recharge time for most
 batteries, and the
  lower voltage of the cells is safer than regular
 electrical outlets,
  especially in wet outdoor locations. The employer
 would not have to
  provide anything except anchor points to keep the
 panels from blowing over. 
 
  Even more interesting are the economics. A typical
 parking space is
  9 by 18 feet, or 2.74 by 5.48 meters, for a total
 of 15 square meters.
  A typical latitude in the U.S. is 35 degrees, so
 tilting the panel to
  face the sun allows more panel space to be mounted
 above the
  same parking space, or 18.3 square meters. Typical
 solar radiation is
  1000 watts per square meter, and using high
 efficiency solar cells like
  the 20% efficient A300 units from Sunpower, 200
 watts can be obtained
  per square meter. Without a tracking mechanism to
 continually point the
  cells toward the sun, the average power over 9
 hours is 60% of the
  peak power, or 120 watts per square meter. All this
 adds up to around
  20,000 watt-hours for a typical 9 hour work day.
 This is a significant
  amount of energy that can be collected from one
 parking space,
  although this also points out how much land we
 waste parking our cars,
  but that’s a story for another day. 
 
  The present day cost for solar cells is about $5
 per peak watt, so
  the 3660 peak watt system described here would cost
 $18,300.
  Using a mortgage calculator we can calculate a loan
 for
  this system using a 20 year loan and 6% interest
 rate.
  This comes out to a cost of $131 per month. 
 
  An efficient battery electric car, such as an EV1,
 consumes
  170 watt-hours per mile. The 20,000 watt-hours
 collected by the
  solar panel would thus power this car for 118 miles
 per day.
  A typical month has 22 working days, during which
 the solar panel
  could power the car for about 2600 miles. Compare
 this to a very
  efficient gasoline powered car that got 40 miles
 per gallon,
  traveling 2600 miles and paying $2 per gallon for
 gas.
  The monthly gasoline payments would be $130,
  essentially the same as the solar powered case. 
 
  Some of you may think that it would be better for
 the environment
  to connect the solar cells to the electric power
 grid to displace the
  use of coal. Per basic heating power, gasoline does
 generate less
  carbon dioxide than coal because much of the heat
 comes from
  the hydrogen in the gasoline molecules. However,
 coal generating
  plants are more efficient than internal combustion
 engines, so the
  carbon dioxide emissions are similar whether using
 gasoline in a
  car or coal in an electric power plant. Therefore
 solar cells can
  displace a similar amount of emissions in either
 case. But my
  objective is to promote more solar cells, and the
 way to do this is
  to sell them in a market where they are already
 competitive, which
  is the gasoline market. Furthermore, in many cases
 solar power
  does not displace coal, but displaces more
 expensive fuels like
  natural gas, even though natural gas is cleaner.
 Economic wise, it
  will always be difficult to displace coal because
 it is so cheap.
  After all, the commodity can be simply scraped off
 the ground
  from huge coal fields in Wyoming, delivered in
 railroad cars
  without even requiring a lid to shield it from the
 weather, sent to
  the furnace after very little refining, and 

[Biofuel] NaOH

2005-06-13 Thread Marc Arends


Hello all, 

I have a questions before i want to start with making my first test batch with the single stage method. 


I bought NaOH from a hardware store, but it looks white so it is not pure. Does somebody know how i can mesure the moisture content of this NaOH so i can compensate for all this water? 
(I can use an oven at my work that canreach1000 degrees Celsius).

Greetings,

Marc


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] NaOH

2005-06-13 Thread Jan Warnqvist



Hello Marc.
If your NaOH is not anhydrous, you should 
not use it at all. The best way of finding out the water content is to ask your 
dealer (or his supplier) for a certificate of analysis, where the actual NaOH 
content along with the impurities should be stated properly.
With best regards
Jan WarnqvistAGERATEC AB

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

+ 46 554 201 89+46 70 499 38 45

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Marc 
  Arends 
  To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  
  Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 9:52 AM
  Subject: [Biofuel] NaOH
  
  
  
  
  Hello all, 
  
  I have a questions before i want to start with making my first test batch 
  with the single stage method. 
  
  
  I bought NaOH from a hardware store, but it looks white so it is not 
  pure. Does somebody know how i can mesure the moisture content of this NaOH so 
  i can compensate for all this water? 
  (I can use an oven at my work that canreach1000 degrees 
  Celsius).
  
  Greetings,
  
  Marc
  
  

  ___Biofuel mailing 
  listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
  at Journey to 
  Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the 
  combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
  messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Animal Fat

2005-06-13 Thread FRANCISCO

Hi you all

The investors team  have defined we will start our industrial biodiesel 
production and fuel production using animal fat. I have gone  thru 
several sources and found very litllte info and literature about 
production strating from animal fat. Can you folks help me on this?? 
Very best

Chico Ramos

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Solar PV Is Cheaper Than Gasoline

2005-06-13 Thread Michael Redler

Solar (PV)may become an even biggercontributortoour future energy scheme thanpreviously imagined. If it looks good now, the technology seems to have nowhere else to go but up.


"A solar cell with the simplest possible physical structure could achieve 50 percent efficiency or better, far higher than any yet demonstrated in the laboratory."
http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/sb-MSD-multibandsolar-panels.html
"After working on the problem for about 3 billion years, nature has achieved an energy transfer efficiency of approximately 97 percent," says Graham Fleming, director of Berkeley Lab's Physical Biosciences Division and an internationally acclaimed leader in spectroscopic studies of photosynthetic processes. "If we can get a complete understanding as to how this is done, creating artificial versions of photosynthesis should be possible." 
http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/sb/Oct-2004/3-INCITE-Photosynthesis.html
MikeMH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solar PV Is Cheaper Than Gasoline By Stephen Killough Charging an electric vehicle with sunlightcosts less than running a vehicle on gasoline May 31, 2005 http://www.evworld.com/view.cfm?section=articlestoryid=856 Are solar cells a waste of money?Not if you compare them to gasoline. Most people consider solar cells to be impractical.They always make comments like solar cells are too expensive,useless at night, ugly, undependable because of clouds, andwould require cutting down trees. For the typical home application,these are unfortunately valid complaints, mainly because solar cellshave to compete against cheap coal. However, compared with gasoline,solar cells can be quite competitive. This example deals with one of the largest users of gasoline,people driving to work. Of course I am talking
 aboutbattery-electric cars recharged by solar cells, but for adifferent twist I am proposing that the cells be locatednot at the owners home, but instead in the parking lot wherethe owner works. Why at work? Because when the sun shines,that’s where the car is. In addition, expansive employee parkinglots are not shaded by trees, and shade from cells mounted abovethe car keep the car from becoming hot on summer days, andcan reduce rust and paint fading caused by rain and sunshine.And nobody will accuse you of harming the appearance of theirbeautiful asphalt lot. The nine-hour stay in the parking lot iscompatible with the recharge time for most batteries, and thelower voltage of the cells is safer than regular electrical outlets,especially in wet outdoor locations. The employer would not have toprovide anything except anchor points to keep the panels from blowing over. Even more interesting are the economics. A typical
 parking space is9 by 18 feet, or 2.74 by 5.48 meters, for a total of 15 square meters.A typical latitude in the U.S. is 35 degrees, so tilting the panel toface the sun allows more panel space to be mounted above thesame parking space, or 18.3 square meters. Typical solar radiation is1000 watts per square meter, and using high efficiency solar cells likethe 20% efficient A300 units from Sunpower, 200 watts can be obtainedper square meter. Without a tracking mechanism to continually point thecells toward the sun, the average power over 9 hours is 60% of thepeak power, or 120 watts per square meter. All this adds up to around20,000 watt-hours for a typical 9 hour work day. This is a significantamount of energy that can be collected from one parking space,although this also points out how much land we waste parking our cars,but that’s a story for another day. The present day cost for solar cells is about $5 per peak watt,
 sothe 3660 peak watt system described here would cost $18,300.Using a mortgage calculator we can calculate a loan forthis system using a 20 year loan and 6% interest rate.This comes out to a cost of $131 per month. An efficient battery electric car, such as an EV1, consumes170 watt-hours per mile. The 20,000 watt-hours collected by thesolar panel would thus power this car for 118 miles per day.A typical month has 22 working days, during which the solar panelcould power the car for about 2600 miles. Compare this to a veryefficient gasoline powered car that got 40 miles per gallon,traveling 2600 miles and paying $2 per gallon for gas.The monthly gasoline payments would be $130,essentially the same as the solar powered case. Some of you may think that it would be better for the environmentto connect the solar cells to the electric power grid to displace theuse of coal. Per basic heating power, gasoline does
 generate lesscarbon dioxide than coal because much of the heat comes fromthe hydrogen in the gasoline molecules. However, coal generatingplants are more efficient than internal combustion engines, so thecarbon dioxide emissions are similar whether using gasoline in acar or coal in an electric power plant. Therefore solar cells candisplace a similar amount of emissions in either case. But myobjective is to promote more solar 

Re: [Biofuel] fuel filter

2005-06-13 Thread Mel Purdy
thanks to both...

i've been looking at various filters online and calling about pricing
and such, and was heading for a racor 660 model with heater.  i, too,
am in the northeast (NW massachusetts to be exact) and the fact that
the racor heaters are thermostatically controlled seems to me to be
worth the extra 60+ dollars it costs.

is it worth it IYO to pay for the heater, or should i just wrap the
filter with a coolant line?

and will the viscosity of the oil create a need for a greater GPH
rating on the filter?  or will 60gph be fine for a 250 horsepower
greasel?


On 6/11/05, Mel Riser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 The racor heated filters seem to be the best.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 Your fuel filter must be have no bypass ability, should be of the same
 micron as the original fuel filter for your vehicle and all of the fuel that
 is used should be pre filtered to a micron smaller than the fuel filter.

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] When corporations rule the world

2005-06-13 Thread r
These corporations are too big, suffering from gigantism.  As a 
shareholder, I wonder what I can do to bring these giant corporations 
back down to a more human size.  I noticed, when I get my stock proxy 
forms, that invariably, corporation officers advise voting stockholders 
to turn down proposals submitted by other stockholders.  In return, I 
vote, in my proxy, exactly the opposite that the board of directors 
recommend.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


lol

keith, i was laying on the sasrcasm pretty thick, or thought i was.

you're right about schmeiser.  i thought the fact that he's canadian is 
interesting.  i'd be curious to know whether monsanto is basing it's claim, wholly 
or in part, on provisions of NAFTA.  another vehicle for eliminating 
'frivolous' lawsuits (darn near restrictions of any kind, actually) against 
corporations.


-chris

In a message dated 6/12/05 2:02:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 so much for congress' new tort reform eliminating frivolous lawsuits!

 



 


-chris
   




Hi Chris


It's a one-edged sword, and that's not the direction it's intended to 


cut. 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

 



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Animal Fat

2005-06-13 Thread r
I went to a biodiesel convention and saw a booth on animal fat 
conversion to biodiesel, the process is called rendering.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi you all

The investors team  have defined we will start our industrial 
biodiesel production and fuel production using animal fat. I have 
gone  thru several sources and found very litllte info and 
literature about production strating from animal fat. Can you folks 
help me on this?? Very best

Chico Ramos

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
messages):

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Solar PV Is Cheaper Than Gasoline

2005-06-13 Thread Darryl McMahon
http://www.econogics.com/ev/evdl.htm#Sale

http://evfinder.com/

Darryl McMahon

Jeffrey Kumjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked:

 How do you buy a electric Car or van?? Jeffrey
 
 --- MH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Solar PV Is Cheaper Than Gasoline 
   By Stephen Killough 
  
   Charging an electric vehicle with sunlight
   costs less than running a vehicle on gasoline 
   May 31, 2005 
  
 
 http://www.evworld.com/view.cfm?section=articlestoryid=856
  
  
   Are solar cells a waste of money?
   Not if you compare them to gasoline. 
  
   Most people consider solar cells to be impractical.
   They always make comments like solar cells are too
  expensive,
   useless at night, ugly, undependable because of
  clouds, and
   would require cutting down trees. For the typical
  home application,
   these are unfortunately valid complaints, mainly
  because solar cells
   have to compete against cheap coal. However,
  compared with gasoline,
   solar cells can be quite competitive. 
  
   This example deals with one of the largest users of
  gasoline,
   people driving to work. Of course I am talking
  about
   battery-electric cars recharged by solar cells, but
  for a
   different twist I am proposing that the cells be
  located
   not at the owners home, but instead in the parking
  lot where
   the owner works. Why at work? Because when the sun
  shines,
   that’s where the car is. In addition, expansive
  employee parking
   lots are not shaded by trees, and shade from cells
  mounted above
   the car keep the car from becoming hot on summer
  days, and
   can reduce rust and paint fading caused by rain and
  sunshine.
   And nobody will accuse you of harming the
  appearance of their
   beautiful asphalt lot. The nine-hour stay in the
  parking lot is
   compatible with the recharge time for most
  batteries, and the
   lower voltage of the cells is safer than regular
  electrical outlets,
   especially in wet outdoor locations. The employer
  would not have to
   provide anything except anchor points to keep the
  panels from blowing over. 
  
   Even more interesting are the economics. A typical
  parking space is
   9 by 18 feet, or 2.74 by 5.48 meters, for a total
  of 15 square meters.
   A typical latitude in the U.S. is 35 degrees, so
  tilting the panel to
   face the sun allows more panel space to be mounted
  above the
   same parking space, or 18.3 square meters. Typical
  solar radiation is
   1000 watts per square meter, and using high
  efficiency solar cells like
   the 20% efficient A300 units from Sunpower, 200
  watts can be obtained
   per square meter. Without a tracking mechanism to
  continually point the
   cells toward the sun, the average power over 9
  hours is 60% of the
   peak power, or 120 watts per square meter. All this
  adds up to around
   20,000 watt-hours for a typical 9 hour work day.
  This is a significant
   amount of energy that can be collected from one
  parking space,
   although this also points out how much land we
  waste parking our cars,
   but that’s a story for another day. 
  
   The present day cost for solar cells is about $5
  per peak watt, so
   the 3660 peak watt system described here would cost
  $18,300.
   Using a mortgage calculator we can calculate a loan
  for
   this system using a 20 year loan and 6% interest
  rate.
   This comes out to a cost of $131 per month. 
  
   An efficient battery electric car, such as an EV1,
  consumes
   170 watt-hours per mile. The 20,000 watt-hours
  collected by the
   solar panel would thus power this car for 118 miles
  per day.
   A typical month has 22 working days, during which
  the solar panel
   could power the car for about 2600 miles. Compare
  this to a very
   efficient gasoline powered car that got 40 miles
  per gallon,
   traveling 2600 miles and paying $2 per gallon for
  gas.
   The monthly gasoline payments would be $130,
   essentially the same as the solar powered case. 
  
   Some of you may think that it would be better for
  the environment
   to connect the solar cells to the electric power
  grid to displace the
   use of coal. Per basic heating power, gasoline does
  generate less
   carbon dioxide than coal because much of the heat
  comes from
   the hydrogen in the gasoline molecules. However,
  coal generating
   plants are more efficient than internal combustion
  engines, so the
   carbon dioxide emissions are similar whether using
  gasoline in a
   car or coal in an electric power plant. Therefore
  solar cells can
   displace a similar amount of emissions in either
  case. But my
   objective is to promote more solar cells, and the
  way to do this is
   to sell them in a market where they are already
  competitive, which
   is the gasoline market. Furthermore, in many cases
  solar power
   does not displace coal, but displaces more
  expensive fuels like
   natural gas, even though natural gas is cleaner.
  Economic wise, it
   will always be difficult to displace coal 

Re: [Biofuel] NaOH

2005-06-13 Thread Bill Clark



Marc,

When it looks white, it is dry, unless it has all 
turned to carbonte which is unlikely. Pure anhydrous NaOH is white in appearance 
and becomes more translucent as it absorbs water. Exposed to the air long enough 
it will liquify. 

Hope this helps,

Bill Clark

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Marc 
  Arends 
  To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  
  Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 2:52 AM
  Subject: [Biofuel] NaOH
  
  
  
  
  Hello all, 
  
  I have a questions before i want to start with making my first test batch 
  with the single stage method. 
  
  
  I bought NaOH from a hardware store, but it looks white so it is not 
  pure. Does somebody know how i can mesure the moisture content of this NaOH so 
  i can compensate for all this water? 
  (I can use an oven at my work that canreach1000 degrees 
  Celsius).
  
  Greetings,
  
  Marc
  
  

  ___Biofuel mailing 
  listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
  at Journey to 
  Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the 
  combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
  messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] WASHING

2005-06-13 Thread Vincent zadworny
hello all,

justa few questions about washing, i have bought an aquarium pump with two different settings on it Hi \ Lo and am wondering if hi is to many bubbles. i haven't read anything about to many bubbles and was wondering. i am washing 40 gallons of BioD i will use about 10 - 15 gallons of water. Also wondering about hard and soft water. we have soft water here in Vancouver BC and had read something about it making the soap foam up more. what can i do about this or has anyone experienced anything to do with soft water?


thanks you all

vince zadworny__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] NaOH

2005-06-13 Thread ings . group

Bill:

I have not seen the stuff for a while, but I believe when NaOH is
new and anhydrous it is opaque, you can almost see through it.
As it absorbs water it turns white.  It has been 20 years, so...

Ray

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:03:45 -0400, Bill Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:



Marc,

When it looks white, it is dry, unless it has all turned to carbonte  
which is

unlikely. Pure anhydrous NaOH is white in appearance and becomes more
translucent as it absorbs water. Exposed to the air long enough it will  
liquify.


Hope this helps,

Bill Clark

- Original Message -

From: Marc Arends

To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org

Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 2:52 AM

Subject: [Biofuel] NaOH






Hello all,

I have a questions before i want to start with making my first test  
batch with

the single stage method.

I bought NaOH from a hardware store, but it looks white so it is not  
pure. Does

somebody know how i can mesure the moisture content of this NaOH so i can
compensate for all this water?

(I can use an oven at my work that can reach 1000 degrees Celsius).

Greetings,

Marc

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000  
messages):

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___

Biofuel  mailing  list

Biofuel@sustainablelists.org

http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 

Biofuel  at  Journey  to  Forever:

http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 

Search  the  combined  Biofuel  and  Biofuels-biz  list  archives   
(50,000

messages):

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

 




--
Ray or Shiraz Ings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1-613-253-1311
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Salvaged ball valves

2005-06-13 Thread Marc DeGagne

Hello Keith

While perusing your site, I noticed you have implemented salvaged ball 
valves in your system.  I have salvaged several and was wondering if you 
cleaned them in any particular manner?


Thank you

Marc

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Bombshell As Six More British Documents Leaked

2005-06-13 Thread Keith Addison

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9125.htm

Bombshell As Six More British Documents Leaked

06/13/05 - - Six new secret British documents have been leaked and 
are provided below. These were retyped from the originals to protect 
the source,  RawStory.com  has verified the authenticity .


Iraq options paper: Full text

The following, titled IRAQ OPTIONS PAPER, was prepared and dated 
March 8, 200. It presents possible courses to war. Continued

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9124.htm

British foreign secretary Straw says case for Iraq is weak

he following is purported to have been penned by the British Foreign 
Secretary Jack Straw--U.S. equivalent of Secretary of 
State--concerning a possible war in Iraq. Straw indicates the case 
for war is weak; that the Iraq situation has remained unchanged; and 
that the United States would not have gone to war without September 
11. Continued.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9126.htm

Condi committed to regime change in early 2002

The following, is purported to be written by Blair foreign policy 
advisor David Manning, indicates that now-Secretary of State 
Condoleezza Rice was committed to regime change in early 2002. It 
also outlines some problems a postwar Iraq might face. Continued

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9127.htm

Iraq: The British legal background

The following was said prepared as an Iraq legal background for war. 
It is not dated. Continued

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9128.htm

'What has changed is not the pace of Saddam's WMD programs'

06/13/05 - - This memorandum, said from Blair political director 
Peter Ricketts and dated Mar. 22, 2002, indicates the challenges that 
an Iraq war would face. It indicates that it would have been carbon 
copied to then-Secretary of State Colin Powell and President George 
W. Bush. The truth is that what has changed is not the pace of 
Saddam Hussein's WMD programmes, the document says. Continued

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9129.htm

'The need to wrongfoot Saddam on the inspectors'

The following is said from Christopher Meyer, British ambassador to 
the US from 1997 through February 2003, and dated in March of 2002. 
Strikingly, the document speaks of a need to wrongfoot Saddam on the 
inspectors and suggests British intelligence and diplomacy draws a 
great deal on articles written by Sy Hersh in the New Yorker. It also 
describes a meeting with then-Deputy Secretary of Defense, Paul 
Wolfowitz. Continued.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9130.htm

UK: Ministers were told of need for Gulf war 'excuse'

Bush and Blair agreed on regime change in April 2002 and then looked 
for a way to justify it.


Michael Smith

06/12/05 The Times - MINISTERS were warned in July 2002 that 
Britain was committed to taking part in an American-led invasion of 
Iraq and they had no choice but to find a way of making it legal. The 
briefing paper is certain to add to the pressure, particularly on the 
American president, because of the damaging revelation that Bush and 
Blair agreed on regime change in April 2002 and then looked for a way 
to justify it.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9111.htm

Leaked Cabinet Office paper: Conditions for military action

PERSONAL SECRET UK EYES ONLY
IRAQ: CONDITIONS FOR MILITARY ACTION (A Note by Officials)

Agree to engage the US on the need to set military plans within a 
realistic political strategy, which includes identifying the 
succession to Saddam Hussein and creating the conditions necessary to 
justify government military action

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9112.htm






___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Downing Street II

2005-06-13 Thread Keith Addison

See also:

Proof is in the memo:
Times Herald-Record June 13, 2005
Soldiers died for a lie: All the world - except America - is buzzing 
about the fact that George Bush created the WMD threat to justify his 
war in Iraq.

http://www.recordonline.com/archive/2005/06/13/bethcolj.htm

Mr. President, Explain The Downing Street Memo :
We, the citizens of the United States, join the 88 members of 
Congress who demand that the President and his administration address 
the disturbing revelations in the Downing Street Memo.
We come together, as concerned Americans, irrespective of political 
affiliation, to seek the truth from our government. As citizens, we 
deserve no less.

http://www.ipetitions.com/campaigns/dsm3/

Administration's Offenses Impeachable: So, what does it mean?
By Robert Shetterly 
06/02/05 Bangor Daily News
It means that our president and all of his administration are war 
criminals. It's as simple as that. They lied to the American people, 
have killed and injured and traumatized thousands of American men and 
women doing their patriotic duty, killed at least 100,000 Iraqi 
civilians

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9035.htm

-

http://www.tompaine.com/articles/20050613/downing_street_ii.php

Downing Street II

Ray McGovern

June 13, 2005

Ray McGovern is a co-founder of the Truth Telling Coalition and of 
Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity. He had a 27-year 
career as a CIA analyst, and now works for Tell the Word, the 
publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in Washington, 
DC.


Yesterday, London's Sunday Times published the text of another SECRET 
UK EYES ONLY briefing document prepared for senior British officials. 
This one was dated July 21, 2002, two days before British 
intelligence chief Richard Dearlove gave Prime Minister Tony Blair 
and his top national security advisers a briefing based on 
discussions with American counterparts in Washington. The minutes 
recording the discussion at the July 23, 2002, meeting, published by 
the Rupert Murdoch's Sunday Times on May 1, 2005, included Dearlove's 
matter-of-fact report that President George W. Bush had decided to 
bring about regime change in Iraq by military action; that the 
attack would be justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD 
(weapons of mass destruction); and that the intelligence and facts 
were being fixed around the policy.


Creating Conditions

At that meeting, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw noted that the evidence 
regarding weapons of mass destruction was thin. And British 
Attorney General Peter Goldsmith pointed out that the desire for 
regime change was not a legal base for military action. But Blair 
gave them the back of his hand, ordering them to work on the 
assumption that the U.K. would take part in any military action.


It is a safe bet that the British seemed a bunch of nervous Nellies 
in the eyes of the hard-nosed neoconservatives running our policy 
toward Iraq. The briefing paper of July 21 shows senior British 
officials preoccupied with the question of how to fix it so the war 
would be legal. The paper makes it clear that U.S. military plans 
assumed, as a minimum, the use of British bases on the islands of 
Cyprus and Diego Garcia. Even this minimum gave rise to serious 
legal questions. Pervading the briefing paper is the British leaders' 
need to square a circle: how to render legal an illegal, unprovoked 
attack on Iraq-or in the words of the briefing paper, how to go about 
creating the conditions...in which we could legally support military 
action.


The briefing paper of July 21, 2002, offers this clear picture of 
what the British see as the U.S. goal. U.S. military planning 
unambiguously takes as its objective the removal of Saddam Hussein's 
regime, followed by elimination of Iraqi WMD. But, alas, with the 
evidence of WMD thin, and an invasion to bring about regime 
change illegal, the British found themselves between Iraq and a hard 
place-Washington. The document reeks not only of obsequiousness 
toward the United States, but also wonderment at Washington's 
policies-particularly with respect to international law.


U.S. views of international law vary from that of the U.K. and the 
international community. Regime change per se is not a proper basis 
for military action under international law...Legal bases for an 
invasion of Iraq are in principle conceivable...but would be 
difficult to establish because of, for example, the tests of 
immediacy and proportionality.


In lay terms, that must mean that, absent any immediate threat, those 
who chose to invade and occupy Iraq anyway would flunk the test of 
proportionality. Grasping at straws, the document raises the 
possibility of demanding Iraqi acceptance of an unacceptably 
intrusive U.N. inspection regime:


It is just possible that an ultimatum could be cast in terms which 
Saddam would reject (because he is unwilling to accept unfettered 
access)However, failing

Re: [Biofuel] WASHING

2005-06-13 Thread Keith Addison

Hello Vince

Bubble washing might not be the best method anyway. We still use it, 
but mostly we stir-wash - faster and better, and it doesn't oxidise 
your fuel. But you have to process it properly in the first place, 
with good completion. Well, you have to do that anyway, don't you?


See:

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg37251.html
Re: [biofuel] Questions Speed-up washing biodiesel

Best wishes

Keith



hello all,

justa few questions about washing, i have bought an aquarium pump 
with two different settings on it Hi \ Lo and am wondering if hi is 
to many bubbles. i haven't read anything about to many bubbles and 
was wondering. i am washing 40 gallons of BioD i will use about 10 - 
15 gallons of water. Also wondering about hard and soft water. we 
have soft water here in Vancouver BC and had read something about it 
making the soap foam up more. what can i do about this or has anyone 
experienced anything to do with soft water?



thanks you all

vince zadworny



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] When it comes to Africa, Bush has more on his mind than aid

2005-06-13 Thread Keith Addison
... there are only three letters that really matter to the US in 
Africa, they are O-I-L.


http://www.sundayherald.com/50283
[Sunday Herald]

When it comes to Africa, Bush has more on his mind than aid 


By Torcuil Crichton

For the United States, the balance sheet of what comes out of Africa 
far outweighs what goes back in. Oil, raw materials and the expansion 
of the free market are the principal reasons the US engages in 
Africa, anything else is pretty much incidental.


Chancellor Gordon Brown may have wrung significant support from the 
US for the debt relief deal he announced after yesterday's meeting of 
G8 ministers, but in the balance book of persuading the richest 
nation on Earth to help the poorest continent, the bottom line is not 
all that encouraging.


America will have nothing to do with the commitment to providing 0.7% 
of GDP (gross domestic product) for aid which the European powers 
have signed up to. The US will have nothing to do with Gordon Brown's 
International Finance Facility (IFF) which would use the sale of gold 
reserves to speed up the rate of aid delivery. According to aid 
agencies, the Bush administration's agreement on debt cancellation 
simply makes more economic sense than the European proposals for debt 
relief which would see the impoverished African nations picking up 
the repayment baton again halfway through the next decade.


In the same way as it blindly ignores the Kyoto targets on climate 
change, the US government is pursuing its own unilateral agenda on 
Africa and poverty reduction.


This, however, does not necessarily support the conclusions about 
American intentions most of Europe has already come to before George 
Bush steps foot on Scottish soil for the G8 summit at Gleneagles next 
month.


Bush has a reputation in Europe, for grudgingly accepting that 
Africa has to be dealt with, but in practice he has a fairly 
benevolent policy in terms of aid, says Martin Meredith, whose book, 
The State Of Africa, a study on the 50 years of post-colonial 
independence, was published this month.


It's not as if Bush, who arrived in office as one of the 
least-travelled presidents, doesn't know where Africa is. He toured 
part of the continent in 2003, emphasising the tough-love approach to 
poverty reduction, insisting on the entrenchment of democracy and on 
cleaning up state corruption.


Bill Clinton was the first US president to tour Africa while in 
office, and although he made large gestures about working with the 
continent, they amounted to very little in reality. Bush has actually 
delivered on promises - over the last three years the US aid to 
Africa has trebled.


Within the US itself, there is a perception that the world's 
superpower does deliver a lot for Africa. Survey after survey shows 
that Americans do care, do think that something should be done for 
Africa, do think that the US government is putting its shoulder to 
the wheel.


In sheer volume terms the world's largest economy is sending the 
largest amount of foreign aid to Africa, but as a proportion of 
national wealth only 0.16% of the US budget goes on aid, far short of 
the 0.7% of GDP that is the UN target.


A ridiculously small amount of US aid, far less than 1% of its total 
aid budget, is spent in sub-Saharan Africa, the poorest place on 
Earth. A lot of the funds go to Pakistan, to Israel, to countries 
that assist in the US's strategic interests. In that respect, foreign 
aid is, as it always was, a tool of foreign policy.


In stark contrast to Britain, which brought a wealth of diplomatic 
and technical know-how to post-colonial Africa, and France, which 
bought influence throughout the continent with generous financial 
support, for most of the 20th century the United States brought only 
guns.


The US bears a historical responsibility for numerous regional and 
tribal conflicts that have destabilised countries such as Angola, 
Liberia, Congo and Somalia.


Africa does not loom as large in the collective American conscience 
as it does for Europeans. For most of the last two centuries Africa 
was ruled by Britain and France, with Portugal and Belgium picking up 
the remnants of the map. Slavery and Liberia excepted, the US had 
little geo-political interest in Africa until the continent became a 
playground for cold war politics as the colonial control waned and 
the Soviet Union sought strategic advantage.


When the US was involved in a proxy war against communism any leader 
who served as a bulwark against the spread of Soviet influence was 
deemed good enough for money and guns. When twinned with 
multinational demands to continue to exploit Africa's mineral wealth, 
the US cold war policy for the continent often led to bizarre 
contradictions such as having Cuban troops guarding Angolan oil 
installations operated by American companies against rebel insurgents 
armed by the US government.


Dictators have received billions of dollars of military aid and there 

Re: [Biofuel] Salvaged ball valves

2005-06-13 Thread Keith Addison

Hello Marc


Hello Keith

While perusing your site, I noticed you have implemented salvaged 
ball valves in your system.  I have salvaged several and was 
wondering if you cleaned them in any particular manner?


IIRC I cleaned them with by-product. Wish I had more of them, the 
gate valves are a pain. But they work.


Regards

Keith



Thank you

Marc



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] NaOH

2005-06-13 Thread Bill Clark
Hi Ray,

When I open a new bag of caustic ( I have used NaOH micro pearls and KOH
flake) the caustic is as white as snow. It turns opaque when it begins
absorbing water. Only after it has absorbed water and been left out does it
turn white again due to carbonization. I work with these caustics 2 or 3
times per week.

Bill Clark
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] NaOH


 Bill:

 I have not seen the stuff for a while, but I believe when NaOH is
 new and anhydrous it is opaque, you can almost see through it.
 As it absorbs water it turns white.  It has been 20 years, so...

 Ray

 On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:03:45 -0400, Bill Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

  Marc,
 
  When it looks white, it is dry, unless it has all turned to carbonte
  which is
  unlikely. Pure anhydrous NaOH is white in appearance and becomes more
  translucent as it absorbs water. Exposed to the air long enough it will
  liquify.
 
  Hope this helps,
 
  Bill Clark
 
  - Original Message -
 
  From: Marc Arends
 
  To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 
  Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 2:52 AM
 
  Subject: [Biofuel] NaOH
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Hello all,
 
  I have a questions before i want to start with making my first test
  batch with
  the single stage method.
 
  I bought NaOH from a hardware store, but it looks white so it is not
  pure. Does
  somebody know how i can mesure the moisture content of this NaOH so i
can
  compensate for all this water?
 
  (I can use an oven at my work that can reach 1000 degrees Celsius).
 
  Greetings,
 
  Marc
 
  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
  messages):
  http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
  ___
 
  Biofuel  mailing  list
 
  Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 
 
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 
 
  Biofuel  at  Journey  to  Forever:
 
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 
 
  Search  the  combined  Biofuel  and  Biofuels-biz  list  archives
  (50,000
  messages):
 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 



 -- 
 Ray or Shiraz Ings
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 1-613-253-1311
 Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Animal Fat

2005-06-13 Thread Keith Addison

Hi Chico

There is quite a lot of information about.

Just do it, it's no big deal.

regards

Keith


Hi you all

The investors team  have defined we will start our industrial 
biodiesel production and fuel production using animal fat. I have 
gone  thru several sources and found very litllte info and 
literature about production strating from animal fat. Can you folks 
help me on this?? Very best

Chico Ramos



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] NaOH

2005-06-13 Thread Keith Addison

Hi Bill


Hi Ray,

When I open a new bag of caustic ( I have used NaOH micro pearls and KOH
flake) the caustic is as white as snow. It turns opaque when it begins
absorbing water. Only after it has absorbed water and been left out does it
turn white again due to carbonization. I work with these caustics 2 or 3
times per week.


So do I, and I disagree.

Fresh: opaque
Moisture: translucent
Carbonated: white

Marc, if you're not sure, don't use it, is the best advice.

However, since it's your first test batch, and I guess (hope) it'll 
only be a litre or so rather than 200 or so, and using virgin oil 
(fresh, new, uncooked), why not just go ahead and try it. New oil is 
quite forgiving, used oil progressively less so. If you have problems 
then replace the lye. As Jan advised, get some pure stuff from a lab 
supply company. Later, you can use this pure lye as a check against 
cheaper lye from a hardware store if you're not sure of the quality.


Keep it well-sealed and away from moisture. It absorbs moisture from 
the atmosphere very fast, as soon as it's exposed. Replace the lid 
tightly as quickly as you can. We measure it out into plastic bags 
and close them and the container as soon as possible to keep moist 
air out. For overkill you could do the whole operation inside a big 
plastic bag, lye, scales, your arms and all.


Best wishes

Keith




Bill Clark
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] NaOH


 Bill:

 I have not seen the stuff for a while, but I believe when NaOH is
 new and anhydrous it is opaque, you can almost see through it.
 As it absorbs water it turns white.  It has been 20 years, so...

 Ray

 On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:03:45 -0400, Bill Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

  Marc,
 
  When it looks white, it is dry, unless it has all turned to carbonte
  which is
  unlikely. Pure anhydrous NaOH is white in appearance and becomes more
  translucent as it absorbs water. Exposed to the air long enough it will
  liquify.
 
  Hope this helps,
 
  Bill Clark
 
  - Original Message -
 
  From: Marc Arends
 
  To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 
  Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 2:52 AM
 
  Subject: [Biofuel] NaOH
 
  Hello all,
 
  I have a questions before i want to start with making my first test
  batch with
  the single stage method.
 
  I bought NaOH from a hardware store, but it looks white so it is not
  pure. Does
  somebody know how i can mesure the moisture content of this NaOH so i
can
  compensate for all this water?
 
  (I can use an oven at my work that can reach 1000 degrees Celsius).
 
  Greetings,
 
  Marc



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/