Re: [Biofuel] Acids

2007-03-13 Thread Jan Warnqvist
Hello Robin et al.
The acidic step is necessary for neutralisation of the biodiesel. But, 
basically any mineral acid can be used. The most common (and efficient ?) is 
concentrated sulphuric acid. Even hydrochloric acid can be used, however 
usually available as 35-36% solution. For neutralisation similar amounts of 
phosphoric and sulphuric acid are required, all according to the need for 
neutralisation.
With best regards
AGERATEC AB
Jan Warnqvist

- Original Message - 
From: Robin Pentney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 9:49 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Acids


 Hi!
 Can anyone tell me what the purpose of the Phosphoric acid in the
 'Foolproof method? I would like to try it (the method) but phosphoric
 is only made in Alberta by a fertilizer mfr just down the road from
 me, but they will only make enough for themselves. Rats! The oilfield
 creates a huge demand for it here, so the suppliers who ship it up
 from the states or from Winnipeg mark it up mercilessly. $158.00 for
 a 20 L pail! It is 75% so there's lots of diluting to do , but still
 Can I use another acid for the wash? Can you describe the reaction
 for me ( a neophyte ) In the wash process so I can fully understand
 it? I am striving to achieve the best quality fuel possible so that
 others will not be discouraged when if they see me sitting at the
 side of the road beside my car , with the hood up and my thumb out
 What would I dilute the 75% phosporic with? Distilled water?
 Tnx
 Robin


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Introduction to tropical homegardens: time-tested agroforestry

2007-03-13 Thread Keith Addison
Publication date: March 12, 2007

The Overstory #186--Introduction to tropical homegardens:
 time-tested agroforestry
  by P.K.R. Nair and B.M. Kumar

Contents:

: INTRODUCTION
: THE CONCEPT OF HOMEGARDEN
: GENESIS AND GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION OF HOMEGARDENS
: -- Temperate homegardens
: COMPLEXITY OF HOMEGARDENS
: HOMEGARDENS IN THE CONTEXT OF CONTEMPORARY LAND USE ISSUES
: REFERENCES
: ORIGINAL SOURCE
: ABOUT THE AUTHORS
: WEB LINKS
: RELATED EDITIONS OF THE OVERSTORY
: PUBLISHER NOTES
: SUBSCRIPTIONS




THE CONCEPT OF HOMEGARDEN

It is rather customary that any writing on homegardens starts with a 
definition of the term. There is no universally accepted 
definition of the term. An examination of the various definitions 
used or suggested by various authors shows that they all revolve 
around the basic concept that has been around for at least the past 
20 years, i.e., since the early literature on the subject (Wiersum, 
1982; Brownrigg, 1985; Fernandes and Nair, 1986; Soemarwoto, 1987): 
homegardens represent intimate, multistory combinations of various 
trees and crops, sometimes in association with domestic animals, 
around the homestead. This concept has been developed around the 
rural settings and subsistence economy under which most homegardens 
exist(ed). The practice of homegardening is now being extended to 
urban settings (Drescher et al., 2006; Thaman et al., 2006) as well 
as with a commercial orientation (Abdoellah et al., 2006; Yamada and 
Osaqui, 2006).

Even before the advent of such new trends as urban and commercial 
homegardens, the lack of clear-cut distinctions between various 
stages in the continuum from shifting cultivation to high-intensity 
multistrata systems and the various terms used in different parts of 
the world to denote the different systems has often created confusion 
in the use of the term homegarden and its underlying concept. The 
confusion is compounded by the fact that in many parts of the world, 
especially in the New World, swidden farming such as the milpa of 
Mesoamerica evolve over a period of time into full-fledged 
homegardens consisting of mature fruit trees and various other types 
of woody perennials and the typical multistrata canopy 
configurations. In such situations, it is unclear where the swidden 
ends and homegarden begins -- and often they co-exist. Yet another 
cause of confusion is the term itself: homegarden. Even for most 
agricultural professionals who are either not familiar with or are 
not appreciative of agroforestry practices, what we write as one word 
'homegarden' sounds as two words 'home' and 'garden' sending the 
signal that the reference is to ornamental gardening around homes. 
While ornamentals are very much a part of homegardens in many 
societies, homegardens, in our concept, are not just home gardens of 
strictly ornamental nature.

As we explained in our recent paper (Kumar and Nair, 2004), we use 
the term homegardens (and homegardening) to refer to farming systems 
variously described in English language as agroforestry homegardens, 
household or homestead farms, compound farms, backyard gardens, 
village forest gardens, dooryard gardens and house gardens. Some 
local names such as Talun-Kebun and Pekarangan that are used for 
various types of homegarden systems of Java (Indonesia), Shamba and 
Chagga in East Africa, and Huertos Familiares of Central America, 
have also attained international popularity because of the excellent 
examples of the systems they represent (Nair, 1993). In spite of the 
emergence of homegardening as a practice outside their traditional 
habitat into urban and commercial settings, the underlying concept of 
homegardens remains the same as before intimate, multistory 
combinations of various trees and crops, sometimes in association 
with domestic animals, around homesteads. Intimate plant 
associations of trees and crops and consequent multistory canopy 
configuration are essential to this concept. Equally important in 
this concept is the home around which most homegardens are 
maintained; but in some situations, multistory tree gardens (such as 
the Talun or Kebun of Indonesia: Wiersum, 1982) that are not in 
physical proximity to homes but receive the same level of constant 
attention from the owners' household and have similar structural and 
functional attributes as other homegarden units located near homes 
are also considered as homegardens.


GENESIS AND GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION OF HOMEGARDENS

Tracing the history of homegardening, Kumar and Nair (2004) describe 
it as the oldest land use activity next only to shifting cultivation 
that has evolved through generations of gradual intensification of 
cropping in response to increasing human pressure and the 
corresponding shortage of arable lands. The Javanese homegardens of 
Indonesia and the Kerala homegardens of India -- the two oft-cited 
examples -- have reportedly evolved over centuries of cultural and 

Re: [Biofuel] man pays $520 electric bill in pennies

2007-03-13 Thread Paul S Cantrell
Darryl,
I tend to agree with you.  Instead of taking personal responsibility
for his USAGE of a service, which he now must pay for, he blames the
service provider.

What would he do if CIPS turned off his power tomorrow for being a
PITA customer?  He'd freeze, but I bet he'd never take personal
responsibility for any of it.  He'd be a lot better off spending that
$50 bucks on a case of insulating spray foam than postage.

Of course, CIPS can't turn him off, they are required by the state to
offer him power service until he doesn't pay or elects to turn it off.

The new rates are less than I pay here in SC.

On 3/12/07, Darryl McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Am I the only one who sees this as a particularly feeble response to the
 issue?

 First, here's the company side on the rate increases.
 http://www.ameren.com/AboutUs/ADC_AUE_RateFiling.asp

 A couple of snippets from that page.

 If approved, this electric rate increase would mark the first one for
 AmerenUE in almost 20 years.

 Typical residential customers using 1,000 kilowatt-hours a month would
 see their electric bills rise from approximately $66 per month to $72
 per month, excluding taxes.

 Clearly, some people did get hammered by the changes.  Testimony of
 Scott Cisel, President and CEO, Ameren Illinois Utilities - 2007.02.27

 http://illinoischannel.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!B0DB128F5CD96151!2007.entry

 Even Cisel says that low electrical rates were partly to blame for
 people using more electricity (as opposed to say, insulation) than
 necessary.

 BTW, the new, higher rates are still below 10 cents/kWh.
 http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/illinoisnews/story/C80ED6D9855C9A18862572920017A867?OpenDocument

 But not to worry, there is political pressure to force the prices back
 down. (see story above)

 So, in order to make his point, Hancock ups his cost by another 10-20%.
   And increases the company's overhead to deal with the protest payment,
 which is not likely to reduce electricity rates.

 So, based on the evidence I came across, it seems likely Hancock heats
 with electricity, and the unseasonably cold weather had the expected
 effect.

 Let's hope his next step (and for his neighbours) is to figure out how
 to reduce his electrical consumption in the future.  Unlikely though, it
 appears instead they'll apply political pressure to end up in the
 Ontario scenario (keep residential electrical rates unrealistically low,
 let taxpayers make up the difference, remove the incentive to conserve).

 Nationalizing oil will simply lead to exploitation by a (somewhat)
 different group of piggish folks: government.  PetroCanada is a
 disappointing example of what nationalizing oil accomplishes.

 Darryl


-- 
Thanks,
PC

He's the kind of a guy who lights up a room just by flicking a switch

An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes that can be made
in a very narrow field. - Niels Bohr  (1885 - 1962)

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] man pays $520 electric bill in pennies

2007-03-13 Thread darryl
I expect the reality is somewhere in between.  I would be surprised if  
everyone in Illinois was facing a 2.7 times increase in their  
electrical bills, if there was not something close to open revolt.   
According to the stories I read around this, the rate increases were  
approved by a regulatory body.  I can't imagine that they would  
approve a one-time, overnight, 270% increase in rates.

Undoubtedly, there is more to it.  The media story is decidedly light  
on facts.  It seems likely this case is exceptional, and selected for  
that purpose.  It may be a combination of the rate increase, unusually  
cold weather and increased electricity use that resulted in this  
outlier result.

I suppose what galls me is that the media thinks the penny protest  
constitutes action, while more constructive efforts (conservation,  
efficiency, substituting renewables, stimulating consumer awareness)  
go unreported, although they could really benefit from such coverage.

Darryl

Quoting Kirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Tripling ones bill doesnt make sense if the rate increase was 10%.   
 Nor does bad weather explain it. A bad month may bump it 50%. So   
 there is a problem here.
   Granted there are usually 3 sides to a story. But 300%
   I am inclined to think something else was in there besides the   
 rate increase- some fine print about passing on some generating   
 cost. We saw that happen in Northern California and the story was   
 the same - tripling of bills.

   Kirk

 Darryl McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Am I the only one who sees this as a particularly feeble response to the
 issue?

 First, here's the company side on the rate increases.
 http://www.ameren.com/AboutUs/ADC_AUE_RateFiling.asp

 A couple of snippets from that page.

 If approved, this electric rate increase would mark the first one for
 AmerenUE in almost 20 years.

 Typical residential customers using 1,000 kilowatt-hours a month would
 see their electric bills rise from approximately $66 per month to $72
 per month, excluding taxes.

 Clearly, some people did get hammered by the changes. Testimony of
 Scott Cisel, President and CEO, Ameren Illinois Utilities - 2007.02.27

 http://illinoischannel.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!B0DB128F5CD96151!2007.entry

 Even Cisel says that low electrical rates were partly to blame for
 people using more electricity (as opposed to say, insulation) than
 necessary.

 BTW, the new, higher rates are still below 10 cents/kWh.
 http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/illinoisnews/story/C80ED6D9855C9A18862572920017A867?OpenDocument

 But not to worry, there is political pressure to force the prices back
 down. (see story above)

 So, in order to make his point, Hancock ups his cost by another 10-20%.
 And increases the company's overhead to deal with the protest payment,
 which is not likely to reduce electricity rates.

 So, based on the evidence I came across, it seems likely Hancock heats
 with electricity, and the unseasonably cold weather had the expected
 effect.

 Let's hope his next step (and for his neighbours) is to figure out how
 to reduce his electrical consumption in the future. Unlikely though, it
 appears instead they'll apply political pressure to end up in the
 Ontario scenario (keep residential electrical rates unrealistically low,
 let taxpayers make up the difference, remove the incentive to conserve).

 Nationalizing oil will simply lead to exploitation by a (somewhat)
 different group of piggish folks: government. PetroCanada is a
 disappointing example of what nationalizing oil accomplishes.

 Darryl



 Kirk McLoren wrote:
 necessities of life shouldnt be available to exploitation by piggish
 folks-
 like the electricity corporations and natural gas.
 Nationalize oil!
 Kirk

 http://www.kfvs12.com/global/story.asp?s=6206504ClientType=Printable

 Carterville, IL
 *Carterville man pays electric bill with 52,000 pennies*
 March 12, 2007 03:14 AM PST

 *Carterville man pays electric bill with 52,000 pennies*
 By: Carly O'Keefe
 CARTERVILLE, Ill. - A Carterville man wanted to give Ameren CIPS more
 than just his two cents about the recent rate hike. He's giving them
 52,000 cents, by paying his electric bill entirely in pennies.
 Hancock withdrew $525 dollars from his bank entirely in pennies. It was
 a large enough withdrawal he needed a pick-up truck to take it all home.
 He sent his payment to Ameren CIPS in six flat-rate boxes through the
 United States Postal Service. But he didn't send nice, neat rolls of
 pennies. Hancock broke open each and every one of the 1050 rolls, to
 protest his electric bill that increased three times as much as it was
 this time last year from $193 to $522. When my bill came, my first
 reaction was shock. That didn't last long. Then I got mad, and then I
 remembered: don't get mad, just get even, Hancock said.
 If his protest helps lower electric bills, Hancock says, it'll be worth
 every penny. I just want to inconvenience them, and 

Re: [Biofuel] kind of interesting

2007-03-13 Thread Joe Street
Really Jesse?  Mark knows Bill Lishman?  What a small world.  You know I 
was standing down at the mouth of wilmot creek where it blows into Lake 
Ontario trout fishing when the ultralight went directly over me with the 
classic V formation of geese.  It was just after Dawn and I had been 
fishing since 4 am and I know I had imbibed but I stood there in 
disbelief first wondering why in heck the ultralight jockey would 
venture beyond gliding range of the shore and second what the heck was 
wrong with these geese who decided to form up on the ultralight and 
wondering if I was actually losing my mind.  Later the story was on the 
news.  It gets richer, the movie Fly Away Home which chronicles 
Lishman's work ( hollywood style of course) has all the flying scenes 
done by Michael Robertson a long time hang glider and Canadian icon of 
sorts ( he flew a hang glider from the top of the CN tower) and he is a 
local activist trying to stop the expropriation of farm land in the GTA 
for the proposed new airport.  He is a real great down to earth guy just 
like Bill.  They cut their teeth on the old home made rogallo wing hang 
gliders back in the late 60's and 70's. He lived with a red tail hawk up 
in Locust hill when I met him back in '85 when I bought my first wing. 
What a sweet guy. He will be building one of my biodiesel reactors this 
summer.  He has an open petition you can sign if you want to add your 
voice to the protest over the land issues.

I think you can find a link to it on his page
http://www.flyhigh.com/index.php
This is a big issue as the area has primo fertile land and wetlands 
which stand to be harmed if the airport goes in.
The area I used to fish is all suburbia now.:(  Caught a 40 pound 
chinook there once upon a time.sigh.



Joe

Jesse Frayne wrote:


Thanks for this completely engaging picture of your
nutty feathered friends.  What lucky birds to be
closely observed and respected.

My husband worked on a film years ago about birds who
imprinted on a guy who showed them how to migrate,
leading them south with a pair of ultra-lights.   Came
home from work with wonderful stories about the social
life of geese:  their hard-working natures, how they
would play and relax at the end of a long film
shooting day, their community interaction and
supportiveness... but especially their sense of
humour!

Damn!  I used to love to eat a goose, but boy, you
can't do that to someone who can crack a joke.

As a cook, I'm dismayed to read that the chickens I
prepare regularly are also in the wide-awake species
category...  humm.

Not to resurrect the vegan theme.  We all know we must
be grateful for anything that sustains us (broccoli!),
and try to make something worthwhile with it.






 --- Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 


Hi Jesse

   


Thanks Keith,
and I loved reading about your birds!  No flirting,
just the fanning of feathers.
-J
 


:-)

I've had a day fraught with birds, especially broody
females getting 
bad-tempered with everyone else because they think
it gives them the 
moral high ground. Marilyn the duck came out of her
nest-box where 
she's sitting on 11 eggs, had an enormous shit, had
a large meal, 
attacked poor Lucy and Spot and beat them up,
snarled at the others, 
and went back to her eggs, making weird squeaking
noises. She's a 
sweetie, is Marilyn, when she's sane, which she's
always been up to 
now. The two big drakes stood off all the while and
huffed a lot, 
left the womenfolk to it, very wise. Anyway Lucy and
Spot weren't 
exactly beaten up, Muscovies are built like those
special rubber 
balls that bounce 10 times higher, it's hard to make

an impression.

The geese, though, are being sweet and reasonable
about it all, for 
once. Well, they're always extremely sweet, unless
you happen to be 
not a goose (we're sort of honorary geese), but
they're not always 
reasonable. They argue about everything, they're
terrible busybodies. 
They untied all the knots holding up the pasture
fence netting, we 
had to retie everything with strong plastic cord.
They didn't want to 
get out, they just really enjoy untying knots.
They're really good at 
it. Very hi-tech gear, those beaks of theirs.


Anyway there are two nests of eggs in their hutch,
lots of eggs, 
probably a communal effort rather than two separate
nests for two 
geese. Very tight-knit are the geese. Very sexually
liberated too, 
they're not rapists like cocks and drakes, it's much
more like making 
love. It also gets to be a communal effort, I saw
five them in a 
tangle the other day, I couldn't tell who was doing
what to whom. 
They sure seemed to be enjoying it, with the other
two standing by 
providing a torrent of advice and encouragement.
Suppose they'd 
already had their turn. These teenagers of today,
tut-tut. (Tut-tut 
is Otjiwarongan for Wish I'd had it so good in my

day.)

All first-timers so far, these new mums-to-be, and
quite a lot of 
chaos with it, probably not helped by the fact that

Re: [Biofuel] man pays $520 electric bill in pennies

2007-03-13 Thread Kirk McLoren
I posted a blog of horror stories earlier. He is not just one selected case.
  That was the point of the blog. They were sharing horror stories.
  I still suspect some manipulation. I can cite numerous predatory practices.
   
  Conservation is definitely needed. 
  Better yet personal energy independence.
  That would be the best solution.
  A company in China is manufacturing vacuum insulated glass tubes that become 
a solar water heater.
  Works even on cloudy days.
   
  Kirk
  

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I expect the reality is somewhere in between. I would be surprised if 
everyone in Illinois was facing a 2.7 times increase in their 
electrical bills, if there was not something close to open revolt. 
According to the stories I read around this, the rate increases were 
approved by a regulatory body. I can't imagine that they would 
approve a one-time, overnight, 270% increase in rates.

Undoubtedly, there is more to it. The media story is decidedly light 
on facts. It seems likely this case is exceptional, and selected for 
that purpose. It may be a combination of the rate increase, unusually 
cold weather and increased electricity use that resulted in this 
outlier result.

I suppose what galls me is that the media thinks the penny protest 
constitutes action, while more constructive efforts (conservation, 
efficiency, substituting renewables, stimulating consumer awareness) 
go unreported, although they could really benefit from such coverage.

Darryl

Quoting Kirk McLoren :

 Tripling ones bill doesnt make sense if the rate increase was 10%. 
 Nor does bad weather explain it. A bad month may bump it 50%. So 
 there is a problem here.
 Granted there are usually 3 sides to a story. But 300%
 I am inclined to think something else was in there besides the 
 rate increase- some fine print about passing on some generating 
 cost. We saw that happen in Northern California and the story was 
 the same - tripling of bills.

 Kirk

 Darryl McMahon wrote:
 Am I the only one who sees this as a particularly feeble response to the
 issue?

 First, here's the company side on the rate increases.
 http://www.ameren.com/AboutUs/ADC_AUE_RateFiling.asp

 A couple of snippets from that page.

 If approved, this electric rate increase would mark the first one for
 AmerenUE in almost 20 years.

 Typical residential customers using 1,000 kilowatt-hours a month would
 see their electric bills rise from approximately $66 per month to $72
 per month, excluding taxes.

 Clearly, some people did get hammered by the changes. Testimony of
 Scott Cisel, President and CEO, Ameren Illinois Utilities - 2007.02.27

 http://illinoischannel.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!B0DB128F5CD96151!2007.entry

 Even Cisel says that low electrical rates were partly to blame for
 people using more electricity (as opposed to say, insulation) than
 necessary.

 BTW, the new, higher rates are still below 10 cents/kWh.
 http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/illinoisnews/story/C80ED6D9855C9A18862572920017A867?OpenDocument

 But not to worry, there is political pressure to force the prices back
 down. (see story above)

 So, in order to make his point, Hancock ups his cost by another 10-20%.
 And increases the company's overhead to deal with the protest payment,
 which is not likely to reduce electricity rates.

 So, based on the evidence I came across, it seems likely Hancock heats
 with electricity, and the unseasonably cold weather had the expected
 effect.

 Let's hope his next step (and for his neighbours) is to figure out how
 to reduce his electrical consumption in the future. Unlikely though, it
 appears instead they'll apply political pressure to end up in the
 Ontario scenario (keep residential electrical rates unrealistically low,
 let taxpayers make up the difference, remove the incentive to conserve).

 Nationalizing oil will simply lead to exploitation by a (somewhat)
 different group of piggish folks: government. PetroCanada is a
 disappointing example of what nationalizing oil accomplishes.

 Darryl



 Kirk McLoren wrote:
 necessities of life shouldnt be available to exploitation by piggish
 folks-
 like the electricity corporations and natural gas.
 Nationalize oil!
 Kirk

 http://www.kfvs12.com/global/story.asp?s=6206504ClientType=Printable

 Carterville, IL
 *Carterville man pays electric bill with 52,000 pennies*
 March 12, 2007 03:14 AM PST

 *Carterville man pays electric bill with 52,000 pennies*
 By: Carly O'Keefe
 CARTERVILLE, Ill. - A Carterville man wanted to give Ameren CIPS more
 than just his two cents about the recent rate hike. He's giving them
 52,000 cents, by paying his electric bill entirely in pennies.
 Hancock withdrew $525 dollars from his bank entirely in pennies. It was
 a large enough withdrawal he needed a pick-up truck to take it all home.
 He sent his payment to Ameren CIPS in six flat-rate boxes through the
 United States Postal Service. But he didn't send nice, neat rolls of
 pennies. Hancock 

[Biofuel] Fwd: RE: [SOLAR] Evacuated Tubes In Trough (Was US renewable energy policy)

2007-03-13 Thread Kirk McLoren
crosspost from Solar-concentrator mailing list
  If you look into solar collectors this is high technology and gets excellent 
reviews.
  Efficiency is good even with diffuse light.
  Expect to pay contractors 1500 -2500 for this performance. 318 from 
www.tec-solar.com
is most definitely a good price.
   
  Kirk
  


Gerhard Stemmler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  From: Gerhard Stemmler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'solar concentrators for thermal and photovoltaic applications'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SOLAR] Evacuated Tubes In Trough (Was US renewable energy policy)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:17:59 +1200

We bought 15 sets of 24 tubes each from www.tec-solar.com
Each set comes with 24 evacuated tubes 1.85 meters long and holders and
one manifold. Cost per set was USD318.00 plus freight.
Very friendly service. Company is in China like most of the
manufacturers of such tubes.

gks


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Barlow
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 13:26 PM
To: solar concentrators for thermal and photovoltaic applications
Subject: Re: [SOLAR] Evacuated Tubes In Trough (Was US renewable energy
policy)

Lee Wright wrote:

I've been looking at this too. I've bought a tube - only cost $42.


Where does one buy these?

-- 
Later,
Jeff

___
Solar-concentrator mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cichlid.com/mailman/listinfo/solar-concentrator
Problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]







































































































































































___
Solar-concentrator mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cichlid.com/mailman/listinfo/solar-concentrator
Problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 
-
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
 Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] kind of interesting

2007-03-13 Thread Jesse Frayne
Hi Joe,
Why yes (she said modestly), Mark knows Bill.  I have
forwarded your note to him so he can tell you all
about it.  

Your story is so cool!!  Imagine seeing that formation
fly over, yipers.

Mark is proud to be part of a group who is organizing
to green up the IATSE film union activities here in
Toronto, on-site recycling, the reuse of building
materials:  all stuff that the biz has been doing for
years and is now integrating with the general
community.  There's a big new studio going up that is
squeeky green.

Jess



--- Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Really Jesse?  Mark knows Bill Lishman?  What a
 small world.  You know I 
 was standing down at the mouth of wilmot creek where
 it blows into Lake 
 Ontario trout fishing when the ultralight went
 directly over me with the 
 classic V formation of geese.  It was just after
 Dawn and I had been 
 fishing since 4 am and I know I had imbibed but I
 stood there in 
 disbelief first wondering why in heck the ultralight
 jockey would 
 venture beyond gliding range of the shore and second
 what the heck was 
 wrong with these geese who decided to form up on the
 ultralight and 
 wondering if I was actually losing my mind.  Later
 the story was on the 
 news.  It gets richer, the movie Fly Away Home which
 chronicles 
 Lishman's work ( hollywood style of course) has all
 the flying scenes 
 done by Michael Robertson a long time hang glider
 and Canadian icon of 
 sorts ( he flew a hang glider from the top of the CN
 tower) and he is a 
 local activist trying to stop the expropriation of
 farm land in the GTA 
 for the proposed new airport.  He is a real great
 down to earth guy just 
 like Bill.  They cut their teeth on the old home
 made rogallo wing hang 
 gliders back in the late 60's and 70's. He lived
 with a red tail hawk up 
 in Locust hill when I met him back in '85 when I
 bought my first wing. 
 What a sweet guy. He will be building one of my
 biodiesel reactors this 
 summer.  He has an open petition you can sign if you
 want to add your 
 voice to the protest over the land issues.
  I think you can find a link to it on his page
 http://www.flyhigh.com/index.php
 This is a big issue as the area has primo fertile
 land and wetlands 
 which stand to be harmed if the airport goes in.
 The area I used to fish is all suburbia now.:( 
 Caught a 40 pound 
 chinook there once upon a time.sigh.
 
 
 Joe
 
 Jesse Frayne wrote:
 
 Thanks for this completely engaging picture of your
 nutty feathered friends.  What lucky birds to be
 closely observed and respected.
 
 My husband worked on a film years ago about birds
 who
 imprinted on a guy who showed them how to migrate,
 leading them south with a pair of ultra-lights.  
 Came
 home from work with wonderful stories about the
 social
 life of geese:  their hard-working natures, how
 they
 would play and relax at the end of a long film
 shooting day, their community interaction and
 supportiveness... but especially their sense of
 humour!
 
 Damn!  I used to love to eat a goose, but boy, you
 can't do that to someone who can crack a joke.
 
 As a cook, I'm dismayed to read that the chickens I
 prepare regularly are also in the wide-awake
 species
 category...  humm.
 
 Not to resurrect the vegan theme.  We all know we
 must
 be grateful for anything that sustains us
 (broccoli!),
 and try to make something worthwhile with it.
 
 
 
 
 
 
   --- Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
   
 
 Hi Jesse
 
 
 
 Thanks Keith,
 and I loved reading about your birds!  No
 flirting,
 just the fanning of feathers.
 -J
   
 
 :-)
 
 I've had a day fraught with birds, especially
 broody
 females getting 
 bad-tempered with everyone else because they think
 it gives them the 
 moral high ground. Marilyn the duck came out of
 her
 nest-box where 
 she's sitting on 11 eggs, had an enormous shit,
 had
 a large meal, 
 attacked poor Lucy and Spot and beat them up,
 snarled at the others, 
 and went back to her eggs, making weird squeaking
 noises. She's a 
 sweetie, is Marilyn, when she's sane, which she's
 always been up to 
 now. The two big drakes stood off all the while
 and
 huffed a lot, 
 left the womenfolk to it, very wise. Anyway Lucy
 and
 Spot weren't 
 exactly beaten up, Muscovies are built like those
 special rubber 
 balls that bounce 10 times higher, it's hard to
 make
 an impression.
 
 The geese, though, are being sweet and reasonable
 about it all, for 
 once. Well, they're always extremely sweet, unless
 you happen to be 
 not a goose (we're sort of honorary geese), but
 they're not always 
 reasonable. They argue about everything, they're
 terrible busybodies. 
 They untied all the knots holding up the pasture
 fence netting, we 
 had to retie everything with strong plastic cord.
 They didn't want to 
 get out, they just really enjoy untying knots.
 They're really good at 
 it. Very hi-tech gear, those beaks of theirs.
 
 Anyway there are two nests of eggs in their hutch,
 lots 

Re: [Biofuel] Cheese Whey to Ethanol or tagatose sugar? ;)

2007-03-13 Thread Dimas Ramirez
It is the same whey and cheese whey.  I get 25,000 liters of cheese whey for 
free each day.  I make a project to convert cheese whey to ethanol, but the 
tagatose sugar is very interesting.  I am located in Panama, Central 
America.  A program of the Europe Union grant me a few euros to make it 
happens, you know, we are on the third world.  I am going to use the same 
pilot plant to produce ethanol from sugar cane.  I am located in a sugar 
cane region here in Chiriqui, Panama.I want to buy a small plant with a 
fermentor/separator and/or use pervaporation to make the production cost 
smaller.  At first I wanted to recover lactoferrin and lactoperoxidase, but 
the ultrafiltration equiment is too expensive.



From: Kirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Cheese Whey to Ethanol
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:05:02 -0700 (PDT)

What is the difference between whey and cheese whey?
   Whey that body builders buy is not cheap.

   Kirk

NV Dhana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   To, Ramirez, You can find lot of information about fermenting whey by 
using
google, just type Whey fermentation and see what can you get. Also try this
website. w. bio-process.com/wheyethanol.htm. Any college with micro-biology
class will tell you where to get K.Fragilis or K. Lactis. N.V. Dhana


 From: Dimas Ramirez
 Reply-To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Cheese Whey to Ethanol
 Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 19:54:49 +
 
 
 
 
 
 What I need to produce this sugar?
 
 
 
 
 From:  NV Dhana
 Reply-To:  biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 To:  biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Subject:  Re: [Biofuel] Cheese Whey to Ethanol
 Date:  Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:54:50 -0400
  To Saludos, Why you want to ferment whey to ethanol when you can make
  Tagatose sugar that is more lucrative fron whey.
  
  
   From: Dimas Ramirez
   Reply-To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
   To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
   Subject: [Biofuel] Cheese Whey to Ethanol
   Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:56:32 +
   
   I have a waste of 20,000 liters of cheese whey every day.
   I want to convert it to ethanol, but a can not find Kluyveromyces
 Fragilis
   to break the lactose. Anybody knows about it or another method to 
make
 it
   happens?
   
   Saludos!
   Dimas



-
Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and
always stay connected to friends.


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


_
The average US Credit Score is 675. The cost to see yours: $0 by Experian. 
http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=660600bcd=EMAILFOOTERAVERAGE


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] GRAIN: Bird flu: a bonanza for 'Big Chicken'

2007-03-13 Thread Keith Addison
http://www.grain.org/articles/?id=22
GRAIN | Against the grain | 2007 | Bird flu: a bonanza for 'Big C
Bird flu: a bonanza for 'Big Chicken'

GRAIN

Against the grain

Available in PDF:
  (62k)
http://www.grain.org/articles_files/atg-8-en.pdf
Author: GRAIN
Date: March 2007

See also the GRAIN Bird flu resource page here
http://www.grain.org/m/?id=84
GRAIN | Bird Flu

The bird flu crisis rages on. One year ago, when governments were 
fixated on getting surveillance teams into wetlands and the Food and 
Agriculture Organisation (FAO) was waving the finger of blame at Asia 
and Africa's abundant household poultry, GRAIN and other groups 
pointed out that large-scale industrial poultry farms and the global 
poultry trade were spreading bird flu -- not wild birds nor backyard 
flocks. Today, this has become common knowledge, even though little 
is being done to control the industrial source of the problem, and 
governments still shamelessly roll out the wild bird theory to dodge 
responsibility. Just a few weeks ago, Moscow authorities blamed 
migratory birds for an outbreak near the city -- in the middle of the 
Russian winter.

A more sinister dimension of the bird flu crisis, however, is 
becoming more apparent. Last year, we warned that bird flu was being 
used to advance the interests of powerful corporations, putting the 
livelihoods and health of millions of people in jeopardy. Today, more 
than ever, agribusiness is using the calamity to  consolidate its 
farm-to-factory-to-supermarket food chains as its small-scale 
competition is criminalised, while pharmaceutical companies mine the 
goodwill invested in the global database of flu samples to profit 
from desperate, captive vaccine markets. Two UN agencies -- FAO and 
the World Health Organisation (WHO) -- remain at the centre of this 
story, using their international stature, access to governments and 
control over the flow of donor funds to advance corporate agendas.

Slaughtering the small poultry sector

Authorities in charge of dealing with bird flu are finally 
acknowledging the role played by the poultry trade in spreading the 
virus. This is long overdue. The first bird flu outbreaks in 
Southeast Asia -- Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos and Indonesia -- 
occurred in closed, intensive factory farms. But thorough 
investigations were never made into why the disease broke out on 
those farms and how it subsequently spread from there. The same goes 
for Turkey and Egypt, where wild birds and backyard flocks were 
quickly condemned while the poultry companies, which supplied markets 
and backyard producers with birds as the disease raged through the 
industry, were left off the hook. Even in South Korea, with healthy 
free-range poultry roaming next to factory farms hit by the disease, 
authorities are obsessed with the role of wild birds. It was only in 
the UK this past February that the myth that large farms are 
biosecure was shattered and the shroud concealing the many ways 
that bird flu spreads through the transnational poultry industry was 
torn off. Government officials at first blamed wild birds for the 
outbreak on a large factory farm owned by poultry giant Bernard 
Matthews and the company dismissed media reports about a possible 
link with its operations in Hungary, saying that these were far from 
the area in that country where bird flu recently broke out. But both 
explanations fell apart when a government inspector found a wrapper 
on the company's UK premises proving that meat from a slaughterhouse 
in Hungary's bird-flu infected area had indeed been processed at the 
UK factory farm just prior to the outbreak.

Yet back in the Asian epicentre of the crisis, the message to poultry 
farmers is still, Get big, really big, or get out. In 2006, 
Vietnam, under a joint government-UN programme, laid out a ten-year 
plan to, in the words of its Minister of Agriculture, turn its 
poultry sector into a modern, large-scale industry in terms of 
farming, slaughter and consumption.  The government began with a ban 
on live poultry in urban centres, putting an end to thousands of 
backyard stocks. Then new regulations on trade and on poultry 
slaughtering in residential areas came into effect. Small-scale 
markets and butchers were shut down, and slaughterhouses were moved 
to a few licensed facilities on the outskirts of the cities. In Ho 
Chi Minh City, over 200 local markets sold chicken before the bird 
flu crisis; today, chicken can be legally sold only by supermarkets 
or factory farm selling points. The number of slaughterhouses in 
the city has plummeted from 50 to three. The changes are devastating 
small-scale producers because the supermarkets and new 
slaughterhouses sell only poultry that is certified according to 
standards that small farmers cannot comply with. The three or four 
companies that control Vietnam's industrial poultry production thus 
not only get captive urban markets; they also get a low-wage labour 
force of