Frankly, I think Bush himself did 9/11. Ok ... so he did not directly
push the button. But IMHO ... he enabled it. and surgically
enhanced it.
IMHO he WANTED the WTC down (for reasons listed by Dave).So he
arranged it to go down. He had DEMOLITION CHARGES set up in it so
Hallo Friends,
Although I am responding to this mail of Curtis' it is a general mail
to the list in general.
Are we not beating a dead horse with this thread? It is obvious that
there are strongly held beliefs on all sides about this but has
sufficient thought been given to what the
!
Will I'm not a president, but I play one online Dwyer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 12:43 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [biofuel] Re: Fahrenheit 9/11
I would certainly like to hear what you would have
Well, Todd, it seems that some folks don't understand, or don't want
to understand, that if a house is built on silt and quicksand it
will soon crumble. Duh. So it is apparent that any information used
as foundation for an argument or testative point and that that
foundation information is
The pages you've given are opinion and conjecture. I won't argue
that they're not the opinion and conjecture of the people who posted
them. You just can't seem to get the point that the opinion and
conjecture of the right is not proof of Moore lying. You offer
pages that take one little
Before I let my NRA membership lapse because I did not feel that
they represented me as a responsible firearm owner, I used to
receive their publication which was supposed to support protection
of my second ammendment rights. This publication offered reports on
the studies which showed an
Perhaps my post # 36427 can shed some light of it. :)
L.
--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, Appal Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Randall,
I'm also from Michigan, doesn't mean I blindly accept the
opinion of
everyone who speaks here.
That goes ditto for me as well, especially when folks
--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I applaud your attempt to discredit the source rather than to make
any attempt whatsoever to discredit the arguement or the premise
itself.
Have you ever heard the expression the pot calling the kettle
black? I don't know if I've
when questions are considered more chaotic than
actions.
Todd Swearingen
- Original Message -
From: bioveging [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:38 PM
Subject: [biofuel] Re: Fahrenheit 9/11
Perhaps my post # 36427 can shed some light
I wrote my reply to Randall's post before looking at his
references. For that I apologize. Now that I have read Heston's
entire speech, I would like to thank him for posting that link
here. He has proven to us all that the editing that Moore did
in Bowling fro Columbine presented a very
Is your best source a thoroughly slanted website in which the writer
admits that he doesn't know what Moore was thinking, but basing his
premise on his own interpretation of it? A website that chronicles
a few deaths related to toasters as proof that Moore doesn't know
what he's talking
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:10:29 -0400
From: Darryl McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fahrenheit 9/11
Went to see this last night with my son (age 14). He thought it was
awesome.
Unfortunately, I could not interest any of the women in the party (my wife and
sisters) in
Backwoods_Bob wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:10:29 -0400
From: Darryl McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fahrenheit 9/11
Went to see this last night with my son (age 14). He thought it
was awesome.
Unfortunately, I could not interest any of the women in the party
I should send you a picture of me from high school. Of course, now
I'm just older, uglier and fatter. I guess that means that nothing
that I have to say is relevant. Sorry for ever posting here.
As far as doing away with a number of the traditions and morals of
this country (I assume you
I hope no voters base their vote on anything that Michael Moore writes or
films. All of his premises and arguements are based on skewed data and emotion.
He really has a very poor arguement. Its very sad that people would take
something, written by someone with severe political motivations and
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: Fahrenheit 9/11
I hope no voters base their vote on anything that Michael Moore writes
or films. All of his premises and arguements are based on skewed data
and emotion. He really has a very poor arguement. Its very sad that
people would take something, written
I hope you're not voting then. The last Michael Moore book I read had 26
pages regarding works cited. He said himself that his publications
aren't fair. At least he doesn't claim to be when he's not. [foxnews.com]
--
--
Martin Klingensmith
http://infoarchive.net/
http://nnytech.net/
[EMAIL
He could site 500 works for all I care, it doesn't mean he used the information
accurately or in context. He is not a source of information, he is a source of
entertainment. He slants information to make his point, and his point alone. He
is like any other media outlet, its a lot easier to
See below
Regards,
Dermot
-Original Message-
From: Dermot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 June 2004 17:32
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [biofuel] Re: Fahrenheit 9/11
Pretty strong words there, partner. Can you back them up with examples of
where Moore has lied or skewed
I would certainly like to hear what you would have done in that situation. If
he had jumped up and ran out of the room he would have caused panic. Of course
then everyone on the left would say he showed bad form. If he made a statement
right then and there, he would be speaking on almost no
For those of us outside the US, the movie is called Celcius 488
Pierre
--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, Darryl McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Went to see this last night with my son (age 14). He thought it
was awesome.
Unfortunately, I could not interest any of the women in the party
I hope you're not voting then. The last Michael Moore book I read had 26
pages regarding works cited.
Which is 100% more than Randall's managed to do, along with most of
the people who say just that about him and his work. Short of
non-sources and anti-sources like the NY Post, the Washington
Greets...A newbie to the list (me) chimes in ... Im still learning about
biofuels and really appreciate this amazing list and Keith's great work
keeping it going. I want to have the ability to make batches of biodiesel
in the future and am in the early stages of research right now. Intro
I understand the fact that this is propeganda. But, being that it is
controversial, and that it does have some flaws, there is a very good reason to
have public discussion about/against/for it. The man is deliberately trying to
sway the vote to get Bush out of office with this movie. And given
--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In his documentary about how bad GM is for closing the Flint plant,
he shows evictions and people getting kicked out onto the street.
It's no result of the GM closing, the person didn't work for GM but
it made a good picture for his
25 matches
Mail list logo
