Re: [svg-developers] FF3.0a2 works great

2007-02-13 Thread T Rowley
On 2/13/07 8:32 AM, André M. Winter - Carto.net wrote: i was just testing a map interface with FF2 and was disappointed while unloading a map and reloading another form the local filesystem. it took around 15sec. now FF3 (feb. 8th) does it in around 1sec and this over the web. this is

Re: [svg-developers] FF3.0a2 works great

2007-02-13 Thread T Rowley
On 2/13/07 2:24 PM, TheMountainScene wrote: In a FF test I've created, a mouseover of Canada 364 Kb, it has improved from 6 seconds to 2 seconds. 2 Seconds is still much too slow compared to the Adobe viewer, but it is an improvement. I submitted this as a bug some time ago. For my

Re: [svg-developers] FF3.0a2 works great

2007-02-13 Thread T Rowley
On 2/13/07 3:37 PM, T Rowley wrote: Changing the style system to give detailed information is a larger scope item, though maybe something gecko would want to do as it could help other sorts of content. Correction - gecko does have a mechanism for splitting style information into repaint

Re: [svg-developers] FF3.0a2 works great

2007-02-13 Thread T Rowley
On 2/13/07 2:58 PM, Guy Morton wrote: I wish I could report the same happy news. Unfortunately, GranParadiso (on MacOSX at least) fails to render *anything* for me. It even seems buggy in doing normalish browser things like resizing framesets (the toolbar has half disappeared under the

Re: [svg-developers] FF3.0a2 works great

2007-02-13 Thread T Rowley
On 2/13/07 3:41 PM, Guy Morton wrote: Aha...well that's the problem for me. I resized the window and it appeared. Good to know you know what is causing it. And I'll add my Wow to Andre's...FF used to use 70% of my CPU playing this file. Now it's using about 7%. In your case, this is

Re: [svg-developers] Re: WPF/E Goes Beta Community preview available for download

2006-12-06 Thread T Rowley
On 12/6/06 10:36 AM, Jeff Schiller wrote: I think I've asked before, but couldn't find my post when searching: What would be the challenge in taking the Mozilla codebase and turning that into an ActiveX control for IE that handles XHTML and SVG content? IE6 and 7 both don't support either

Re: [svg-developers] FF2 text-anchor bug?

2006-11-15 Thread T Rowley
On 11/14/2006 8:38 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: Not to speak for Tim, but I think he was asking for an minimal test case, not a full application where the error was occurring. Right, as I mentioned in my email to to Guy, I've done some preliminary investigation, but haven't gotten around to

Re: [svg-developers] FF2 text-anchor bug?

2006-11-08 Thread T Rowley
On 11/8/06 6:11 PM, Guy Morton wrote: It seems in FF2 on Windows that all my text elements that use text- anchor=middle are now positioned incorrectly. FF2 on Mac doesn't show the problem (though it has other text bugs) Anyone know anything about this? Anyone at Mozilla working on it? It

Re: [svg-developers] Re: SVG performance

2006-11-06 Thread T Rowley
On 11/6/06 1:58 PM, brucerindahl wrote: --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, T Rowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: are certainly known areas where things will be slow. Also keep in mind that I haven't seriously used the SVG code shipped in Firefox 1.5 and 2.0 for over a year now. The trunk

Re: [svg-developers] Re: SVG performance

2006-11-04 Thread T Rowley
On 11/4/06 4:30 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote: and I am pretty sure that it has to do with the X server configuration. The main developer, Tim Rowley develops on Linux and he says that he doesn't experience these performance problems. I don't think I've ever said I don't see performance

Re: [svg-developers] Re: tspan in mozilla

2006-09-26 Thread T Rowley
On 9/25/06 11:39 AM, T Rowley wrote: On 9/25/06 10:12 AM, revelonshift wrote: Yeah, it is workaround, but I could it use, perhaps. Hope FFX2 will be working already as expected... Err, oops. While the fix is trivial and has been on the trunk since February, it was missed when merging low

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Performance tips

2006-09-21 Thread T Rowley
On 9/21/06 7:29 AM, revelonshift wrote: No, I'm not using styles at all, knowing, that they are not so fast as direct properties. Some other ideas, if Mozilla specific, the better... There will be no performance difference between style and property attributes in Mozilla SVG, as they are both

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Performance tips

2006-09-21 Thread T Rowley
On 9/21/06 10:18 AM, T Rowley wrote: Major items to keep an eye out for performance in Firefox 1.5/2.0 SVG are group opacity (fill-opacity is fine), clipPaths, and complex paths (the current cairo tesselator has poor scalability). All of these should improve in Firefox 3.0. A little more

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Performance tips

2006-09-21 Thread T Rowley
On 9/21/06 10:42 AM, Phi Tran wrote: Lately I am very careful in what I will say specially after ADOBE's announcement. For not to be misunderstood as a cheap-shot to promote my SVG/Zip . . . . Let me make my point on this thread. I only trying to help to save some CPU instructions here and

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Performance tips

2006-09-21 Thread T Rowley
On 9/21/06 11:27 AM, Jim Ley wrote: The biggest Mozilla speed improvement in scripting will be to not use getElementById() but to cache every single reference in a seperate variable of your own. currently mozilla re-looks up every node in the DOM for XML documents, and it's very, very

Re: [svg-developers] Re: 'Native' SVG support in Opera and FF

2006-09-12 Thread T Rowley
On 9/12/06 9:51 AM, Tim Hesse wrote: Another huge issue for our firm is that FF (at least, haven't tested opera) doesn't support compressed .svgz which ASV did. Our clients won't be happy if we start sending 5+mb docs over the wire to them, when with ASV they would compress down to under a

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Announcement: Adobe to Discontinue Adobe SVG Viewer

2006-09-07 Thread T Rowley
On 9/7/06 1:19 PM, Jeff Schiller wrote: So where are the open source, cross-platform SVG 1.1 viewers ? What about taking the Mozilla base and developing a browser plugin from that for only SVG support? What about candidates like AmanithVG and Renesis for a SVG 1.2 viewer? Let's get a

Re: [svg-developers] Announcement: Adobe to Discontinue Adobe SVG Viewer

2006-09-06 Thread T Rowley
On 9/6/06 10:55 AM, Sean wrote: My concern with FF, is how slow it is with SVG over 300k. Hopefully within 1.5 years the issue will be solved. I tested it with the FF 2 beta 2, and mouseover events are still laboriously slow. I posted it as a bug back in January, but nothing. Have a bug #

Re: [svg-developers] Re: arc and markers

2006-07-13 Thread T Rowley
On 7/13/06 9:22 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote: the reason is that FF does not yet implement .getPointAtLength() - at least not in version 1.5. Will be in Firefox 3: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344378 -tor - To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox on MacOSX, or is it Intel-related? / progress with latest Cairo?

2006-07-04 Thread T Rowley
On 7/4/06 8:27 AM, meikelneu wrote: jophof007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes firefox on the Mac (Intel or PPC) is on SVG much worse than under PC. yes, this is unfortunately true and it's mainly due to poor Cairo (the graphic engine for SVG behind Firefox) development on MacOSX. Has

Re: [svg-developers] Firefox on MacOSX, or is it Intel-related?

2006-07-04 Thread T Rowley
On 7/3/06 9:13 AM, Guy Morton wrote: I've just got myself a macbook pro running mac os x 10.7, and i downloaded firefox (the current version) and SVG is terrible in it. the bitmaps are all in a weird colour space and the text is outlined weirdly and so on. Is this just a problem with FF

Re: [svg-developers] Re: Firefox 1.5 with SVG now officially released

2005-12-01 Thread T Rowley
On 12/1/05 3:07 PM, Richard Pearman wrote: Firefox doesn't correctly display any of the SVG's on my site, including ones I'm pretty sure have the Kosha namespace declarations etc. Also, as far as I can tell, the server uses the correct mime type for SVGZ. Can anyone please tell me what

[svg-developers] Re: [update] Mozilla SVG report from XTech 2005

2005-05-27 Thread T Rowley
Ronan Oger ronan at roasp.com writes: 3/ MOZ SVG will support scripting Mozilla/Firefox SVG already supports scripting. The problem you might be seeing is the script mimetype: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/svg/faq.html#script 4/ MOZ SVG will support XForms. While Mozilla/Firefox SVG