Re: [swinog] Switzerland judged Cleanest Country

2012-08-13 Diskussionsfäden Serge Droz
Hello Andre, I am a bit surprised at your reply. In fact, the domain take down process is described in the law: http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/784_104/a14bist.html Besides the rather strict legal framework we operate in, we must submitt a list ob blocked domain names OFCOM four times a year. And

Re: [swinog] Switzerland judged Cleanest Country

2012-08-13 Diskussionsfäden Oliver Schad
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:05:19 +0200 Serge Droz serge.d...@switch.ch wrote: I am a bit surprised at your reply. In fact, the domain take down process is described in the law: http://www.admin.ch/ch/d/sr/784_104/a14bist.html Besides the rather strict legal framework we operate in, we must

Re: [swinog] Switzerland judged Cleanest Country

2012-08-13 Diskussionsfäden Guillaume Leclanche
2012/8/13 Oliver Schad oliver.sc...@oschad.de It doesn't make sense to mix up responsibilities of entities. I'm very happy, that most of my domains have nothing to do with switch.ch and this clueless law. I think the law makes a good job of delimiting the cases where the block can be done.

Re: [swinog] Switzerland judged Cleanest Country

2012-08-13 Diskussionsfäden Oliver Schad
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:55:04 +0200 Guillaume Leclanche guilla...@leclanche.net wrote: I think the law makes a good job of delimiting the cases where the block can be done. In addition, I think Switch makes a good job applying this law. I'd be happy that switch blocks one of my domains to

Re: [swinog] Switzerland judged Cleanest Country

2012-08-13 Diskussionsfäden Andreas Fink
Doesnt matter. Switch is only following the rules in the law. Now we can argue if its a good law or not. And we can launch a public voting for this in switzerland (not like in germany) On 13.08.2012, at 21:47, Oliver Schad oliver.sc...@oschad.de wrote: On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:55:04 +0200