Original Message -
From: Chris Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 3:04 PM
Subject: [Syslog] Secure substrate - need your input
I'll be asking this in Vancouver but would like to get some input from the
mailing list.
Our charter says that
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
1) What secure substrate should the WG look towards:
__ ssl
__ ssh
__ dtls
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rescorla-dtls-05.txt
__ other
I believe it should be SSL 3.0 / TLS 1.0.
I agree and for all the
I see that there is a lot of work around SSH connection
protocol and its potential use in new protocols. I have not
followed these developments. There must have been a good
reason for it. I would like to understand why people object
to SSL, which is a well established technology. Any
In the context of isms, ie SNMP, the choice was SSH v TLS + SASL; TLS provides
the security but not the authentication while SSH does both. And SSH is a
well-established protocol.
I agree that TLS/SSL is the most widely used but that is because more people
access websites (securely) than access
