Tom,
I do not know if rewriting really helps. I suspect Huawei's patent
lawyers, like patent lawyers everywhere, did a good job in wording the
patent application so generally that probably evertyhing we do in
respect to syslog/tls would fall under their claim. Eventually, that
would even apply to
Hi Tom,
The editors' responsibility is to make the document reflect WG
consensus, as best they can.
The co-chairs and the AD are responsible for ensuring that the editors
represented the WG consensus in the document, and to determine WG
consensus if it is not clear to the editors.
Please
I wonder if all the references to RFC3164 should be revisited in the
light of Rainer's work on syslog-protocol, or is this an environment
which is accurately described by RFC3164?
The current DOCSIS and PacketCable syslog agent/server
environments are
accurately described by RFC 3164.
