Hi Miao,
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Miao Fuyou wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunately (or fortunately), there are several issues raised after the
chair start shepherding process. As the editor, I would like close the
issues as soon as possible, and get the doucment updated.
1, Version. The wg seems have
Hi Everyone,
Cisco asked Huawei to make this change. Essentially the prior statement
appeared to be similar to the IPR statements made by Cisco and other
companies but it had differences that were not acceptable to the Cisco
legal team. Hence, Cisco would not have been willing to implement
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 2:48 AM
To: Miao Fuyou; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document
-
5.1
==
When confidentiality is
Hi,
Chris and I have discussed the last calls and the status of the
documents.
We believe the -protocol-, -udp-, and -tls- documents have received
adequate review, and are (almost) ready for submission to the IESG. If
the WG reaches consensus on the remaining issues, and revisions are
published
Hi,
Yes, I/we should correct this.
Do we have any information about vendors that have implemented the
current UDP specification?
dbh
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 6:29 AM
To: David Harrington; [EMAIL
I am changing the sentence to:
For the deployment where confidentiality is a concern, receiver
authentication is required for sender/relay to make sure it is talking to
the right peer. It is up to the operator to decide whether confidentiality
is a concern for a specific deployment.
This
That wording satisfies me.
dbh
-Original Message-
From: Miao Fuyou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 9:07 PM
To: 'David Harrington'; 'Rainer Gerhards'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document
I am changing the sentence to:
