Original Message -
From: "Miao Fuyou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Rainer Gerhards'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'tom.petch'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 7:58 AM
Subject: RE: Ci
yslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document
>
> That wording satisfies me.
>
> dbh
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Miao Fuyou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 9:07 PM
> > To: 'David Harrington'; 'Rainer Ger
That wording satisfies me.
dbh
> -Original Message-
> From: Miao Fuyou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 9:07 PM
> To: 'David Harrington'; 'Rainer Gerhards'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls
you'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 2:48 AM
> > To: Miao
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 2:48 AM
> To: Miao Fuyou; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document
> > > -
> > >
gt; Subject: RE: Ciphersuites Re: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document
>
> Tom, Miao,
>
> might it be a compromise to add a sentence to -transport-tls
> that tells an implementor to look for mandatory to implement
> suites inside the TLS document. Something like
>
> &quo
]
> Subject: RE: Ciphersuites Re: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document
>
>
> My observation about ciphersuite:
> 1, TLS wg can do a better job on ciphersuite selection than a profile
> developer.
> 2, TLS specification will be updated if the mandatory cipher
> is t
My observation about ciphersuite:
1, TLS wg can do a better job on ciphersuite selection than a profile
developer.
2, TLS specification will be updated if the mandatory cipher is too weak to
provide appropriate protection, but profile-specific suite may not be
updated accordingly.
3, Before TLS
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: "Rainer Gerhards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Miao Fuyou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 8:47 AM
Subject: RE: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document
Hi Miao,
Rainer
&
> > Probably lower case. The point is confidentility is meaningless
> > without authenticaion.
>
> Well... maybe it is just a wording issue. Are we actually
> REQUIREING a sender to authenticate the receiver in all
> cases? If so, we should state that. My impression so far is
> that this is
Hi Miao,
Rainer
> -Original Message-
> From: Miao Fuyou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 3:38 AM
> To: Rainer Gerhards; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document
>
> Hi, Rainer,
>
> Thanks for your
Miao,
> -Original Message-
> From: Miao Fuyou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 2:24 AM
> To: Rainer Gerhards
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document
>
>
> > > The public messege c
Hi, Rainer,
Thanks for your thorough review!
Some responses are inline.
> -
> 3.0
> ==
> The security service is also applicable to BSD Syslog defined in
>RFC3164 [7]. But, it is not ensured that the protocol
> specification
>defined in this docum
> > The public messege can be found at:
> > http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg01273.html
> >
> > It seems there was a rough concensus that the version number was
> > welcomed to save port resource when we discussed this issue on the
> > mailing list. That is the reason why
Tom,
>
> Ports may or may not be scarce but they are expensive.
> Introduce a new one and
> - anyone with firewall
> - anyone with an application level gateway
> - anyone with a packet filtering router
> has to go out and change each and every box to reflect the
> new assignment, a
> slow a
- Original Message -
From: "Rainer Gerhards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Miao Fuyou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document
> -Original Message-
> From: Miao Fuyou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 10:40 AM
> To: Rainer Gerhards; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document
>
>
> > > I questio
Hi Miao,
thanks for the update. I have gone through the draft again and found
some, mostly minor, issue. I have listed them below:
-
3.0
==
The security service is also applicable to BSD Syslog defined in
RFC3164 [7]. But, it is not ensured that the proto
> > I questioned the need for a version number for the TLS transport in
> > private conversation and now I bring this up again here.
>
> Was that private? I thought it was on-list. Anyhow... I
The public messege can be found at:
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg01273.htm
> -Original Message-
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 9:09 AM
> To: Miao Fuyou
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 09:12:38AM
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 09:12:38AM +0800, Miao Fuyou wrote:
> There are two major changes since last update.
> 1, Section 3 is removed. It is an introductory text on TLS, and is neccesary
> because TLS is already a normative reference.
> 2, Updated the section 4.3.2 (original 5.3.2), removed the
21 matches
Mail list logo
