Yes, peer entity authentication is seperate from integrity, this is
addressed in section 3 of the current document. Client only authenticaiton
is not available in TLS, so I think it is safe to say peer entity
authention instead of sender authenticaiton.
Probably it is appropriate to say
transport-tls should be designed to enable policy decisions. This group is
not able to make policy decisions. Some of this discussion is really
policy making. Policy discussions within syslog should be oriented towards
ensuring that any reasonable policy can be properly supported.
For
It sounds like trust anchor selection (what security people talk about
when the rest of the world talks about set of root CAs) is actually
very important to you. It's just that you don't actually consider the
traditional root CAs part of your trust anchor set; you have a much
smaller trust anchor
Correct. So I just need to make sure that the various
MUST/SHALL/SHOULD/etc decisions continue to support our policy needs.
I suspect that a diversity of trust anchor sets and a diversity of trust
purposes will be increasing in the authentication process when people start
making operational use
Forwraded from ietf@ietf.org; please include ietf@ietf.org in
responses.
dbh
-Original Message-
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 2:32 AM
To: David W. Hankins
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-syslog-protocol: Reliable delivery
Forwarded from ietf@ietf.org; please include ietf@ietf.org in any
responses.
dbh
-Original Message-
From: Eliot Lear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 9:04 AM
To: Pekka Savola
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-syslog-protocol: Reliable delivery
Forwarded from ietf@ietf.org; please include ietf@ietf.org in any
responses.
dbh
-Original Message-
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 5:33 AM
To: David W. Hankins
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-syslog-protocol: Reliable
Forwarded from ietf@ietf.org; please include ietf@ietf.org in any
responses.
dbh
-Original Message-
From: David W. Hankins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 1:00 PM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-syslog-protocol: Reliable delivery
consideredharmful.
Forwarded from ietf@ietf.org; please include ietf@ietf.org in any
responses.
dbh
-Original Message-
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 5:33 AM
To: David W. Hankins
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-syslog-protocol: Reliable
Hi,
FYI.
Chris is travelling heavily for work at this point, so has not had
time to participate much in the recent discussions. He begs your
indulgence, and hopes to get back into participation mode in the next
few weeks.
David Harrington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Glenn and Alex,
Can you provide a quick summary for the WG of the issues that have
been raised regarding the mib document and the sign document since the
beginning of the WGLC (which started 9-11-06 and 8-28-06
respectively), pointers to the threads where discussions of the issues
were held,
Hi David,
Got it. I will prepare the summary and mail it - tentatively
by 16/2.
Thanks and cheers
Glenn
David Harrington wrote:
Hi Glenn and Alex,
Can you provide a quick summary for the WG of the issues that have
been raised regarding the mib document and the sign document
12 matches
Mail list logo
