WE PAY CASH NOW!

2001-07-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WE PAY CASH, NOW! We will pay you a lump sum of cash for Eight years of your Military and Government pensions, or your VA diusability. We pay top dollar! Go to: www.tfund2000.com and click on Military/Government pensions.

Wouldn't Flexible Investment Terms be nice?

2002-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Government Secured WEALTH WITHOUT RISK! Government "Secured" tax certificates PAY YOU between 16%-50%! Receive your free copy of "INSIDER SECRETS OF IVESTING IN SECURED GOVERNMENT TAX CERTIFICATES," just for filling out this form! (A $39.95 Value)YOURS

Pay nothing for your conference calls!

2002-01-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Take Control Of Your Conference Calls Crystal Clear Conference CallsOnly 18 Cents Per Minute! (Anytime/Anywhere) No setup fees No contracts or monthly fees Call anytime, from anywhere, to anywhere Connects up to 100 Participants

Would you Like a Guaranteed Rate of Return on your Investment?

2002-03-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Message from InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT ** ** No virus found in attached file noname.htm This e-mail has been checked for viruses and found to be clean. * End of message *** Title: Government Secured Government "Secured"

Conference calls/best quality/$.18 per minute!

2002-03-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Take Control Of Your Conference Calls Crystal Clear Conference CallsOnly 18 Cents Per Minute! (Anytime/Anywhere) No setup fees No contracts or monthly fees Call anytime, from anywhere, to anywhere Connects up to 100 Participants

Re: TCP-syslog (as RFC)

2002-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Darren, with thre risk of starting a flamwar .. However for syslog-reliable, as good as the protocol is, there are no implementations yet! And you didn't implement it because ? As said, NO S-R is to complex to implement _*_ for us _*_ ( my custumor the _user_) ! Our implemenation is based

Re: Any early syslog-sign implementations?

2003-01-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it, on BSDEuroCon 2002 See http://2002.eurobsdcon.org/ http://2002.eurobsdcon.org/papers/#mietus http://2002.eurobsdcon.org/papers/mietus_presentation.pdf Email mee for more info --ALbert Mietus Sent prive mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent business mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

FYI: implementation of syslog-sign now on SF.net

2003-04-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello All, To keep you informed, I have uploaded my implementation of syslog-sign (based on draft-07) to sourceforge. Info can be found on http://sourceforge.net/projects/syslog-sec/ Note: Today (April 4), the CVS Repository does contain incorrect files. It is corrected, but it will

Re: Where we're at - 25 Aug 2003

2003-08-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, but the mail of Chris has shown me we are allowed to improve syslog. I think this simple change is a big improvement! (Let face it, the current name/numers are old) --ALbert Mietus Send prive mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send business mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Misunderstanding ( was security and reboot (was ...))

2003-09-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, we (Renair and me) agree we agree on most issues. So please don't misread our discussion! --ALbert Mietus Send prive mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send business mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't send SPAM! -- --ALbert Mietus Send prive mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send

RE: syslog implementations etc.

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Alex" == Alex Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "Time synchronization is _definitely_ outside Alex the scope of a logging protocol." Actually, _I_ said that. Alex I agree that there should be as few protocol dependencies in the solutions Ale

Majordomo results: who syslog-sec

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- who syslog-sec Members of list 'syslog-sec': [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Ballot: On the question of moving the list (anywhere)

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "If we moved the list address to a list hosted by at www.onelist.com it would provide that a few other nifty features like a calendar, shared web links, etc." Having got my network support people in motion to get the list hosted here,

Re: syslog.conf format

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Roger" == Roger Marquis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Roger A few suggestions for /etc/syslog.conf: Roger * default location remains /etc/syslog.conf, No. New semantics, new name. Using an old name for a new thing is a _very_ bad idea. -- Carson Gaspar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re: [syslog-sec] Re: timestamps and timezones (was: time-sync)

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"cstone" == cstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: cstone Keeping backwards compatibility with traditional syslog by accepting cstone its UDP messages is a useful goal--I don't really like the idea cstone of running two syslog daemons speaking two entirely different protocols This is

Re: timestamp in syslog messages belong to ?

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Darren" == Darren Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Re: transit timestamps Darren I have one problem with this: it requires changes/additions to the Darren original message. This poses some obvious problems when you start Darren adding MAC's of the original message, etc, to what's

Draft informational/BCP RFC on historical syslog -- comments welcome!

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is document is primarily concerned with security issues in network logging. Other related issues in UNIX system and network administration are not within its scope. 12. References [TBS] 13. Author's Address Alexander S Brown 3Com Modular Systems Division Three 3Com Drive Marlborough MA 01752 Phone: (508) 323-2283 EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Appendix syslog(3) syslog.conf(5)

Re: and.. what if we define the goals first?

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Iv?n Arce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "... an auditor client is an agent that retrieves logged data from the syslog server and presents it for visualization either by a human being or a program." This is an important point - in security defense, detection and response shou

Re: Performance?

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Andreas" == Andreas Siegert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andreas Quoting Roger Marquis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 09:49:00AM -0700: Bennett Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While the focus of this design effort is on security, my biggest concern is p

Re: FYI -- Re: XML Digital Signatures (xmldsig) for securing network event logging?

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks like Notes dropped the body of Reagle's reply. Grrr. -- Alex

Re: updated version of XML doc

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kriss Andsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied to my reply: " applications. If you invent your own encoding, you will have to do your own parsers; because coding errors in such things are the most vulnerable feature of existing protocol implementations (esp. syslogd) reusing docum

Re: FYI -- Re: XML Digital Signatures (xmldsig) for securing network event logging?

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
G! - A. From: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/27/99 04:08 PM GMT Sent by:"Joseph M. Reagle Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 11:16 99/10/27 -0400, Alex Brown wrote: (1) Comments? Do you know of related work? Alex, I don't know

Re: timestamps and timezones (was: time-sync)

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Roger" == Roger Marquis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Roger Again, from the perspective of an administrator, 5 bytes of timezone Roger info cab be a great help in a number of ways. For reports it is much Roger easier than determining the source timezone by looking at the source Roge

FYI: 46th IETF-FINAL AGENDA

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
an electronic written copy of the transparency, or of other material, for the BOF minutes. I will also be serving as BOF secretary -- if there is a volunteer planning to attend who can assist, that would be greatly appreciated. Alex Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 508 323 2283 NB: I will be away from my

Re: draft-syslog-bcp

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As usual, Notes mail has got line terminations wrong. Here's an attachment version of the text file. (See attached file: draft-syslog-bcp.txt) Sent by:Alex Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: (Alex Brown/US/3Com) Subject:draft-syslog-bcp Network

Re: updated version of XML doc

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cure email message formats? No guarantee any of them would fit in a UDP packet. This is all a ripe topic for discussion around the BOF. Alex Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 508 323 2283 NB: I will be away from my desk much of this week; I can be reached most easily at: Alex Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fwd: FYI: 46th IETF-FINAL AGENDA

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll arrive in DC on Monday afternoon but have to leave on Thursday afternoon. Would you like to get together before the BoF? I'm staying at the Marriott. I'm arriving Monday evening and am booked at the IETF's hotel on New Hampshire Ave - can't remember the name right now. I will

Typo ( sorry): Re - Informal meeting at 3TF of interested people on key initialization

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Bind (JB) is actually Jim Binder.

Informal meeting at 3TF of interested people on key initialization

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
N promised more information in the draft 3FC; no commitments on date due to travel and conflicting activities. (AB also reported briefly on progress on the IETF BOF on syslog security.) Alex Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 508 323 2283

FYI on draft texts

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a great deal for that bandwidth, I think I should make it available on demand. Alex Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 508 323 2283 Sent by: Alex Brown - Consulting Engineer, MSD To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Revisions, text format files for http://njlug.rutgers.edu/projects/syslog Hi

Re: Fwd: FYI: 46th IETF-FINAL AGENDA

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks very much - I appreciate the help, and it will look great to have us working together. Alex Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 508 323 2283 NB: I will be away from my desk much of this week; I can be reached most easily at: Alex Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 617 504 8761 "Ch

46th IETF-Breakout Rooms

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FYI -- Forwarded by Alex Brown/US/3Com on 11/05/99 12:46 PM --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/04/99 05:09:49 PM Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(Alex Brown/US/3Com) Subject: 46th IETF-Breakout Rooms

FTP location of output of IETF46 syslog BOF

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
will remain as a mirror of the new location. Alex Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 508 323 2283 Access [EMAIL PROTECTED] via: (1) Send "subscribe syslog-sec" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (syslog-sec-digest also available) (2) Anonymous FTP to ftp.3com-ne.com, directory /pub/syslog-

LAST CALL for BOF agenda timeslots

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. Results of the BOF will be posted here as available. Thanks again for your interest and participation -- Alex Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 508 323 2283 SYSLOG - Security Issues in Network Event Logging BOF Security Issues in Network Event Logging BOF (syslog) Wednesday, November 10 at 1530-1730

Re: Guarunteed Delivery and Initial Message Submission

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Mark" == Mark D Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mark Another possible difference between syslogd-syslogd transfers and Mark process-syslogd transfers is the fsync() interval. Since the Mark receiving syslogd cannot send an ACK until it's fsync()'ed its queue Mark file(s), we wil

FYI -- Re: XML Digital Signatures (xmldsig) for securing network event logging?

2000-04-10 Thread by way of Chris M. Lonvick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d by Chris Calabrese, although using the xmldsig work "one may be able to provide confidentiality with minimal to no changes." Alex Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 508 323 2283 Sent by: Alex Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "J. Reagle" reagle @w3.org, Donald Eastlake 3rd dee3 @t