[systemd-devel] PATCH: handle SYSTEMCTL_OPTIONS in systemctl

2013-01-16 Thread Frederic Crozat
Hi, on openSUSE, we found the need to sometime force --ignore-dependencies when systemctl is called (usually from other services / initscripts / tools started by initscripts and which can cause deadlock). To handle this in a transparent manner, I'd like to introduce SYSTEMCTL_OPTIONS environment

Re: [systemd-devel] PATCH: handle SYSTEMCTL_OPTIONS in systemctl

2013-01-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 16.01.13 17:34, Frederic Crozat (fcro...@suse.com) wrote: Hi, on openSUSE, we found the need to sometime force --ignore-dependencies when systemctl is called (usually from other services / initscripts / tools started by initscripts and which can cause deadlock). I am pretty sure

Re: [systemd-devel] PATCH: handle SYSTEMCTL_OPTIONS in systemctl

2013-01-16 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Frederic Crozat at 16/01/13 16:34 did gyre and gimble: Hi, on openSUSE, we found the need to sometime force --ignore-dependencies when systemctl is called (usually from other services / initscripts / tools started by initscripts and which can cause deadlock). To handle

Re: [systemd-devel] PATCH: handle SYSTEMCTL_OPTIONS in systemctl

2013-01-16 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le mercredi 16 janvier 2013 à 16:58 +, Colin Guthrie a écrit : 'Twas brillig, and Frederic Crozat at 16/01/13 16:34 did gyre and gimble: Hi, on openSUSE, we found the need to sometime force --ignore-dependencies when systemctl is called (usually from other services / initscripts /

Re: [systemd-devel] PATCH: handle SYSTEMCTL_OPTIONS in systemctl

2013-01-16 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Frederic Crozat at 16/01/13 17:07 did gyre and gimble: I was planning to handle this environment variable in our tools but tools team would prefer to have it in systemctl. I guess I'll have to maintain this patch downstream in openSUSE :( It would seem to me that the tools

Re: [systemd-devel] PATCH: handle SYSTEMCTL_OPTIONS in systemctl

2013-01-16 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le mercredi 16 janvier 2013 à 17:15 +, Colin Guthrie a écrit : 'Twas brillig, and Frederic Crozat at 16/01/13 17:07 did gyre and gimble: I was planning to handle this environment variable in our tools but tools team would prefer to have it in systemctl. I guess I'll have to maintain

Re: [systemd-devel] PATCH: handle SYSTEMCTL_OPTIONS in systemctl

2013-01-16 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Frederic Crozat at 16/01/13 17:07 did gyre and gimble: I was planning to handle this environment variable in our tools but tools team would prefer to have it in systemctl. I guess I'll have to

Re: [systemd-devel] PATCH: handle SYSTEMCTL_OPTIONS in systemctl

2013-01-16 Thread Colin Walters
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 17:34 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote: Hi, on openSUSE, we found the need to sometime force --ignore-dependencies when systemctl is called (usually from other services / initscripts / tools started by initscripts and which can cause deadlock). Hm, what about having

Re: [systemd-devel] PATCH: handle SYSTEMCTL_OPTIONS in systemctl

2013-01-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 16.01.13 13:04, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote: On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 17:34 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote: Hi, on openSUSE, we found the need to sometime force --ignore-dependencies when systemctl is called (usually from other services / initscripts / tools started