On 09/13/2011 09:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.09.2011 23:25, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 23:15 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.09.2011 21:41, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
thanks for this information , could I update systemd to systemd-35 in
Fedora 15 with rebuilding the
Am 14.09.2011 10:11, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
please open a bugreport - maybe they would hear if i am not would be the
only person who is unhappy about what was done with F15 but all others
out there are silent and hoping for wonders
This is rather interesting the person that has
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 10:50 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.09.2011 10:11, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
please open a bugreport - maybe they would hear if i am not would be the
only person who is unhappy about what was done with F15 but all others
out there are silent and hoping for
Hi,
The spice guest agent for Linux consists of a system level
process (a daemon) and a per session process (started for
each active xsession).
Currently the linux spice-vdagent is using ConsoleKit to
figure out (for the first seat, it assumes a vm is single seat):
1) Which session is active
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 04:26:20PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Currently the linux spice-vdagent is using ConsoleKit to
figure out (for the first seat, it assumes a vm is single seat):
1) Which session is active (including notification of when this changes)
2) Which session each session
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:44:40PM +0200, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
The later, systemd uses mount() directly, not via /bin/mount. See
src/mount-setup.c.
Nah, this is not entirely true.
We mount the virtual API file systems such as as /proc or /sys with
mount()
Am 2011-09-14 21:28, schrieb Mirco Tischler:
Hm. Didn't you get my reply or was it not extensive enough?
Didn't get it. Might be related to the problem with policyd-weight in
the last days (false positives due to a dead RBL).
Please resend, thanks in advance.
Stefan
Am 2011-09-14 21:43, schrieb Jan Willies:
2011/9/14 Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at mailto:li...@xunil.at
Am 2011-09-14 21 tel:2011-09-14%2021:28, schrieb Mirco Tischler:
Hm. Didn't you get my reply or was it not extensive enough?
Didn't get it. Might be related to the
What I have now:
# cat amanda.socket
[Socket]
ListenStream=10080
Accept=true
[Install]
WantedBy=sockets.target
# cat amanda\@.service
[Unit]
Description=amandad
[Service]
ExecStart=-/usr/libexec/amanda/amandad -auth=bsdtcp amdump
User=amanda
Group=amanda
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
Here it is
2011/9/10 Mirco Tischler mt...@gmx.de:
2011/9/8 Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at:
Greets, systemd-devs and -users,
maybe I ask a FAQ, pls be kind ...
I am rather new to systemd and figuring out how to use it w/ gentoo
linux. It is available within the
2011/9/14 Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at:
What I have now:
# cat amanda.socket
[Socket]
ListenStream=10080
Accept=true
[Install]
WantedBy=sockets.target
# cat amanda\@.service
[Unit]
Description=amandad
[Service]
ExecStart=-/usr/libexec/amanda/amandad -auth=bsdtcp amdump
Am 14.09.2011 22:58, schrieb Mirco Tischler:
Pretty much identical to what I wrote. You can find information about
User and Group in systemd.exec.
Ah, yes, did now.
Minor detail: you don't want the Install section in the service file.
systemd wouldn't know what to fill in behind the @.
2011/9/14 Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at:
Am 14.09.2011 22:58, schrieb Mirco Tischler:
Pretty much identical to what I wrote. You can find information about
User and Group in systemd.exec.
Ah, yes, did now.
Minor detail: you don't want the Install section in the service file.
systemd
Am 14.09.2011 23:36, schrieb Mirco Tischler:
Maybe the Type of the service is wrong?
Easy to check: if you execute the command in a shell does amandad
background itself? If yes type should be forking, else Type=simple
(the default) is fine.
Don't know.
# su amanda
$
additional info:
# systemctl status amanda.socket
amanda.socket
Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/amanda.socket)
Active: failed since Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:04:17 +0200; 19min ago
Accepted: 22; Connected: 0
CGroup: name=systemd:/system/amanda.socket
What
2011/9/15 Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at:
additional info:
# systemctl status amanda.socket
amanda.socket
Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/amanda.socket)
Active: failed since Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:04:17 +0200; 19min ago
Accepted: 22; Connected: 0
Am 15.09.2011 00:35, schrieb Mirco Tischler:
Do you actually see any amanda service instances started in the
systemctl output?
nope.
maybe the naming is wrong?
I have
/etc/systemd/system/amanda.socket
and
/etc/systemd/system/amanda@.service
S
17 matches
Mail list logo
