Thanks Susant!
But it seems the function in which the patch you pointed to is applied is
missing in systemd-219 source.
So i may need to back port more patches in order to get around this issue.
Thanks,
Renjith
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Susant Sahani wrote:
>
>
On Mon, May 16 2016, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> That's actually the interface index formatted as integer
> string. However, since D-Bus does not allow object path components to
> start with a number it it is escaped with an underscored followed by
> the ASCII code of the character... Hence "3"
On Mon, 16.05.16 23:42, Yuri D'Elia (wav...@thregr.org) wrote:
> On Mon, May 16 2016, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> For example, the PropertyChanged signal might have a path of
> >> "/org/freedesktop/network1/link/_33", however I have no clue what link
> >> _33 actually refers to.
> >>
> >> In
On Mon, May 16 2016, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> For example, the PropertyChanged signal might have a path of
>> "/org/freedesktop/network1/link/_33", however I have no clue what link
>> _33 actually refers to.
>>
>> In the node /org/freedesktop/network1/link/_33 there's nothing going
>> back to
On Mon, 16.05.16 21:30, Yuri D'Elia (wav...@thregr.org) wrote:
> I'd like to monitor interface state changes as emitted by networkd.
>
> By monitoring the emitted signals though, it looks like the current
> interface is either next to useless or I don't understand it at all.
>
> For example,
I'd like to monitor interface state changes as emitted by networkd.
By monitoring the emitted signals though, it looks like the current
interface is either next to useless or I don't understand it at all.
For example, the PropertyChanged signal might have a path of
Lennart Poettering 2016-05-11 19:31:
On Wed, 11.05.16 11:32, Brian Kroth (bpkr...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi again all,
TL;DR: would it be possible (or make sense) to have systemd Match rules for
network units that could match on some artifact of the network the link is
On May 11, 2016 12:07, "Lennart Poettering" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11.05.16 11:27, Brian Kroth (bpkr...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi all, I'm in the midst of steeping myself in systemd docs as I
prepare to
> > face lift a slew of services for Debian Jessie updates.
> >
> > As I
Terry Burton 2016-05-16 17:43:
On 13 May 2016 at 00:04, Terry Burton wrote:
I have a process (ISC DHCP) that has no reload or soft restart
mechanism. The only way to "reload" it is a stop and start.
I understand systemd's design choice of
On 13 May 2016 at 00:04, Terry Burton wrote:
> I have a process (ISC DHCP) that has no reload or soft restart
> mechanism. The only way to "reload" it is a stop and start.
>
> I understand systemd's design choice of maintaining a clear
> distinction between reload and
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Michael Biebl [2016-05-16 4:24 +0200]:
>> Any ideas, why simple tools like loginctl, busctl, hostnamectl require 300K+
>> ?
>> Could we move more common functionality into a shared, private library
>> to counter the
Hello,
Am Samstag, 14. Mai 2016, 16:55:11 CEST schrieb liuxueping:
> I have a test in arm64,my test case try to start/stop a ntp service
> frequently,like that:
>
> #!/bin/bash
> i=0
> while [ 1 ];do
> echo "$((i++))"
> systemctl restart ntpd &
> kill -9 $!
You are
Am 16.05.2016 um 14:18 schrieb Michael Biebl:
2016-05-16 6:15 GMT+02:00 Auke Kok :
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 04:24:25AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
1,5M usr/bin/systemd-analyze
What's up with systemd-analyze?
It shouldn't be part of a base package, it's not even a
2016-05-16 6:15 GMT+02:00 Auke Kok :
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 04:24:25AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> 1,5M usr/bin/systemd-analyze
>>
>> What's up with systemd-analyze?
>
> It shouldn't be part of a base package, it's not even a diagnostic tool, more
> like a
16.05.2016 13:28, Reindl Harald пишет:
>
>
> Am 16.05.2016 um 08:58 schrieb Andrei Borzenkov:
>> 16.05.2016 09:01, liuxueping пишет:
>>> Do you mean to say that systemctl will return a value when the process
>>> is still at terminate gracefully?
>>>
>>
>> By default systemctl should wait for
Am 16.05.2016 um 08:58 schrieb Andrei Borzenkov:
16.05.2016 09:01, liuxueping пишет:
Do you mean to say that systemctl will return a value when the process
is still at terminate gracefully?
By default systemctl should wait for stop job to complete. What may
happen - if it takes more time
Michael Biebl [2016-05-16 4:24 +0200]:
> Any ideas, why simple tools like loginctl, busctl, hostnamectl require 300K+ ?
> Could we move more common functionality into a shared, private library
> to counter the constant growth?
Building src/shared/ into a private libsystemd-internal.so (which
commit:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/4de2402b603ea2f518f451d06f09e15aeae54fab
Susant
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Renjith Vijayan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting the exact journal service crash as mentioned in the link
> below.
>
>
If it is as you say,it takes more time than JobTimeout,job is canceled
while systemd is still trying to terminate unit,then the return value
should not be 0.
在 2016/5/16 14:58, Andrei Borzenkov 写道:
16.05.2016 09:01, liuxueping пишет:
Do you mean to say that systemctl will return a value
Mantas Mikulėnas writes:
> ~/.zprofile seems just fine for this task – it
> *is* the zsh "run things on login" script after
> all. (And since these are your personal processes,
> especially the X stuff, it's much better to have
> them running *inside* the login session along
16.05.2016 09:01, liuxueping пишет:
> Do you mean to say that systemctl will return a value when the process
> is still at terminate gracefully?
>
By default systemctl should wait for stop job to complete. What may
happen - if it takes more time than JobTimeout, job is canceled while
systemd is
Hi,
I am getting the exact journal service crash as mentioned in the link
below.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=805042
(journal is killed every minute by watchdog)
We are using systemd-219.
This bug seems to be fixed in latest versions of systemd.
We will not be able to
Do you mean to say that systemctl will return a value when the process
is still at terminate gracefully?
在 2016/5/14 18:32, Reindl Harald 写道:
Am 14.05.2016 um 10:55 schrieb liuxueping:
The result of "ps aux" before sleep 5 shows:
root 6698 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?Ds 08:45
23 matches
Mail list logo