04.02.2021 17:53, Simon McVittie пишет:
> On Thu, 04 Feb 2021 at 13:07:33 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> "Requires=a.service" combined with "Before=a.service" is contradictory -
>> don't you get that?
>
> It means what it says: whenever my service is enabled, a.service must
> also be enabled, but
On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 22:16 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 03.02.2021 22:25, Benjamin Berg пишет:
> > Requires= actually has the difference that the unit must become
> > part of
> > the transaction (if it is not active already). So you get a hard
> > failure and appropriate logging if the unit
03.02.2021 22:25, Benjamin Berg пишет:
> On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 20:47 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> 03.02.2021 00:25, Benjamin Berg пишет:
>>> On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 22:50 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
02.02.2021 17:59, Lennart Poettering пишет:
>
> Note that Requires= in almost
On Thu, 04 Feb 2021 at 13:07:33 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> "Requires=a.service" combined with "Before=a.service" is contradictory -
> don't you get that?
It means what it says: whenever my service is enabled, a.service must
also be enabled, but my service has to start first (and stop last).
On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 13:07 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 04.02.21 um 12:46 schrieb Benjamin Berg:
> > On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 16:43 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > > seriously - explain what you expect to happen in case of
> > >
> > > Requires=a.service
> > > Before=a.service
> > >
> > >
Am 04.02.21 um 12:46 schrieb Benjamin Berg:
On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 16:43 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
seriously - explain what you expect to happen in case of
Requires=a.service
Before=a.service
except some warning that it's nonsense
So, one way I used it is as ExecStartPost= equivalent
On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 16:43 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> seriously - explain what you expect to happen in case of
>
> Requires=a.service
> Before=a.service
>
> except some warning that it's nonsense
So, one way I used it is as ExecStartPost= equivalent for a .target
unit. i.e. pull in a
On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 20:47 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 03.02.2021 00:25, Benjamin Berg пишет:
> > On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 22:50 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > > 02.02.2021 17:59, Lennart Poettering пишет:
> > > >
> > > > Note that Requires= in almost all cases should be combined with
> >
03.02.2021 21:13, Andrei Borzenkov пишет:
> 02.02.2021 12:43, Ulrich Windl пишет:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Having:
>> ---
>> # /usr/lib/systemd/system/virtlockd.service
>> [Unit]
>> Description=Virtual machine lock manager
>> Requires=virtlockd.socket
>> Requires=virtlockd-admin.socket
>
> That's always
02.02.2021 12:43, Ulrich Windl пишет:
> Hi!
>
> Having:
> ---
> # /usr/lib/systemd/system/virtlockd.service
> [Unit]
> Description=Virtual machine lock manager
> Requires=virtlockd.socket
> Requires=virtlockd-admin.socket
That's always wrong with After for the same units unless you can prove
03.02.2021 00:25, Benjamin Berg пишет:
> On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 22:50 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> 02.02.2021 17:59, Lennart Poettering пишет:
>>>
>>> Note that Requires= in almost all cases should be combined with an
>>> order dep of After= onto the same unit.
>>
>> Years ago I asked for
Am 03.02.21 um 10:43 schrieb Benjamin Berg:
On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 08:00 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.02.21 um 22:25 schrieb Benjamin Berg:
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 22:50 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
02.02.2021 17:59, Lennart Poettering пишет:
Note that Requires= in almost all cases
On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 08:00 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.02.21 um 22:25 schrieb Benjamin Berg:
> > On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 22:50 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > > 02.02.2021 17:59, Lennart Poettering пишет:
> > > >
> > > > Note that Requires= in almost all cases should be combined
Am 02.02.21 um 22:25 schrieb Benjamin Berg:
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 22:50 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
02.02.2021 17:59, Lennart Poettering пишет:
Note that Requires= in almost all cases should be combined with an
order dep of After= onto the same unit.
Years ago I asked for example when
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 22:50 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 02.02.2021 17:59, Lennart Poettering пишет:
> >
> > Note that Requires= in almost all cases should be combined with an
> > order dep of After= onto the same unit.
>
> Years ago I asked for example when Requires makes sense without
>
On Di, 02.02.21 22:50, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 02.02.2021 17:59, Lennart Poettering пишет:
> >
> > Note that Requires= in almost all cases should be combined with an
> > order dep of After= onto the same unit.
>
> Years ago I asked for example when Requires makes sense
02.02.2021 17:59, Lennart Poettering пишет:
>
> Note that Requires= in almost all cases should be combined with an
> order dep of After= onto the same unit.
Years ago I asked for example when Requires makes sense without After.
Care to show it? I assume you must have use case if you say "in
On Di, 02.02.21 10:43, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Having:
> ---
> # /usr/lib/systemd/system/virtlockd.service
> [Unit]
> Description=Virtual machine lock manager
> Requires=virtlockd.socket
> Requires=virtlockd-admin.socket
> Before=libvirtd.service
> ...
>
Hi!
Having:
---
# /usr/lib/systemd/system/virtlockd.service
[Unit]
Description=Virtual machine lock manager
Requires=virtlockd.socket
Requires=virtlockd-admin.socket
Before=libvirtd.service
...
---
How would I start both sockets successfully unter program control?
If I start one socket, I cannot
19 matches
Mail list logo
