[systemd-devel] how to correctly specify dependency on dbus

Hi For my service, I have: # cat my.service [Unit] Description=My Service After=dbus.service Requires=dbus.service ... ... Some time i see that my service fails to get dbus connection (dbus_bus_get_private() fails without any error msg). one possibility i think is that dbus is not fully

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:21:19PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote: >On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:54:45AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >>No, it does not. sd-bus was inconsistent. See, there are 3 things >>involved in the Object-Manager: >> >>Signal: InterfacesAdded >>Signal: InterfacesRemoved >>Call:

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:47:24AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: >On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 07:45 +, David Härdeman wrote: >> April 24, 2017 5:49 PM, "Dan Williams" wrote: >>> >>> It's not clear that the GNOME side was implemented correctly yet. >>> Would be nice to see the sample

Re: [systemd-devel] monitoring systemd unit flapping

Am 25.04.2017 um 17:30 schrieb Jeremy Eder: If we have a service that is flapping because it's crashing after startup...what's the right way to monitor for that condition? Eventually it triggers startburstlimit, was thinking that if we hit startburstlimit that the service could set some

[systemd-devel] fully volatile running from ram

hello, in a fully-volatile boot scenario /usr from a physical disk gets mounted on top of an instance of a tmpfs. my first question is why is that necessary? (the tmpfs part i mean) my second question is, would it be possible to do the same but rather than mounting the /usr *populate* the said

[systemd-devel] Plan for DHCP Option 119?

Hi all, First of all this is my first email to this list so apologies if it's not worded perfectly. I am wondering if there's any plan to support Domain Search List option in networkd. Some cloud providers like GCE, advertise multiple search domains through option 119 and they just get ignored

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:54:45AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:40 AM, David Härdeman wrote: >> April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote: >>> This change makes sure all objects have the built-in interfaces >>> reported at

Re: [systemd-devel] monitoring systemd unit flapping

Sorry, I did not explain myself clearly. systemd is doing nothing wrong. What I'd like to do is find an optimal way to notify our monitoring system (zabbix) that a service is flapping. We can probably script something. Just looking to see if there's a more elegant way. Looking also at OnFailure

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd --session instance?

> > Increased complexity in *all* software — each and every thing you start > must > support multiple sessions. > Oh, why is that? I wasn't suggesting to replace the existing systemd --user instance, only to add a new one for each session. So software that does not support multiple sessions still

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

April 24, 2017 4:51 PM, "Lennart Poettering" wrote: > On Fri, 21.04.17 13:22, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> Anyway, gdbus bugs aside, it seems that the interfaces reported by >> sd-bus should match what gdbus does? (assuming, of course, that gdbus >>

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, David Härdeman wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:19:22PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM, David Härdeman wrote:

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

April 24, 2017 5:49 PM, "Dan Williams" wrote: > On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 16:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> On Fri, 21.04.17 13:22, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote: >> > Anyway, gdbus bugs aside, it seems that the interfaces > reported by > sd-bus

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd --session instance?

On Mon, 24.04.17 20:09, Benno Fünfstück (benno.fuenfstu...@gmail.com) wrote: > Thank you Lennart for taking the time to answer my question. It does make > sense that you wouldn't want to support multiple sessions in big desktop > environments like Gnome or KDE or any complex software. > >

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

Hi On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:40 AM, David Härdeman wrote: > April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, David Härdeman wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:19:22PM +0200, David Herrmann

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

On Tue, 25.04.17 09:54, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> This change makes sure all objects have the built-in interfaces > >> reported at all times. The GetManagedObjects() call didn't report them > >> so far. > > > > Quite the contrary? If you look at the output from

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

April 25, 2017 9:54 AM, "David Herrmann" wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:40 AM, David Härdeman wrote: > >> April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, David Härdeman

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

Hey On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 25.04.17 09:54, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> >> This change makes sure all objects have the built-in interfaces >> >> reported at all times. The GetManagedObjects() call didn't

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd --session instance?

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 at 09:55:16 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > If you now > introduce a third set of search paths /usr/lib/systemd/session, then > you'll open an entirely new can of worms, as no apps install their > unit files there, and you'd have to convince every single one of them > to do

Re: [systemd-devel] hibernation sometimes not working

I have probably discovered the cause, and it is, that the memory image would be too large to fit in the swap space, and I would have to increase the swap space. W dniu 25.04.2017 o 05:34, Andrei Borzenkov pisze: > 25.04.2017 04:45, Michał Zegan пишет: >> Hello. >> >> I have archlinux with systemd

Re: [systemd-devel] Activation socket overwritten while socket service running

On Tue, 25.04.17 10:17, Trent Lloyd (tr...@lloyd.id.au) wrote: > I had two general thoughts, > > (a) Can I make a unit change to "improve" the situation, for example adding > PartOf=avahi-daemon.service to avahi-daemon.socket. I have noticed that > CUPS and Docker (err, moby) seem to ship this

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 07:45 +, David Härdeman wrote: > April 24, 2017 5:49 PM, "Dan Williams" wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 16:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Fri, 21.04.17 13:22, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Anyway,

[systemd-devel] monitoring systemd unit flapping

If we have a service that is flapping because it's crashing after startup...what's the right way to monitor for that condition? Eventually it triggers startburstlimit, was thinking that if we hit startburstlimit that the service could set some special bit that we could look for. Like ...