Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering (apt) timer services to not run at the same time

28.04.2017 12:05, Julian Andres Klode пишет: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 08:46:45AM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Julian Andres Klode >> wrote: >> >>> Now, we seem to be missing one bit: If daily-upgrade is already >>> running, and daily is

[systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

Hello, I've recently updated systemd and now user session is failing to start: Apr 29 11:04:02 xxx systemd[550]: user@xxx.service: Failed at step PAM spawning /usr/lib/systemd/systemd: Operation not permitted Apr 29 11:04:02 xxx systemd[1]: Failed to start User Manager for UID xxx. Apr 29

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering (apt) timer services to not run at the same time

On Thu, 27.04.17 23:30, Julian Andres Klode (j...@debian.org) wrote: > Hi systemd folks, > > (service and timer files being discussed at the bottom) > > we are currently reworking the way automatic updates and upgrades work > on Ubuntu and Debian systems. We basically have two persistent timers

Re: [systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

On Sat, 29.04.17 11:13, Vlad (vo...@vovan.nl) wrote: > Hello, > > I've recently updated systemd and now user session is failing to start: > Apr 29 11:04:02 xxx systemd[550]: user@xxx.service: Failed at step PAM > spawning /usr/lib/systemd/systemd: Operation not permitted > Apr 29 11:04:02 xxx

Re: [systemd-devel] fully volatile running from ram

On Thu, 27.04.17 12:52, jr (darwinsker...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 04:08:21PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Tue, 25.04.17 13:13, jr (darwinsker...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > hello, > > > > > > in a fully-volatile boot scenario /usr from a physical disk gets mounted

Re: [systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

Lennart, As I can see pam_systemd is "optional" everywhere in pam.d configuration. Is that what you meant? grep pam_systemd * system-auth:session optionalpam_systemd.so debug systemd-user:session optional pam_systemd.so Regards, Vlad. On 29/04/17 12:21, Lennart Poettering wrote: >

Re: [systemd-devel] Should automount units for network filesystems be Before=local-fs.target?

On Thu, 27.04.17 15:53, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote: > Hello all, > > At present, when systemd-fstab-generator creates an automount unit for an > fstab entry, it applies the dependencies that would have been put into the > mount unit into the automount unit instead. > > For a

Re: [systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

On Sat, 29.04.17 13:25, Vlad (vo...@vovan.nl) wrote: > Lennart, > > I've just tried your suggestion as well, but it doesn't change behavior. > I'm just wondering how it would be possible to investigate the error. > The message "user@xxx.service: Failed at step PAM spawning >

Re: [systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

Lennart, I've just tried your suggestion as well, but it doesn't change behavior. I'm just wondering how it would be possible to investigate the error. The message "user@xxx.service: Failed at step PAM spawning /usr/lib/systemd/systemd: Operation not permitted" isn't very descriptive. I enabled

Re: [systemd-devel] Best way to configure longer start timeout for .device units?

On Fri, 28.04.17 09:36, Michal Sekletar (msekl...@redhat.com) wrote: > Hi, > > On big setups (read: a lot of multipathed disks), probing and > assembling storage may take significant amount of time. However, by > default systemd waits only 90s (DefaultTimeoutStartSec) for > "top-level" device

Re: [systemd-devel] Plan for DHCP Option 119?

On Tue, 25.04.17 11:28, Daniel Wang (wonder...@google.com) wrote: > Hi all, > > First of all this is my first email to this list so apologies if it's not > worded perfectly. > > I am wondering if there's any plan to support Domain Search List option in > networkd. Some cloud providers like GCE,

Re: [systemd-devel] monitoring systemd unit flapping

On Tue, 25.04.17 16:05, Jeremy Eder (je...@redhat.com) wrote: > Sorry, I did not explain myself clearly. systemd is doing nothing wrong. > What I'd like to do is find an optimal way to notify our monitoring system > (zabbix) that a service is flapping. We can probably script something. > Just

Re: [systemd-devel] monitoring systemd unit flapping

On Tue, 25.04.17 11:30, Jeremy Eder (je...@redhat.com) wrote: > If we have a service that is flapping because it's crashing after > startup...what's the right way to monitor for that condition? Eventually > it triggers startburstlimit, was thinking that if we hit startburstlimit > that the

Re: [systemd-devel] Running a set of group isolated from other services?

Great, thanks! Lennart Poettering schrieb am Sa., 29. Apr. 2017, 19:32: > On Wed, 26.04.17 11:08, Benno Fünfstück (benno.fuenfstu...@gmail.com) > wrote: > > > > I have the problem that I want to run a set of services that are > isolated > > > from the other services. In

Re: [systemd-devel] Should automount units for network filesystems be Before=local-fs.target?

On Sat, 29 Apr 2017, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 27.04.17 15:53, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote: Hello all, At present, when systemd-fstab-generator creates an automount unit for an fstab entry, it applies the dependencies that would have been put into the mount unit

Re: [systemd-devel] how to correctly specify dependency on dbus

On Wed, 26.04.17 10:09, prashantkumar dhotre (prashantkumardho...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi > For my service, I have: > > # cat my.service > [Unit] > Description=My Service > After=dbus.service > Requires=dbus.service > ... > ... > > Some time i see that my service fails to get dbus connection >

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering (apt) timer services to not run at the same time

On Apr 27, 2017 4:31 PM, "Julian Andres Klode" wrote: Hi systemd folks, (service and timer files being discussed at the bottom) we are currently reworking the way automatic updates and upgrades work on Ubuntu and Debian systems. We basically have two persistent timers with

Re: [systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

Thanks for the answer. I'd then rephrase my original question: I'd like to know what has been changed in the systemd (pam_systemd?) version 233, that now it fails to start user@xxx.service? If I downgrade to the version 232, then systemd gives the same error, but still starts user@xxx.service

Re: [systemd-devel] Upgrade 232 -> 233: user@XXX.service: Failed at step PAM spawning...

On Sat, 29.04.17 16:59, Vlad (vo...@vovan.nl) wrote: > Thanks for the answer. I'd then rephrase my original question: I'd like > to know what has been changed in the systemd (pam_systemd?) version 233, > that now it fails to start user@xxx.service? If I downgrade to the > version 232, then

Re: [systemd-devel] Running a set of group isolated from other services?

On Wed, 26.04.17 11:05, Benno Fünfstück (benno.fuenfstu...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > > I have the problem that I want to run a set of services that are isolated > from the other services. In particular, I'd like to: > > * share some environment variables between these services, that aren't >

Re: [systemd-devel] Should automount units for network filesystems be Before=local-fs.target?

On Sat, 29.04.17 22:04, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote: > > We can't really do that in the generic case, sorry. The distinction > > between local-fs.target and remote-fs.target mostly exists because the > > latter may rely on network management services which aren't available > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Running a set of group isolated from other services?

On Wed, 26.04.17 11:08, Benno Fünfstück (benno.fuenfstu...@gmail.com) wrote: > > I have the problem that I want to run a set of services that are isolated > > from the other services. In particular, I'd like to: > > > > * share some environment variables between these services, that aren't > >

[systemd-devel] sd_bus_add_match after sd_bus_get_fd

Hi! I'm struggling to understand if this can be done: suppose i start polling on sd_bus_get_fd() without any match; then, after some event happens, i add a match on same bus. Will i receive events on my fd just going on polling? Ie: will this work? fd = sd_bus_get_fd(); event_happened = 0;

[systemd-devel] iwd and systemd-networkd

Hello everybody, I have read in a phoronix article that iwd will be integraded into systemd-networkd.[1] Is this already the case with the newest systemd version? If not, are there any plans to integrate it into systemd-networkd? I am really interested in this topic, because currently I use

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering (apt) timer services to not run at the same time

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 11:40:44AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > That said, there are limits to this: this will only work correctly if > the start jobs for both units are either enqueued at the same time or > in the order they are supposed to be run in. If however, the job for > the unit that

Re: [systemd-devel] Should automount units for network filesystems be Before=local-fs.target?

On Sun, 30 Apr 2017, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Sat, 29.04.17 22:04, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote: We can't really do that in the generic case, sorry. The distinction between local-fs.target and remote-fs.target mostly exists because the latter may rely on network