Re: [systemd-devel] Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, not true

Kai Krakow [2016-12-02 8:47 +0100]: > Am Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:53:53 +0100 > schrieb Lennart Poettering : > > I now added a small extension to this line: "(to the level the > > firmware permits this)" ot clarify that we are bound by firmware > > limitations for this. > I

Re: [systemd-devel] Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, not true

Am Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:53:53 +0100 schrieb Lennart Poettering : > On Wed, 16.11.16 23:19, Pekka Sarnila (sarn...@adit.fi) wrote: > > > Well my first point was that the web page should not say > > > [...] > > I now added a small extension to this line: "(to the

Re: [systemd-devel] Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, not true

On 11/16/16 23:26, Dave Reisner wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Pekka Sarnila > wrote: On 11/16/16 18:11, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:33:42PM +0200, Pekka Sarnila wrote: On 'Predictable Network

Re: [systemd-devel] Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, not true

On Wed, 16.11.16 23:19, Pekka Sarnila (sarn...@adit.fi) wrote: > Well my first point was that the web page should not say > > >> Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, i.e. > >> no re-enumeration takes place I now added a small extension to this line: "(to the level

Re: [systemd-devel] Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, not true

On Wed, 16.11.16 15:33, Pekka Sarnila (sarn...@adit.fi) wrote: > On 'Predictable Network Interface Names' it states as a benefit of the new > policy: > > Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, i.e. > no re-enumeration takes place > > Unfortunately this is not true.

Re: [systemd-devel] Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, not true

On 11/16/16 18:11, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:33:42PM +0200, Pekka Sarnila wrote: On 'Predictable Network Interface Names' it states as a benefit of the new policy: Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, i.e. no re-enumeration takes place

Re: [systemd-devel] Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, not true

I was talking about systemd out of the box distribution defaults. I'm afraid there are plenty of people who most likely would not be able figure out what happened to their system (while being able to change their display card). pekka On 11/16/16 18:21, Michał Zegan wrote: But he coul use a

Re: [systemd-devel] Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, not true

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Pekka Sarnila wrote: > > > On 11/16/16 18:11, Greg KH wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:33:42PM +0200, Pekka Sarnila wrote: >> >>> On 'Predictable Network Interface Names' it states as a benefit of the >>> new >>> policy: >>> >>> Stable

Re: [systemd-devel] Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, not true

But he coul use a .link file to give a persistent interface name based on some property, wouldn't it be a nice thing to do? W dniu 16.11.2016 o 17:11, Greg KH pisze: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:33:42PM +0200, Pekka Sarnila wrote: >> On 'Predictable Network Interface Names' it states as a benefit

Re: [systemd-devel] Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, not true

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:33:42PM +0200, Pekka Sarnila wrote: > On 'Predictable Network Interface Names' it states as a benefit of the new > policy: > > Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, i.e. > no re-enumeration takes place > > Unfortunately this is not true. >