On Tue, 01.11.16 20:01, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 01.11.2016 18:47, Lennart Poettering пишет:
> > On Tue, 01.11.16 11:11, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/31/2016 03:40 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >>> Why is it using /var/run (where /var
On Tue, 01.11.16 12:42, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>
> On 11/01/2016 12:14 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 01.11.2016 um 17:05 schrieb Steve Dickson:
> >> and I still getting the following errors
> >>
> >> rpcbind.socket: Failed to listen on sockets: No such file or
On Wed, 02.11.16 06:16, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Am Tue, 1 Nov 2016 12:05:43 -0400
> schrieb Steve Dickson :
>
> > rpcbind.service: Failed at step EXEC spawning /usr/bin/rpcbind: No
> > such file or directory
>
> Do you still use DefaultDependencies=no?
>
>
On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 20:01 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 01.11.2016 18:47, Lennart Poettering пишет:
> > DefaultDependencies=no now, which means you run in early boot, and
> > then things become more complex, as /var is not around fully yet.
> >
>
> Unit file had RequiresMountsFor=/var/run.
On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 06:16 +0100, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Do you still use DefaultDependencies=no?
>
> Then /usr is probably not available that early (now that it can start
> much earlier due to /run being available). What's the exercise of
> disabling default dependencies anyway?
/usr is always
Am Tue, 1 Nov 2016 12:05:43 -0400
schrieb Steve Dickson :
> rpcbind.service: Failed at step EXEC spawning /usr/bin/rpcbind: No
> such file or directory
Do you still use DefaultDependencies=no?
Then /usr is probably not available that early (now that it can start
much earlier
01.11.2016 18:47, Lennart Poettering пишет:
> On Tue, 01.11.16 11:11, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/31/2016 03:40 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Why is it using /var/run (where /var could be on a separate partition)
>>> and not /run for the socket files?
>>
>> Historical
On 11/01/2016 12:14 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 01.11.2016 um 17:05 schrieb Steve Dickson:
>> and I still getting the following errors
>>
>> rpcbind.socket: Failed to listen on sockets: No such file or directory
I though this was talking about /run/rpcbind.sock since
that's the only
Am 01.11.2016 um 16:11 schrieb Steve Dickson:
On 10/31/2016 03:40 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Why is it using /var/run (where /var could be on a separate partition)
and not /run for the socket files?
Historical reasons?? I guess that's way its always been
and never caused a problem...
i
On 11/01/2016 11:47 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 01.11.16 11:11, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/31/2016 03:40 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Why is it using /var/run (where /var could be on a separate partition)
>>> and not /run for the socket files?
>>
>>
On Tue, 01.11.16 11:11, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>
> On 10/31/2016 03:40 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Why is it using /var/run (where /var could be on a separate partition)
> > and not /run for the socket files?
>
> Historical reasons?? I guess that's way its always been
> and
On 11/01/2016 09:31 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 31.10.16 13:19, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> [Unit]
>> Description=RPCbind Server Activation Socket
>> DefaultDependencies=no
>> RequiresMountsFor=/var/run /run
>> Wants=rpcbind.target
>> Before=rpcbind.target
>>
>>
On 10/31/2016 06:07 PM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:19:24 -0400
> schrieb Steve Dickson :
>
>> Upstream has come up with some new rpcbind service socket files
>> and I'm trying to incorporate them into f25.
>>
>> The rpcbind.socket is failing to come up
>>
On 10/31/2016 03:40 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Why is it using /var/run (where /var could be on a separate partition)
> and not /run for the socket files?
Historical reasons?? I guess that's way its always been
and never caused a problem...
steved.
>
> 2016-10-31 18:19 GMT+01:00 Steve
On Mon, 31.10.16 13:19, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote:
> [Unit]
> Description=RPCbind Server Activation Socket
> DefaultDependencies=no
> RequiresMountsFor=/var/run /run
> Wants=rpcbind.target
> Before=rpcbind.target
>
> [Socket]
> ListenStream=/var/run/rpcbind.sock
So you turned off
Am Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:19:24 -0400
schrieb Steve Dickson :
> Upstream has come up with some new rpcbind service socket files
> and I'm trying to incorporate them into f25.
>
> The rpcbind.socket is failing to come up
>rpcbind.socket: Failed to listen on sockets: No such
Why is it using /var/run (where /var could be on a separate partition)
and not /run for the socket files?
2016-10-31 18:19 GMT+01:00 Steve Dickson :
> Hello,
>
> Upstream has come up with some new rpcbind service socket files
> and I'm trying to incorporate them into f25.
>
>
17 matches
Mail list logo