Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On 01.03.2017 20:23, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 01.03.2017 19:44, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > [...] > replying on the list, a bit lengthy >> >> Ok, my guest has 4 disks >> >> - sda - virtio-scsi, over virtio-pci transport >> - sdb - virtio-scsi, over virtio-mmio transport >> - vda -

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On 01.03.2017 19:44, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: [...] replying on the list, a bit lengthy > > Ok, my guest has 4 disks > > - sda - virtio-scsi, over virtio-pci transport > - sdb - virtio-scsi, over virtio-mmio transport > - vda - virtio-scsi, over virtio-pci transport > - vdb - virtio-scsi,

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:28:46PM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 01.03.2017 16:58, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > given a basic Fedora 25 guest, with a virtio-mmio disk added as per the > > guide above... > > > > looking at device > >

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On 01.03.2017 16:58, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:02:53PM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: >> On 01.03.2017 04:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: One could argue about back-level

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 03:58:12PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:02:53PM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > > If wanted, I can take a stab at virtio-mmio, but would need the output > > of udevadm -a /dev/vda from a virtio-mmio system. > > Presumably you mean

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:02:53PM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 01.03.2017 04:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > >> One could argue about back-level compatibility, but virtio by-path > >> naming has

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On 01.03.2017 04:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: >> One could argue about back-level compatibility, but virtio by-path >> naming has changed multiple times. We have seen virtio-pci-virtio >> (not predictable),

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:51:17AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 01.03.2017 06:43, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek пишет: > > > > We could keep an informal list of people who care about specific areas. > > MAINTAINERS file as part of systemd sources? Heh, I really didn't want to mention this ;)

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 08:39:07PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 28.02.17 19:28, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote: > > The problem with splitting these rules out into a separate project > > is that there's no other existing place that they would live. The > > "virtio

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

01.03.2017 06:43, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek пишет: > > We could keep an informal list of people who care about specific areas. MAINTAINERS file as part of systemd sources? ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > One could argue about back-level compatibility, but virtio by-path > naming has changed multiple times. We have seen virtio-pci-virtio > (not predictable), pci- and virtio-pci- already. It > might be a good

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On Tue, 28.02.17 19:28, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote: > > Even better would be if the kernel would do the naming on its own, and > > maybe just provide us with a sysattr on the relevant devices that we > > can read to determine the path from, so that we don#t have to maintain >

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 04:14:32PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 20.02.17 15:34, Viktor Mihajlovski (mihaj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) > wrote: > > > But then, I find this naming scheme somewhat weird. > > A virtio disk shows up as a regular PCI function on the PCI > > bus side by side

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On 27.02.2017 12:22, Michal Sekletar wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Viktor Mihajlovski > wrote: >> On 20.02.2017 17:00, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:34:49 +0100 >>> Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: >>> Hi,

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 20.02.2017 17:00, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:34:49 +0100 >> Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> with systemd > v229 all virtio block devices

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On 20.02.2017 17:00, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:34:49 +0100 > Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> with systemd > v229 all virtio block devices will receive persistent >> device names in the format /dev/disk-by/virtio-pci-, the >> last

Re: [systemd-devel] udev virtio by-path naming

On Mon, 20.02.17 15:34, Viktor Mihajlovski (mihaj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: > But then, I find this naming scheme somewhat weird. > A virtio disk shows up as a regular PCI function on the PCI > bus side by side with other (non-virtio) devices. The naming otoh > suggests that virtio-pci is a