Why try to eliminate false starts??? Its all part of
the sport:- people trying to get as fast out of the
blocks as possible...there are bound to be mistakes.
Sean
--- "Wayne T. Armbrust" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (whoever that is) wrote:
I read, but very rarely
Justin Clouder wrote:
There are very very few
reactions in the 0.1 to 0.12 range, if any. There
has never been evidence of
any athlete, even you Mr Drummond, being able to
react faster than 0.1.
At some point in the past someone could have written
the following:
"There are very very few
In a message dated 3/21/2001 4:34:03 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why try to eliminate false starts??? Its all part of
the sport:- people trying to get as fast out of the
blocks as possible...there are bound to be mistakes
yeah...why is that s hard for others
Netters
Darrell wrote:
The good thing is that the sprinters know this,
and it enables them to tolerate the ignorance that comes from the peanut
gallery.
Oh now isn't that a nice statement! :) Let them eat cake!
"scratch a liberal and you know what you find under his skin? An
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (whoever that is) wrote:
I read, but very rarely do I feel the need to post. All you
armchair
athletes have the audacity to sit here and say that false starting is
unsportmanlike conduct?!? LOL Give me a break. I've also read that
it is
unfair to anticipate the
Wayne wrote:
What is your suggestion, Prince, on how to eliminate false starts?
You can't! Should every distance runner be expelled from the race if
they touch or push a runner? Come on, get serious, it's part of the game.
The 2 false start rule aids that purpose. Very rarely do you
Hi All
On this point:
My understanding is that this has been extensively researched, with a
generous allowance made below the fastest reaction tested.
You're correct, but this test was done on military men, not
athletes!
As I understand it there has never been a test done
Justin says:
As I understand it there has never been a test done among any group which
showed a reaction time to aural stimulus of less than a fifth of a second.
Top class athletes are thus allowed to react twice as fast as anyone else
has ever been shown to do. That, to me, is more than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wayne wrote:
What is your suggestion, Prince, on how to eliminate false starts?
You can't! Should every distance runner be expelled from the
race if
they touch or push a runner? Come on, get serious, it's part of the
game.
The 2 false start rule aids that
After
reading this I get the feeling that [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] might really be the same clown
... err, I mean person.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 1:58
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Perhaps they have microneural transplant splices surgically implanted at
the neural junctions. Nanotechnology - the future of track?
Don
It might be easier to just exercise mind control over the
starter, so that he fires the gun exactly WHEN YOU WANT HIM TO.
---Madame Clio, now available as
In a message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:31:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I think I am accurate in saying that the reaction time is unresearched
because the last time it's been researched, as you have stated, was up
through 1980's. It's 2001. The world record has
I read, but very rarely do I feel the need to post. All you armchair
athletes have the audacity to sit here and say that false starting is
unsportmanlike conduct?!? LOL Give me a break. I've also read that it is
unfair to anticipate the gun. Well, let's look at it from a sprinters point
of
13 matches
Mail list logo
