On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Jason Cunningham
jamicu...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think Brownfield would be useful for mapping current status of previously
developed land, not currently used, and where the future use is
2010/10/5 Jason Cunningham jamicu...@googlemail.com:
Planning Permission is often not acted upon,
and we should be mapping 'whats on the ground' or a status that affecting
the land (eg Nature Reserve). Planning Permission is doesn't impact the land
unless acted upon, in which case the land
2010/10/6 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2010/10/5 Jason Cunningham jamicu...@googlemail.com:
Planning Permission is often not acted upon,
and we should be mapping 'whats on the ground' or a status that affecting
the land (eg Nature Reserve). Planning Permission is doesn't impact
A greenfield site is one that is currently a field, so it should be
tagged as a field until it gets built on. Nothing should ever be
tagged greenfield.
A brownfield site is derelict land that was something once, but is now
nothing in particular until someone does something with it. A
brownfield
On 10/5/10 7:15 AM, Richard Mann wrote:
A greenfield site is one that is currently a field, so it should be
tagged as a field until it gets built on. Nothing should ever be
tagged greenfield.
A brownfield site is derelict land that was something once, but is now
nothing in particular until
On 5 October 2010 12:15, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
A greenfield site is one that is currently a field, so it should be
tagged as a field until it gets built on. Nothing should ever be
tagged greenfield.
A brownfield site is derelict land that was something
On 6 October 2010 07:57, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Also agreed. Although there are cases of green grass with big signs
all around selling off house and land packages. Clearly something will
be built. Does it matter that construction hasn't technically started
yet? (IMHO, given
2010/10/4 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
According to the wiki, landuse=greenfield Describes land scheduled
for new development where there have been no buildings before. Does
this mean that any undeveloped land owned by a developer or zoned as
planned development is a greenfield?
I
According to the wiki, landuse=greenfield Describes land scheduled
for new development where there have been no buildings before. Does
this mean that any undeveloped land owned by a developer or zoned as
planned development is a greenfield? If so, should a bug be filed on
trac to render it less
On 04/10/2010 23:09, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/10/4 Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:11 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
I believe brownfield has the connotation of something substantial
having been there, like a military base or factory, that needs to be
cleaned up
10 matches
Mail list logo
