On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote...
Well done Paul, for not rising to the bait.
Can we keep discussions productive please.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 14/06/2011 19:49, Peter Svensson wrote:
This tag might be useful for subjective tagging for bikes:
Please avoid subjective tagging, because, err... it's /subjective/. For
confusing examples refer to the page you linked to.
Dave F.
___
Tagging
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 12:48 +0100, Dave F. wrote:
On 14/06/2011 19:49, Peter Svensson wrote:
This tag might be useful for subjective tagging for bikes:
Please avoid subjective tagging, because, err... it's subjective. For
confusing examples refer to the page you linked to.
Out of
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:59 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Out of interest, as tracktype=gradeX is subjective also, should we avoid
using that too?
A scale is not necessarily subjective if it is well defined. The key
sac_scale is a good example. tracktype would probably
If you want an absolute safety value, then you need some numbers like the
number of accidents that happened between 2000 and now on that road. It
seems that Ethias (an insurance company) uses that data in an iPhone app (I
don't have an iPhone, so I can't try it). If you use google translate (or
On 15.06.2011 16:29, Pieren wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:59 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
mailto:da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Out of interest, as tracktype=gradeX is subjective also, should we
avoid
using that too?
A scale is not necessarily subjective if it is
a dangerousness scale for bikers has been many times discussed in my
country. The problem is that even outside OSM itself, there is no real
standard and many local initiatives (at municipalities level) do not
have a common agreement about such scale. But it is clear for me that
access=avoid is
On 06/13/2011 06:27 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/83524747/history
No comment.
Nice troll. Go back under your bridge.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Tagging mailing list
2011/6/14 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/83524747/history
No comment.
you are actually missusing the access-tag because it is intended for
legal restrictions and not for recommendations. Why not use another
tag? Their number is not limited...
It's Paul Johnson who introduced the tag, not Nathan.
Your comment is right, but you should point it to Paul Johnson instead.
regards,
Sander
you are actually missusing the access-tag because it is intended for
legal restrictions and not for recommendations. Why not use another
tag? Their
2011/6/14 Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com:
It's Paul Johnson who introduced the tag, not Nathan.
Your comment is right, but you should point it to Paul Johnson instead.
yes, I saw this, he kept it, so they're sitting in the same boat ;-)
Cheers,
Martin
On 6/14/2011 5:57 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/6/14 Sander Deryckeresander...@gmail.com:
It's Paul Johnson who introduced the tag, not Nathan.
Your comment is right, but you should point it to Paul Johnson instead.
yes, I saw this, he kept it, so they're sitting in the same boat ;-)
That'll be a very big boat
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:57 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/14 Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com:
It's Paul Johnson who introduced the tag, not Nathan.
Your comment is right, but you should point it to Paul Johnson instead.
yes,
, just like
wheelchair:description, you could use hgv:avoid=yes/no.
flaimo
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:47:26 +0200
From: M?rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] access=avoid
On 6/14/2011 6:19 AM, Flaimo wrote:
the wiki page doesn't say that the restriction need to be of a legal
kind. access=no could also mean that it is physically not accessible
even though it might be allowed legally.
Are there any common values that are neither legal nor physical?
on the other
On 14/06/2011 11:19, Flaimo wrote:
the wiki page doesn't say that the restriction need to be of a legal
kind.
The wiki page makes it abundantly clear that this is what access is
for. It uses words such as /legally-enshrined right of access and
//dedicated to a specific mode of travel by
2011/6/14 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
the wiki page doesn't say that the restriction need to be of a legal
kind.
How else can you interpret: Description For describing the legal
accessibility of an element. ?
access=no could also mean that it is physically not accessible
even though it might
∡rtin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com]
Skickat: den 14 juni 2011 11:47
Till: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Ämne: Re: [Tagging] access=avoid
2011/6/14 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/83524747/history
No comment.
you are actually
discussion, strategy and related tools
Ämne: Re: [Tagging] access=avoid
2011/6/14 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/83524747/history
No comment.
you are actually missusing the access-tag because it is intended for legal
restrictions
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/83524747/history
No comment.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
20 matches
Mail list logo
