2011/6/14 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/83524747/history
No comment.
you are actually missusing the access-tag because it is intended for
legal restrictions and not for recommendations. Why not use another
tag? Their number is not limited...
It's Paul Johnson who introduced the tag, not Nathan.
Your comment is right, but you should point it to Paul Johnson instead.
regards,
Sander
you are actually missusing the access-tag because it is intended for
legal restrictions and not for recommendations. Why not use another
tag? Their
2011/6/14 Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com:
It's Paul Johnson who introduced the tag, not Nathan.
Your comment is right, but you should point it to Paul Johnson instead.
yes, I saw this, he kept it, so they're sitting in the same boat ;-)
Cheers,
Martin
On 6/14/2011 5:57 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/6/14 Sander Deryckeresander...@gmail.com:
It's Paul Johnson who introduced the tag, not Nathan.
Your comment is right, but you should point it to Paul Johnson instead.
yes, I saw this, he kept it, so they're sitting in the same boat ;-)
That'll be a very big boat
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:57 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/14 Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com:
It's Paul Johnson who introduced the tag, not Nathan.
Your comment is right, but you should point it to Paul Johnson instead.
yes,
the wiki page doesn't say that the restriction need to be of a legal
kind. access=no could also mean that it is physically not accessible
even though it might be allowed legally. on the other hand, i don't
see avoid as a value, but rather as some sort of additional
information like description.
On 6/14/2011 6:19 AM, Flaimo wrote:
the wiki page doesn't say that the restriction need to be of a legal
kind. access=no could also mean that it is physically not accessible
even though it might be allowed legally.
Are there any common values that are neither legal nor physical?
on the other
On 14/06/2011 11:19, Flaimo wrote:
the wiki page doesn't say that the restriction need to be of a legal
kind.
The wiki page makes it abundantly clear that this is what access is
for. It uses words such as /legally-enshrined right of access and
//dedicated to a specific mode of travel by
2011/6/14 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
the wiki page doesn't say that the restriction need to be of a legal
kind.
How else can you interpret: Description For describing the legal
accessibility of an element. ?
access=no could also mean that it is physically not accessible
even though it might
This tag might be useful for subjective tagging for bikes:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Class:bicycle
The idea is good, but how do we tag the same kind of information for other
vehicles? Is there a class:motor_vehicle or class:vehicle?
Peter
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från:
The tag (class:xxx=?) isn't helpful for standard transportation, but for
recreative transportation.
mot
So class:vehicle would be of no use, but e.g. class:touring would be (e.g.
for oldtimer touring, moto turiong ...) or class:4wd. A 4wd car falls under
the same type in the access tags as the
11 matches
Mail list logo
