2009/4/24 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com:
2009/4/23 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
ho per caso trovato questa pagina di statistica che trovo interessante:
http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/europe_countries_toplist.html
Martin,
non puoi organizzare un mapping party di tedeschi in
Ciao a tutti,
Segnalo questa iniziativa, di cui mi sono fatto promotore:
Vallelongabike e Openstreetmap assieme... per i tratturi!
http://niubii.blogspot.com/2009/04/vallelongabike-e-openstreetmap-assieme.html
Per chi volesse contribuire, anche senza partecipare IRL, sto
organizzando la cosa
Pero' in questo caso sarebbe piu' da mettere shop=newsagent, infatti
oggi mi son chiesto perche' alcuni negozi sono su amenity ed altri su
shop, devo dire che c'e' un po' di confusione.
Mentre prima come la indicano loro come kiosk inteso come chiosco
esterno poteva stare su amenity ora
2009/4/24 Bighi bi...@ngi.it:
Pero' in questo caso sarebbe piu' da mettere shop=newsagent, infatti oggi mi
son chiesto perche' alcuni negozi sono su amenity ed altri su shop, devo
dire che c'e' un po' di confusione.
Mentre prima come la indicano loro come kiosk inteso come chiosco esterno
2009/4/22 Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com:
Ciao,
come posso fare il revert a una versione precedente dell'history?
Josm non ce l'ha ancora implementato e da Potlatch non funziona.
Ho aperto un fault per potlatch:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/1743
Ciao,
Andrea.
Bighi dixit:
Pero' in questo caso sarebbe piu' da mettere shop=newsagent, infatti
oggi mi son chiesto perche' alcuni negozi sono su amenity ed altri su
shop, devo dire che c'e' un po' di confusione.
C'è un po' di confusione in proposito, infatti mi sono confuso anch'io :-),
newsagent era
Giovanni Fasano wrote:
C'è un po' di confusione in proposito, infatti mi sono confuso anch'io :-),
newsagent era stato correttamente proposto (ed usato) come valore della
key shop e non di amenity.
[...]
Che facciamo ? Lo riproponiamo? O per il momento ci limitiamo ad usarlo ? :-)
Il 25/04/2009 01:23, Luigi Toscano ha scritto:
Giovanni Fasano wrote:
Che facciamo ? Lo riproponiamo? O per il momento ci limitiamo ad usarlo ? :-)
Entrambe, direi. Avevo chiesto qualche tempo fa, anche per il discorso
dei chioschi, ma senza molto successo.
Scrivete, scrivete:
Dear All,
I'd like to propose a mapping party in Stoke on Trent at the beginning of
July. I'm working with a resident group in Blurton to help them with their
use of OSM and I'd like to build it into an event with their input.
I was orginally hoping to do something this weekend, but after advice
A lo que obliga el nuevo sistema de commit es a espaciar los envíos,
dejando el riesgo (pérdida de datos, conflictos) de lado del mapper. No
se si hemos ganado por aquí. Hasta que no tengas cambios sólidos no
actualizas.
Iván Sánchez Ortega escribió:
El Jueves, 23 de Abril de 2009, Rodrigo Moya
Etienne Chové a écrit :
Christian Rogel a écrit :
Je pense qu'il faut savoir mettre un commentaire très bref et, pourquoi
pas, un tiret si la correction est minime (retirer un ou 2 noeuds).
... et 2 tirets si on modifie entre 3 et 7 nœuds, puis trois tirets au delà.
Une page
Par curiosité tu choppes ces infos où ? Tu m'a l'air au courant de
pleins de trucs que je ne vois nul part et pourtant je lis talk (en)...
Yann
Le 24 avr. 09 à 14:57, Pieren a écrit :
2009/4/24 Etienne Chové ch...@crans.org:
Bonjour,
Est ce que quelqu'un sait ou je peut trouver un extrait
2009/4/24 Yann Coupin y...@coupin.net:
Par curiosité tu choppes ces infos où ?
Sur la liste OSM-dev qui couvre les aspects techniques:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2009-April/015050.html
Pieren
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Bonjour,
Je publie une nouvelle version de l'outil. Petites corrections et prise en
compte de patchs que l'on m'a fait parvenir.
http://f.rodrigo.free.fr/tmp/r-cadastre-client-20090424-2.tar.bz2
ChangeLog du 2009-04-24
- Plus de limitation sur la taille de la commune
- Passage de la
prise en
compte de patchs que l'on m'a fait parvenir.
http://f.rodrigo.free.fr/tmp/r-cadastre-client-20090424-2.tar.bz2
ChangeLog du 2009-04-24
- Plus de limitation sur la taille de la commune
- Passage de la simplification des GPX de 0.001k a 0.0006k
- Prise en compte du patch de Nicolas
2009/4/24 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
(php ou perl)
oops : python, et non perl
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Etienne Chové a écrit :
Etienne Chové a écrit :
Bonjour,
Est ce que quelqu'un sait ou je peut trouver un extrait de la france pas
trop vieux (après migration) ?
Géofabrik est de retour... test du fichier en cours.
Et hop, mon script plante... certaint ways ont des noeuds non présents
Hi Folks,
been on the cards for a while, but we've decided on a location,
Pateley Bridge, in North Yorkshire, a nice little place, with the UK's
oldest sweet shop, apparently!
All welcome, the more the merrier.
The surrounding area needs mapping too, and there should be excellent
walks nearby.
please correct me, I want to be wrong, I heard yesterday that by
projecting any data into OSGB, the OS has copyright / dominion over
it, since they own that coordinate system.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Grand! There are certainly some excellent walks in the area, alas all
done in my dark pre-GPS past. If any one is interested in industrial
archeaology, the area to the north of the road between Pately Bridge
and Greenhow Hill is full of old lead mines, and, at least when I last
went there, has
I'm fairly sure that the OSGB36 (36 being a year) transformations are
fairly publicly known.
The more detailed OSTN02 transformations are copyrighted (and very
hard to get a hold of).
There's a bit of info on what OSTN02 actually is here -
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Kev js1982 o...@kevswindells.eu wrote:
depending on what the data is stored in - alas I have an issue where it
isn't rendering tiles properly, looks to be memory related - those with
really complex coastlines (North West Wales) are rendering in sea colour,
and
and then what is this info good for? just because someone claims it's
correct? is it correct then? more correct than data with the tag set
to no? can you give a single example where this info is helping?
the tiger data is terrible wrong in some places. it's more important
to fix the data
and then what is this info good for? just because someone claims it's
correct? is it correct then? more correct than data with the tag set
to no? can you give a single example where this info is helping?
the tiger data is terrible wrong in some places. it's more important
to fix
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 23:01 -0700, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
On 23 Apr 2009, at 14:25 , Russ Nelson wrote:
On Apr 22, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
what is the benefit in doing this?
There is no other method for somebody to say I looked at this and
everything about it
On Apr 24, 2009, at 2:01 AM, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
the tiger data is terrible wrong in some places.
And how do you know this?
--
Russ Nelson - http://community.cloudmade.com/blog -
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:RussNelson
r...@cloudmade.com - Twitter: Russ_OSM -
Perhaps there should just be a view option highlight unreviewed
objects, and those that like this can turn it on and those that don't
can not.
if it's an option I wouldn't wast a second to write about the pro/con.
why does anyone try to force users to do it?
I have patched josm already
On 24 Apr 2009, at 7:14 , Russ Nelson wrote:
On Apr 24, 2009, at 2:01 AM, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
the tiger data is terrible wrong in some places.
And how do you know this?
1.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=37.379805lon=-122.166681zoom=18layers=B000FTF
compare wit Yahoo,
2.
apollinaris wrote:
Perhaps there should just be a view option highlight unreviewed
objects, and those that like this can turn it on and those that don't
can not.
if it's an option I wouldn't wast a second to write about the pro/con.
why does anyone try to force users to do
my java knowledge is 0. can't patch it to make it an option.
all I can is to remove the whole style and rebuild.
anyone is free to remove this tag and I have done it in the past too
but since then I realized it's just useless. why waste time if
there is so much to work on?
and I consider it
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 09:40 -0700, Alan Millar wrote:
If you don't like the tag, you don't have to use it. But I have been
waiting for this highlighting feature for a long time, but never got
around to figuring out enough in JOSM, so I am happy to see it. To
each his own; there is room for
I'd also be very happy if JOSM flipped the tag for me when I edit a
tiger object. It seems reasonable enough that if I'm editing something
that we can consider it reviewed. I certainly don't want to have to go
flip it manually every time I go fixing some minor road details.
Good idea. (I
On 24 Apr 2009, at 9:40 , Alan Millar wrote:
can you give a single example where this info is helping?
It may not help you anywhere. It helps me everywhere, in my personal
mapping process.
good for you, osm is free and this a good thing that we can do things
the way we like it.
is that
Since we are speaking of TIGER, the quality of the data seems to vary
according to county - some are consistently good, others consistently
poor. Has anyone looked at the TIGER 2008 data to see if it is better?
We have some counties in Georgia that have poor TIGER data in OSM, and
very few
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Sarah Manley sa...@cloudmade.com wrote:
Hello All,
I am curious if anyone has signed up or has submitted a presentation
to SOTM? I have been thinking about topics to submit, and thought
maybe the SOTM of the US (including americanizing terms, TIGER data,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 14:07 -0400, Rev. Theodore Book wrote:
I just took a peak at the data, and noticed that it doesn't have any
information on road category - how did you do that on the main import
- simply by the name of the
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com wrote:
On Apr 24, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 09:40 -0700, Alan Millar wrote:
If you don't like the tag, you don't have to use it. But I have been
waiting for this highlighting feature for a
Russ Nelson wrote:
On Apr 24, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
I'd also be very happy if JOSM flipped the tag for me when I edit a
tiger object.
Does anybody object to this? If not, I'll look at inserting special
case code which removes tiger:reviewed when the way or any node it
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Apollinaris Schoell
ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
2. http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=121u8tcs=5
this is a residential road imported from tiger. have fun to drive here
that does need surface condition and access tags. Maybe a bollard/chicane too.
but if it's a
On 24 Apr 2009, at 14:27 , Russ Nelson wrote:
On Apr 24, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
forcing every josm user to accept it is somewhere between ignorance
and dictatorship
Your argument, if true, is an argument against ANY change to JOSM.
improvements are always welcome
First I would like to say I think the highlighting is a good thing.
As such I do not see why anyone is upset with it. But to make people
happy, perhaps making it an option that defaults to being turned on
would solve any issues people have. While this is tiger specific at
the moment, I would
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 10:26 -0700, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
forcing every josm user to accept it is somewhere between ignorance
and dictatorship
Hi Apollinaris,
I'd be happy to code up a custom version of JOSM for you that doesn't
have the yellowness. I'd also be happy to looking into
Dave,
have already done my customize version and removed it from the style
file
It's just not everyone can do it and you need a working build
environment check out the source code ...
Not even java knowledge required, a simple grep and an editor is enough
this is definitely a feature some
101 - 143 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
