Živijo,
Geopedia je pripravila zanimiv portal
http://www.pespoti.si
A kaj ko je vse, kar oni počnejeo, licenčno nekompatibilno z openstreetmap :-(
LP Martin
___
Talk-si mailing list
Talk-si@openstreetmap.org
On Tuesday 29 May 2012 16:19:20 Damjan Gerl wrote:
Martin Vuk, on 29/05/2012 15.36, wrote:
Živijo,
Geopedia je pripravila zanimiv portal
http://www.pespoti.si
A kaj ko je vse, kar oni počnejeo, licenčno nekompatibilno z
openstreetmap :-(
LP Martin
Ja, nekaj podobnega je
Legal people know that an investigation is needed before an accusation can
lead to a judge or jury proclaiming 'guilty' or 'not guilty'.
Unfortunately, some users are very quick to proclaim guilty, even without
knowing the local situation or talking to the person being accused. I'm
very happy to
It's So Funny has not copied your data here, he has simply modified it (in
this case, changing highway=residential to highway=unclassified). When the
redaction bot is unleashed, if you have still not accepted the CTs (do you have
a particular reason not to?), this data will be deleted. There
On 2012-05-29 08:41, Thomas Davie wrote:
It's So Funny has not copied your data here, he has simply modified
it (in this case, changing highway=residential to
highway=unclassified). When the redaction bot is unleashed, if you
have still not accepted the CTs (do you have a particular reason not
I've sent CeesW a message asking him to join the discussion here.
Most of his other edits seem legit, but the comment on this changeset
is somewhat remarkable: ... data reconciliation ODbl.
Let's hope he explains himself.
Greets,
Floris Looijesteijn
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Maarten
Ok, they don't name us, but I think a leading open source map does
refer to us.
http://www.tomtom.com/en_gb/licensing/newsletter/201205/didyouknow/
Oh wauw. We're not perfect. Let's close up the shop. Thanks to SteveC
for all the effort, but it wasn't enough.
Well, probably one of the very
On 2012-05-29 09:49, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 5/29/2012 3:00 AM, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2012-05-29 08:41, Thomas Davie wrote:
It's So Funny has not copied your data here, he has simply
modified
it (in this case, changing highway=residential to
highway=unclassified). When the redaction bot
Whatever. I've certainly seen footpaths classified as roads in commercial
online maps for instance.
This is a very one sided argument and assumes that commercial online maps are
accurate. It also completely neglects the fact that you can use OSM data
without a fee andf without someone telling
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Ok, they don't name us, but I think a leading open source map does refer
to us.
http://www.tomtom.com/en_gb/licensing/newsletter/201205/didyouknow/
Oh wauw. We're not perfect. Let's close up the shop. Thanks to SteveC for
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Whatever. I've certainly seen footpaths classified as roads in
commercial
online maps for instance.
It's basically a misreading of how OSM data works. Essentially they're
saying that the fact we use the highway=track tag means OMG OSM
MISCLASSIFIES FOREST TRACKS AS
Certainly Apple mark footpaths as roads in the data that they have used from
us, but that's a rendering issue, not a data issue.
Tom Davie
On 29 May 2012, at 09:14, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Whatever. I've certainly seen footpaths classified as roads in commercial
online maps for instance.
2012/5/29 John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com:
footpaths as roads --- I don't think I've seen any of those, but I
have found quite a few unclassified roads that look more like
tracks on Bing (and have adjusted them accordingly where confident
of it).
+1 to the rest, but I don't think we should
To be honest, if a road has no classification, and is made of mud and gravel,
it's a track... If it's an official road in some way, then clearly it is
classified ;)
Thanks
Tom Davie
On 29 May 2012, at 09:32, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2012/5/29 John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com:
footpaths
Apparently this ownership is more complex then
at first sight.
A way is defined by its nodes and its tags.
Maarten only took a look at the tags.
cetest did not only add a residential tag, but
created the nodes (Version 1) that defines this
particular way with GPS acquired data,
later assisted
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com wrote:
To be honest, if a road has no classification, and is made of mud and gravel,
it's a track...
The ones I reclassified typically had two wheel-tracks of soil-colour
and grass between them, I think. If it's
If I remember correctly (someone correct me if I don't), a lawyer has agreed
that it's okay to keep node positions and ways where a user would reasonably
have created the same way from an ODbL compatible data source. So for example,
in this case, the user could reasonably create the exact same
On 2012-05-29 10:43, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
wrote:
Apparently this ownership is more complex then
at first sight.
A way is defined by its nodes and its tags.
Maarten only took a look at the tags.
cetest did not only add a residential tag, but
created the nodes (Version
At the time it was judged to be important to
keep reference to the original and data.
I remember copying lots of old AND tags
onto my created roads.
I think what should be leading here is
the version number, as recorded by the server.
Whatever excuse there may be, including reference to
On 29/05/2012 08:44, Maarten Deen wrote:
Ok, they don't name us, but I think a leading open source map does
refer to us.
http://www.tomtom.com/en_gb/licensing/newsletter/201205/didyouknow/
Sounds like they're scared to me. With them looking over their shoulders
at OSM, it means their
On 29 May 2012, at 10:15, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
At the time it was judged to be important to
keep reference to the original and data.
I remember copying lots of old AND tags
onto my created roads.
I think what should be leading here is
the version number, as
That's some great imagery if he can read the name signs on that street...
Greets,
Floris Looijesteijn
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com wrote:
If I remember correctly (someone correct me if I don't), a lawyer has agreed
that it's okay to keep node positions
On 29 May 2012, at 10:27, Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
That's some great imagery if he can read the name signs on that street...
The fact that all the tags were ODbL safe had already been established – they
were created by another user who had accepted.
Thanks
Tom Davie
On 29 May 2012, at 10:36, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
Off list ! No need to annoy the list with
comments with suggestion on how to cheat even more.
No, I'd rather keep it on list, as I'd really like people to know the quickest
and best methods for keeping as much
On 29 May 2012 08:44, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Ok, they don't name us, but I think a leading open source map does refer
to us.
http://www.tomtom.com/en_gb/licensing/newsletter/201205/didyouknow/
RichardF has a comprehensive slap down of their FUD:
I am really astonished about the way some users on this list
react to a claim to respect (my and CC-by-SA) copyright .
The whole business of changeing license IS about copyright.
If there is only a single grain of non-respect to copyright in your
heads
(those that are addressed, do
On 29 May 2012 11:28, Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 May 2012, at 10:27, Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
That's some great imagery if he can read the name signs on that street...
The fact that all the tags were ODbL safe had already been established – they
were created by another
I did not give you permission to share
a private conversation on the list.
That is also about copyrights, Davie.
Gert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Thomas Davie [mailto:tom.da...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 11:43 AM
Aan: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
On 29 May 2012, at 10:50, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
I am really astonished about the way some users on this list
react to a claim to respect (my and CC-by-SA) copyright .
Do you have an example of such a reply that astonishes you?
Thanks
Tom
On 29 May 2012 11:01, Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com wrote:
If I remember correctly (someone correct me if I don't), a lawyer has agreed
that it's okay to keep node positions and ways where a user would reasonably
have created the same way from an ODbL compatible data source.
I don't know
Gert,
Although I would have chosen a different tone of voice you are
absolutely right to raise this issue.
Let's just try to keep the discussion civilized.
Greetings,
Floris Looijesteijn
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:50 AM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote:
Hello,
First of all, let me just say it is indeed impolite to share private
conversation but I would love to see that tested in a court.
That said, the whole point of people in FOSM waiting for OSM to fail is
kind of annoying. I understand why the fork happened (doesn't mean that I
agree with
O , 2012-05-29 11:50 +0200, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
rakstīja:
I am really astonished about the way some users on this list
react to a claim to respect (my and CC-by-SA) copyright .
Hi Gert!
First, keep tone civil and you won't get nasty replies as before :)
And
On Tuesday 29 May 2012, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
I did not give you permission to share
a private conversation on the list.
That is also about copyrights, Davie.
Public interest defence trumps this.
Next!
robert.
___
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Ok, they don't name us, but I think a leading open source map does refer
to us.
http://www.tomtom.com/en_gb/licensing/newsletter/201205/didyouknow/
I think the most interesting part of this is actually direct criticism
from
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 20:37 +1000, Steve Bennett wrote:
http://www.tomtom.com/en_gb/licensing/newsletter/201205/didyouknow/
I think the most interesting part of this is actually direct criticism
from our commercial competitors. You know the Gandhi thing: First they
ignore you, then they
Emilie,
I defend 2 legal interests:
Mine : I invested time work and money, that I co-licensed under
CC-by-SA to the previous OSM
OSM: by keeping the OSM database clean of tainted data
If you call that trolling ..
Sometimes I think that people are called trolls because they
All
This thread has gotten way out of line. Please refrain from posting anything
more on this thread, or related threads (ie (dis)Honesty and Copyright).
I suggest taking a moment and reviewing the Etiquette page on the wiki.
Thanks
Mikel
On 29 May 2012, at 12:51, Worst Fixer wrote:
Hello.
I ask you to review my planned edit.
There are lot of ways to tag intermittent water feature found in database.
Most popular is intermittent=yes. All others come from different old imports.
Date ist 2009-2010 year. I countiered ~350
On May 29, 2012 1:16 AM, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk
wrote:
This is a very one sided argument and assumes that commercial online maps
are accurate. It also completely neglects the fact that you can use OSM
data without a fee andf without someone telling you what you can and cannot
Hello,
I will retract the troll bit as you seem actually to be enthusiastic but
you seriously have to work on the perception that you give to people in the
first place. Goodwill is something difficult enough to accrue in the first
place.
However, I will not retract the fact that I consider that
The fence around an airport here** (Bishkek in Kyrgyzstan):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.83491lon=74.5764zoom=16layers=M
Seems to have been tagged building = yes, building:levels = 2. I'm
sure it gets chilly there in the winter, but this seems unlikely.
Perhaps someone local to the
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Emilie Laffray
emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
First of all, let me just say it is indeed impolite to share private
conversation but I would love to see that tested in a court.
That said, the whole point of people in FOSM waiting for OSM to fail is
Hello,
Please, do not respond further to this thread. Any further comments will
receive individual moderation.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
From: Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com
To: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Hi,
On 05/29/12 13:51, Worst Fixer wrote:
There are lot of ways to tag intermittent water feature found in
database. Most popular is intermittent=yes. All others come from
different old imports. Date ist 2009-2010 year. I countiered ~350 000
features tagged in different such ways. Most is done
All
In case you didn't see it the first time, this and related threads are
moderated. Do not respond further to these threads, or you will be individually
moderated.
Thanks
Mikel Moderators
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron___
talk
2. I don't think you should continue to make mass edits under the
username WorstFixer because that implies that before you
fixed
things they were among the worst which has the potential to
offend people.
I've not been following what has and hasn't been done, or is
proposed, but the username
Worst Fixer wrote:
I ask you to review my planned edit.
There are lot of ways to tag intermittent water feature found in database.
Most popular is intermittent=yes. All others come from different old
imports. Date ist 2009-2010 year. I countiered ~350 000 features tagged in
different such ways.
2012/5/29 Phil Endecott spam_from_osm_t...@chezphil.org:
You're going to remove 9413 ele tags; why? No doubt at some point someone
decided that lake:shore_length:miles=2 was a useful thing to record, and
you want to remove it. Why?
because there is no such thing as a shore length, it
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:52 AM, SomeoneElse
li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
The fence around an airport here (Bishkek in Kyrgyzstan):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.83491lon=74.5764zoom=16layers=M
Seems to have been tagged building = yes, building:levels = 2. I'm sure
it gets
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2012/5/29 Phil Endecott spam_from_osm_t...@chezphil.org:
No doubt at some point someone
decided that lake:shore_length:miles=2 was a useful thing to record, and
you want to remove it. Ã Why?
because there is no such thing as a shore length, it depends on the
Hmm I seem to recall a stnav company accepting speed limit information
from users and then having the problem that people set the roads in
front of their houses to a speed limit of 0 so that the satnav
routing would avoid it... wasn't that TomTom?
Toby
The node referenced created by cetest will not survive redaction (and I
assume the rest of data to be similar), and neither do the edits on the
way indicate anything other than normal editing (see
http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=7539781). I am slightly at a
loss to see what exactly Gert
We'd be vulnerable to exactly the same kind of attack, right? Do we
have any mechanisms to detect or prevent it?
Steve
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm I seem to recall a stnav company accepting speed limit information
from users and then having
Steve Bennett wrote:
We'd be vulnerable to exactly the same kind of attack, right? Do we
have any mechanisms to detect or prevent it?
Well (at the risk of stating the bleeding obvious) we can actually see
data that says maxspeed=0 rather than just wondering why we never
actually get routed
On 05/29/2012 12:48 PM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
Sorry Emilie, it’s a pity if that creates some loss of data,
but you should take it like a man
I'm afraid she won't.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
2012/5/28 valent.turko...@gmail.com valent.turko...@gmail.com:
You have probably seen this Waste map project that uses OpenStreetMap
as background for mapping waste all over the globe:
http://www.letsdoitworld.org/waste_map
Does anybody know what technology did they use to overlay images and
On 29/05/12 15:29, Steve Bennett wrote:
We'd be vulnerable to exactly the same kind of attack, right? Do we
have any mechanisms to detect or prevent it?
A community!
Steve
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Toby Murraytoby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm I seem to recall a stnav company
Hello.
I used reply to instead of reply to all in my mail agent. We had a
small thread with Thomas. Here is major result we achived.
Thomas expressed opinion that not 100% of water=intermittent have
other tags, so we have no way count them as water.
In my sub-extract of water=intermittent:
Actually, the conclusion, while it involved that, also involved that there are
potential other uses (e.g. on river=intermittent; stream=intermittent etc) that
need to be checked too, and that this seems like an arbitrary renaming of tags
that doesn't gain anything, but may destroy data.
Thanks
Worst Fixer writes:
Just removed stream=fixme.
Why?
Removed all id-like tags.
Why?
If no valid objections will be raised, I upload this change on 2012-06-12.
Don't.
--
--my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1
Frederik Ramm writes:
2. I don't think you should continue to make mass edits under the
username WorstFixer because that implies that before you fixed
things they were among the worst which has the potential to offend people.
I always thought it meant that he was the worst person to be
Toby Murray writes:
I pointed out this error before the edit was made but apparently
community feedback was not respected before the automated edit was
run...
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2012-May/063021.html
Okay, Worst Fixer, you said that you wouldn't make the edit
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Toby Murray writes:
I pointed out this error before the edit was made but apparently
community feedback was not respected before the automated edit was
run...
On 5/29/2012 1:09 AM, Alan Mintz wrote:
I used to agree with you, but in terms of minimum labor, updates are
best performed by retaining the original upload data, then doing a
conflation between the original data and a later update. That will
highlight only changes from the original source,
HI there,
I thought FOSM was off topic, where are all the moderators to stop this thread?
I never wanted to leave osm, osm made me leave. I never wanted to fork
osm, osm forked itself to some new license.
lets keep the facts straight, people just wanted to continue with the
same system as
Could you post the code used to generate the changesets? That would be the
easiest way for some of us to review your proposed changes. It wouldn’t remove
the need to explain it to non-programmers, but it would be much easier for some
of us if we could look at the code.
That being said, a
Olá Martin,
2012/5/23 Martin Weilandt martin...@gmx.net:
Talvez nem seja uma boa ideia você colaborar com esses mapas baseados em
Google Maps: As condições de Google Maps API não permitem o uso de arquivos
KML criados usando Google Maps fora do mundo de Google. Em outras palavras: O
valor
Hi,
ich habe seit Jahren leider kaum was bei OSM editiert, nachdem ich vor
fünf Jahren einiges an Grundlagen in meiner Stadt gemappt hatte. Nun
habe ich mir im Zuge der Relizenzierung überlegt, ob ich nicht helfen
sollte Daten von Nichtzustimmern zu überarbeiten. Aber wärend ich zwar
den
hi !
ich habe folgendes URL abgesetzt die schon einmal min. funktioniert hat:
http://overpass.osm.rambler.ru/cgi/xapi?way[construction_year=*][@meta]
Bekomme jetzt folgende Meldung:
The data included in this document is from www.openstreetmap.org. It has
there been collected by a large group
Hallo Jan,
2012/5/29 Jan Tappenbeck o...@tappenbeck.net
http://overpass.osm.rambler.ru/cgi/xapi?way[construction_year=*][@meta]
Bekomme jetzt folgende Meldung:
The data included in this document is from www.openstreetmap.org. It has
there been collected by a large group of contributors.
Hi!
Ich bin gerade dabei den Tracks Selector etwas zu erweitern. Die Darstellung
und Bedienung wurde daher überarbeitet. Die Tracks werden jetzt bei
MouseOver in einer anderen Farbe hervorgehoben.
Darüber hinaus bereite ich gerade die Möglichkeit vor, die Tracks auch
direkt im Browser
Weitergeleitet aus talk-at.
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Von: ScubbX markus4mayr.li...@gmail.com
Datum: 29. Mai 2012 14:46
Betreff: [Talk-at] derStandard Artikel - TomTom schimpf über OSM
An: OpenStreetMap AT talk...@openstreetmap.org
Hallo!
Seht, was heute im onlineStandard
Ottimo! Questo intendevo: per ricalco come hai fatto tu oppure per
aggiungere dettagli alle way, perché i sentieri in osm sono graficamente
tutti uguali e senza uno sfondo fotografico non ricordo per esempio quale ha
mtb_scale=1 e quale mtb_scale=3.
Malizioso chi è andato subito a pensare a
Malizioso chi è andato subito a pensare a qualcosa di illegale. :-/
in realtà non credo volessero sospettarti di cattive intenzioni, è che
in passato siamo stati accusati gratuitamente dal PCN di ogni
neffandezza, compresi quelli che cercavano di difendere certe loro
scelte ... Tieni presente
http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/05/29/019213/tomtom-flames-openstreetmap
Tag: FUD
ciao
maxx
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:40 AM, emmexx emm...@tiscalinet.it wrote:
http://news.slashdot.org/story/12/05/29/019213/tomtom-flames-openstreetmap
Tag: FUD
Imagine if some of those 'self-driving cars' would use them.
Esatto. Immaginiamo che usino i dati proprietari che contengono un
ponte che non
Non solo gli svincoli autostradali, girando per la mappa italiana e non solo ce
ne sono a josa di svincoli non segnalati e senza restrizioni. Sarebbe un lavoro
da fare tutti assieme svincolo per svincolo regione per regione. Chi mappa uno
svincolo dovrebbe inserire subito le restrizioni e
2012/5/29 Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto lorenzetto.l...@gmail.com:
Esatto. Immaginiamo che usino i dati proprietari che contengono un
ponte che non esiste (tempo fa bigshot me ne ha segnalato un paio in
mezzo ai campi).
Qualcuno che ha un TomTom aggiornato può guardare se a Piacenza c'è il
http://www.tomtom.com/en_gb/licensing/newsletter/201205/didyouknow/
e ha così tanta paura che non dice nemmeno il nostro nome :)
Our map-makers are real experts
--
-S
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
Am 29.05.2012 09:18, schrieb Stefano Salvador:
...
... Tieni presente che il sistema di ban attuale del PCN è
stato istituito dopo che GFOSS aveva messo in piedi un server di cache
che serviva ad -aiutare- il loro lavoro ...
Mi sono accorto che da un pò non è più possibile usare il PCN. Ci
2012/5/29 Alexander Roalter alexan...@roalter.it:
Mi sono accorto che da un pò non è più possibile usare il PCN. Ci sono altri
informazioni come mediare?
funziona qui ;-)
Hai provato di cancellare gli indirizzi del WMS dalle preferenze e di
riaggiungerli dai presets (dopo aver fatto un update
Am 29.05.2012 13:44, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2012/5/29 Alexander Roalteralexan...@roalter.it:
Mi sono accorto che da un pò non è più possibile usare il PCN. Ci sono altri
informazioni come mediare?
funziona qui ;-)
Hai provato di cancellare gli indirizzi del WMS dalle preferenze e di
Ciao,
vi riferisco la proposta di mcheck di mappare le zone colpite dal terremoto
di questi giorni.
Lui ha tracciato da PCN gli edifici di Finale Emilia (
http://osm.org/go/xdVQL~R9) ed è disponibile a tracciare altre zone.
Stefano
___
Talk-it mailing
--
Linux Infinite Freedom
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
2012/5/29 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com
Lui ha tracciato da PCN gli edifici di Finale Emilia (
http://osm.org/go/xdVQL~R9) ed è disponibile a tracciare altre zone.
Ho sistemato ed inserito alcune vie a Cavezzo (http://osm.org/go/xX~yOj~L--
).
Però in casi come questi sarebbe utile per non dire
Però in casi come questi sarebbe utile per non dire cruciale avere delle
immagini satellitari aggiornate...
Proviamo a sentire l'HOT?
Sono stati fatti diversi rilievi nei giorni scorsi, alcuni anche molto
dettagliati. Le scosse odierne hanno però tragicamente cambiato la
situazione. In ogni
2012/5/29 Stefano Salvador stefano.salva...@gmail.com:
Però in casi come questi sarebbe utile per non dire cruciale avere delle
immagini satellitari aggiornate...
Proviamo a sentire l'HOT?
Sono stati fatti diversi rilievi nei giorni scorsi, alcuni anche molto
dettagliati. Le scosse odierne
Si , sicuramente servono per un'analisi dello stato attuale e la scelta dei
tag adatti a rappresentare il danno
Ma il ricalco degli edifici non può essere eseguito sulle immagini del
2006?
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Stefano Salvador [mailto:stefano.salva...@gmail.com]
Inviato: martedì 29
Per inserire gli edifici si puo' fare l'import dei dati (molto accurati)
forniti dalla regione Emilia Romagna:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Emilia_Romagna_edificato
In questo modo si fa molto prima rispetto a ricalcarli dalle foto aeree.
2012/5/29 Alech OSM alech.hos...@gmail.com
Si ,
infatti... avevo già iniziato tempo fa ad importare nel comune dove vivo
(Cesena)
stasera vedo di concentrarmi sulla prov di Modena e Ferrara
Il giorno 29 maggio 2012 16:22, Luca Wehrstedt
luca.wehrst...@gmail.comha scritto:
Per inserire gli edifici si puo' fare l'import dei dati (molto
Ciao a tutti,
mi chiedevo quali sono i tag piu' appropriati per riportare il codice ISTAT
e il codice catasto delle divisioni amministrative (comuni, province,
regioni). Intendo le relazioni type=boundary/boundary=administrative, non i
nodi place=*!
Io proporrei *ref:ISTAT* e *ref:catasto*.
2012/5/29 Luca Wehrstedt luca.wehrst...@gmail.com:
Io proporrei ref:ISTAT e ref:catasto. Tuttavia ho un paio di dubbi:
Riguardo al primo: ho notato che e' gia' stato utilizzato il tag
istat_id[1]
sappiamo che sono costanti gli id dell'ISTAT? O sono anche sogetto a
delle modifiche? In questo
vedo che ci sono anche questi tags:
295
it:lombardia:ctrn:localita_significativa:COD_ISTAT
86
it:lombardia:ctrn:cod_istatn
86
it:lombardia:ctrn:cod_istat
di cosa si tratta? Sono gli stessi codici?
ciao,
Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
2012/5/29 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
sappiamo che sono costanti gli id dell'ISTAT? O sono anche sogetto a
delle modifiche? In questo caso dovremo avere versioni
(ref:istat:1,...)
Questi ID sono abbastanza costanti: cambiano quando cambia il territorio
amministrato dal comune
Per inciso, ho dato un'occhiata alla viabilità della zona e mi pare
manchino un po' di primary e secondary: una statale declassata (con old ref
SS255) è classificata secondary mentre alcune provinciali sono solo
tertiary...
Che ne dite, facciamo qualche promozione?
ciao
Tiziano
2012/5/29 Tiziano D'Angelo tiziano.dang...@gmail.com:
Per inciso, ho dato un'occhiata alla viabilità della zona e mi pare manchino
un po' di primary e secondary: una statale declassata (con old ref SS255) è
classificata secondary mentre alcune provinciali sono solo tertiary...
Che ne dite,
2012/5/29 Luca Wehrstedt luca.wehrst...@gmail.com:
2012/5/29 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
secondome, se il tag precedentemente usato è istat_id lo utilizzerei
anche in futuro (chiarendo prima la questione delle versioni).
Il tag istat_id ha una semantica diversa (indica il codice
NIVEL NARANJA(II): ERUPCIÓN PROBABLE EN TÉRMINO DE DÍAS O SEMANAS
Durante las últimas horas se ha presentado un incremento importante en la
actividad del volcán que se puede resumir en los siguientes aspectos:
A las 03:07 (Hora Local) del día 29 de Mayo de 2012, se registró de una señal
sísmica
Estimada Sandra:
Buenos días y gracias por mantenernos informados. Ante la situación asalta
la duda sobre cómo esta comunidad de maperos y desarrolladores de
geo-aplicaciones puede contribuir de manera articulada a la prevención y
atención de este posible e inminente desastre. Aparecen las
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
