Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

Le 27/08/2017 à 22:05, Christian Rogel a écrit : Le 27 août 2017 à 17:04, Bruno a écrit : Je me réponds moi-même : Dans le wiki il faudrait peut-être préciser que en cas de désaccord sur un nom on peut se référer aux plaques de rues pour vérifier les champs name ou name:xx

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

>I haven't seen any compelling evidence or discussion about whether or not the data in question was illegally copied into OSM. All we have to go on is the first paragraph of Frederik's initial post. I'm not questioning Frederik's (or any DWG members') passion or dedication to the project, but we

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Paul Norman wrote: > On 8/27/2017 10:29 AM, Ian Dees wrote: > >> >> I strongly disagree. As a group of people who have received >> extra-judicial powers in the OSM community, they should be expected to >> follow community guidelines to a higher

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

On 8/27/2017 10:29 AM, Ian Dees wrote: I strongly disagree. As a group of people who have received extra-judicial powers in the OSM community, they should be expected to follow community guidelines to a higher degree than the rest of the community. As the publisher of the OSM database, the

Re: [Talk-us] Pittsburgh neighborhood boundaries mapped with admin_level 9?

On 25/08/2017 12:18, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: The point of admin_level is that each member in the hierarchy is a distinct "government" offering specific government services by the consent of the governed. (By several-years-ago OSM consensus, special-purpose districts like parks, schools,

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

On 27/08/2017 06:49, Frederik Ramm wrote: Here's a list of way IDs affected, with country and state: http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/chdr.details In case it helps, I dumped this CSV into a spreadsheet and sorted it by country and region:

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Stations service rue de Rivoli

Bonsoir, Le 27/08/2017 à 23:56, Vincent Privat a écrit : > "Rue de Rivoli" ? le nom m'est familier mais pour autre chose: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:ref:FR:FANTOIR > > Un rapport avec le bug? Non, code RIVOLI et Rue de Rivoli sont bien distincts a priori ;) > Le 27 août 2017 à

Re: [Talk-us] TIGER fixup for Hurricane Harvey potential impact areas

There is now a task in the OSM Task Manager to help coordinate the effort at http://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/104 There is also a WMS layer of Texas statewide streets available at http://maps.mapwise.com/cgi-bin/mapserv?map=maps/fmo-base-osm-texas.map; - use that URL in JOSM. Adding

[OSM-talk-fr] quadruple no 46 à Rennes

Bonsoir, Quel est le sens exact des points d'adresse opendata à Rennes ? c'est supposé être un noeud par adresse unique ? Parce que dans ce coin, il y avait 4x no 46 http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4225474046 PS un utilisateur vient de renommer un en 46b Cordialement, Marc

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Stations service rue de Rivoli

"Rue de Rivoli" ? le nom m'est familier mais pour autre chose: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:ref:FR:FANTOIR Un rapport avec le bug? Le 27 août 2017 à 23:50, Francois Gouget a écrit : > > Osmose signale les stations service pour lequelles on dispose > d'information

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

Le 27. 08. 17 à 23:38, Francois Gouget a écrit : > * Quand on renseigne le champ name d'un traffic_sign=city_limit ? >Si je comprends bien le wiki il faut mettre ce qui est sur le panneau >mais du coup Osmose se plaint (il me semble, je n'ai pas d'exemple >sous la main). >Faut-il

[OSM-talk-fr] Stations service rue de Rivoli

Osmose signale les stations service pour lequelles on dispose d'information en OpenData mais pour lesquelles on n'a pas d'objet dans OpenStreetMap. Normalement ces signalements sont faits à l'endroit ou est censée se trouver la station service. Mais rue de Rivoli il semble y avoir des

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

On Sun, 27 Aug 2017, Philippe Verdy wrote: [...] > On a la même chose sur les panneaux directionnels et même les panneaux > d'entrée/sortie d'agglomération qui là aussi ont des abréviations et > des notations marginales ("Commune de..." après le nom de > l'agglomération). Justement, que

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

> Le 27 août 2017 à 17:04, Bruno a écrit : > > Je me réponds moi-même : > > Dans le wiki il faudrait peut-être préciser que en cas de désaccord sur un > nom on peut se référer aux plaques de rues pour vérifier les champs name ou > name:xx pour celles qui sont multilingues. > >

Re: [Talk-ca] [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

I agree with John that many ways flagged by Frederik look like they are legitimate CanVec imports. In a random sampling of chdr's flagged ways in Canada, fewer than 15% were created by that user. Some had existing names cleaned up (eg: Libersan → Rue Libersan in way 23456048) by chdr. Perhaps more

Re: [Talk-lv] kādēļ nedrīkst izmantot nelegālus avotus

Vai ir kāds sarakst ar avotiem, ko drikst legali izmantot OSM Latvijā? On 27 Aug 2017 23:11, "Ilja Denisovs" wrote: > Vai ir kads sarakst ar avotiem, ko drikst izmantot OSM Latvijā? > > On 27 Aug 2017 20:30, "Rihards" wrote: > >> openstreetmap nedrīkst

[OSM-talk-fr] viviers et autres bar à huîtres

Bonjour, En vérifiant la station SNSM de Camaret, j'ai profité pour préciser un vivier : http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51474011#map=19/48.27519/-4.58957 Sauf que je ne trouve pas comment préciser que l'on peut faire cuire (les crustacés) et qu'on vend des animaux vivants (les

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

John, Once the way names are redacted, I will revise for Québec following the naming rules different from the english part of Canada. ToDo / JOSM should help for this. regard   Pierre john whelan wrote : I suspect Jamie could wave a magic wand for Quebec.

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

The odbl=clean could be a way to exclude road names from the removal, though sources from the info should be given, whether Canvec, Mapillary, OpenStreetCam or local survey On Aug 27, 2017 3:29 PM, "john whelan" wrote: > There are a couple of issues here. The first are

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > I don't understand what people mean with 'verifying' objects. We're > not trying to find factually-incorrect data. The data is legally > tainted. It's questionable whether looking at the current names >

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > I don't understand what people mean with 'verifying' objects. We're > not trying to find factually-incorrect data. The data is legally > tainted. It's questionable whether looking at the current names >

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

There are a couple of issues here. The first are our users, we don't normally think about them but deleting the names at the wrong point in OSMAND's cycle could mean missing street names for a period of time. Second is the problem of some data might be incorrect as a result of the source

Re: [Talk-cz] Ilegální pěšiny v lese?

> z toho budou války. za rok to tam nejaky novy nadsenec zakresli zase, jak to > chteji zajistit? > jak chteji zajistit, ze to nekdo nepopisr do verejneho bike fora? nevim.. Proto jsem taky psal nemazat, ale pouzit tag access=private pripadne access=discouraged, ackoli je to samozrejme jen

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

There was a script during the licence change that assessed whether or not changes to names were copyrightable. -- Andrew From: Mikel Maron Sent: 27 August 2017 19:51:05 To: Greg Morgan; Martijn van Exel Cc: Talk Openstreetmap; Steve

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Presumably it means something like the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:odbl%3Dclean tag. It may not be as much use hete though. -- Andrew From: Nicolás Alvarez Sent: 27 August 2017 20:01:16 To: Frederik Ramm Cc: Talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

I don't understand what people mean with 'verifying' objects. We're not trying to find factually-incorrect data. The data is legally tainted. It's questionable whether looking at the current names imported from GMaps, comparing to another source, seeing they match and marking them as "verified"

[OSM-talk] DWG redaction and Autometed edits code of conduct

Le 27 août 2017 20:37:18 GMT+02:00, Greg Morgan a écrit : >On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Ian Dees wrote: > >> >> >> On Aug 27, 2017 11:58, "Yves" wrote: >> >> a écrit : >> >> >> Frederik, >> >> >> Thanks

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

> we can find a good workflow for that. I wasn't expecting the community to >start working on this pre-redaction but if people prefer that to fixing issues >later... Absolutely, let's do this! Also, Frederik, I think your script picked up false positives. Spot checked in DC, and these are

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

> we can find a good workflow for that. I wasn't expecting the community to >start working on this pre-redaction but if people prefer that to fixing issues >later... Absolutely, let's do this! Also, Frederik, I think your script picked up false positives. Spot checked in DC, and these are

Re: [Talk-cz] Ilegální pěšiny v lese?

Už takhle pár edit wars bylo - ale tady aspoň mají nějaký kontakt. Až jim to někdo zmapuje do Google Maps, budou jak vládní vojska v Itálii, tam se na nějaký diskuze nehraje ;) Zrovna mám v poště opačný případ: POI celkem prokazatelně existuje, ale mapper hodlá mazat a mazat a mazat, protože s

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Happy to help. All we'd need for MapRoulette is a list of locations and a > proper description of the work we'd expect people to do. Anyone can create > the challenge but I'd be happy to do it. > > Martijn >

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Happy to help. All we'd need for MapRoulette is a list of locations and a > proper description of the work we'd expect people to do. Anyone can create > the challenge but I'd be happy to do it. > > Martijn >

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Ian Dees wrote: > > > On Aug 27, 2017 11:58, "Yves" wrote: > > a écrit : > > > Frederik, > > > Thanks for notifying us about this. I hope that you treat this as an > import or automated edit and follow

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Okay, slogged though the rest of the list Steve had. Nearly all match the TIGER 2015 data so should be good. Here is what I checked: TIGER 2015 5949993,"California","United States of America" Tulagi Road, San Diego TIGER 2015 5957171,"California","United States of America"

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Frederik just answered Steve, but no message was received from Steve on the talk list. Bad documentation of the thread and difficulty to follow discussions coming from two lists, talk and talk-us. I then suggest that this thread be only on talk. >From the list that Frederik provided earlier

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

Le 27 août 2017 à 20:23, djakk djakk a écrit : > Pour le rendu rien n’empêche un logiciel d'afficher les name:xx que l'on >> veut en plus du name= il faut juste le faire.. > > > C'est alors possible de faire une carte du monde en occitan, ou en > mandarin, mais pour faire

Re: [Talk-cz] Ilegální pěšiny v lese?

z toho budou války. za rok to tam nejaky novy nadsenec zakresli zase, jak to chteji zajistit? jak chteji zajistit, ze to nekdo nepopisr do verejneho bike fora? nevim.. On Sun, 27 Aug 2017, 07:06 Petr Holub wrote: > > > access=private > > > bicycle=private > > > foot=private >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

> > Pour le rendu rien n’empêche un logiciel d'afficher les name:xx que l'on > veut en plus du name= il faut juste le faire.. C'est alors possible de faire une carte du monde en occitan, ou en mandarin, mais pour faire une carte mondiale avec les noms officiels + les noms en "patois" de chaque

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > Here's a list of way IDs affected, with country and state: > > http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/chdr.details > > Frederik, I looked a small sample of the list. For example, way 10012342 [1] in Texas was only touched

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > Here's a list of way IDs affected, with country and state: > > http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/chdr.details > > Frederik, I looked a small sample of the list. For example, way 10012342 [1] in Texas was only touched

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Happy to help. All we'd need for MapRoulette is a list of locations and a proper description of the work we'd expect people to do. Anyone can create the challenge but I'd be happy to do it. Martijn On Sun, Aug 27, 2017, 11:40 Frederik Ramm wrote: > Steve: > > thank you for

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 10:31:14AM -0700, Tod Fitch wrote: > There was a (poorly) done import of house numbers done in San Diego county a > long while back. Data from that import usually has a source tag of "SanGIS > Addresses Public Domain (http://www.sangis.org/)???. I think a reasonable >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

Le 27/08/2017 à 18:58, djakk djakk a écrit : … et l'ambiguïté du "trunk" en France n'est pas résolue ^^ Cas compliqué transfrontalier : à une époque il aurait été intéressant d'afficher sur osm "Lille - Rijsel" car "Rijsel" était la seule indication de direction côté Belgique flamande sur les

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

Bonjour Le 27/08/2017 à 18:58, djakk djakk a écrit : Mais alors comme "Paris" est fléché "Parijs" depuis la Belgique flamande, faut-il avoir un name_2 = "Parijs" ? Si c'est fléché, alors c'est "destination=*" ou "destination:lanes=*|*" :-D Cordialement -- David Crochet

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Steve: thank you for your work. I'll save your list. It appears that others might be eager to do the same, maybe we can find a good workflow for that. I wasn't expecting the community to start working on this pre-redaction but if people prefer that to fixing issues later, it is of course an

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Steve: thank you for your work. I'll save your list. It appears that others might be eager to do the same, maybe we can find a good workflow for that. I wasn't expecting the community to start working on this pre-redaction but if people prefer that to fixing issues later, it is of course an

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

Le 27 août 2017 à 18:03, marc marc a écrit : > Le 27. 08. 17 à 17:21, Ch. Rogel a écrit : > > Un seul endroit, en Europe, est une zone disputée à l'intérieur > > d'un Etat, Bruxelles, mais le choc entre les "entités" fédérales > > flamandes et wallonnes > ben non :)

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

There was a (poorly) done import of house numbers done in San Diego county a long while back. Data from that import usually has a source tag of "SanGIS Addresses Public Domain (http://www.sangis.org/)”. I think a reasonable check for some of the questionable street names in that area could be

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

On Aug 27, 2017 11:58, "Yves" wrote: a écrit : Frederik, Thanks for notifying us about this. I hope that you treat this as an import or automated edit and follow the rules you would expect to see the rest of the community follow Ian, To lessen the

[Talk-lv] kādēļ nedrīkst izmantot nelegālus avotus

openstreetmap nedrīkst izmantot datu avotus, kur autortiesības to aizliedz, pat vairāk - nepieciešama nepārprotama atļauja. te piemērs, kur kāds ir kopējis ielu nosaukumus no google maps. 75 000 ielu nosaukumi tiks dzēsti : https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2017-August/017679.html

Re: [Talk-cz] Seznam poštovních schránek České pošty

Dne 13.4.2017 v 06:38 Dalibor Jelínek napsal(a): > Ahoj, > > povedlo se mi sehnat kontakt na člověka, který by měl > > mít na České poště na starost vytváření seznamu poštovních schránek. > > Nechci ho ale zveřejňovat na Internetu. Jestli někdo máte zájem > > se s tím člověkem zkusit dohodnout

Re: [OSM-talk] Highway=trunk : harmonization between countries ?

> > If we are going to have the consistency you want, the way would be to > downgrade the trunk sections to primary, because after all it's US 2, > not "Trunk 2". In the UK, it would be the A2, and unquestionably > primary. yes, that's what I want. Perhaps you should make your own render, and

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Hi Ian, On 08/27/2017 06:23 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > Thanks for notifying us about this. I hope that you treat this as an > import or automated edit and follow the rules you would expect to see > the rest of the community follow. Sorry for not being clear about this. I posted this with my DWG hat

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Hi Ian, On 08/27/2017 06:23 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > Thanks for notifying us about this. I hope that you treat this as an > import or automated edit and follow the rules you would expect to see > the rest of the community follow. Sorry for not being clear about this. I posted this with my DWG hat

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

What a bummer. I went through all the ways in California, and half of them were in Orange County where I live, so I was able to confirm / fix them via public sources - two changelists reflect the confirmation and various fixes I made while I was in the area.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

… et l'ambiguïté du "trunk" en France n'est pas résolue ^^ Cas compliqué transfrontalier : à une époque il aurait été intéressant d'afficher sur osm "Lille - Rijsel" car "Rijsel" était la seule indication de direction côté Belgique flamande sur les autoroutes :O Perso dans le cas de l'occitan,

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

a écrit : Frederik, Thanks for notifying us about this. I hope that you treat this as an import or automated edit and follow the rules you would expect to see the rest of the community follow Ian, To lessen the burden of the DWG, I would say that this thread is

[OSM-talk-be] Het was op de brug van de A11

Een groot mankement voorstellen als een kenmerk, dat hebben ze uit de informatica. Is er al een systeem dat de onderbrekingen van de snelweg door de scheepvaart voorspelt ? Of moeten we het zelf schatten met https://www.marinetraffic.com/nl/ais/home/centerx:3.238/centery:51.269/zoom:12 Ik

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Indeed, with the geometry still remaining it will be easy to create a maproulette task(s) to repair the damage +1 for name tag redaction On Aug 27, 2017 12:26 PM, "Ian Dees" wrote: > Frederik, > > Thanks for notifying us about this. I hope that you treat this as an > import

Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

On balance I'd go rip it out then go back in and clean it up. Cheerio John On 27 August 2017 at 12:04, James wrote: > As Mr.Ramm said, there can be trap streets, which should be removed. > > When I inspected the data, it seems most of it is in Québec and wouldnt be > hard

[talk-ph] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

FYI, 717 roads will be affected by this redaction in the Philippines. Let's discuss next actions. -- Forwarded message -- From: Frederik Ramm Date: Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 7:19 PM Subject: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75,000 street names contributed by user chdr To:

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Frederik, Thanks for notifying us about this. I hope that you treat this as an import or automated edit and follow the rules you would expect to see the rest of the community follow. Please post samples of your changes, make a wiki page for posterity, and thanks for working to get buy-in from

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Frederik, Thanks for notifying us about this. I hope that you treat this as an import or automated edit and follow the rules you would expect to see the rest of the community follow. Please post samples of your changes, make a wiki page for posterity, and thanks for working to get buy-in from

Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Then it wouldn't be hard either to add the names again from a legal source after the redaction. > El 27 ago 2017, a las 13:04, James escribió: > > As Mr.Ramm said, there can be trap streets, which should be removed. > > When I inspected the data, it seems most of it is in

Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

As Mr.Ramm said, there can be trap streets, which should be removed. When I inspected the data, it seems most of it is in Québec and wouldnt be hard to validate streetnames for 1400 something items. On Aug 27, 2017 11:24 AM, "Paul Norman" wrote: > On 8/27/2017 7:26 AM, john

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

Le 27. 08. 17 à 17:21, Ch. Rogel a écrit : > Marc dit que les plaques bilingues officielles > pourraient être retranscrites non non j'ai dis exactement l'inverse ! Je crains (= je suis contre) le jour où un petit village ou un individu change la plaque d'entrée d'un hameau, certains vont en

Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Either directly or indirectly, and it is a suggestion only. Cheerio John On 27 August 2017 at 11:21, Paul Norman wrote: > On 8/27/2017 7:26 AM, john whelan wrote: > >> I would suggest that any street names added by chdr in Canada were more >> than likely derived from CANVEC

Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

What do you think is  google source for names in Canada ;)   Pierre De : Paul Norman À : talk@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Dimanche 27 août 2017 11h24 Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr On 8/27/2017 7:26 AM, john

Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

On 8/27/2017 7:26 AM, john whelan wrote: I would suggest that any street names added by chdr in Canada were more than likely derived from CANVEC sources What makes you believe this to be so? ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

[Talk-gb-westmidlands] New: Esri imagery

New imagery available! Does this bring anything new to the UK / West Midlands? (Without laptop so cannot check). https://blogs.esri.com/esri/arcgis/2017/08/24/world-imagery-in-osm/ P.s. please feel free to forward to talk-gb Rob ___

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

Je me réponds moi-même : Dans le wiki il faudrait peut-être préciser que en cas de désaccord sur un nom on peut se référer aux plaques de rues pour vérifier les champs name ou name:xx pour celles qui sont multilingues. En aucun cas le wiki ne devrait laisser penser que l'on doit remplir le

Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

As James said earlier, canvec/geobase opendata provides the street names. This can be easily corrected. But we need to establish a procedure and identify which ways chdr originally added the name. We can look simply at the history with a link to the OSM APIexample adding the id after way/ :

Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

In Canada as James has said CANVEC which has been accepted as Open Source acceptable to OSM has most street names in Canada. There are a few exceptions locally where the city has renamed streets and these changes have not yet been reflected in CANVEC. I would suggest that any street names added

Re: [Talk-ca] [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

In Canada as James has said CANVEC which has been accepted as Open Source acceptable to OSM has most street names in Canada. There are a few exceptions locally where the city has renamed streets and these changes have not yet been reflected in CANVEC. I would suggest that any street names added

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

Le 27 août 2017 à 12:23, marc marc a écrit : > niveau wiki sur la page > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name > la version anglaise dit que name est le nom > des plaques de rue la version française dit pareil. > Ceci dit cela va poser problème le jour où une

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] multilinguisme

Oui mais les suffixes de langue sont résolus sur les tags name=* et pas network=* et si on commence à mettre des suffixes de langue sur les tags network, ou imposer les noms concaténés sur les network=* on va trouver un peu de tout (dans tous les ordres, avec divers séparateurs), l'unification

Re: [Talk-cz] České názvy v Banátu

On 27.8.2017 15:45, Jan Martinec wrote: Ahoj, to by skoro fungovalo s name:cs, name:de a jenom name, ne? Pokud je tam nějaká ta užívaná česká transkripce z němčiny, osobně bych použil alt_name:cs. Jestli přidávat alt_name:etymology:cs ... to už asi ne, to mi připadá jako overkill. Já bych

Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

If we validate via survey say in Canada, will we be able to remove the id from the revert list? Canada has Canvec we can reference to as well as OpenStreetCam and Mapillary On Aug 27, 2017 9:50 AM, "Frederik Ramm" wrote: > Hi, > >in 2010 I was privately contacted by

[OSM-talk] Redacting 75,000 street names contributed by user chdr

Hi, in 2010 I was privately contacted by another OSM user with the suspicion that user "chdr" might be copying names from Google maps (there were few "easter eggs" in Oman that were only on Google and not in the real world, and they suddenly popped up on OSM). "chdr" was contacted at the time,

[Talk-us] Redacting 75,000 street names contributed by user chdr

Hi, in 2010 I was privately contacted by another OSM user with the suspicion that user "chdr" might be copying names from Google maps (there were few "easter eggs" in Oman that were only on Google and not in the real world, and they suddenly popped up on OSM). "chdr" was contacted at the time,

Re: [Talk-cz] České názvy v Banátu

Ahoj, to by skoro fungovalo s name:cs, name:de a jenom name, ne? Pokud je tam nějaká ta užívaná česká transkripce z němčiny, osobně bych použil alt_name:cs. Jestli přidávat alt_name:etymology:cs ... to už asi ne, to mi připadá jako overkill. Zdar, Honza Piškvor Martinec Dne 27. 8. 2017 15:38

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

Le 27/08/2017 à 12:23, marc marc a écrit : niveau wiki sur la page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name la version anglaise dit que name est le nom des plaques de rue la version française dit pareil. Ceci dit cela va poser problème le jour où une petite commune met des panneaux bilingues

Re: [Talk-cz] České názvy v Banátu

On 27.8.2017 12:29, Mikoláš Štrajt wrote: Zdar, narazil jsem na na článek[1] o festivalu v české vesnici Eibentál v rumunském Banátu. Chtěl jsem jí pak najít na mapy.cz a ejhle - ono to nešlo. Když jsem jí pak našel v datech OSM[2], zjistil jsem proč - někdo jí dal název "Tisové údolí".

[Talk-cz] České názvy v Banátu

Zdar, narazil jsem na na článek[1] o festivalu v české vesnici Eibentál v rumunském Banátu. Chtěl jsem jí pak najít na mapy.cz a ejhle - ono to nešlo. Když jsem jí pak našel v datech OSM[2], zjistil jsem proč - někdo jí dal název "Tisové údolí". Proto mám dotaz do pléna: Jak moc se ten název

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] contributions peut-être à revoir

niveau wiki sur la page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name la version anglaise dit que name est le nom des plaques de rue la version française dit pareil. Ceci dit cela va poser problème le jour où une petite commune met des panneaux bilingues sans changer de nom officiel. c'est sur