[Talk-es] semanarioOSM Nº 479 2019-00-17-2019-09-23

Hola, el semanario Nº 479, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/12408/ ¡Disfruta! ¿Sabías que también puedes enviar mensajes para la nota semanal sin ser miembro? Simplemente ingresa a

[Talk-cu] semanarioOSM Nº 479 2019-00-17-2019-09-23

Hola, el semanario Nº 479, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/12408/ ¡Disfruta! ¿Sabías que también puedes enviar mensajes para la nota semanal sin ser miembro? Simplemente ingresa a

[OSM-co] semanarioOSM Nº 479 2019-00-17-2019-09-23

Hola, el semanario Nº 479, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/12408/ ¡Disfruta! ¿Sabías que también puedes enviar mensajes para la nota semanal sin ser miembro? Simplemente ingresa a

[Talk-cl] semanarioOSM Nº 479 2019-00-17-2019-09-23

Hola, el semanario Nº 479, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/12408/ ¡Disfruta! ¿Sabías que también puedes enviar mensajes para la nota semanal sin ser miembro? Simplemente ingresa a

[OSM-talk-fr] Cyclo4 : intégration des itinéraires et aménagements cyclables des Alpes-de-Haute-Provence dans OpenStreetMap

Bonjour, Le département des Alpes-de-Haute-Provence confie à APITUX l'intégration de ses itinéraires et aménagements cyclables dans OpenStreetMap. À l’heure où « la donnée de référence pour le vélo est sur OSM »*, il est devenu essentiel pour la collectivité de veiller à la meilleure description

[Talk-ko] weeklyOSM #479 2019-00-17-2019-09-23

매주 일어나는 OSM 소식을 종합한, 479번째 주간OSM이 발행되었습니다. http://www.weeklyosm.eu/ko/archives/12408/ 읽어 주셔서 감사합니다! 셨나요? 그냥 https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/login 에 들어가서 오픈스트리트맵 계정으로 로그인하기만 하면 됩니다. 기사 작성법 등의 정보는 여기를 참조하세요. 주간OSM이란? 누가?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages 어디서?:

[Talk-us] weeklyOSM #479 2019-00-17-2019-09-23

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 479, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/12408/ Enjoy! Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in to

[talk-latam] semanarioOSM Nº 479 2019-00-17-2019-09-23

Hola, el semanario Nº 479, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/12408/ ¡Disfruta! ¿Sabías que también puedes enviar mensajes para la nota semanal sin ser miembro? Simplemente ingresa a

[Talk-br] semanárioOSM Nº 479 2019-00-17-2019-09-23

Bom dia, O semanárioOSM Nº 479, o resumo de tudo o que acontece no mundo OpenStreetMap, está publicado *em português* : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/pb/archives/12408/ Aproveite! Você sabia que também pode enviar mensagens para o OSM semanal/semanárioOSMſ sem ser membro? Basta fazer login em

[Talk-ca] weeklyOSM #479 2019-00-17-2019-09-23

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 479, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/12408/ Enjoy! Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in to

[OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #479 2019-00-17-2019-09-23

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 479, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/12408/ Enjoy! Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in to

[Talk-africa] weeklyOSM #479 2019-00-17-2019-09-23

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 479, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/12408/ Enjoy! Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in to

[Talk-GB] weeklyOSM #479 2019-00-17-2019-09-23

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 479, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/12408/ Enjoy! Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in to

[Talk-pt] semanárioOSM Nº 479 2019-00-17-2019-09-23

Bom dia, O semanárioOSM Nº 479, o resumo de tudo o que acontece no mundo OpenStreetMap, está publicado *em português* : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/pb/archives/12408/ Aproveite! Você sabia que também pode enviar mensagens para o OSM semanal/semanárioOSMſ sem ser membro? Basta fazer login em

[Talk-in] weeklyOSM #479 2019-00-17-2019-09-23

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 479, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/12408/ Enjoy! Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in to

[Talk-bo] semanarioOSM Nº 479 2019-00-17-2019-09-23

Hola, el semanario Nº 479, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/12408/ ¡Disfruta! ¿Sabías que también puedes enviar mensajes para la nota semanal sin ser miembro? Simplemente ingresa a

[OSM-talk] From the SotM: tagging session

Hello everybody, I have promised to report results from the tagging session at the SotM. I'm sorry for being late. The good news are that there is a relatively actionable item that has found general acclaim. We would like to have a secondary tag documentation with the properties: - It is

Re: [talk-au] Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law

On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 13:58, Ewen Hill wrote: > > Just to note that you can ride on a footpath if you are 12 or under OR as an > adult riding with a child 12 or under. This is a national standard in all > states I believe. I believe it's only nsw and vic that have these age based rules.

Re: [Talk-ca] Importing buildings in Canada

Hi Steve, Thanks for posting the event! I just RSVPed. I think a separate import event would probably be helpful - somewhere with wifi and outlets for laptops, probably not a bar. Perhaps we can book a meeting room at a public library or something? I can poll some of the more active local

Re: [talk-au] Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law

On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 06:42, Andrew Davidson wrote: > On 29/9/19 10:41 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access says designated means > > "...in general this means that there is a (explicit) sign saying > > something like 'pedestrians allowed', or a

Re: [talk-au] Discussion F: landuse=residential

*# Discussion F: landuse=residential* *...* *QUESTION* *How is the best way to approach this? * *I welcome your comments.* Herbert.Remi This is the fifth in your 'discussion' series, and prior to that you presented two 'Topics' and 3 or more other long emails. *However you have yet to respond

Re: [talk-au] Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law

Just to note that you can ride on a footpath if you are 12 or under OR as an adult riding with a child 12 or under. This is a national standard in all states I believe. In Victoria, you will see sometimes a pedestrian and cyclist on a white rectangle sign or a blue directional street name style

Re: [talk-au] Discussion F: landuse=residential

On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 13:31, Herbert.Remi via Talk-au < talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > # Discussion F: landuse=residential > > ## The Issue > > I am very interest in improving quality and consistency. In this case, the > question is inconsistent or incomplete? I have discovered that many >

Re: [talk-au] Discussion F: landuse=residential

On 30/09/19 13:30, Herbert.Remi via Talk-au wrote: I have not had the time to review OSM Wiki on this, unfortunately. What I have seen in the editor is that some mappers have mapped the whole suburb with one polygon, while others have mapped every city block. The latter sort of makes sense

[talk-au] Discussion F: landuse=residential

# Discussion F: landuse=residential ## The Issue I am very interest in improving quality and consistency. In this case, the question is inconsistent or incomplete? I have discovered that many residential areas have still not been mapped. ### Specifics: landuse=residential There is a land

Re: [talk-ph] [Tabang-AI] Siquijor road mapping project

Hi, TabangAI Siquijor Mapping is complete, we need help validating: https://tasks-assisted.hotosm.org/project/16 If you have project specific notes to share, please post here: https://github.com/OSMPH/Tabang-AI/issues/10 Thanks! On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 9:58 PM maning sambale wrote: > > Hi, > >

Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

On 30/09/19 00:30, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote: On 29/09/2019 14:30, David Woolley wrote: I think too much effort goes into these big changes. The actual change is dead easy in JOSM. It's all this faffing about having to discuss it that takes up all the time. +1 As I said in another thread

Re: [talk-au] Are we allowed to use PTV datasets (CC 4.0)?

Hi, just thought I would mention if you get the waiver that you could use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GO-Sync to manage in the conflation. I am one of the developers and plan on doing a lot of work on it over the summer. If you need help, send me an email. Thanks Reuben On 14/9/19

Re: [talk-au] Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law

On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 09:06, Andrew Davidson wrote: > I was more interested in how consistently they are installed in > Queensland. > Sorry! In my part of the GC, I've seen the shared path signs along the GC Oceanway. One other shared path nearby, they're "painted" on the path itself, rather

Re: [talk-au] Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 7:30 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > Examples of the signs are given on the linked page > > > Yeap, the law is the same as the ACT. I was more interested in how consistently they are installed in Queensland. In the ACT as a rule they don't put them up (but they will use

Re: [talk-au] Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law

On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 06:44, Andrew Davidson wrote: > > Does anyone know what the situation in Queensland is? Do they bother > putting up the signage? > https://www.qld.gov.au/transport/safety/rules/wheeled-devices/bicycle#footpath Riding on a separated pathOn a separated path, you can only

Re: [Talk-it] errore mkgmap durante compilazione

Il 29/09/19 20:46, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu ha scritto: ... Ho guardato con Josm, mi da errori vari tra i quali i nodi duplicati in alcune parti dei landuse, può essere legato a questo il problema? non ho mai usato mkgmap. Giusto una nota OT: Brrr... tutta la zona è affetta da

Re: [Talk-GB] Rights of way vs. tracks

This is just fantastic, thank you. Looking at the definitive map there is a RoW there, but it seems that the path as shown on OSM is only roughly right: it should actually run from the road at an angle of ~240deg rather than the ~220deg OSM shows,

Re: [talk-au] Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law

On 29/9/19 10:41 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access says designated means "...in general this means that there is a (explicit) sign saying something like 'pedestrians allowed', or a pedestrian icon." So if signposted for a particular mode, I'd use

Re: [Talk-GB] Rights of way vs. tracks

On 29/09/2019 19:37, Edward Bainton wrote: Do I mark a track, with all it's passability tags, and then tag horses & foot=designated? That acknowledges the track, but disregards the documentation here

Re: [Talk-GB] Rights of way vs. tracks

For the bridleway map with highway=track, designation=public_bridleway. Basic access rights can be inferred from this combination, but explicit tagging does no harm (although it does make it a little harder to ensure these are correct if there is a change in status). One of the beauties of OSM is

Re: [Talk-GB] Rights of way vs. tracks

The documentation is for the general case, where a public bridleway is physically a bridleway. (There are also private bridleways.) Here you should tag highway=track horse=designated foot=designated vehicle=private designation=public_bridleway. You may need to break the track if it continues with

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] switch2OSM

C'est justement en cherchant comment les habitants d'un lieu-dit donnaient leur adresse sur les PagesBlanches que je suis tombé sur Mappy. La réponse ? Je n'ai trouvé personne à cette adresse ! Selon le cadastre il y a un "lieu-dit" sous forme de polygone avec dedans un "lieu-dit" sous forme de

Re: [Talk-GB] Rights of way vs. tracks

There is absolutely no indication of it on the ground: no beaten path, no fingerboard, no break in the hedge at the SW end (it wouldn't need one at the NE end, open country). Do I delete as probably sourced from OS, or leave as it's a right of way? First thing to do is check the County

Re: [Talk-it] errore mkgmap durante compilazione

Il 29/09/19 19:33, demon_box ha scritto: > ciao ragazzi forse sono OT ma da qualche giorno quasi al termine della > compilazione con mkgmap mi compare questa segnalazione (la compilazione > termina comunque correttamente): > > GRAVE (RoadDef): 66923004.osm.pbf: internal error? The nodeCount

[Talk-GB] Rights of way vs. tracks

Hi all Two rights of way questions for England & Wales: 1. What do we do when a public bridleway passes down an otherwise private track, as here ? Both the track the the right of way are 'on the ground'. Do I mark a track, with all it's passability

[Talk-ca] Carte velo CyclOSM et Référence Route Verte

CyclOSM, une nouvelle carte vélo est disponible https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=14/45.5167/-73.5464/cyclosm Et voici quelques commentaires pour les collègues du Québec, dont Claude, qui font un suivi des réseaux de velo. Sur les cartes de Velo, quoique la Route verte est bien tracée, il n'est pas

[Talk-it] errore mkgmap durante compilazione

ciao ragazzi forse sono OT ma da qualche giorno quasi al termine della compilazione con mkgmap mi compare questa segnalazione (la compilazione termina comunque correttamente): GRAVE (RoadDef): 66923004.osm.pbf: internal error? The nodeCount doesn't match value calculated by RoadNetwork:

Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

On 29/09/2019 15:30, Dave F wrote: Preventing the mass (hardly "mass" though) edit of Thomas Cook & instead relying on individuals to update *will* guarantee more shops will be "wrong". It could well actually have the opposite effect by getting people to audit lesser known businesses on the

[OSM-ja] 湘南（江ノ島）マッピングパーティー

ikiyaです。 10月5日（土）江ノ島エリアにてOpenStreetMapマッピングパーティーを開催します。 湘南モノレール江ノ島駅から、江ノ島の間を中心に湘南を散策しながら調査します。 江ノ島ヨットハーバーなど、注目のエリアでグループに分かれて行動します。 午後は、江の電で移動して、藤沢駅近くのレンタルスペースにてワークショップを開催します。 OpenSteetMapに興味をお持ちの方、街歩きが好きな方、江ノ島エリアに興味をお持ちの方お気軽に参加ください。 マッピングパーティー初心者歓迎します！ イベント情報、参加申し込みはこちらになります。 Facebookサイト

[Talk-bo] Nuevos mapeadores en Bolivia

Hola, Andy del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM aquí. Hemos escuchado que en Bolivia ocasionalmente puede tener un gran número de estudiantes mapeando en OSM por cortos períodos de tiempo (¿tal vez como parte de un curso universitario?). Si desea ayuda con la mejor manera de lidiar con este

Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

On 29/09/2019 14:30, David Woolley wrote: I think too much effort goes into these big changes. The actual change is dead easy in JOSM. It's all this faffing about having to discuss it that takes up all the time. As I said in another thread this increasing reluctance to removing/updating

Re: [Talk-hr] Javni prijevoz u Zagrebu

Napravio sam eksperiment sa busom 103 gdje sam ucrtao stanice uz put (public_transport=platform), a nisam ucrtao stajališta na way (public_transport=stop_position): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10088931 Skinuo sam generiranu kartu sa data.osm-hr.org i ubacio je u OsmAnd da isprobam

Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

On 29/09/2019 14:03, Jez Nicholson wrote: Re: my comment about shop=vacant. I may have been convinced to use disused:shop=travel_agent + name=Thomas Cook. * travel_agency Not sure whether a vacant shop with no ghost signage would still be a shop=vacant or a disused:shop=yes. As those two

Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

On 29/09/2019 14:03, Jez Nicholson wrote: I'm not keen on bulk automated closing everything called Thomas Cook because the world is more complicated than it first seems to be. I favour visual confirmation. I think too much effort goes into these big changes. The real problem with

Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

Re: my comment about shop=vacant. I may have been convinced to use disused:shop=travel_agent + name=Thomas Cook. Not sure whether a vacant shop with no ghost signage would still be a shop=vacant or a disused:shop=yes. I'm not keen on bulk automated closing everything called Thomas Cook because

Re: [talk-au] "designated" for foot and bicycle (was: Re: Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law)

On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 at 21:33, Andy Townsend wrote: > They're designed for use by foot > and bicycle traffic, and foot and bicycle traffic is at the very least > actively encouraged from using them in preference to the parallel > roads. Whether that should be "=yes" or "=designated" on these

Re: [Talk-GB] TfL cycle data published - schema mapping

On Fri, 20 Sep 2019, Martin - CycleStreets wrote: What are people's thoughts about these suggested new tags? Thanks so much everyone for all the great comments. I'll be replying on these as soon as I get a chance later this week and merging the changes in, after a busy week following

Re: [talk-au] Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law

On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 at 20:35, Andrew Davidson wrote: > On 28/9/19 8:55 am, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > If the way is specifically for a particular mode, then use > > mode=designated. So a shared cycle pedestrian path is > > foot=designated+bicycle=designated. > > Actually in Australia if a path is

Re: [talk-cz] Jak značit bankomaty s bezkontaktním výběrem

On Thu 2019-09-26 13:26:45, Jakub Konečný wrote: > Ahoj, > poslední dobou se mi párkrát stalo, že jsem si potřeboval vybrat peníze z > bankomatu, ale měl jsem u sebe jenom mobil (případně hodinky). Dneska už > hodně bankomatů, minimálně ve větších městech, nabízí bezkontaktní výběr, > ale

[talk-au] "designated" for foot and bicycle (was: Re: Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law)

On 29/09/2019 11:34, Andrew Davidson wrote: On 28/9/19 8:55 am, Andrew Harvey wrote: If the way is specifically for a particular mode, then use mode=designated. So a shared cycle pedestrian path is foot=designated+bicycle=designated. Actually in Australia if a path is designated for bicycles

Re: [talk-au] Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law

29 Sep 2019, 12:34 by thesw...@gmail.com: > On 28/9/19 8:55 am, Andrew Harvey wrote: > >> If the way is specifically for a particular mode, then use mode=designated. >> So a shared cycle pedestrian path is foot=designated+bicycle=designated. >> > > Actually in Australia if a path is

Re: [talk-au] Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law

On 28/9/19 8:55 am, Andrew Harvey wrote: If the way is specifically for a particular mode, then use mode=designated. So a shared cycle pedestrian path is foot=designated+bicycle=designated. Actually in Australia if a path is designated for bicycles then you can't walk on it:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Geopunt dag

Hi Maarten, How did it go? I had an extended interview with the Geopunt team once, and made similar suggestions. They did not seem very open to the idea, but I can imagine people keep badgering them about that. So I hope you did :) Joost Op di 24 sep. 2019 09:57 schreef rodeo .be : > Hey

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] switch2OSM

Le 28 septembre 2019, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit : > Joli poisson : sur la carte des Pages Jaunes (Mappy) j'ai eu la surprise > de voir : > > © Mappy > | 2018 TomTom, OpenStreetMap. > > Bien ? Oui et non car seul

Re: [Talk-de] railway=crossing für Straßenbahnen auf Straßen

Hallo Samuel, die Frage, ob bei railway=tram Kreuzungspunkte mit highways als crossing bzw. level_crossing zu markieren sind, habe ich mir auch schon gestellt. In den Wikiseiten zu diesen Attributen habe ich keine Ausnahme für den Fall railway=tram gesehen. An der Darstellung im OSM-Carto-Stil