Hi I chatted briefly with Trudy. Who would like to help me curate a track
on community for SOTM?
Last weekend I went to FOSDEM. There were some great talks that relate to
our work - I curated a list (videos and slides are online)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Heather%20Leson/diary/392119
> Re: "Similarly, type=route relations (road, bicycle, hiking, equestrian...)
> enter OSM from ODbL-compatible government-published maps, yet remain unsigned
> (or poorly signed) in the real world."
Please do not add this section. Most types of route relation should
only be mapped if they are
Ciao,
nei credits c'è.
Lorenzo
Il sab 8 feb 2020, 23:02 Cascafico Giovanni ha
scritto:
> Mi sembra che questo sito [1] non abbia attribuito la mappa OSM...
> forse è un problema del mio browser? Mi chiedo anche se sia
> controllato dal CAI o meno.
>
>
> [1] https://mappasentieroitalia.cai.it
>
Mi sembra che questo sito [1] non abbia attribuito la mappa OSM...
forse è un problema del mio browser? Mi chiedo anche se sia
controllato dal CAI o meno.
[1] https://mappasentieroitalia.cai.it
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
I've been working on the translation of the wiki into Spanish for a long
time, both creating new translations and updating the translations that
become obsolete. In all this time I have been able to check the
evolution of some pages of documentation in English, the way in which
they have
Done:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Talk:Good_practice#Supplementing_and_clarifying_the_On_The_Ground_.22rule.22
Follow it there, if you like.
SteveA
> On Feb 8, 2020, at 12:04 PM, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
>
> I am in favor of this or similar language. I think for a more vote-like
> discussion it
I agree that putting the building on the map should rank higher than giving it
a lifecycle or damaged attribute that hard to assess from the image quality.
This is also the approach I recall from HOT disaster mapping. Roads and
building from satellite, destruction details from ground crew.
There’s really no good time that works universally. These won’t be the only
meetings or way to get involved, they’re just to get things moving.
Mikel
On Saturday, February 8, 2020, 1:40 PM, Philip Barnes
wrote:
On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 16:12 +, Mikel Maron wrote:
To accommodate time zones,
I am in favor of this or similar language. I think for a more vote-like
discussion it might be better to use the wiki talk page (easier to add +1s
and short comments).
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 2:59 PM stevea wrote:
> I don't know if here or https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Talk:Good_practice is a
>
I don't know if here or https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Talk:Good_practice is a
better place to discuss and eventually insert these suggested improvements into
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability (and its first section,
"Map what's on the ground").
I suggest adding these essences
And in fact David Earl deserves recognition for pretty much single-handedly
doing the original basic mapping of Cambridge at street level. (I did about 1%
of it at the time, but had the excuse of very young children taking my
attention)
Sent from my iPhone
> On 8 Feb 2020, at 14:30, Richard
Just another data point to add to the discussion:
JOSM currently warns that is_in=* tags are deprecated:
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/changeset/14917/josm
Generally, tagging suggestions in JOSM are not usually controversial
(unlike some of iD's tagging suggestions). Therefore, I usually delete
On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 16:12 +, Mikel Maron wrote:
> To accommodate time zones, we’ll hold this initial meeting twice, the
> second at 1700 UTC on the same day, Wednesday February 12. I’ve
> blocked out an hour for each, but if you can only attend a portion
> that’s fine too.
Hi Mikel
Would it
Very well stated, Colin. I agree that "independent verifiability" is at the
heart of OTG and what we mean to distill from it as crucially important and a
tenet of OSM that we can all agree upon (well, I hope so, anyway).
By explicitly stating that John Random Public can "consult the source"
On 2020-02-08 18:03, stevea wrote:
> See, "the on the ground rule," to the best of my ability to determine it (an
> exception is your opinion as you explicitly express here, and that's part of
> the problem with it), isn't clearly defined and it needs the elasticity of
> such ad hoc
On Feb 8, 2020, at 2:58 AM, Rory McCann wrote:
> On 07.02.20 20:12, stevea wrote:
>> A well-known example is (national, other) boundaries, which
>> frequently do not exist "on the ground,"
> National borders don't exist on the ground? huh? Have you ever actually
> _crossed_ an international
Thanks Rory, that's an interesting case. One thing of note is grouping
names by language/dialect is fairly common but still arbitrary division --
i.e. it assumes that a group of people speaking one language/dialect have
no contradictions in naming something. But just like we should not assume
To accommodate time zones, we’ll hold this initial meeting twice, the second at
1700 UTC on the same day, Wednesday February 12. I’ve blocked out an hour for
each, but if you can only attend a portion that’s fine too.
Expect we’ll discuss the scope of work laid out by the Board, sketch initial
Umap is another good one to use for those who want to overlay additional
data / information onto a base map
On Sat 8 Feb 2020, 14:51 Peter Mooney, wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm giving a general overview talk about OpenStreetMap in Maynooth
> University next week, as part of Love Data Week
Hello everyone,
I'm giving a general overview talk about OpenStreetMap in Maynooth
University next week, as part of Love Data Week 2020. Details are here [1].
I only have an hour so I want to show attendees what kinds of applications
OpenStreetMap is being used for in Ireland and beyond. This
On 06/02/2020 16:49, Phillip Barnett wrote:
And here is the email from the guy who did the original mapping, the last time
this came up, including his reasoning for the amenity Tag rather than building
tag https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2015-May/017457.html
Note the time
Impressionnant !
Le 08/02/2020 à 13:57, Baptiste Jonglez a écrit :
https://munin.openstreetmap.org/openstreetmap.org/tile.openstreetmap.org/squid_times_http.html
Si tu veux savoir où est chaque serveur :
https://hardware.openstreetmap.org/#tile-caches
Et quel serveur(s) de cache est
Dave F wrote:
> CU wanted a new site map. They paid someone to provide it for
> them. Which is fine, but please don't suggest they're
> contributions are superior to those of any anybody else.
> Especially when they decided to knowingly go against accepted
> tagging procedures.
I think that's
On 06/02/2020 15:48, Brian Prangle wrote:
"OSM is not beholden to data consumers.
They take the data 'as is'. That includes any amendments
My planned amendment can always be reversed if there is a valid reason.
Upsetting CU isn't one"
Not a great way to build a community when the data user
> I've been looking at IoM, Jersey, and Guernsey which AFAIK have no coverage in the Community Index. As you say, it uses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1_alpha-2 country codes via the countryCoder so I'm expanding coverage to ["gb", "gg", "je", "im"]. I believe that there may be an issue
Great...then as far as Northern Ireland is concerned then I think that the
Community Index has it right already. It allows for the overlap or OSMUK
and OSMIE, Talk-GB and Talk-IE
I've been looking at IoM, Jersey, and Guernsey which AFAIK have no coverage
in the Community Index. As you say, it
Salut,
Si tu t'intéresse à la performance du fond de carte OSM.org, une métrique
disponible facilement est le temps de réponse médian au niveau de chaque
cache Squid :
https://munin.openstreetmap.org/openstreetmap.org/tile.openstreetmap.org/squid_times_http.html
C'est très variable selon le
Le 08.02.20 à 13:21, Arnaud Champollion a écrit :
> beaucoup d'attributs "proposés" mais pas validés.
>
> Est-ce que ça veut dire que pour l'instant on ne les utilise pas ?
dans osm, tout le monde est libre d'utiliser n'importe quel tags.
un tag validé est simplement un tag qui a fait l'objet
note: certains attributs documentés ne sont pas rendus.
Exemple les obstacles fixes de saut équestres, il manque la prise en compte
de certaines valeurs de barrier=*, pour les pistes de steeplechase; on
pourrait tricher en indiquant barrier=gate ou barrier=fence ou
barrier=hedge, mais ce serait
Bonjour,
Ma question concerne le thème équestre, mais aussi plus largement les
attributs "proposés".
Cette page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:%C3%89quitation
est justement très complète et documente beaucoup d'attributs "proposés"
mais pas validés.
Est-ce que ça veut dire que
Hej!
PangoSE, kan du till att börja med be SCB att uppdatera sin hemsida? För
närvarande står det visserligen att tätortsgeometrierna är öppna data [1]
men också att deras öppna data är CC-BY-licensierade [2] vilket inte är
tillräckligt för OSM [3]. Det är ingen bra idé att ladda upp data med
On 08.02.20 11:58, Rory McCann wrote:
On 07.02.20 20:12, stevea wrote:
A well-known example is (national, other) boundaries, which
frequently do not exist "on the ground,"
National borders don't exist on the ground? huh? Have you ever actually
_crossed_ an international border? I assure you
Nice hookup with Trek Viewdoes this warrant adding to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Current_events as a mapping party? I
always like seeing UK events on there.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:37 PM Nick Whitelegg
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As some of you may know I am developing
On 08.02.20 12:01, Colin Smale wrote:
Absolutely. But we should document our sources! Basic rule of research.
And if we choose to promote one alternative above the others, we are
skating on thin ice.
IMO, the "alternative" OSM promotes is "what's on the ground". Let's
nail our colours to the
On 07.02.20 20:56, Colin Smale wrote:
In the case of Crimea, two different authorities have different views of
the jurisdiction to which it belongs. That is a fact, that we can safely
map. We can represent the border in one place "according to Russia" and
in another place "according to
Merci pour les conseils :)
On 07/02/2020 22:17, Jérôme Seigneuret wrote:
Dans ton cas de toute-façon il y a une signalisation verticale...
Ca reste de la dégradation sans justification.
Après discussion propose lui déjà de faire un revert de son changeset
en mettant les liens et notre
On 07.02.20 20:22, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
(e.g. two fairly large groups of people could refer to the same
place/object by different names). ... the map should be able to
reflect difference of opinions to some "reasonable" degree (an
intentionally vague term).
One useful example of that is a city
On 2020-02-08 11:48, Rory McCann wrote:
> It is true that government A might have one opinion, and government B might
> have another, and Provisional Autonomous Republic of C might have another
> opinion.
>
> But there can be another way. We go there, and we see what nearly everyone
> there
On 07.02.20 20:12, stevea wrote:
A well-known example is (national, other) boundaries, which
frequently do not exist "on the ground,"
National borders don't exist on the ground? huh? Have you ever actually
_crossed_ an international border? I assure you they exist on the
ground. From large
It is true that government A might have one opinion, and government B
might have another, and Provisional Autonomous Republic of C might have
another opinion.
But there can be another way. We go there, and we see what nearly
everyone there calls it. We look at the words on the signs. We
Ahoj,
19.2.2020 se koná další olomoucký mapathon. Start je v 18h tradičně v
učebně LP2.004 na adrese Přírodovědecká fakulta Univerzity Palackého v
Olomouci, 17. listopadu 12, 77146 Olomouc, Czech Republic
S sebou vlastní notebook a ideálně také myš.
odkaz na FB událost
Le 08/02/2020 à 09:35, Christian Quest - cqu...@openstreetmap.fr a écrit :
Le 07/02/2020 à 23:12, Jérôme Seigneuret a écrit :
Je suis déjà parti sur le principe de proposer du Mapbox ou une
solution interne.
Penses au français aussi... Mapbox commence a être envahissant et les
positions
Le 07/02/2020 à 23:12, Jérôme Seigneuret a écrit :
Je suis déjà parti sur le principe de proposer du Mapbox ou une
solution interne.
Penses au français aussi... Mapbox commence a être envahissant et les
positions dominantes c'est jamais sain.
@Vincent la question de garantie n'est pas
43 matches
Mail list logo
