ass man genau nicht so verfahren soll, und dass das eine
Vorgabe der „internationalen Community“ sei.
Gruß Martin
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
uch aus anderen Gründen problematisch).
Gruß Martin
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
zurückgebaut werden müssen.
Kennt Ihr solche Entscheidungen?
Wäre es nicht eher dem System entsprechend, aufgrund der baulichen Trennungen
den highway aufzufächern?
Gruß Martin
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https
gni modo la richiesta l'ho inviata, male che vada mi diranno che non
> ho i requisiti. :)
praticamente contano gli ultimi 365 giorni, puoi controllare con “how did you
contribute”. Se manca qualche giorno dovrebbe essere fattibile ricuperare, per
esempio inserendo un civico al giorno ;-)
probabilmente a Dicembre, ed è richiesto di essere membro da
90 giorni), non esitate!
Non è un problema se siete anche membri del local chapter italiano (WMI),
ovviamente.
Più mappatori e meno imprese ;-)
Ciao Martin
sent from a phone___
Talk
probabilmente a Dicembre, ed è richiesto di essere membro da
90 giorni), non esitate!
Non è un problema se siete anche membri del local chapter italiano (WMI),
ovviamente.
Più mappatori e meno imprese ;-)
Ciao Martin
sent from a phone___
Talk
info and that is supposedly “the
> original”.
>
>
>
the original is right. The translation must still be updated, it was decided
recently that the tiles are now published with no specific license (i.e. as
produced works under the ODbL)
Cheers Martin __
eare una tale
istruzione ugualmente)
Ciao Martin ___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
mfoundation.org/wiki/Articles_of_Association
Auf jeden Fall eine super Sache, ich freue mich auf einen Ansturm von
Neumitgliedern aus der Craftmapperecke, bisher sind Leute die mit OpenStreetMap
Geld verdienen in der OpenStreetMap-Foundation gefühlt überrepräsentie
map.org/wiki/Lacking_proper_attribution
to keep track of the case.
Cheers Martin ___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
nti lasciano, utilizzando i loro sistemi).
Cheers Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
é non lo uso
praticamente mai.
In generale abbiamo un vantaggio: non dobbiamo sacrificare la obiettività a
favore di qualcuno che ci paga per essere visto di più rispetto a quel che si
merita ;-)
(quello che loro chiamano “mappe individuali”)
Ciao Martin
tabella e se
> sono presenti delle viste la procedura
> ovviamente non va a buon fine.
>
devi creare la vista ogni volta di nuovo (con lo script). Se crei una nuova
tabella non ha nessuna vista.
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
T
1, ho fatto anch‘io così, perché QGIS ha un problema con hstore.
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
quelle di iD
Ciao Martin ___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
fine when we consider them still the
same and where they start to be so different that another tag is required.
Cheers Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ntegration of wikidata: just add
a wikidata reference to an object and you could decide to ignore all
OpenStreetMap tags and rely only on wikidata (although it would not be
advisable IMHO, looking at where wikidata is currently, you would loose lots of
relevant inform
nk data storage, network traffic and computing power for image scaling), so
I’m not holding my breath for this to come any soon.
Cheers Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ut even
having a human looking at it. I also agree with Simon that this would be an
enormous drop in quality.
Cheers Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ontano sulle segnalazioni,
ma le posizioni talvolta sono così approssimative che non si capisce nemmeno
quale delle fontanelle c’è e quale manca. Poi credo hanno solo fontane e
fontanelle che gestiscono loro, perciò li saltano alcuni importanti...
Ciao Martin
line map.
>
this is because Londn is apparently the name in West Flemish
Londn (name:vls)
https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R=65606
Cheers
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
06 433 edits, this is less than half the edits of
JOSM (43,6%). Of all contributions to OSM in 2020, 65,4% came in through
JOSM and 28,5% through iD. This is more or less unchanged also in the
previous 3 years:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editor_usage_stats#by_number_of_edits
C
s of
man-years.
Cheers Martin ___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ght be tempted to use it for the
screws as well).
Cheers Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Hit 2 times „a“ (angle display becomes green)
Cheers Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ktop editors. A mouse is still much faster and more precise than
touch input, i.e. for those types of edits where you add or modify a lot of
geometry, or copy paste information from various sources.
Cheers Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetm
)
Complimenti a tutti
Ciao Martin
PS: chi vuole vedere tutto, dal minuto 10:14
https://www.tagesschau.de/multimedia/sendung/ts-38393.html
sent from a phone___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
ré u položky zobrazí výřez z
> OSM s vyznačeným příslušným prvkem (přes Overpass)
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Mxn/overpass.js
>
len pripomeniem, že aj na
https://www.freemap.sk/?map=13/49.344586/16.430311=Xw sa zobrazujú
wikidata/wikipedia tagy.
--
Ing. Martin Ždila <http
utors, and 2500 is
no big money for the OpenStreetMap-Foundation, so it may be worth the effort.
At least you can be sure that in these 9,7 million edits no imports are hiding
;-) and this number makes it 4th for performed edits.
Cheers Martin
___
talk ma
already implemented, but
there may be few icons available (missing artwork for many symbols)
Cheers Martin ___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
nker.de/html/body_openstreetmap.html#sym2name
Cheers Martin ___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
hen thinking about the direction that iD shall go to:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Controversial_Decisions
Cheers Martin ___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
sent from a phone
> On 2. Aug 2020, at 03:19, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> An indication that all these things are maintained by one organization?
there is the operator tag for this. Don’t use relations where tags can do the
trick...
sent from a phone
> On 1. Aug 2020, at 20:48, Yves via talk wrote:
>
> This would be better joined in a site relation.
why should it? What’s the benefit? How is this different to adding all roads of
a village into a site relation?
Chee
; 11. Export Rules.
> You agree that the Software will not be shipped, transferred, or exported
> into any country or used in any manner prohibited by the United States Export
> Administration Act or any other export laws, restrictions, or regulations
> (collectively the “Exp
in pratica è già stato fatto tante volte...
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
licenza cc0 che però non garantisce
che i dati sono privi di diritti...
Mi potrei sbagliare, ma ricordo così
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
s in der Art
Gruß Martin
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
sent from a phone
> On 27. Jul 2020, at 22:20, Michal Migurski wrote:
>
> I turned this into a PR,
thank you!
Cheers Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
penstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_contribute” right after “see” and
before “the OpenStreetMap blog, user diaries.”
What do you think?
Cheers Martin
sent from a phone___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
only the pencil which appears
to be the same as „edit source“.
Cheers Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ora a Roma e vorrebbe pertecipare?
Ciao Martin ___
Talk-it-lazio mailing list
Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-lazio
tibili e contro il consenso della comunità.
Ciao Martin ___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
ng the route.
>
+1
>
>
> Unless the script preserves the information by storing it by alternative
> means, I would regard such a script as vandalism.
>
I agree and oppose this proposed automatic edit
Cheers Martin ___
talk ma
.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank
ti riferisci ad iD?
Ciao Martin ___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
en working locally
on the downloaded file. Maybe doing a dozen or so in an evening, once or
twice a week.
The modified images would then be distributed to others via my own
server. Which would have no effect on the OSM server.
cheers,
Martin.
_
pecially when zoomed in. But I'm not
planning to fetch or modify any raster tiles.
The downloaded PDF files are vector files which can be zoomed to any
level without pixelating, and can have the internal records modified as
required.
cheers,
Martin.
___
? What indication is required that it
has been modified? The project will be free and open-source, there is no
financial gain involved.
cheers,
Martin.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
, which can't?
Many thanks for any help/ideas/suggestions.
cheers,
Martin.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ind anything missing they can add it themselves
for the benefit of others.
Most of them go back to OS Explorer when they find UK public rights of
way are not shown in different colours on the OSM standard map.
Martin.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk
Gratulujem :-)
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020, 08:40 Tom Ka wrote:
> Ahoj,
>
> byla podepsána formální smlouva a spolek OpenStreetMap Česká republika
> z.s. se tak stal oficiálním zastoupením Nadace OpenStreetMap pro
> Českou republiku, viz:
>
> https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Local_Chapters
>
> Díky
sent from a phone
> On 22. Jul 2020, at 14:31, Francesco Ansanelli wrote:
>
>
> Ciao Martin,
>
> secondo te, "For disputed areas" sarebbero tutte le strade d'Italia o magari
> vuol dire che se c'è un dubbio tra due nomi diversi vince quello indicato
> su
d
commonly is) spelled without an abbreviation, then don't abbreviate it in
Openstreetmap.
...
Ciao
Martin
PS: Questa pagina: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:name
che tra altro non sembra una traduzione della pagina inglese, riporta un
esempio int_name=E64, ma penso d
ma soltanto un dolce sogno come “dovrebbe essere” ;-)
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
sent from a phone
> On 22. Jul 2020, at 07:05, Francesco Ansanelli wrote:
>
> Sono davvero così importanti le targhe fatte dai comuni?
sì, sono la cosa più rilevante per chi usa la mappa per orientarsi.
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it mai
o official_name (presumendo che lo stradario
contenga i nomi come da delibera)
nel dubbio, mettete un nome in più, invece di scegliere.
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
così ieri dove non c’erano cartelli di nome di strada per le
laterali, ma sò che i civici si riferiscono a questa via (farei come da
indirizzo):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/827906066#map=19/42.66925/12.21661
Ciao Martin ___
Talk-it ma
sent from a phone
> On 20. Jul 2020, at 22:38, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu
> wrote:
>
> storage=pile_log
log_pile
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
ome pensi, questo è come funziona :)
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
penstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade
in realtà credo che nella maggior parte dei percorsi “interni” non ci siano
nomi, i nomi si assegnano principalmente a strade pubbliche, per le vie interne
di una proprietà può decidere il proprietario se dare un nome e se renderlo
pu
it was paved yesterday, it’s not completely excluded that the
road was paved in between
Cheers Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
t was
misleading for me, until I came there and understood that the information in
the area in OpenStreetMap was unreliable (looked like detailed tagging but then
half of these details were fictional).
Cheers Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
you do not know the on the ground situation, both physically and the
local mapping conventions.
Cheers Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
these
passwords are thought to be provided to customers only, not to the general
public, but it might be different elsewhere.
Cheers
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Wieder einmal kommt die Warnung bei JOSM wenn man mit dem AT Adresshelfer
arbeiten will:
java.lang.NullPointerException
Gibt es eine Lösung des Problems?
would lean to using a separate highway=cycleway,
not least because it's easier then to put proper metadata on it.
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** https://www.cyclestreets.net
that
isn't asphalt makes it worthwhile putting the surface in explicitly. This
demonstrates to future mappers that the value is actually known (rather
than assumed/unknown/ambiguous).
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** https
will noch mitstimmen. Das Projekt führt
derzeit nur ganz knapp...
Gruß Martin
sent from a phone
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer etc
neither am I, just wondering up to which level contradictions and uncertainties
in licensing terms are still ok for OpenStreetMap and when it’s too much.
Cheers Martin
___
legal-talk mailing list
l
that.
Best regards,
Martin
___
OSRM-talk mailing list
OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
sent from a phone
> On 14. Jul 2020, at 14:48, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> ho anche trovato un paper che lo dice:
> https://www.jlis.it/article/downloadSuppFile/5461/271
in realtà dice che è “probabilmente“ ok, visto la dichiarazione del license
steward, per la IODL2, m
f the license steward that the license
is compatible with the ODbL.
I’ve found this document which indicates the compatibility is “likely ok”
https://www.jlis.it/article/downloadSuppFile/5461/271
licence in question is the IODL 1 and 2.
Cheers Martin _
sent from a phone
> On 11. Jul 2020, at 19:11, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> non è questione della ODbL, la questione è il progetto OpenStreetMap, che
> consente a chiunque di modificare tutto
in realtà sembra che sia problema della compatibilità con la Odbl, così hanno
s
o’, potrebbe anche andare
bene. non è detto che in una seconda fase gli orari saranno gli stessi.
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
e that the contained information is not "misrepresented"?
IIRR, in the past we have rejected import plans where such discriminatory
clauses have been present in the license.
Cheers
Martin
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
h
Come da oggetto, propongo un edit automatico per cancellare gli
opening_hours:covid19=*
(e forse altri tag covid19, se ci sono).
Ciao
Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
io a chi
usa dati non aggiornati.
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
sent from a phone
> On 13. Jul 2020, at 07:03, Bernhard Weiskopf wrote:
>
> Für amtliche Namen würde
> vielleicht "name:official" passen.)
official_name
Gruß Martin
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@o
rt hat ist es noch derselbe, auch wenn die
Straße im Verzeichnis nicht auftaucht.
Mal beim Amt angefragt warum das nicht drin ist?
Cheers Martin
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
questione è il progetto OpenStreetMap, che
consente a chiunque di modificare tutto
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
ternazionali.
Mi potrei sbagliare ;-)
Ciao Martin ___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
It is just possible (sight unseen) that it is an Easter Egg.
We could do the same. If we don't know whether it is permissible to tag
it Fairfield Road in OSM, and there is no actual sign on it, we could
call it Fairfields Road.
Martin.
___
Talk
sent from a phone
> On 10. Jul 2020, at 09:55, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu
> wrote:
>
>> ma per aree meno dense, per esempio in montagna, potrebbe essere
>> un’alternativa interessante.
>>
>> Ciao Martin
>>
>
> grazie dell
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:10 AM THEVENON Julien
wrote:
>
> Very nice !
>
thank you
> Hope to see France covered one day, my holiday destination is not so far
> from the coverage limit :-(
>
The limit is dictated by our hardware. But in the future we may expand even
more :-
Vi segnalo che Martin Zdila ha esteso la copertura di Freemap anche su Italia.
Non è uno stile per i centri urbani:
https://www.freemap.sk/?map=14/41.898508/12.477336=X
ma per aree meno dense, per esempio in montagna, potrebbe essere un’alternativa
interessante.
Ciao Martin
sent from
-contributed photos on the map
- live tracking (using eg. OsmAnd, Locus, ...)
- export to GPX
- wikipedia layer
- PWA
Most of it is the work of a single person (me) doing it in his free time
and therefore some features may not be 100% user friendly.
Best regards
--
Martin Ždila <h
As mentioned by Daniel, this is due to the nature of the CANVEC data
import. CANVEC shapefile data is based on tiles and these will chop
practically anything into pieces - lakes are just ones of the more
noticeable. I have corrected some of these myself as I've come across
them. Just be careful
sent from a phone
> On 7. Jul 2020, at 13:43, Luigi Scuotto wrote:
>
> Certo che no come anche ai negozi
> Gigi
Ottimo. Grazie del tuo lavoro e scusa le domande, mi era venuto questo dubbio
leggendo che su certi elementi gli indirizzi erano stati lasciati ;-)
vero? Per dire, se c’era un ristorante o
un negozio, non hai rimosso gli indirizzi?
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
sent from a phone
> On 6. Jul 2020, at 16:55, Luigi Scuotto wrote:
>
> Comunque mi mancano dei civici che overpass non vede quelli assegnati ai
> palazzi.
li trovi cambiando “node” con “way”
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it maili
stiamo facendo fatica a
rivelarli tutti, sono sempre rivelazioni puntuali, ancora non siamo ad un buon
punto. La stima è che sono 50 a Roma, e ne abbiamo 338000 in tutto il
centro italia, compreso Firenze ecc.
https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe/italy/centro/keys/addr:hou
oppo rigido per il mio parere, ma d'altro canto, un civico che non si
"trova" sennò nel cassetto del comune, non ha neanche molto senso/utilità
fuori dall'amministrazione.
Ciao
Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
riferimenti di indirizzo se non c’è civico.
Strada e città / comune si possono dedurre dalle highway e dai confini
amministrativi
(vicinanza ed inclusione)
siamo parlando di tag come addr:street=via xy
vero?
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it ma
Am Mo., 6. Juli 2020 um 14:27 Uhr schrieb Luigi Scuotto <
luigiscuott...@gmail.com>:
> Sono parcheggi sulla strada o confinati. ok grazie me sorto il dubbio
>
se c'è un civico metterei sia la strada che anche eventualmente un CAP,
invece se c'è solo il CAP allora non ha senso.
Per gli altri che seguono: abbiamo disdetto questo appuntamento per scarso
interesse :(
C'è un nuovo tentativo, ultimo Lunedì del mese di Luglio, fra 3 settimane,
27/7/2020.
C'è qualcuno interessato ad associarsi?
Un saluto a tutti,
Martin
___
Talk
in commons e creare poi i tag OSM sempre
"a mano" lo trovo tanto laborioso, anche se poi il risultato è migliore.
Visto che https://europeanwaterproject.org/ tratta uno dei miei temi
preferiti, lo consiglio anche a voi ;-) ma chiaramente non è universale.
Ciao
Martin
___
sent from a phone
> On 6. Jul 2020, at 11:35, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> le url delle immagini in uno dei tags di sopra,
oppure anche il format “file:....”
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.
be andare bene.
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
sent from a phone
> On 4. Jul 2020, at 23:17, Marcello Pelato wrote:
>
> Beh.
> Come non detto. Non posso esserci, sigh!
> Alla prossima
quando potresti?
Ciao Martin
___
Talk-it-lazio mailing list
Talk-it-lazio@openstre
301 - 400 of 19785 matches
Mail list logo
