y? Do you
> think it's a good idea to import from WestCOG and maybe rely on CT data
> for the rest of CT? I tried playing with the data and I didn't see any
> difference between drawing the buildings from scratch and having to
> simplify and correct CT's data.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Le
Thank Julien for pushing this forward!
yeah, I tried to get addresses from here:
http://geodata-ctmaps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/bfa7da83da384c2aa809882179369dc4_0/features/305004
and add them on top of the westCOG buildings.
The data is a big mess because it's a join_table of like 30
I just edited a OSMwiki page and apparently that hurt him so much that
immediately started heated discussion claiming his rules to be OSM
community rules. And as an act of retaliation he went on and changed my
data and data of other users to his liking. I don't know how to correctly
name this.
I
I am just going to paste here what I wrote on Slack and I as well consider
removal of counties from admin_level=6 as vandalism.
Pasted text:
My argument would be to not take boundary=administrative in a strict sense
of government, but use it to tag all the areas that are part of the
4 matches
Mail list logo
