Even still, the location of major substations (e.g the 400-132kv type) isn't
really a secret. I could reel off quite a few in the UK without even looking at
a map.
Nick
From: john whelan
Sent: 19 January 2023 17:38
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: OpenStreetMap talk
of continental European
countries.
Nick
From: john whelan
Sent: 19 January 2023 03:03
To: OpenStreetMap talk mailing list
Subject: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines?
Apparently you can do a lot of expensive damage by firing a rifle
Anthony wrote
"Creating new Bus Stop nodes
Is the consensus to remove the plaform tags from new nodes?"
I'm not sure I understand.
If you are creating a new bus stop node, then there won't be any tags to
remove, platform or otherwise.
___
Talk-au
Hi Anthony,
One reason I can see for discussing this edit here, before doing it, is in
regard to the cases where the platform tag already exists on an area close
to the bus stop node.
If this edit had not been reverted then the question would be, who will
clean up the mess of the duplicate tags.
.
Thanks,
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
which I am prepared to meet in the short term, I will
also give accounts to trusted members of the community on request to work on
the project should they wish.
Nick
From: OSMUK
Sent: 13 December 2020 18:36
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Cc: Nick Whitelegg
Hello Martin/Nick,
Perhaps the combination of highway, surface and designation will cover many of
these use-cases?
e.g. a service road that looks like a track but is a service road, and has
bridleway rights, could be tagged as:
highway=service; surface=unpaved; designation=public_bridleway
I will throw something in the pot, apart from using the "Cycle map"
solution what do people think of Overlapping ways i.e. one is a road and
a duplicate is a bridleway? Not elegant and something I would not
normally suggest but...
On 13/12/2020 13:00, Martin Wynne wrote:
As the OP on this,
Totally agree that openstreetmap.org isn't supposed to be a "general
public" map destination but without knowing user journeys, I assume that
is where most people land.
Options could be that openstreetmap.org provide alternative links based
on locality and/or develop robust (N.B. tiles from
to find. To my mind this is where more options from the
worldwide map fail to deliver and is a bigger issue that can be resolved
by understanding the 'customer' journey better?
On 13/12/2020 10:28, Nick Allen wrote:
Hi,
I tend to think of tagging more in terms of 'who will use this?' I
know my
Hi everyone,
I notice I'm being CCed in quite a bit here.
Just to make it clear, there are at least two "Nick"s on the thread. I just
made the comment about Noverton Farm - it's another Nick who has made most of
the contributions.
It's an interesting thread but just want to make s
actually find that
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa explains it
better.
Regards & Happy Mapping / Surveying
Nick(Tallguy)
On Sun, 2020-12-13 at 10:08 +, Edward Bainton wrote:
> > https://85a.uk/noverton_farm_1280x800.jpg
> >
> > It seems daft t
be used for
experimenting with creating an OSM UK walkers' map. I will be willing to give
shell accounts to trusted members of the OSM UK community (people I know
personally or mailing list regulars). More on that later.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
proved since..
Nick
From: Martin Wynne
Sent: 12 December 2020 14:30
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track
On 12/12/2020 13:15, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
> Ultimately, if "something needs doing", "someo
ure type = Bridleway?
Cheers
Nick
On 12/12/2020 17:37, Andy Townsend wrote:
On 12/12/2020 13:59, Nick wrote:
I had to check the Council GIS - so the designation is Bridleway.
Because of the complexity, if this was tagged something like
'Bridleway=Yes' and get that displayed on maps of footpaths
Hi Martin
I had to check the Council GIS - so the designation is Bridleway.
Because of the complexity, if this was tagged something like
'Bridleway=Yes' and get that displayed on maps of footpaths, surely that
would solve the problem?
Nick
On 12/12/2020 13:41, Martin Wynne wrote:
On 12/12
For this particular example it is clearly complex as it was shown as a
'permissive' footpath (other non vehicular access was along the
designated bridleway). As this is in England and given that the driveway
seems to have just been changed to 'designated', I assume the change
made to the map
Would changing this to Tag:highway=bridleway be a starting point?
On 12/12/2020 13:03, Nick wrote:
For this particular example it is clearly complex as it was shown as a
'permissive' footpath (other non vehicular access was along the
designated bridleway). As this is in England and given
Hello Seán,
Thanks for that, sounds a great idea! Would be a great addition to any UK
countryside map once you have opened your API.
Nick
From: Seán Lynch
Sent: 11 December 2020 21:03
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: Andy Townsend ; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject
necessary to develop an interactive POI map. We'd
also of course need people with strong web design and UX skills - alas, mine
are not so great!
As for other points - things like https cert renewal seem easy with Let's
Encrypt; have been using that succesfully for a while now.
Nick
Nick Whitel
g this) but I'll leave it
up to others to do serious cartography work, and of course web design.
Or, we could even use client-side rendering, Tangram is pretty powerful, have
had a play with it.
Would be a great project for the community to work on.
Nick
From: To
, which
I have not updated in more than a year now.
Thanks,
Nick
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
route that people
actually use!
Nick
From: nathan case
Sent: 08 December 2020 15:11
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field
That's a fair viewpoint and I'm open to changing my method.
But what would you suggest
)?
Thanks,
Nick
From: Nick Whitelegg via Talk-GB
Sent: 04 December 2020 15:40
To: Talk-GB
Subject: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application
Hi,
Just floating an idea for a possible OSMUK site, namely an OSMUK
'semi-official' web application for walkers
I - adopted by all councils for problem reporting would be a great thing
to have.
Nick
From: David Woolley
Sent: 04 December 2020 16:49
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application
On 04/12/2020 16:38, Nick Whitelegg
I was just thinking it might be a nice idea to have a completely open path
problems API that could be used not only for councils but also third party
applications.
However as you say council take up could be problematic. Maybe we could provide
a link to FixMyStreet?
Nick
in existence, maybe a semi-official OSMUK walkers' map
with added functionality would have greater traction and it's something that
could be launched as a project on GitHub?
Thanks,
Nick
Disclaimer<http://www.solent.ac.uk/disclaimer/disclaimer.a
Hello Frederik,
OK - thanks for that. That clears things up quite nicely I think.
I have too many "day job" obligations at the moment to set it up as a
business, but the thought has crossed my mind for the future.
Thanks,
Nick
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:03 PM Frederik Ramm wr
on road panoramas being liable to be removed if unlikely to
be of interest to walkers.
Thanks,
Nick
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 11:44 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> IANAL, but why do you believe you could have any obligation to host their
> content on your server?
>
> Do you have term
the
storage space to be used for purposes other than panos of walking trails.
Thanks,
Nick
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Hi Jez,
Try
amenity=recycling
Regards
Nick
Tallguy
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020, 13:08 Jez Nicholson, wrote:
> I'm planning some work with Household Waste Recycling Centres and
> Recycling Points during the Code The City OSM hack weekend this Sat/Sun
> (which you are very welcome to joi
The 'shell' of the building is not normally addressable so it would not
have a postcode allocated. I guess this has occured as postcode areas
normally would cover up to 100 properties. I note that the response in
the discussion seems to have come from a councillor at Peterborough City
Council
Different bus/train/ferry/other public transit services could sach have
different policies on whether bicycles can be allowed onboard or not. How
should they be tagged?
Off hand I have think of several types of permission:
- Allowed
- Prior notification needed
- Only during some time period (not
>From Hong Kong's situation, I don't think it is wise to simply use capacity
to differentiate between minibus and regular bus.
Ithe city, minibus and regular buses are generally two different types of
service, operated by different companies in different mode and according to
different rules. Some
be great to get some feedback on these 'edge cases', whether they
look reasonably 'safe' to release permanently, on the balance of probability.
Thanks,
Nick
From: Nick Whitelegg
Sent: 10 October 2020 21:38
To: Christian Quest ; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM
blurring tools I used
blurred all the faces but they didn't blur the child who was partly looking
away (with the face not visible)
Christian - thanks once again for this!
e.g. see https://opentrailview.org/?id=9928
Nick
From: Nick Whitelegg
Sent: 07 October 2020 17
..sorry, the photo ID in that URL is incorrect, should be 9728, not 9928.
Nick
From: Nick Whitelegg
Sent: 10 October 2020 21:37
To: Christian Quest ; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Face and license blurring (GDPR territories)
... to follow
Hello Christian,
This does indeed look very nice, it's providing much more extensive blurring
than what I've tried so far.
Thanks to everyone also for the replies.
Nick
From: Christian Quest
Sent: 07 October 2020 09:25
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re
... sorry, this sentence maybe could be misconstrued. "however I now have a
collaborator to work on exploring an open source panos platform."
This is very much a joint-effort project between myself and the person I'm
collaborating with, I want to make that clear.
Th
.
Thanks,
Nick
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
as a 'desire
path' and is definitely less pleasurable to negotiate than many of the others
in the area. Just wanted some way of distinguishing this path from others in
the area in active use, so that those seeking a 'nice walk in the woods' could
avoid it!
Nick
That is a good point and if the councils agree to publish under OGL,
that would be ideal. Perhaps need to consider what data should be
requested as a standard submission? For example, apart from the UPRN
related data (i.e. whether parent/child, historic, provisional) the
request could perhaps
The update on the FOIA request
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/lists_of_historic_and_parent_upr
is worth a read!! Makes you wonder at the value of releasing open data
that has limited value to the public?
On 01/08/2020 20:24, Nick wrote:
As a follow up, Robert Whittaker also
and routers can warn the user about it or even
ignore it, for instance) but just wondering if anyone else has come across this
situation.
Thanks,
Nick
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Yes - that's absolutely fine! Just wanted to clarify it here so that the
wording could be altered (I'm quite happy to do this myself).
Thanks,
Nick
From: Mateusz Konieczny via talk
Sent: 16 September 2020 11:01
Cc: osm
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] "Limita
Hi Gareth
It was just a thought if that might have been the source
Cheers
Nick
On 16/09/2020 10:12, Gareth L wrote:
Hi Nick,
Not in the example I cited.
Gareth
On 16 Sep 2020, at 10:03, Nick wrote:
Just out of curiosity, were these all mapped with the new version of
the RapiD OSM
which can be viewed from public roads, is this correct?
Nick
From: Martin Koppenhoefer
Sent: 16 September 2020 08:51
To: Mateusz Konieczny
Cc: OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] "Limitations on mapping private information" - wiki page
sent from a ph
Just out of curiosity, were these all mapped with the new version of the
RapiD OSM editor https://mapwith.ai/rapid-esri?
On 16/09/2020 08:18, Gareth L wrote:
Morning Mateusz,
You’re right, it’s not encountered in edit mode.
4:
1. “en-GB en”
2. “en-GB”
3. System Locale:
0 at 15:13, Nick <mailto:n...@foresters.org>> wrote:
My thinking was that most people surveying would not use accurate
and precise systems such as differential GPS and/or RTK. So if
these systems were used to accurately and precisely locate
distinct local markers (i.e. trig
rather than generic improvement of feature
alignment.
Regards,
Jerry
On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 at 10:05, Nick <mailto:n...@foresters.org>> wrote:
I have been looking at what is recorded under this tag in my area.
I see
that there aren't that many and those that are on OS
Sorry, got Dave's email wrong - damn typo!
dgreenw...@trekview.org
Nick
From: Nick Whitelegg
Sent: 23 August 2020 13:43
To: Talk-GB
Subject: New Forest Panorama Mapping Party - September 13th 11.00
Hello everyone,
Some of you are aware of this, but we
details.
Thanks,
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I have been looking at what is recorded under this tag in my area. I see
that there aren't that many and those that are on OSM refer to trig
points (see also http://trigpointing.uk/). My thinking is that if these
are accurate and precisely marked on OSM then perhaps they could be used
for
:30, Nick wrote:
On delving deeper, it looks as if my comment is a load of rubbish.
UPRNs that are listed do include huge numbers of adopted roads - so
if we could have a list of these and other 'non-addressable' UPRNs,
it would help users identify relevant ones
How are you identifying
On delving deeper, it looks as if my comment is a load of rubbish. UPRNs
that are listed do include huge numbers of adopted roads - so if we
could have a list of these and other 'non-addressable' UPRNs, it would
help users identify relevant ones
On 13/08/2020 14:08, Nick wrote:
Lester makes
Lester makes a very valid point - the UPRNs relating to roads/streets
are probably not adopted (certainly the example that I cited in Fife is
not adopted)
On 13/08/2020 11:21, Lester Caine wrote:
On 13/08/2020 10:55, SK53 wrote:
That was me too, I would have added the USRN if I'd had it
UPRNs are applied to street records (e.g. 320276457 is a street record
in Fife, I am sure there are many more).
Perhaps all these non-addressable UPRNs should be identified as part of
the open data?
Related to this is the FOI request that Robert Whittaker made re "list
of all UPRNs that are
Hi Jez
You can limit the number of requests to a specific URL (or set of URLs)
by IP address - so polling "every available UPRN" would not be an issue
(e.g. can limit the number of requests from a given IP over a given time
period).
Cheers
Nick
On 02/08/2020 11:58, Jez Nicho
I have no problem with licencing but the UPRN and related data is
managed by Authority custodians - do they not retain ownership of that data?
If the authorities sell it to OS, then should this be raised with The Rt
Hon Alok Sharma MP (he owns 100% of the shares of OS)?
N.B. there are some
ack of trust
On 01/08/2020 21:19, Mark Goodge wrote:
On 01/08/2020 20:24, Nick wrote:
As a follow up, Robert Whittaker also submitted an FOI asking for
"... a list of all UPRNs that are classified as 'historic', and a
separate list of all those classified as a 'parent' ". the
from the commercial value, this is unlikely to
be published as apparently this might be misleading due to the
randomness of the data and likely to be out of date quickly.
So much for the potential for collaboration with the various authorities.
On 06/07/2020 15:10, Nick wrote:
Hi Jez
To
Save the file as an XML file on your computer or wherever then in JOSM:
Edit>Preferences>Map Display>Tagging presets - then click the + sign and
add the file.
On 30/07/2020 16:08, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 15:36, Tony OSM wrote:
I did know of that plug-in so i created my
Hi Tony
I had contacted one of the authors but also did wonder if it was better
to make my own - thank you so much for sharing your version :-)
Cheers
Nick
On 30/07/2020 15:36, Tony OSM wrote:
Hi
I did know of that plug-in so i created my own
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/tagging-preset
for the NHLE heritage listings? Taking this further, should
the preset also have a drop down for Listed Building listed_status?
On 23/07/2020 15:12, Nick wrote:
Out of interest, I note that in England the 'List Entry Number'
appears to be simply numeric, which does not appear to give
oJSON data and MapCSS compiled into
JavaScript.
Nick
From: Mark Goodge
Sent: 24 July 2020 14:41
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Surveying rural buildings
On 24/07/2020 13:20, Martin Wynne wrote:
> > but most people I know are
'volunteers', OS
and other agencies strikes me as a possible win-win?.. but I suppose
that is me going 'a step too far'
On 23/07/2020 10:55, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote:
Jul 23, 2020, 11:49 by for...@david-woolley.me.uk:
On 23/07/2020 10:12, Nick wrote:
Do we actually
Out of interest, I note that in England the 'List Entry Number' appears
to be simply numeric, which does not appear to give an indication of the
type of designation. Perhaps I have not picked that up correctly.
N.B. in Scotland, designations have a code + numeric listing e.g. HMPA2
(which is
My apologies, I have just realised this discussion only relates to
english tags.
Is it worth discussing in tandem what happens in other parts of GB
(separate thread)? for example, in Scotland the "Garden & Designed
Landscape" designation don't have individual grades (category) but are
easily. So the purpose here may need
to be different (e.g. more detailed mapping, link to other local data)?
Do we actually know what the general public use OSM for?
On 22/07/2020 22:13, Dave Love wrote:
On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 11:29 +0100, Nick wrote:
Dear all
I have been mapping a few properties
if the quality is good, that
people might use OSM as the map to go to e.g. for Planning applications?
Cheers
Nick
On 22/07/2020 13:20, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote:
Jul 20, 2020, 12:29 by n...@foresters.org:
Dear all
I have been mapping a few properties using Bing maps with local
Could the data be included in https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/ ?
On 21/07/2020 22:42, Colin Smale wrote:
On 2020-07-21 22:54, Mark Goodge wrote:
It's the errors which are more of a problem, because it's generally
better not to map something than to map it wrongly.
This is a difficult point.
Hi Lester
Rob has suggested a matching USRN tag
You make a good point regarding upper and lower case. Perhaps the tag
should be ref:GB:UPRN in line with normal convention of referring to
UPRN in upper case?
Nick
On 21/07/2020 10:34, Lester Caine wrote:
On 20/07/2020 22:11, Rob Nickerson
perceive as the purpose
of mapping (hope I have not opened a can of worms).
Any thoughts/suggestions gratefully received
Nick
P.S. I am aware of some documentation e.g.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Accuracy
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
elements.
Tony
On 16/07/2020 13:42, Nick wrote:
listed_status:website - URL seems to have changed from
http://list.english-heritage.org.uk/resultsingle.aspx?uid=1409803 to
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1409803
On 16/07/2020 10:51, SK53 wrote:
It looks
listed_status:website - URL seems to have changed from
http://list.english-heritage.org.uk/resultsingle.aspx?uid=1409803 to
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1409803
On 16/07/2020 10:51, SK53 wrote:
It looks that for listed gardens we've used a combination of
Just a thought, is there any value aligning with Wikidata ('heritage
designation') https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1435 or at least
have links?
On 15/07/2020 11:16, Brian Prangle wrote:
I use listed_status =Scheduled Monument
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, 10:19 Tony OSM,
Not sure if this is of help - in Scotland there is this link
https://www.historicenvironment.scot/advice-and-support/listing-scheduling-and-designations/scheduled-monuments/types-of-scheduled-monument/
which translates to 'Category' (e.g. Roman: camp) in the gis data set.
On 15/07/2020 10:18,
certainly
help land managers and users. Imagine if this was in place for Covid
restrictions.
Nick
On 11/07/2020 11:37, Dan S wrote:
Is there anyone here who is competent to write some kind of summary
guidance on the wiki? Ideally one reflective of the approximate
consensus? It would be super helpful
there is no explicit 'This is a
permissive path' notice.
Certain paths are closed from time to time, usually due to forestry operations.
Nick
From: Nick Whitelegg
Sent: 11 July 2020 10:11
To: Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Paths on Wimbledon Common
I would probably add
'.
I tend to use:
designation for rights of way;
foot=permissive for explicit or implicit (as above) permissive paths;
foot=yes for urban paths;
access=private for those with an explicit 'Private/Keep Out' sign.
Nick
From: Adam Snape
Sent: 11 July 2020 06:20
Hi Lester
I think there needs to be some thought as to the "proper channel to feed
corrections to the 'data officer' responsible". It took me months to get
a 'data officer' to correct the location of a single UPRN, so my thought
is that this needs to be a 'public' (open) channel that shows a)
Hi Mark
Brilliant comment - "because the people who are most likely to spot
errors - members of the general public with local knowledge - tend not
to have easy access to the data". Now we need the evidence (errors)
collated centrally (OSM?).
On 10/07/2020 11:27, Mark Goodge wrote:
Apologies
). That
allowed me to have details, which in this instance I then checked
property sites (e.g. ESPC) to verify the 'likely' error.
If you want more details of the example, let me know and I can put a bit
more detail together.
Cheers
Nick
On 06/07/2020 12:34, Jez Nicholson wrote:
Sorry, i mean
sts
of anomalies to demonstrate this to government.
On 06/07/2020 12:09, Nick wrote:
I went for the crude approach as my computer is not that powerful, so
I split the CSV into chunks and imported batches into QGIS with
county/postcode boundaries as my interest is trying to understand how
the UPRNs h
I went for the crude approach as my computer is not that powerful, so I
split the CSV into chunks and imported batches into QGIS with
county/postcode boundaries as my interest is trying to understand how
the UPRNs have been batched. Not elegant but means that I now can focus
on our area and
Hi Mark
I was wondering in the future if street names etc. could be derived from
Mapillary (attribution source=Mapillary) where images exist?
Cheers
Nick
On 04/07/2020 12:02, Mark Goodge wrote:
On 04/07/2020 06:16, Kai Michael Poppe - OSM wrote:
So, a few months ago I stumbled upon
Hi Mike
I tend to agree in terms of consistency. Looking at the results for
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=usrn - the key 'ref:usrn'
dominates so to me makes sense to use 'key:uprn'. Searching on UPRN
reveals the lack of clarity.
Cheers
Nick
On 03/07/2020 17:47, Mike Baggaley
if in the future, if calling for emergency
services people will be asked to give their UPRN.
I actually think that at the root of the problem is the "philosophy of
what is an address" so that I know how I can add address data to OSM - I
am happy to acknowledge the source on OSM.
Ch
address data - I do that by also checking the Roayl Mail address finder.
Perhaps you can shed some light on the tangle of relevant licensing?
Cheers
Nick
On 03/07/2020 10:07, Russ Garrett wrote:
Just to emphasise that the output from your script is not suitable for
use in OSM - the osg.scot
he concept you
can use Python (a friend has done some preliminary work) or similar.
This is not elegant but is perhaps a first step in enabling a whole lot
of development?
Cheers
Nick
On 02/07/2020 18:38, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote:
Hi Robert,
Many thanks for producing that map.
I was ab
work well for me but happy to fit in with others.
Cheers
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
sets for later use.
Nick
From: Nick Whitelegg
Sent: 29 June 2020 10:03
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Facebook acquires crowdsourced mapping company Mapillary
Something else which might be of interest to contributors to this thread, from
starting a
wiki page showing all the possible software which could be used? Including, but
not limited to: the first (open source) version of OpenStreetCam;
OpenTrailView; the TrekView upload system when it's ready; and any open source
image blurring software out there.
Nick
-source
software that others could also use in small-scale situations.
Nick
From: Marc M.
Sent: 25 June 2020 16:25
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Facebook acquires crowdsourced mapping company Mapillary
Le 25.06.20 à 16:16, Florian Lohoff
exactly a fully open source StreetView
would be funded - other people would be better-placed than myself to think of
solutions to this - but was just floating the idea as a nice-to-have.
Nick
From: Florian Lohoff
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 22:45
To: Nick
erstand-ai/anonymizer
No idea how good it actually is, but I have a number of panoramas with both
faces and number plates so I have material to test it with.
Maybe OSC have done some stuff here, haven't looked I have to admit.
Nick
From: Simon Poole
to Mapillary and others, then I'm quite happy to
take street panoramas.
Nick
From: Martin Koppenhoefer
Sent: 19 June 2020 12:56
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Facebook acquires crowdsourced mapping company Mapillary
sent from
for other countries welcome, though note that if they are for large and/or
highly-populated countries countries such as the USA, China or Brazil I would
have to restrict it to a region).
You can login using your OSM account.
Nick
From: Florian Lohoff
Sent: 19 June 2020
http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/cons/en/html#part2
For those that don't trust Wikipedia
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020, 12:38 Karl Newsletters, wrote:
> Article 4 of the Constitution of Ireland, gives the state its two official
> names, Éire in Irish and Ireland in English. Each name is a direct
>
the polygon was appearing.
I have now fixed this so only ways with specified values for the 'designation'
tag, i.e. the allowed values for rights of way, are retuened.
Nick
From: Roger Calvert
Sent: 23 May 2020 13:07
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re
1 - 100 of 1424 matches
Mail list logo
