On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 03:47:14PM +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
On 30/06/15 11:36, Richard Z. wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:14:07PM +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
On 29/06/15 15:08, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
The step from 2D to 3D would add a lot of complexity on the mappers,
narrowing
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:12:24PM +0200, Michael Reichert wrote:
A large bounding box of a changeset is not a proof that the edit is
mechanical. There are also users at OSM who first edit an object in
Europe and afterwards in America before they upload their changes. (This
usually happens if
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:14:07PM +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
On 29/06/15 15:08, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
The step from 2D to 3D would add a lot of complexity on the mappers,
narrowing down the mass of contributors potentially willing and able to
participate. Everyone would have to deal
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 10:40:52AM +0200, Ture Pålsson wrote:
I recently taught my rendering hack about the ’layer’ tag, and immediately
encountered a set of new problems. For example, consider this ditch:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243331898
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243331898
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 02:45:54AM +0200, Andreas Goss wrote:
I was pretty annoyed recently, because every now and then a wikimedia image
I used in a ValueTemplate would not work.
For some reason I decided to check Privacy Badger today and after that
disable Adblock. Well, that did the job.
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 05:09:59PM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
On So, Mai 17, 2015 at 04:46:24 +0200, Maarten Deen wrote:
Is it normal that the a, b and c.tile.openstreetmap.org IP-adresses refer to
the same server? For me, they all refer to amsterdam.tile.openstreetmap.org
and for some
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 01:31:52PM +0200, Andreas Goss wrote:
On 5/7/15 16:40 , Richard Z. wrote:
indeed my intention was to use contact:twitter exactly when
a company explicitly recommends it as a way to contact them whereas
twitter=* could be used to mean anything else.
1. That's not how
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 10:27:54AM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
I am looking for examples how toll status of roads is displayed on
existing maps. I am considering rendering toll status in
openstreetmap-carto. But I have no good ideas how it may be done and I
failed to find maps displaying
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:37:41PM +0200, Andreas Goss wrote:
the verbosity may be unneeded for very simple things like phone
but is that true for everything covered by contact* ?
key:fax? key:twitter? key:vhf?
So what would you do with those tags?
If we don't use contact for phone, it
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 12:49:40PM +0100, SomeoneElse wrote:
This page is an excellent example of what can go wrong with the OSM wiki.
Yet another example why the wiki needs some love.
If random edits like this are allowed to continue*** it'll devalue the
wiki even more as a resource. I'm
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 04:20:22PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 07.05.2015 um 13:50 schrieb Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
then contact:twitter is also flat
out wrong, because many companies will not reply and maybe not even read
what you tweet them.
this is one
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:20:42PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-05-05 17:21 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
the verbosity may be unneeded for very simple things like phone
but is that true for everything covered by contact* ?
key:fax? key:twitter? key:vhf?
have
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 11:17:35AM -0400, Andrew MacKinnon wrote:
The reason is that the contact: tags are unnecessarily verbose (we
should use simpler tags whenever possible) and the simpler tags are
much more popular (there are 98865 contact:phone tags but 490328 phone
tags). Why do we need
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 07:24:18PM +0100, Roland Olbricht wrote:
Im Gegensatz dazu verbreitet sich mit Certificate Pinning [6] ein Verfahren,
das inhärent große Anbieter bevorzugt: man muss sich wieder mit dem
Browser-Hersteller gutstellen, damit er für die eigene Seite nur die
Zertifikate
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 06:23:19PM +1100, Warin wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to find out which user has contributed a key to the map ... the key
has no wiki page and I'd like to know what was meant by the key and its'
value. The key has low numbers .. so while there may be more than one user
.. I
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:31:55AM +0100, Martin Vonwald wrote:
Hi!
Am 19. Februar 2015 um 10:46 schrieb Eifelhunde eifelhu...@gmx.de:
Sehe ich weniger problematisch, oder werden kurvenreiche Strecken auch
berücksichtigt?
Häufig sind doch diese nicht beschränkt, erlauben aber wegen
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:45:31PM +0100, malenki wrote:
I am working on Lake Nasser* and can predict that after enhancing
it's shore the resulting MP will be quite big.
Based on what I have done so far I'd expect an Multipolygon (MP) with
about 10.000 Members and an outline of 14.000 km
Hi,
came across a pretty major license violation and need technical
help and another pair of eyes to figure out what is going on.
Semi-confidential at this point.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 02:36:13AM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote:
As I've experienced unusually poor performance with Google's NLP in
Android, I was wondering if anybody knew of a dropin replacement I can
install that cuts Google's NLP while still allowing NLP through some kind
of open means, even
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:00:29AM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote:
I'd be curious if you have specific links.
one that I was looking at is this:
https://f-droid.org/repository/browse/?fdfilter=locationfdid=org.fitchfamily.android.gsmlocationfdpage=2
Richard
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:22:59AM +0100, Volker Schmidt wrote:
Ich habe in waterway=sluice_gate benutzt.
bitte keine falsche Scheu das auch mal im wiki zu Dokumentieren.
Im wiki steht nur
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/sluice_gate
wo das tagging ganz anders aussieht?
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 05:22:17PM +, Chris Hill wrote:
On 03/01/15 16:50, Rainer Fügenstein wrote:
in accordance to the mechanical edit policy, I'd like to open the
discussion on this list:
a recently approved proposal introduced new tags for pipelines and
marker [1] and changed an
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 09:18:57AM -0200, Lists wrote:
May I suggest the following work flow:
1) Agree upon 2 dates sufficiently spaced i.e. 2 weeks apart
2) First date, add the new tag, leave the old tag in the system. This will
not break anything, and from that date data consumers know
Hi,
sieht fast nach einem spam-Versuch aus?
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=contact%3Awebsitevalue=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ruheforst-vogelsberg.de%2Findex.php%3Fseite%3DKonzept%26h%3D2#overview
Richard
___
Talk-de mailing list
Hi,
since some time the wiki history (show diffs between versions) always
displays empty changesets for me:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Date_namespacediff=1119628oldid=1119586
displays an empty box and says (Nessuna differenza) which is clearly wrong.
Did anyone else
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:04:28AM +0400, Никита wrote:
We have highly inconsistent content at wiki (feature pages
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Features). Inconsistency is
not limited to landuse=wood/natural=forest. Another example is
landuse=meadow (Landuse
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:34:39PM +0100, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
On 10.11.2014 19:13, Stephan Bösch-Plepelits wrote:
Nun, ich stimme zu, dass es trivial ist. Das heisst aber noch nicht, dass
es auch getan wird. Nur als Beispiel, openstreetmap-carto, der Standardstil
der OpenStreetMap,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:04:11AM +0100, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
Im Deutschen ist es umgekehrt: Grat kennt jeder, Gratrücken ist Fachsprache.
Was ist mit den rest-ridges, also den weniger scharfen bis sanften
Bergrücken.
Soll man da nur den Namen rendern? Den Bergrücken kann man
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 08:09:23AM +0100, Andreas Labres wrote:
On 02.11.14 22:30, Holger Schöner wrote:
Leider verwenden tatsächlich auch
nach meiner Erfahrung nur sehr wenige die Tags natural=ridge und
natural=valley ...
natural=ridge ist mir schon mehrmals untergekommen, das liegt
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:33:26AM +0100, DarkAngel wrote:
Hi,
gibt es eigentlich Tags für Bettelampeln d.h. Fuß/Radfahrer Ampeln
die nur auf Anforderung grün werden?
Die Dinger heißen Bedarfsampel und damit finden man sie auch unter
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:crossing
Hi,
is it possible to download the complete source of all wiki
pages from wiki.openstreetmap.org - preferably as highly compressed
tarball?
I am frequently finding that without a full regexp search
it is very easy to miss important bits of information and
related/similar tags so a copy at home
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:54:38AM +0100, Grant Slater wrote:
Hi Richard,
https://dump.wiki.openstreetmap.org (currently offline) had daily
exports of the wiki.
I will try bring it back online in the next few days.
ok, thanks for trying.
Richard
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:26:40AM +, Nicholas G Lawrence wrote:
Subject: [OSM-talk] Howto tag a prominent dead tree?
Hi,
this must have come up before... any ideas?
What does prominent mean?
in this case local landmark visible on google sat (Bing is clouded in that
place)
and
Hi,
this must have come up before... any ideas?
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 03:28:39PM +0200, Norbert Wenzel wrote:
On 09/25/2014 01:03 PM, thsMD wrote:
Noch eine Zusatzfrage: Welche Attribute verwendet man, wenn Radfahren auf
dem Weg explizit nicht verboten ist (kein Schild), ich aber der Meinung bin,
dass dort keiner mit seinem Rad
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:30:05PM +0200, Andreas Goss wrote:
I am trying to search something like \w+:description in wikipages,
is there some method or search engine to do that?
Have you tried with google and site:http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ ?
yes, maybe I have forgotten something from
Hi,
I am trying to search something like \w+:description in wikipages,
is there some method or search engine to do that?
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:37:33PM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
Redirect pages can have a bad effect, though. Taginfo will show if a wiki page
exists for a key or tag. Taginfo can't know why there is a redirect. Is this a
case where the redirect directs from a typo page to the real page or is
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 02:09:34AM +0200, Imre Samu wrote:
I have got one problem, some of the queries with most bridges do
not load into JOSM. Josm says contacting the server and thats all.
strange ... :(
maybe timeout when generate JOSM data?
my impression was that the problem was on
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 10:17:07PM +0200, Andreas Schmidt wrote:
hallo Liste,
ich bin gerade in Brasilien am mappen.
Da komme ich in Gegenden, wo noch kein Mapper war und zeichne u.a. lange
Stra0en und noch längere Flüsse.
Jetzt habe ich erstmals eine Meldung von JOSM, von der ich nicht
Imre
2014-08-28 12:39 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
Hi,
trying to clean up bridge=swing as far as possible. There was at least
user in the past who used the combination systematically wrong, so I want
to split the result by user who introduced the bridge=swing
Hi,
having frequent problems today, sometimes everything works
and sometimes when downloading/uploading data JOSM says
Failed to upload data to or download data from
'https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/' due to a problem with transferring data.
Details (untranslated):
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 03:08:31PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 29/08/14 15:01, Richard Z. wrote:
having frequent problems today, sometimes everything works
and sometimes when downloading/uploading data JOSM says
Failed to upload data to or download data from
'https
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 03:25:02PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 29/08/14 15:20, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
On 29/08/2014 16:14, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 29/08/14 15:08, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 29/08/14 15:01, Richard Z. wrote:
Failed to upload data to or download data from
'https
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:12:08PM +0200, Imre Samu wrote:
if I would want to compile osmium myself the README says
that no files need to be build and doesn't say where osmium comes from?
I have used the code and instructions from this 2 repo
https://github.com/osmcode/libosmium (
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:39:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
On 29/08/2014 16:32, Richard Z. wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 03:25:02PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 29/08/14 15:20, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
On 29/08/2014 16:14, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 29/08/14 15:08, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 29
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 02:22:10PM +0200, Imre Samu wrote:
Hi Imre,
I have got one problem, some of the queries with most bridges do
not load into JOSM. Josm says contacting the server and thats all.
When I share the query the shorturl looks like the one bellow so
it seems to be somehow an
Hi,
noticed that there is
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:maxspeed%3D20redirect=no
and a few more speeds - does it make any sense to have such
pages around?
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
trying to clean up bridge=swing as far as possible. There was at least
user in the past who used the combination systematically wrong, so I want
to split the result by user who introduced the bridge=swing.
To make things complicated - a few days ago one contributor did a well
meant effort
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:04:37PM +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Friedrich Volkmann schrieb:
Kann sein, dass die Liste auch Zeilen enthält, wo es sich um keine richtigen
Brücken handelt, aber die komischen Namen müssen nicht unbedingt falsch
sein...
Ich finde trotzdem nicht, dass sie
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 03:14:32PM -0700, Kevin Bullock wrote:
With our partnership with Mapbox, the OSM community will start seeing this
imagery through the Mapbox satellite layer; this will be of huge value for
mapping new areas and updating OSM.
just looking at the Seychelles, anything in
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 02:07:15PM +0100, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 23:03 -0700, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
How best should I tag informal swimming areas? These typically have
no lifeguard or facilities. An example deep-content site for these
types of holes is:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:54:19AM +0200, Falk Zscheile wrote:
Am 15. April 2014 09:37 schrieb tumsi tu...@gmx.de:
zu taggen. Vielleicht gibt es dann im Herbst eine
Kastaniensammelkarte?
Sollten wir nicht auch die Bärlauchfelder im Wald mappen, damit man auch in
unbekannteren
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:49:17PM +0200, Ralf GESELLENSETTER wrote:
Der milde März hat dazu geführt, dass bereits jetzt viele
Kastanienbäume ihre fünffingrigen Blätterfächer entfalten
und sogar ihre ersten Blütenkerzen entfachen...
Auf diese Weise sollte es auch botanischen Laien leicht
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:44:46PM +0100, SomeoneElse wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
on iPhones you can change this in settings (geographic vs magnetic north)
not sure for other devices but my guess is there will be settings as well...
Unless you're in northern Canada I really wouldn't
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 07:23:23PM +0400, Ilya Zverev wrote:
Hi! On this day a year ago I announced the Imagery Offset Database.
Since then mappers have uploaded around 6 thousand offsets, and
the number of editors supporting the database has doubled. I hope we
are still teaching beginner
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:05:21PM -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Mar 21, 2014 4:59 PM, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
Example of a problem this should catch: I have seen cases where someone
wanted to tag a simple bridge with layer and added the layer to the wrong
segment - tagging
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 03:33:03PM +0100, colliar wrote:
On 22.03.2014 11:01, Richard Z. wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:05:21PM -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Mar 21, 2014 4:59 PM, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
Example of a problem this should catch: I have seen cases where
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 07:17:26AM +0100, Stefan Keller wrote:
Hi Richard, hi Simon
At 2014-03-14 16:19 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole wrote
At 14.03.2014 16:06, schrieb Richard Z.:
is there really no way to avoid those horrible captchas whenever I add
a link to a JOSM bug ticket or another
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 03:41:45PM -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
This seems like a solution looking for a problem than anything actually
pragmatic and worth doing. It would also needlessly overcomplicate cities
that have large areas underground on multiple levels, such as Kansas City.
Example of
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 04:19:06PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 17. März 2014 13:44 schrieb Manuel Reimer manuel.s...@nurfuerspam.de:
Gibt es denn wenigstens einen Renderer, der bereits irgendwelche
Geländedaten mit einbezieht?
bei den bisher frei verfügbaren Quellen wie SRTM
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 06:12:10PM +, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
On 15/03/2014, Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com wrote:
I now agree that the layer tag should be used as locally as
possible, so I think Richard had good intentions when proposing this.
At the same time, I think
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 05:12:08PM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 15.03.2014 14:44, Richard Z. wrote:
I think it would be good to agree on something...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:layer#Maximum_recommended_segment_length_of_ways_tagged_with_layer
I think
Hi,
I think it would be good to agree on something...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:layer#Maximum_recommended_segment_length_of_ways_tagged_with_layer
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
is there really no way to avoid those horrible captchas whenever I add
a link to a JOSM bug ticket or another friendly website to the wiki??
There are at least 2 tickets open which could help a lot:
*https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/5116
*https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3898
I
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:43:38PM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 14/03/14 15:06, Richard Z. wrote:
How about an OSM quiz instead of captchas?
You're offering to write one I take it?
will think about one. In the short term, there are open tickets
which should make it a lot easier
Richard
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 07:12:13PM +0100, Tobias Knerr wrote:
On 14.03.2014 17:15, Tom Hughes wrote:
I think most of those are already whitelisted aren't they?
Unless I'm mistaken, these are the currently whitelisted URLs:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:23:18AM +0100, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Am 14.03.2014 08:56, schrieb Andreas Schmidt:
[...] Die Herren Hobbyschlachter [...]
Ich verbitte mir eine solche Ausdrucksweise in öffentlichen
Diskussionen. Man mag zur Jagd stehen wie man will, aber man sollte
auch
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 09:06:41PM -0400, Russ Nelson wrote:
Pieren writes:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Frank Little frank...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Richard Z wrote
As mapped, the waterway=stream (Way #138911739) runs underground
(layer=-1),
probably through a culvert given
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:51:22PM +0100, Falk Zscheile wrote:
Worauf die betreffende Person aber vermutlich hinaus will: Radikale
Tierschützer nutzen die Daten unter Umständen, um die jagdlichen
Einrichtungen zu beschädigen. Die Beschädigung ist eine Straftat (§
303 StGB). Für einem Mapper
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 01:32:40PM +0100, Falk Zscheile wrote:
Am 13. März 2014 13:20 schrieb Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:51:22PM +0100, Falk Zscheile wrote:
Worauf die betreffende Person aber vermutlich hinaus will: Radikale
Tierschützer nutzen die Daten
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 02:51:23PM +, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/03/2014 12:21, Richard Z. wrote:
In practice this rule is broken more often than you would think: Hamburg is
full
of waterways connected with roads on bridges through a tag obstacle. France
is
full of bridges sharing a node
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 10:26:59PM +, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 9 March 2014 10:30, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
for some time now I have been working on the wiki page to state the rules
as clearly as possible.. hope that most of the improvements are fairly
uncontroversial
Hi,
this caught my attention some time ago:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/307673868
we could not figure out how it happened and what it was originaly. It seems
none of the validators complains about the existence of such nodes so this
may be an isolated mishap or a widespread problem.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 02:52:02PM +, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/03/2014 14:45, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
+1, but adding a layer=1 to a lake in a park isn't clearer or more
accurate, they are both on the same layer, the lake is in the
park, not above (usually).
Which confirms my point
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 06:32:01PM -0500, Toby Murray wrote:
It was probably a member of a way that got removed. Maybe they forgot to
add the odbl tag to the way.
that was our idea but the OSM Inspector or some other tool would have warned
about that case.. so a little mystery.
I am not
Hi,
I did think a bit more about the situation and think it makes
no sense to try to rescure the meaning of layer for ways
at different levels connected with pylons or similar
constructions.
For simple cases such as pylons of aerial tramways it is defined
so, that the tramway is above ground
Hi,
for some time now I have been working on the wiki page to state the rules
as clearly as possible.. hope that most of the improvements are fairly
uncontroversial. Some of the changes:
* the vertical ordering established by the layer values is valid exactly only
in the point where the ways
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:11:35AM +, Dave F. wrote:
Hi
Prompted by the discussion on the Layer tag I've just noticed
there's two separate pages for it: 'Layer' 'Key:Layer'
What's the reason for the 'Key:' prefix? IMO it can only lead to
confusion. Haven't checked all, but Landuse
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:47:32AM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 09/mar/2014 um 11:30 schrieb Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
* the vertical ordering established by the layer values is valid exactly
only
in the point where the ways cross or objects overlap
actually
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 01:05:18PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 09/mar/2014 um 12:43 schrieb Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
It is broken by definition in at least one case: waterways ar supposed to
share a node with the dam they are crossing, which means the highway
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:35:20AM +, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/03/2014 10:30, Richard Z. wrote:
Hi,
for some time now I have been working on the wiki page to state the rules
as clearly as possible.. hope that most of the improvements are fairly
uncontroversial. Some of the changes
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:35:20AM +, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/03/2014 10:30, Richard Z. wrote:
Hi,
for some time now I have been working on the wiki page to state the rules
as clearly as possible.. hope that most of the improvements are fairly
uncontroversial. Some of the changes
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 12:34:31PM +, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/03/2014 12:24, Richard Z. wrote:
it says point, not node the difference probably needs to be emphasized
very strongly. There is a difference between mathematicaly precise and
intuitive formulations:((
https://www.google.co.uk/#q
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 12:34:31PM +, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/03/2014 12:24, Richard Z. wrote:
it says point, not node the difference probably needs to be emphasized
very strongly. There is a difference between mathematicaly precise and
intuitive formulations:((
https://www.google.co.uk/#q
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 02:00:36PM +0100, Tobias Knerr wrote:
On 09.03.2014 13:21, Richard Z. wrote:
the same conceptual problem exists with pylons where they are shared by two
bridges
or aerial tramways. Actualy every pylon breaks the rule by definition
because it
connects ground
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 04:55:51PM +0100, Tobias Knerr wrote:
On 09.03.2014 14:18, Richard Z. wrote:
Pylons must share a node with the waterway bellow
in my opinion. They are a pretty relevant part of it.
Pylons will often be somewhere within the riverbank area - based on
their exact
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 10:26:59PM +, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 9 March 2014 10:30, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
for some time now I have been working on the wiki page to state the rules
as clearly as possible.. hope that most of the improvements are fairly
uncontroversial
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:53:09PM -0800, Clifford Snow wrote:
Why do I see so many new mappers make edits without a commit comment? Is it
because iD doesn't prompt for a commit message? iD issue 1488 is open but
not acted upon. I wonder why. Is it because the developers don't think
commit
Hi,
after all the discussion, the list has been created and I need
a break from discussions about new tags:)
###
Outdoor sports, wilderness and natural features mapping. Everything from
scuba diving to paragliding, from undersea volcanoes to Mount Everest, related
software and talk.
Main
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:54:35AM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
In the case of climatic zones and vegetation zones you could overlay / mash
the osm data with an external dataset. Nobody will draw a map of climatic
zones in a 1:500 scale, it doesn't make sense, but it is a scale where OSM
Hi,
I want to propose a new mailing list. Currently we have serious gaps in
modeling vegetation zones, climatic zones, geology, oceanography and most
other natural phenomena.
Also a mailing list for outdoor enthusiasts and outdoor sports does not
seem to exist.
So for the beginning I would
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 12:44:39PM +, SomeoneElse wrote:
I want to propose a new mailing list. Currently we have serious gaps in
modeling vegetation zones, climatic zones, geology, oceanography and most
other natural phenomena.
Also a mailing list for outdoor enthusiasts and outdoor
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 01:59:33PM +, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
On 05/03/2014 13:42, Richard Z. wrote:
climatic zones
vegetation zones
soil biology
vegetation layers
Are any of these things verifiable?
of course. Tons of literature about it.
Are they relatively static or do
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 01:52:50PM +, Dave F. wrote:
IMO that should be amalgamated back into the general lists.
Occasionally tagging procedures get changed after brief discussions
between very small select groups metaphorically huddled together in
the corner of a room, that turn out to be
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 04:59:17PM +0100, Christoph Hormann wrote:
On Wednesday 05 March 2014, Richard Z. wrote:
climatic zones
vegetation zones
soil biology
vegetation layers
Are any of these things verifiable?
of course. Tons of literature about it.
That is not what
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 04:04:10PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2014-03-05 14:42 GMT+01:00 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
As an example, we are having repeated discussions how to tag forrest but
did not even start thinking about a generic concept how to map vegetation
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 07:16:36AM -0500, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
How is this different from other tagging discussions?
tagging discussion is only the last step. Before it can happen we
need to have a pretty good model of what we want to map and then
decide how it could be mapped.
Most of us
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 08:44:54PM +0100, Christoph Hormann wrote:
On Wednesday 05 March 2014, Richard Z. wrote:
oh yes. You can say the same about a forrest and almost anything in
the real world.
No, continuously changing properties exist for many features including
for example
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 08:41:06PM +, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
On 05/03/2014 20:30, Richard Z. wrote:
despite beeing sometimes tricky I still consider it pretty important to know
that a certain area is eg part of the tundra climate, permafrost or monsoon.
...and as I said, five messages
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
