Re: [OSM-talk] Brainstorming: Simple Revert-Tools - work for copywriters!

2009-09-03 Thread Peter Körner
Making 10 changesets of more than 10 features each over a period of at least 2 weeks without attracting reverts or complaints should be sufficient I would have thought. That would mean that a newbie who gets on with it can be 'established' within 2 weeks. I think that was how long it took

Re: [OSM-talk] Brainstorming: Simple Revert-Tools - work for copywriters!

2009-09-03 Thread Richard Weait
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Peter Körnerosm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote: Making 10 changesets of more than 10 features each over a period of at least 2 weeks without attracting reverts or complaints should be sufficient I would have thought. That would mean that a newbie who gets on with it

Re: [OSM-talk] Brainstorming: Simple Revert-Tools - work for copywriters!

2009-09-03 Thread Peter Körner
Richard Weait schrieb: On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Peter Körnerosm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote: Making 10 changesets of more than 10 features each over a period of at least 2 weeks without attracting reverts or complaints should be sufficient I would have thought. That would mean that a

Re: [OSM-talk] Brainstorming: Simple Revert-Tools - work for copywriters!

2009-09-03 Thread Peter Miller
On 3 Sep 2009, at 14:34, Peter Körner wrote: Richard Weait schrieb: On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Peter Körnerosm- li...@mazdermind.de wrote: Making 10 changesets of more than 10 features each over a period of at least 2 weeks without attracting reverts or complaints should be

Re: [OSM-talk] Brainstorming: Simple Revert-Tools - work for copywriters!

2009-09-03 Thread John Smith
2009/9/3 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de: I'm talking about building an external tool without any integration into osm.org, as this is what i'm capable of. This tool can be visited by any user and any user may do OAuth-Sign-In with this tool. The tool can't tell if the user is allowed to

Re: [OSM-talk] Brainstorming: Simple Revert-Tools - work for copywriters!

2009-09-03 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Peter Miller wrote:  Ok, so I have just had an RSS alert that Liam123 is back editing again today after a delay of 3 weeks. Probably because kids are back at school now. Look at his first changeset ever - it's next to his school. Of course, it would be an interesting experiment to e-mail the

Re: [OSM-talk] Brainstorming: Simple Revert-Tools - work for copywriters!

2009-09-03 Thread John Smith
2009/9/4 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de: Will you be able to revert a reverted changeset? A reversion is just a new changeset, so basicaly: yes, i think. We could artificialy prevent a circle like this:  - A reverts Bs changeset 1 - results in changeset 2  - B reverts As changeset 2 -

Re: [OSM-talk] Brainstorming: Simple Revert-Tools - work for copywriters!

2009-09-03 Thread Peter Körner
John Smith schrieb: 2009/9/3 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de: I'm talking about building an external tool without any integration into osm.org, as this is what i'm capable of. This tool can be visited by any user and any user may do OAuth-Sign-In with this tool. The tool can't tell if

Re: [OSM-talk] Brainstorming: Simple Revert-Tools - work for copywriters!

2009-09-03 Thread Peter Körner
I wasn't thinking of that case so much as someone being a little over zealous and reverting a changeset by accident and needing to revert their change. This will of course be possible Peter ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Brainstorming: Simple Revert-Tools - work for copywriters!

2009-09-03 Thread SteveC
On 3 Sep 2009, at 07:04, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Peter Miller wrote:  Ok, so I have just had an RSS alert that Liam123 is back editing again today after a delay of 3 weeks. Probably because kids are back at school now. Look at his first changeset ever - it's next to his school. Of

Re: [OSM-talk] Brainstorming: Simple Revert-Tools - work for copywriters!

2009-09-03 Thread Peter Miller
On 3 Sep 2009, at 21:18, SteveC wrote: On 3 Sep 2009, at 07:04, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Peter Miller wrote:  Ok, so I have just had an RSS alert that Liam123 is back editing again today after a delay of 3 weeks. Probably because kids are back at school now. Look at his first changeset