Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy

I've a couple of examples, and a couple of questions which might aid the discussion. I recently did some work which would label me as both a directee and a director. For each changeset I added a custom changeset tag which I thought was the sensible thing to do. It was also helpful for me to be

Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy

I and colleagues are affected by this policy in that we maintain the map, which is based on OSM data, for the estate of the University of Cambridge (obviously, not exclusively, but in practice, most of the work is done by us, and there are some parts of the estate that aren't generally

Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy

Thanks Frederik. This is a good explanation. Can some of it perhaps be added to the document to make it clearer? On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:22 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > On 22.11.2017 04:16, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: > > Pierre, I suspect the number of QA-tool-driven

Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy

Hi, On 22.11.2017 04:16, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: > Pierre, I suspect the number of QA-tool-driven changes are as big, if > not much bigger than changes from the organized events and paid editing. > I agree QA tools should be regulated, but are you sure we want to do it > in the same document, and

Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy

november 2017 11.54 To: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy Hi, On 22.11.2017 09:49, Wiklund Johan wrote: > (first of all, I have not read the backlog of this conversation, only > the last few messages) [...] > Therefore I feel I am opposed to the a

Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy

Hi, On 22.11.2017 09:49, Wiklund Johan wrote: > (first of all, I have not read the backlog of this conversation, only > the last few messages) [...] > Therefore I feel I am opposed to the absoluteness of the damand of > hashtagging every changeset Just as a reminder, the proposed policy leaves

Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy

On Wednesday 22 November 2017, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > This policy applies as soon as someone is > > directed by a third party exactly what and how to contribute to > > OpenStreetMap. > > Maybe it would be a good idea to exclude small scale guided > editing. For example my friend asked me to

Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy

ri Astrakhan [mailto:yuriastrak...@gmail.com] Sent: onsdag 22. november 2017 04.16 To: Pierre Béland <pierz...@yahoo.fr> Cc: Talk Openstreetmap <talk@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy Pierre, I suspect the number of QA-tool-driven changes are as big, if not much

Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy

Pierre, I suspect the number of QA-tool-driven changes are as big, if not much bigger than changes from the organized events and paid editing. I agree QA tools should be regulated, but are you sure we want to do it in the same document, and significantly increase the scope? My understanding is

[talk-ph] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy

t;Frederik Ramm" <frede...@remote.org> Date: Nov 22, 2017 2:38 AM Subject: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy To: "Talk Openstreetmap" <t...@openstreetmap.org> Cc: I posted this announcement to osmf-talk 16 hours ago, where a little > discussion has alrea

Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy

There is a constant increae of organized contributions from Task Managers on QA tools and I agree that this policy should include these various organized contributions. There should be a goal assure the follow-up of these various projects to assure a better collective coordination of the

Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy

While this might not have been the intention, the > b) directed by a third party exactly what and how to contribute to OpenStreetMap can be applied to any "challenge style" sites such as the MapRoulette or Osmose. I think there should either be a clarification about this, an additional

Re: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy

> This policy applies as soon as someone is > directed by a third party exactly what and how to contribute to > OpenStreetMap. Maybe it would be a good idea to exclude small scale guided editing. For example my friend asked me to show how OSM worked. I showed him/her a map and asked to find

[Talk-cz] Pravidla pro organizované mapování (was: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy)

vzniknou. Zdar, Honza Piškvor Martinec -- Přeposlaná zpráva -- Od: "Frederik Ramm" <frede...@remote.org> Datum: 21. 11. 2017 18:37 Předmět: [OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy Komu: "Talk Openstreetmap" <t...@openstreetmap.org> Kopie: I posted this announ

[OSM-talk] Directed Editing Policy

I posted this announcement to osmf-talk 16 hours ago, where a little discussion has already taken place. It has been pointed out to me that it doesn't make sense to involve those who are not members in the initial survey, but then cut them out later, so here's the announcement below (even though,