On 25.05.2013 12:15, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
On 25/mag/2013, at 10:33, Paweł Paprota ppa...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Of course with Wikipedia it was somehow easier because all of
their work gets indexed by search engines
Also osm is indexed by search engines
When Google returns
On 25.05.2013 12:15, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
On 25/mag/2013, at 10:33, Paweł Paprota ppa...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Of course with Wikipedia it was somehow easier because all of
their work gets indexed by search engines
Also osm is indexed by search engines
When Google returns
On 26/mag/2013, at 13:03, Paweł Paprota ppa...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Well of course when you put osm in the search query you will get results
from OSM.org... but it kind of defeats the purpose - the point is to promote
OSM to people who don't know about it, isn't it?
you only get these
On 2013-05-25 07:09, James Mast wrote:
http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/collapsed-i-5-bridge-gone-google-maps-almost-quickly-it-6C10067906
[1]
If I remember correctly, we had it marked as access=no and the
segment removed about an hour faster than on Google. Somebody needs to
get ahold of Rosa
For those who are still naive to think that journalists find out these
things themselves: Google has huge amount of money to waste on PR. If last
two years is evidence everyone is happy to advertise new stuff of their
maps, because it's very easy for people to relate to.
I don't see how OSM would
On 2013-05-25 12:19, pec...@gmail.com wrote:
For those who are still naive to think that journalists find out
these things themselves: Google has huge amount of money to waste on
PR. If last two years is evidence everyone is happy to advertise new
stuff of their maps, because it's very easy for
We did some media work around a new highway opening near Lyon.
It has been quite well received. We turned it around route
calculations as most players had outdated data the route proposed was
much longer than using the new highway ;)
http://openstreetmap.fr/a89
This page has been visited much
Am 25.05.2013 13:09, schrieb Maarten Deen:
On 2013-05-25 12:19, pec...@gmail.com wrote:
For those who are still naive to think that journalists find out
these things themselves: Google has huge amount of money to waste on
PR. If last two years is evidence everyone is happy to advertise new
2013/5/25 Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr
Next media work is about Roland Garros international tennis tournament
which will start tomorrow outside of Paris... the area never looked as
great as on http://u.osmfr.org/m/275/ ;)
That's a beautiful piece of work, Compliments to the French
What are these 8 pitches? They are tagged source=Bing, but don't look
like anything in the Bing background of P2.
http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/map/cquest/openstreetmap-pret-pour-roland-garros/#20/48.84774/2.24775
On 05/25/2013 01:24 PM, Christian Quest wrote:
Next media work is about Roland
On 5/25/2013 6:15 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Also osm is indexed by search engines
To varying levels - I searched OSM for some unusual POI names from
January 2013, and they aren't indexed. I did notice some content
indexed from 2010.
___
Paweł Paprota writes:
Sure but have you ever seen a link to OSM object (way/relation/node) in
the internet?
Sure. I link to them all the time (warning, these are all associated
with railroads, so if you're not a railfan, click at your peril!):
This search:
Am 25/mag/2013 um 12:22 schrieb Paweł Paprota ppa...@fastmail.fm:
Sure but have you ever seen a link to OSM object (way/relation/node) in the
internet?
Yes, I noted this because of a misspelled street name, but it also works for
correctly spelled ones, if you put osm to the search term
http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/collapsed-i-5-bridge-gone-google-maps-almost-quickly-it-6C10067906
If I remember correctly, we had it marked as access=no and the segment
removed about an hour faster than on Google. Somebody needs to get ahold of
Rosa from NBC (who did the article) and let
14 matches
Mail list logo
