IMHO it is much better - on low zoom levels maps is now less cluttered
and on high zoom levels POIs are now more visible.
+1
Honestly I love this simple grey for buildings. I think they are visible
enough, but don't stick out too much. Which in my opinion is exactly how
it is supposed to be
The new color looks even worse in non-garden areas where the new
building color vanishes into the residential area background.
Old and new colors in Kópavogur, Iceland:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vo7pyhsuciqlppq/z16.png?dl=0
Old color in Maun, Botswana:
I stand corrected. Thanks
On 04/01/2015 12:49, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 04/01/15 12:04, Dave F. wrote:
IMO (why do people use 'H' to say there opinion is honest? Surely all
opinion is that?), the new appearance is better. As can be seen from
Andreas image the building's numbers are much clearer,
Hi
As has been pointed out, there was a discussion which all were invited
to join in.
IMO (why do people use 'H' to say there opinion is honest? Surely all
opinion is that?), the new appearance is better. As can be seen from
Andreas image the building's numbers are much clearer, which is
Also none of the demos linked had Landuse=residential as background -
the lack of contrast there as buildings merge into the landuse is my
biggest issue with this change.
However this seems to be a nice way of telling us to stop using that tag
- you are not supposed to map for the renderer
On 04/01/15 12:04, Dave F. wrote:
IMO (why do people use 'H' to say there opinion is honest? Surely all
opinion is that?), the new appearance is better. As can be seen from
Andreas image the building's numbers are much clearer, which is more
worthwhile than viewing the exact, intricate outline
Þann 4.1.2015 12:15, skrifaði Maarten Deen:
On 2015-01-04 11:33, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Note that there was Request for feedback: new building colours
in openstreetmap-carto thread before this change was made.
I missed that, but it was only a two day discussion where I see people
for and
On 04/01/15 12:04, Dave F. wrote:
As has been pointed out, there was a discussion which all were invited
to join in.
In the past these have not been discussions since in many cases the
changes have already been made! And a couple of days over a holiday
period when people are away from their
On 04/01/15 12:50, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
However this seems to be a nice way of telling us to stop using that tag
- you are not supposed to map for the renderer but if the default
renderer makes the buildings nearly impossible to see if they are on top
of Landuse=Residential then
Hi Jóhannes
It was a reply to the thread in general the OP; your post just
happened to be last. However, I think I did reply to a couple of your
points:
I prefer the new rendering
Addresses are clearer (which you appear to agree with)
Accurately draw building outlines, whilst giving the map
On 04/01/2015 12:50, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
Also none of the demos linked had Landuse=residential as background -
the lack of contrast there as buildings merge into the landuse is my
biggest issue with this change.
However this seems to be a nice way of telling us to stop using that
On 04/01/15 13:57, Dave F. wrote:
landuse=residential building=yes are not mutually exclusive.
Landuse=Residential is useful to show the extent of towns etc without
the overhead of detailing all the buildings.
But the new building colour is being lost against a very similar
contrast landuse
I'd hardly describe it as lost.
On 04/01/2015 14:08, Lester Caine wrote:
On 04/01/15 13:57, Dave F. wrote:
landuse=residential building=yes are not mutually exclusive.
Landuse=Residential is useful to show the extent of towns etc without
the overhead of detailing all the buildings.
But the
Søndag den 4. januar 2015 14:08:55 skrev Lester Caine:
On 04/01/15 13:57, Dave F. wrote:
landuse=residential building=yes are not mutually exclusive.
Landuse=Residential is useful to show the extent of towns etc without
the overhead of detailing all the buildings.
But the new building
On 04/01/2015 13:01, Lester Caine wrote:
Perhaps now is the time to be looking again at real time rendering
with a selectable style sheet, or perhaps simply a base layer on top
of which different languages and styles can be selected.
That sort of thing has been suggested before(1) but having
I like how churches have a darker colour. I'd like for schools, hospitals
and other more important buildings to also have the darker colour.
2015-01-04 18:34 GMT+01:00 SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk:
On 04/01/2015 13:01, Lester Caine wrote:
Perhaps now is the time to be looking again at
see https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1176 for
special redering of elements tagged both as building=* and historic=castle.
You may create github issue(s) with additional suggestion(s) for detecting
that building is
important.
2015-01-04 18:57 GMT+01:00 Janko Mihelić
Hi!
The old building colour looks much better than the new one, IMHO:
https://www.openstreetmap.at/karte/Wolfersberg-alt-neu.png
Especially in garden districts.
/al
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 2015-01-04 09:22, Andreas Labres wrote:
Hi!
The old building colour looks much better than the new one, IMHO:
https://www.openstreetmap.at/karte/Wolfersberg-alt-neu.png
Especially in garden districts.
Agreed. Left is old, right is new.
Regards,
Maarten
On 04/01/15 08:22, Andreas Labres wrote:
The old building colour looks much better than the new one, IMHO:
https://www.openstreetmap.at/karte/Wolfersberg-alt-neu.png
Especially in garden districts.
I disagree. The new building colour looks much better than the old one,
IMHO.
HTH
On 2015-01-04 11:02, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 04/01/15 08:22, Andreas Labres wrote:
The old building colour looks much better than the new one, IMHO:
https://www.openstreetmap.at/karte/Wolfersberg-alt-neu.png
Especially in garden districts.
I disagree. The new building colour looks much
Note that there was Request for feedback: new building colours
in openstreetmap-carto thread before this change was made.
IMHO it is much better - on low zoom levels maps is now less cluttered
and on high zoom levels POIs are now more visible.
2015-01-04 9:22 GMT+01:00 Andreas Labres
I don't care much for specific colours but I would like the original
differentiation between building types to be kept or improved. It was
more subtle than the proposed important buildings style, but was
nice visually and useful.
I understand this change was mostly a rewrite and so keeping
23 matches
Mail list logo
