Re: [OSM-talk] Redaction or revertion?

Thanks Martin and Frederik for the clarification. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/23/2016 08:19 AM, maning sambale wrote: >> I'm aware that redaction is only for DWG dedicated accounts. What's >> the best practice/criteria for

Re: [OSM-talk] Redaction or revertion?

2016-03-23 8:19 GMT+01:00 maning sambale : > I'm aware that redaction is only for DWG dedicated accounts. What's > the best practice/criteria for redaction? > redaction might be required if third party rights are infringed, all other cases of problematic edits can

Re: [OSM-talk] Redaction or revertion?

Hi, On 03/23/2016 08:19 AM, maning sambale wrote: > I'm aware that redaction is only for DWG dedicated accounts. What's > the best practice/criteria for redaction? Edits that are *reverted* will stop showing on everything that is based on the current version of our data (map, search, routing,

[OSM-talk] Redaction or revertion?

Hi, Just want to be clear whenever I report something that I think is harmful edit. When should I propose revertion or redaction? I'm aware that redaction is only for DWG dedicated accounts. What's the best practice/criteria for redaction? Thanks! -- cheers, maning