-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
I was actually dissembling slightly in an effort to be polite.
Thanks for being polite.
I know. I could equally have written this is a clear failing in JOSM
which should visualise route relations like Potlatch
Tirkon wrote:
Richard Fairhurst richard at systemed.net wrote:
I honestly didn't know that the relation ordering issue was the
case until
last week when Frederik pointed it out on this list. I'm now told
there'd
been some prior discussion of it on talk-de but that doesn't really
help
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 22:23, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
members) and not noticing - maybe JOSM's default display style doesn't
visualise relations as clearly as Potlatch.
JOSM doesn't visualize relations at all. You need to notice that the
thing you're working on is part of
Am 22.03.2010 23:38, schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 22:23, Richard Fairhurstrich...@systemed.net wrote:
members) and not noticing - maybe JOSM's default display style doesn't
visualise relations as clearly as Potlatch.
JOSM doesn't visualize relations at all. You
On 22/03/2010 22:38, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
JOSM doesn't visualize relations at all. You need to notice that the
thing you're working on is part of a relation in the attributes dialog
(where the key/values are listed).
Almost true. It does if you work in the wireframe view, where
Hi,
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
maybe JOSM's default display style doesn't
visualise relations as clearly as Potlatch, I don't know
May I humbly suggest that, as the lead author of one of OSM's main
editors, you at least look at the competition? I mean I don't demand
that you use it, or
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
maybe JOSM's default display style doesn't visualise relations as
clearly as Potlatch, I don't know
May I humbly suggest that, as the lead author of one of OSM's main
editors, you at least look at the competition? I mean I don't demand
7 matches
Mail list logo
