SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
...
They would like to link to us directly but don't think a) we can handle the
load and b) don't think it would be a good user experience to dump people on
to osm.org, what with the site design. Of those that would like to help us
scale the servers, they don't
That's great! It's a useful way to present OSM and it demonstrates
growing popularity
I fully agree. I think we should ask them if we even can name them on the
OpenStreetMap web site as reference case (and we might kindly ask them at
the same time to put the attribution somemore in the
Tim McNamara wrote:
[stuff about scope of share-alike]
[stuff about whether a share-alike or an attribution-only licence is
better]
Hello Tim; you are new here, I think (and welcome!). There is a bit of prior
discussion on this. About five years' worth, in fact. :)
If you'd like to look
Richard Weait wrote:
Sent: 16 June 2010 8:42 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Frank Sautter
openstreet...@sautter.com wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Sent: 16 June 2010 6:22 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
Hi,
Frank Sautter wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Interesting, they seem to have their own rendering
16.06.2010 18:38, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
it might be OK or not, but generally we explain in our wiki how we
like to be attributed in the web-context, that is supplying cc-by-sa
linked to creative commons and Openstreetmap, not too difficult, is
it?
Apparently it is counter-intuitive at
So I've had phone and email chats with stephen wolfram about everything they're
doing because incidentally I had an internship there a decade ago.
They love OSM. What's good is we're at a nice tipping point with many who want
to use OSM and help it succeed but are having trouble figuring out
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:16 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
There is a slight contradiction here though because the other thing I hear
a lot is they'd like to try something with us but keep it quiet - i.e. try
something small, but that's extremely hard with an open community.
I find
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:16 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
There is a slight contradiction here though because the other thing I hear
a lot is they'd like to try something with us but keep it quiet - i.e. try
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Is the license attribution they are using OK?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Frank Sautter
openstreet...@sautter.com wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Cool.
Is the license attribution they are using OK?
Not according to the FAQ:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 05:47:05PM +0200, Frank Sautter wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
I can't see anything about OSM on that page!? What does it show you?
Jochen
--
Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Frank Sautter
openstreet...@sautter.comwrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Is the license attribution they are using OK?
Down at the bottom of every W|A page they have a Source Information link.
In there,
16.06.2010 17:47, Frank Sautter wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
That's great! It's a useful way to present OSM and it demonstrates
growing popularity. If we want to reach a larger audience, we need to be
present on search engines and the
2010/6/16 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
Imo, it is. They name OSM as a data source directly below the image and
let you access osm.org when you click on the image. They also give more
detailled attribution (with the license abbreviation and another link to
osm.org) on the Source
It's somewhat discouraging, though, that *every time* anyone uses OSM,
we instantly react with this:
+1
It's really good to see OSM being used for something that isn't a pet
project of someone in this community.
It was great to go to WolframAlpha, type in my home town and see a map
that I had
Hi,
Frank Sautter wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Interesting, they seem to have their own rendering as well. A little
yesterday perhaps with no slippy map and zooming via a dropdown but
surely a good start. Should like to find out how
Am Mittwoch, 16. Juni 2010, um 18:41:36 schrieb Joseph Reeves:
It's somewhat discouraging, though, that *every time* anyone uses OSM,
we instantly react with this:
+1
It's really good to see OSM being used for something that isn't a pet
project of someone in this community.
It was
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 18:00:11 Ian Dees wrote:
Down at the bottom of every W|A page they have a Source Information link.
In there, under the Mapping data source information they show
OpenStreetMap (CC-BY-SA). » http://www.openstreetmap.org/ with a link to
OpenStreetMap.org.
Yeah. And that
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Frank Sautter
openstreet...@sautter.com wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Cool.
Is the license attribution they are using OK?
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Frank Sautter
openstreet...@sautter.com wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Nice catch. That's super.
Is the license attribution they are using OK?
It looks good to me. Different from what we recommend for
On 17 June 2010 03:47, Frank Sautter openstreet...@sautter.com wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Is the license attribution they are using OK?
I think it depends on whether you can seperate the map that Wolfram|Alpha
have created from
Tim,
Tim McNamara wrote:
The whole thing creates a single creative work.
The term single creative work is not used in the CC license text.
Displaying OSM content and other content side-by-side does not form a
work derived from OpenStreetMap according to community consensus. You
need to do
On 17 June 2010 10:00, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Tim McNamara wrote:
The whole thing creates a single creative work.
The term single creative work is not used in the CC license text.
Displaying OSM content and other content side-by-side does not form a work
derived from
On 16 June 2010 23:09, Tim McNamara paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz wrote:
Sorry if I've neglected to look into this issue in more detail. May I ask,
which community consensus are you referring to? OSM or CC? My understanding
was the intention behind a share-alike clause is to compel people using
On Thursday 17 June 2010 00:41:43 Grant Slater wrote:
Things beyond the map data I am not interested in.
Aw, c'mon. You ARE interested in beer and map cakes.
:-P
--
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es
___
26 matches
Mail list logo
