On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
If I have data derived from OSM data, do I have to distribute it? The
Hi all,
I'm aware that this topic is somehow delicate, but I was quite astonished
when I had a look at Cloudmade's Terms and Conditions
http://cloudmade.com/terms_conditions
espescially Part 6:
*
###
6. Ownership; Proprietary Rights.* As between the Parties, the CloudMade
Site including the
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
If I have data derived from OSM data, do I have to distribute it? The
licence does not force you to distribute or make any data available. But if
you do choose to distribute it, or anything derived from it, it
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
The claim copyright on graphics and design and restrict just the map data
to cc-by-sa. IMHO that inhebits e.g. that I take a screenshot of their map
and put it on my website. Looking at the legal faq in the
2009/12/1 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
If so, that's just silly.
really?
This term here: (but excluding the Map Data, which are governed solely
under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 2.0
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/) seems to do
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:58:35 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
fine, but to me it seems it doesn't care for the viral aspects of our
current license, that is: every derived work (derived from our data) must
have the same license: cc-by-sa 2.0
A website is no derived work
2009/12/1 marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com
A website is no derived work of a map presented in it.
It is not adding any data to the map or changing the map
itself in a significant way.
Merely including something is not relevant.
Just like Linux-Distributions containing non-free software
and
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
really?
Ja rly. If every website that wanted to use OSM data was forced to open
license the entire rest of their site, all their artwork etc, it would be a
massive disencentive to using it.
Also, don't
2009/12/1 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
Ja rly. If every website that wanted to use OSM data was forced to open
license the entire rest of their site, all their artwork etc, it would be a
massive disencentive to using it.
If I
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns
lafr...@gmail.comwrote:
If I understand him correctly he is not talking about website or any
additional tools but about rastered MAP tiles!
but excluding the Map Data
It's pretty clear.
Steve
Steve Bennett wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Lauris Bukis-Haberkorns
lafriks at gmail.comwrote:
If I understand him correctly he is not talking about website or any
additional tools but about rastered MAP tiles!
but excluding the Map Data
It's pretty clear.
Martin is correct.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
If I have data derived from OSM data, do I have to distribute it? The
licence does not force you to distribute or make any data available.
12 matches
Mail list logo
