Re: [OSM-talk] Very not happy

2012-07-22 Thread Peter Wendorff
Am 22.07.2012 00:42, schrieb andrzej zaborowski: On 21 July 2012 15:07, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: That's quite incorrect, millions of objects that were not flagged in those tools have been removed, Can both of you give us the object IDs of a couple of these objects to

Re: [OSM-talk] Very not happy

2012-07-22 Thread andrzej zaborowski
Peter, On 22 July 2012 09:27, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote: Am 22.07.2012 00:42, schrieb andrzej zaborowski: If you're asking me (not Maetma 91), I think the problem has been known since the early days of OSMI license view (easily fixable too). For example this city I

Re: [OSM-talk] Very not happy

2012-07-21 Thread Vladimir Vyskocil
Le 21 juil. 2012 à 02:25, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com a écrit : On 21 July 2012 00:55, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote: Maetma 91 wrote: I do that. JOSM plugin say no problem and now you break everything The licence check tools would have been showing problems. Nothing

Re: [OSM-talk] Very not happy

2012-07-21 Thread Daniel Neugebauer
On 07/21/2012 12:20 AM, Maetma 91 wrote: Today I look at the map and I see that lot work I do last year is gone. Did you accept the license change? If you did, someone else may have done larger changes to your work or may have removed and replaced it with something else (but you didn't notice).

Re: [OSM-talk] Very not happy

2012-07-21 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 21.07.2012 13:19, Vladimir Vyskocil wrote: That's quite incorrect, millions of objects that were not flagged in those tools have been removed, I fully agree and support that ! I remapped a lot of things mainly in France, BAD map stopped showing them, JOSM plugin stopped report it as

Re: [OSM-talk] Very not happy

2012-07-21 Thread Vladimir Vyskocil
On 21 juil. 2012, at 15:07, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, On 21.07.2012 13:19, Vladimir Vyskocil wrote: That's quite incorrect, millions of objects that were not flagged in those tools have been removed, I fully agree and support that ! I remapped a lot of things mainly in France, BAD map

Re: [OSM-talk] Very not happy

2012-07-21 Thread andrzej zaborowski
On 21 July 2012 15:07, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: That's quite incorrect, millions of objects that were not flagged in those tools have been removed, Can both of you give us the object IDs of a couple of these objects to investigate? If you're asking me (not Maetma 91), I think

Re: [OSM-talk] Very not happy

2012-07-20 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Maetma 91 maetm...@gmail.com wrote: Before I say to my friends Use Openstreetmap it is cool and today they laugh me and say Openstreetmap is shit, it miss lots roads So fix it. Also, this could have been prevented in advance by using the license review tools

Re: [OSM-talk] Very not happy

2012-07-20 Thread Jo
I understand your reaction, but this has been announced for a long time now. Around where I live and practically in all of Belgium hardly anything disappeared. This is due to the hard work of myself and others to remap non ODBL compliant stuff before the bot ran. I've also been contacting people,

Re: [OSM-talk] Very not happy

2012-07-20 Thread Lester Caine
Maetma 91 wrote: Today I look at the map and I see that lots road where I live is gone. Today I look at the map and I see that lot work I do last year is gone. Today I am VERY NOT HAPPY. I am sorry but now I will use map from Google because they do not remove road or brake people work. Before

Re: [OSM-talk] Very not happy

2012-07-20 Thread Mike Dupont
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote: Which you can either choose to do as well. Or you can join the crowd and use maps which you can't improve or reuse for your own needs. -- There are also other alternatives, but I wont reiterate them because it is not on topic for

Re: [OSM-talk] Very not happy

2012-07-20 Thread Lester Caine
Maetma 91 wrote: I do that. JOSM plugin say no problem and now you break everything The licence check tools would have been showing problems. Nothing has been removed that was not flagged in those tools. So the only reason data has gone missing is because nobody has bothered to clean it up

Re: [OSM-talk] Very not happy

2012-07-20 Thread andrzej zaborowski
On 21 July 2012 00:55, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote: Maetma 91 wrote: I do that. JOSM plugin say no problem and now you break everything The licence check tools would have been showing problems. Nothing has been removed that was not flagged in those tools. That's quite incorrect,