Now we can see a big discussion, but no one did anything constructive!
One thing is clear, we need a tag to describe the usability of ways.
If you don't like smoothness invent a better scheme!
Smoothness is better than nothing.
Please have a look at and comment on:
Per-15 wrote:
If you don't like smoothness invent a better scheme!
Smoothness is better than nothing.
That's debatable (as well as, er, very_horrible).
Personally I believe the easiest and most flexible thing is just to extend
the access tags:
bicycle=no|yes|difficult|unsuitable
so you'd
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Per-15 wrote:
If you don't like smoothness invent a better scheme!
Smoothness is better than nothing.
That's debatable (as well as, er, very_horrible).
Agreed
It does not provide a platform to build on at all.
Personally I believe the easiest and most flexible
Hi
bicycle=no|yes|difficult|unsuitable
so you'd get
highway=bridleway
foot=yes (permitted, no problem)
bicycle:racer=unsuitable (permitted but not practical)
bicycle:hybrid=difficult (permitted but challenging)
bicycle:mtb=yes (permitted, no problem)
In Vienna we have an event called
2008/12/1 Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Per-15 wrote:
If you don't like smoothness invent a better scheme!
Smoothness is better than nothing.
That's debatable (as well as, er, very_horrible).
Personally I believe the easiest and most flexible thing is just to extend
the access
Bernhard Zwischenbrugger wrote:
In Vienna we have an event called Friday Night Skating.
Every week about 1000 Inline Skater meet at 10pm and skate on normal
roads.
The police blocks all the roads an it is possible to skate on roads that
are for normal for cars only.
You can't design/evolve
David Earl:
I've implemented some changes to the experimental UK postcode searches
in the Namefinder.
(...)
1. you can now search for UK postcode prefixes, e.g. CB21. These are
just OSM nodes.
Which OSM-tag are you querying there? postcode=x? Do you respect
addr:postcode according to the
On Dec 1, 2008, at 11:02, Bernhard Zwischenbrugger wrote:
In Vienna we have an event called Friday Night Skating.
Every week about 1000 Inline Skater meet at 10pm and skate on normal
roads.
The police blocks all the roads an it is possible to skate on roads
that are for normal for cars
2008/12/1 Bernhard Zwischenbrugger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
bicycle=no|yes|difficult|unsuitable
so you'd get
highway=bridleway
foot=yes (permitted, no problem)
bicycle:racer=unsuitable (permitted but not practical)
bicycle:hybrid=difficult (permitted but challenging)
bicycle:mtb=yes
2008/12/1 Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personally I believe the easiest and most flexible thing is just to
extend
the access tags:
bicycle=no|yes|difficult|unsuitable
so you'd get
highway=bridleway
foot=yes (permitted, no problem)
bicycle:racer=unsuitable (permitted but not
On Dec 1, 2008, at 11:15, Douglas Furlong wrote:
If this is an argument in favour of smoothness, then you would run
in to exactly the same problem (just not as fine grained).
If a user see's a road as being tagged as smooth, then they'd
think that they could roller blade on it, which
Robert Vollmert wrote:
The obvious problem with this is the massive redundancy. You need to tag
for every possible form of transport, or infer suitability for something
exotic from the provided suitabilities.
Yes, infer, like we do with every other tag. People realised they didn't
need to tag
On 01/12/2008 10:11, Claudius Henrichs wrote:
David Earl:
I've implemented some changes to the experimental UK postcode searches
in the Namefinder.
(...)
1. you can now search for UK postcode prefixes, e.g. CB21. These are
just OSM nodes.
Which OSM-tag are you querying there?
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Robert Vollmert wrote:
I do wonder why people are always jumping on the corner cases to
discredit smoothness=*.
It's not about corner cases. It's about usability. Remembering what
very_horrible means, or absolutely_smashing, or
2008/12/1 Matt White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Douglas Furlong wrote:
2008/12/1 Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
bicycle=no|yes|difficult|unsuitable
so you'd get
highway=bridleway
foot=yes (permitted, no problem)
2008/12/1 Matt White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Robert Vollmert wrote:
I do wonder why people are always jumping on the corner cases to
discredit smoothness=*.
It's not about corner cases. It's about usability. Remembering what
very_horrible means, or
2008/12/1 Robert Vollmert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/12/1 Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personally I believe the easiest and most flexible thing is just to
extend
the access tags:
bicycle=no|yes|difficult|unsuitable
so you'd get
highway=bridleway
foot=yes (permitted, no problem)
Douglas Furlong wrote:
This makes is pretty straightforward to tag for all vehicle types
easily
- a tertiary road that has a fair few potholes could be
smoothness=bumpy (given that car is the primary vehicle for the
tertiary
highway type)
smoothness:mtb=bumpy
Douglas Furlong wrote:
2008/12/1 Matt White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Robert Vollmert wrote:
I do wonder why people are always jumping on the corner cases to
discredit smoothness=*.
It's not about corner
2008/12/1 Robert Vollmert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/12/1 Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personally I believe the easiest and most flexible thing is just to extend
the access tags:
bicycle=no|yes|difficult|unsuitable
so you'd get
highway=bridleway
foot=yes (permitted, no problem)
Douglas Furlong wrote:
2008/12/1 Matt White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Douglas Furlong wrote:
This makes is pretty straightforward to tag for all vehicle
types
easily
- a tertiary road that has a fair few potholes could be
hi
smoothness
I found a wiki page - but it's in German:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zustandserfassung_und_-bewertung
They have a scale from 1 to 5 for zustandswert:
1.5 : maximum for new roads
3.5 : warning level
4.5 : /Schwellenwert - the road must be repaired
/For measuring there is
After an RFC time of 4 weeks, and no big objections - only some minor
corrections - I would like to promote this feature request to the Voting.
Voting starts today 2008-12-01 and will end on 2008-12-15.
Here is the link to the proposal:
One more thing: UK postcodes have spaces in them: searching for OX13ld
won't work as it won't recognize it as a UK postcode. You need
OX1 3LD.
However that particular example doesn't work anyway because the
address it tries to find is not helpful. It thinks the word
Scientist is a street name
Voting stopped by alpilotx ... Sorry guys. I have completely forgotten to check
the Talk page. In the first days I didn't get responses and then I was
believing, I would get automatic notification if I set the page on watch (which
was obviously not the case). And I got only one response via the
The latest charts are now online [1] and they show that the number of
contributors has dropped in the last couple of months. The number of new
users signing up each day hasn't changed much.
Is it the northern hemisphere winter kicking in?
Has the credit crunch or fuel prices made a difference?
On 01/12/2008 12:40, Shaun McDonald wrote:
Does the namefinder use any postcodes that have been added to node or
ways in the osm data?
No: see my earlier reply to someone else who asked exactly the same
question.
David
___
talk mailing list
2008/12/1 David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 01/12/2008 12:40, Shaun McDonald wrote:
Does the namefinder use any postcodes that have been added to node or
ways in the osm data?
No: see my earlier reply to someone else who asked exactly the same
question.
I'm guessing what's confusing people
Hi,
Jan Torben Heuer wrote:
Hi, I hope this is the right place for my question.
No, definitely not. There is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list and a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list, both of which would be more suitable than
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want to use OSM data for a routing client. I therefore need the
In my case I've run out of stuff to map. Can someone build some more roads
please? ;)
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest charts are now online [1] and they show that the number of
contributors has dropped in the last couple
On 01/12/2008 13:45, Dave Stubbs wrote:
2008/12/1 David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 01/12/2008 12:40, Shaun McDonald wrote:
Does the namefinder use any postcodes that have been added to node or
ways in the osm data?
No: see my earlier reply to someone else who asked exactly the same
question.
In my case I've run out of stuff to map. Can someone build some more roads
please? ;)
I think you'll find that if you start mapping footpaths, it'll at least partly
solve the problem. Footpaths, by definition, cannot (legally) be cycled on so
you have to do them on foot. Which means your
2008/12/1 80n [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In my case I've run out of stuff to map. Can someone build some more roads
please? ;)
There's the whole world of addresses open to you + you could always
move house :-)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
2008/12/1 80n [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my case I've run out of stuff to map. Can someone build some more roads
please? ;)
Indeed, I think that the stat doesn't say much. In crowded areas like
Germany or UK, there will be a time where there won't be anything left to
map.
The real interesting
Andy asked:
If anyone out there who was contributing in the summer and has
now stopped
could share the reasons I might help shed some light.
I've not stopped as such, but there are a number of factors that
mean I can't contribute as much as I did initially.
When I started mapping I went out
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
If anyone out there who was contributing in the summer and has now stopped
could share the reasons I might help shed some light.
I have almost stopped mapping in the latest month or two for a couple
I've no idea where that template comes from - is it a wikipedia thing?
Very few wikipedia templates have been also copied onto the
openstreetmap wiki.
In answer to your second question, yep, most links are hardcoded
simple urls, but you might want to consider either embedding a map
(see
The queries that failed were attempts to find all relations of
any type, so .../api/0.5/relation[type=*][bbox=-124.0,36.75,-121.0,39.0]
or .../api/0.5/relation[bbox=-124.0,36.75,-121.0,39.0]
only returned nodes.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 07:34:52PM +, 80n wrote:
David
I just tested it
On 1 Dec 2008, at 14:56, Elena of Valhalla wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
If anyone out there who was contributing in the summer and has now
stopped
could share the reasons I might help shed some light.
My mapping
Donald Allwright wrote:
Sent: 01 December 2008 2:13 PM
To: 80n; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Where have all the contributors gone?
In my case I've run out of stuff to map. Can someone build some more
roads please? ;)
I think you'll find that if you start mapping footpaths,
At 9:00am on a Sunday morning, the meaning of no cycling on urban
footpaths mysteriously disappears :-)
Unfortunately the mud doesn't, which if Saturday is anything to go by would
have been a bit too much for my non-mountain bike :-)
The real challenge as has been pointed out is the white
How about covering your area with land use data using yahoo/landsat?
It's something I do occasionally at the end of the work day when I'm
totally exhausted - it's a nice dumb work which helps my brain turn off.
And it comes handy for various hiking maps (example of my area:
80n wrote:
In my case I've run out of stuff to map. Can someone build some more
roads please? ;)
Surrey is finished??!! Congratulations, I missed that!
I've just realised - I have a house to let in a beautiful largely
unmapped part of Italy and was wondering where to find customers. Now I
Igor Brejc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: 01 December 2008 3:57 PM
To: Donald Allwright
Cc: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists); 80n; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Where have all the contributors gone?
How about covering your area with land use data using yahoo/landsat?
It's
graham wrote:
Sent: 01 December 2008 4:07 PM
To: osm
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Where have all the contributors gone?
I've just realised - I have a house to let in a beautiful largely
unmapped part of Italy and was wondering where to find customers. Now I
know ;-)
What part? How Big? Is it
It's very common in Bolivia at least that river have very different
water levels, is there a tag for this? Usually you have a large
riverbed and then a very small river running in the middle for most
part of the year, and then sometimes it will flood all the way up to
the riverbanks.
I have
On Monday 01 December 2008 13:59:32 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
The latest charts are now online [1] and they show that the number of
contributors has dropped in the last couple of months. The number of new
users signing up each day hasn't changed much.
Is it the northern
Inge Wallin schrieb:
On Monday 01 December 2008 13:59:32 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
The latest charts are now online [1] and they show that the number of
contributors has dropped in the last couple of months. The number of new
users signing up each day hasn't changed much.
On Monday 01 December 2008 15:00, 80n wrote:
In my case I've run out of stuff to map. Can someone build some more roads
please? ;)
+1
And I don't care about street numbers
--
Sylvain Letuffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
Most of all since we're growing exponentially and even if we had 90% of
mappers agree on something today, in two or three months those 90% would
perhaps only form 30% of the community...
This is actually an argument _for_ Map_Features and some
Douglas Furlong wrote:
My biggest issues is that smoothness varies depending on the vehicle in
question, and as such it's just to vague to really be of use.
No it doesn't. It's not like a paving machine runs just ahead of every
off-road vehicle, making the road smoother for them. The
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:07 PM, graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
80n wrote:
In my case I've run out of stuff to map. Can someone build some more
roads please? ;)
Surrey is finished??!! Congratulations, I missed that!
To clarify, my immediate area is complete in every direction as far as
80n wrote:
Sent: 01 December 2008 5:38 PM
To: graham
Cc: osm
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Where have all the contributors gone?
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:07 PM, graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
80n wrote:
In my case I've run out of stuff to map. Can someone build some
more
Hello,
Here's a quick update on the planning of the State of the Map 2009:
Proposals: We've received 3 proposals to host the conference in 2009 from
Gran Canaria, Amsterdam and Trento (Italy)
Working Group: Following last week's board meeting we established a working
group to deal with the
Andy == Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Andy,
Andy If anyone out there who was contributing in the summer and has now
Andy stopped could share the reasons I might help shed some light.
I got my 1st GPS (76CSx) few days ago and do not own bike (yet),
although
http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/dailynews/2008/nov/17/news4.html
;-)
--
Tel: +44(0) 7814 517 807
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/dailynews/2008/nov/17/news4.html
;-)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Hi!
Tom Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
The problem with the notesapi branch is not that it's the same
database but just that it takes the wrong approach to doing things
within that database.
For the record my preference would very much be for this to be a
rails based system within the
Hi!
Bernhard Zwischenbrugger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
What about defining the API first?
Yes, at least before starting some serious programming. My basic idea
for the api was to allow to add, search/filter, and modify bug reports
through a RESTful controller. The search/filter output should
Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Christoph Böhme wrote:
That sounds good. I will see at the weekend if it really is a piece
of cake. Would it be possible to reuse and extend the client-side
code from osb for a web-based client-side interface?
Before you get all cranked up writing
Xav [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Christoph Böhme a écrit :
Would it be possible to reuse and extend the client-side code from
osb for a web-based client-side interface?
If it is a moral question : of course.
If it is a technical question : 50% of the code has to be rewriten.
Fine, it
Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Christoph Böhme wrote:
That sounds good. I will see at the weekend if it really is a piece
of cake. Would it be possible to reuse and extend the client-side
code from osb for a web-based client-side interface?
Before you get all cranked up writing
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
graham wrote:
Sent: 01 December 2008 4:07 PM
To: osm
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Where have all the contributors gone?
I've just realised - I have a house to let in a beautiful largely
unmapped part of Italy and was wondering where to find customers. Now
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:00 PM, 80n [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my case I've run out of stuff to map. Can someone build some more roads
please? ;)
We need more volunteers in Metro manila ;)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/index.html?lat=14.594717284692324lon=121.03235961646361zoom=11
You have
Where you have the sign post for 4WD only, is that an access restriction or
a suggestion?
I.E. If you go on that road with a motorbike, or a 2wd vehicle, could you
face prosecution? Or would you just be considered a bit foolish?
It's a warning, not a restriction. I regularly take my 2WD
Just noticed this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/James%20Fee/diary/4223
James Fee of http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com,
now contributing to Openstreetmap. The heavyweights of geoblogging
are here! Welcome!
Can't wait for Dr. Tomlinson, Goodchild and Burrough to chime in. ;)
cheers,
maning
David
Both these queries seem to work ok when I try them.
The actual URLs I used were:
wget
http://osm.bearstech.com/osmxapi/api/0.5/relation[type=*][bbox=-124.0,36.75,-121.0,39.0]which
returned a file of 107,839,289 bytes containing 485,694 nodes, 46,128
ways and 1,238 relations.
And:
wget
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This really depends on where you live. If you live in a major city then you
don't have much option but to map residential streets. Otherwise it's a
special trip out to the countryside. Not something you can easily do in a
lunch hour
Ciao,
penso si possa fare così:
1. DXF2PostGIS (http://www.glasic.it/dxf2postgis.html - non credo
esista una versione Linux però :-( )
2. Il punto 1. puoi sostituirlo con la conversione DWG, DXF to SHP
3. Apri i tuoi dati PostGIS (o SHP) con QGIS
4. Esporti i tuoi dati in GPX
2008/12/1 Elena of Valhalla [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
perche' layer = -1? di solito i portici sono a livello strada, quindi
layer 0; al massimo e` il building ad essere a layer 1+
si scusa mi sono sbagliato
--
Elena of Valhalla
ciao
Luca
___
Talk-it
Concordo su questa vostra opinione. Le persone in ambito di disastro sanno come
muoversi e sono abituati a lavorare in un clima di incertezza.
I dati OSM sono per loro disponibili dal sito OSM e quindi sono in grado di
recuperarli e usarli a loro discrezione.
In questo contesto, un approccio
Stavo dando un'occhiata a
http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/Italy/En/tags.html
e ho notato che sono spariti tutti i distributori di latte crudo. Fino a
2-3 settimane fa sono sicuro che ci fossero ancora. Non che fossero
molti, tra l'altro non ho ancora avuto tempo di creare una paginetta sul
wiki a
Elena of Valhalla ha scritto:
al massimo e` il building ad essere a layer 1+
Perché? Per me anche il building è a layer 0: di solito non viene
indicato, quindi quello di default dovrebbe essere automaticamente 0.
Quindi, per i portici:
highway=pedestrian
tunnel=yes
Chi lo mette nel
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Carlo Stemberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Elena of Valhalla ha scritto:
al massimo e` il building ad essere a layer 1+
Perché? Per me anche il building è a layer 0: di solito non viene
indicato, quindi quello di default dovrebbe essere automaticamente 0.
si`,
Elena of Valhalla ha scritto:
mi chiedo se sia il caso di descrivere l'edificio come sopra il
livello della strada: in teoria e` sia al livello base (l'ingresso,
di solito) che ai livelli superiori
=-O
Cioè? Vorresti indicare il numero dei piani di ogni edificio? O forse
l'altezza in
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Carlo Stemberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Elena of Valhalla ha scritto:
mi chiedo se sia il caso di descrivere l'edificio come sopra il
livello della strada: in teoria e` sia al livello base (l'ingresso,
di solito) che ai livelli superiori
=-O
Cioè? Vorresti
Il 1 dicembre 2008 12.10, Carlo Stemberger ha scritto:
Stavo dando un'occhiata a
http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/Italy/En/tags.html
Erano taggati amenity=milk_dispenser
qui[1] ce ne sono 6
[1] http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/Italy/En/keystats_amenity.html
--
Daniele Forsi
Scusate ... io sono l'ultimo arrivato e quindi il mio è solo un commento
di nessun valore.
So che non bisogna mappare per il renderer ... ma credo che così
qualsiasi renderer visualizzerebbe il portico come un sottopassaggio
pedonale ... cosa che non credo che sia bellissima ...
Mau.
Alberto
Scusate, ma un portico non è attaccato a una strada? Io non penso che
vada contrassegnato in modo particolare. È come un marciapiede
coperto... E non mi pare che segnaliamo i marciapiedi in modo
particolare.
--
Luciano Montanaro
Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President
Ciao Roberto,
in effetti è il primo programma che avevo provato, ma non riesco a farlo
funzionare.
Unzippato il programma in un cartella, l'eseguibile parte, si vede una bella
mappa, ma non riesco a trovare nessuna funzione per definire il percorso da
fare (From, To, etc...).
Qualcuno lo ha già
Luciano Montanaro ha scritto:
Scusate, ma un portico non è attaccato a una strada? Io non penso che
vada contrassegnato in modo particolare. È come un marciapiede
coperto... E non mi pare che segnaliamo i marciapiedi in modo
particolare.
Effettivamente non hai tutti i torti. Però i
2008/12/1 Luciano Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Scusate, ma un portico non è attaccato a una strada? Io non penso che
vada contrassegnato in modo particolare. È come un marciapiede
coperto... E non mi pare che segnaliamo i marciapiedi in modo
particolare.
un marciapiede non si segna, ma una
Maurizio Ferraris Dal Cioca ha scritto:
So che non bisogna mappare per il renderer ... ma credo che così
qualsiasi renderer visualizzerebbe il portico come un sottopassaggio
pedonale ... cosa che non credo che sia bellissima ...
No: se il layer non è indicato (il che equivale a metterlo
Daniele Forsi ha scritto:
Il 1 dicembre 2008 12.10, Carlo Stemberger ha scritto:
Stavo dando un'occhiata a
http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/Italy/En/tags.html
Erano taggati amenity=milk_dispenser
qui[1] ce ne sono 6
[1]
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 07:02:42PM +0100, Fabrizio Carrai wrote:
Ciao Roberto,
in effetti è il primo programma che avevo provato, ma non riesco a farlo
funzionare.
Con la versione Linux e quella sul telefonino FreeRunner bisogna
fare click destro sulla mappa - punto - Imposta come posizione.
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:38:24AM +0100, Simone Cortesi wrote:
i dati originali si possono scaricare dal web.
non è possibile metterli a disposizione altrove.
l'accordo con la Regione non lo prevede.
https://docs.google.com/View?docid=dgjsbdtx_99fbnn8ggg
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Niccolo Rigacci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chi è autorizzato ad usare codesta cartografia per importarla in
OSM? Tutta la comunita' OSM oppure solo Simone?
chiunque carichi dati su OSM, non solo io.
Qual'e' la cartografia CTRN oggetto della licenza? Quella che
Simone Cortesi ha scritto:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Niccolo Rigacci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chi è autorizzato ad usare codesta cartografia per importarla in
OSM? Tutta la comunita' OSM oppure solo Simone?
chiunque carichi dati su OSM, non solo io.
A me pare che il dubbio sul
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 12:58:11AM +0100, Simone Cortesi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Niccolo Rigacci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Qual'e' la cartografia CTRN oggetto della licenza? Quella che ho
scaricato ora dal web? Quella che potro' scaricare tra un anno?
non so, ma a me
As I don't have an @osmfoundation.org address, I can't see november's
draft minutes.
Shaun
On 1 Dec 2008, at 11:57, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Jochen,
We posted draft board meeting minutes to the OSMF website so you can
get up
to date on the workings behind the scenes. We
The August of September minutes have been published. Thank you.
Fyi, the draft minutes of the latest meeting are behind password
authentication. Can the requirement for authentication be removed to make it
generally accessible? I don't know if I have a password as a foundation
member, but I
Mike had put the link up before I'd published the doc. You should be able to
reach it now. Let me know if not.
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcs6phhk_35dkhtq2dj
Patience please on the other Jan Oct ones, they will be up later today.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hoi,
Ik kwam een raar verloop tegen van de gemeente grens in Amsterdam:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.33308lon=4.92431zoom=16
Volgens de history in Potlach zijn die boundaries ruim een maand geleden
opnieuw geïmporteerd uit AND. (Het betreft hier Way: #27963078.)
Weet iemand mij te
Joepie!
Ik ben even langs het door mij voorgestelde cafe gelopen (De Vergulde
Gaper) en we kunnen daar gewoon een tafel reserveren.
Zal ik dat even regelen?
Het cafe is op 5 minuten lopen vanaf Amsterdam Centraal Station.
De locatie op onze kaart klopt niet helemaal dus die heb ik aangepast...
Lambert Carsten schreef:
Ik kwam een raar verloop tegen van de gemeente grens in Amsterdam:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.33308lon=4.92431zoom=16
Wat is daar vreemd aan?
groeten,
Eugene
___
Talk-nl mailing list
Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
Eugene van der Pijll wrote:
Lambert Carsten schreef:
Ik kwam een raar verloop tegen van de gemeente grens in Amsterdam:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.33308lon=4.92431zoom=16
Wat is daar vreemd aan?
Juist. Wat is de definitie van raar? Heb je de grenzen in
Freek wrote On 01-12-08 21:44:
On Monday 01 December 2008, Michiel Zandbelt wrote:
Nu zijn er inmiddels een viertal routes die hardnekkig weigeren
gerenderd te worden en dus ook niet verschijnen op de kaarten.
Ik heb ze bij herhaling nagekeken en opnieuw getagd, kan geen fout
ontdekken,
Verder moet je soms tot twee dagen na een update van de serverdata
wachten tot de tiles 48h oud zijn. Hoe vaker je kijkt, lijkt het wel,
hoe langer het duurt.
Gert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Freek
Verzonden: maandag 1 december 2008
On Monday 01 December 2008, Michiel Zandbelt wrote:
Freek wrote On 01-12-08 21:44:
On Monday 01 December 2008, Michiel Zandbelt wrote:
Nu zijn er inmiddels een viertal routes die hardnekkig weigeren
gerenderd te worden en dus ook niet verschijnen op de kaarten.
Ik heb ze bij herhaling
Freek wrote On 01-12-08 21:56:
Ja, een beetje vreemd, ze lijken mij in ieder geval correct getagd.
Inderdaad
maar even afwachten.
Ze zijn tot nu toe overigens altijd ook bij het opnieuw downlaoden van
het betreffende gebeid van de OSM servers in Merkaartor weer keurig als
relations in
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
