Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

On Oct 24, 2017 3:08 AM, "Blake Girardot HOT/OSM" wrote: Here is my American, collaborative version of the same issue: Hi, I see the new HOT Tasking Manager. I feel like it does not clearly describe how it it used in the OpenStreetMap community. It is just a tool

Re: [OSM-talk] How to create custom online map from OpenStreetMap

On 22/10/2017 18:47, Carlos Cámara wrote: I would like to create a custom map for online use that loads OSM data but displays it in different ways as the standard, cyclemap, transport... layers. Another couple of resources to look at (if you think you'll go down the "Mapnik" route): To

[Talk-it] challenge Mapillary e MapTime Milano

Ciao a tutti, segnalo che ieri domenica 22 ottobre si è concluso il challenge di Mapillary per aggiungere immagini a Milano [1]. Hanno contribuito solo in 6: 5 dei nostri studenti di PoliMappers e Alessandro :) Complimenti anche al vincitore, Francesco (che segue questa lista)! Al MapTime Milano,

Re: [OSM-talk] Could we just pause any wikidata edits for a month or two?

Andy, both sr: and sq: languages describe the same CONCEPT - "republic of Serbia". Both articles mention Kosovo as a territory with the special status. So the content is the same, and both can be used to describe the ground truth of Republic of Serbia. The articles just choose to show a slightly

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

Hi Christoph, Thank you for the suggestions. As the Project Manager for the Tasking Manager 3, I can say most of them should be no problem all and look like they basically line up with what we talked about internally to address the issues raised.. Hopefully we will have some changes out in the

Re: [OSM-talk] Could we just pause any wikidata edits for a month or two?

On 23 October 2017 at 07:17, Tomas Straupis wrote: > 2017-10-22 23:20 GMT+03:00 Ryszard Mikke wrote: > > So, to sum up: > > 1) There was a link to disambiguation page that no one has corrected > until > > it was detected by Yuri's tool. > > There was a link to

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

HOT will probably never find a formulation of our mission and tools that satisfies the entire OSM community. However, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try. My two cents: How about a simple blurb describing and linking to OSM on the About page? And perhaps the title banner could be rephrased to

Re: [OSM-talk] Could we just pause any wikidata edits for a month or two?

On 23/10/2017 11:40, Ryszard Mikke wrote: That seems like a problem to fix in Wikipedia Part of the problem is that some of these problems simply aren't fixable at wikipedia.  For example https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%80%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0 and

Re: [OSM-talk] Could we just pause any wikidata edits for a month or two?

>> There was a link to disambiguation page which was detected using >> other tool which is not using wikidata. > Could you point me to that tool? It is a local Lithuanian tool. But here you can have a look at results: http://patrulis.openmap.lt/wikipedia.html > That's exactly my point. I

Re: [Talk-it] Utilità cartelli limiti di velocità

On 10/22/2017 08:37 PM, carlo folini wrote: > Guardando su OSM ho trovato (andando a caso) questo cartello che è > completamente scollegato dalla strada per cui è stato messo. > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3324840295 (spero che l'utente emmexx > che è su osm da quasi 10 anni sia un buon

[OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

I recently turned up on the HOT tasking manager page (http://tasks.hotosm.org/) and found the page is now presenting itself tautologically as an "OpenStreetMap Collaborative Mapping" portal with no indication except for the small logo on top that this is a separate project with no official

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

Hi Christoph, We can not win if we do or if we do not :) It clearly says the HOT Tasking Manager, which it is. We were asked to change it from OSM Tasking Manager because people felt that was misrepresenting, it was not the OSM Tasking manager, it was HOT's Tasking Manager, so I changed that in

Re: [Talk-it] Utilità cartelli limiti di velocità

Alessandro wrote > Se la regola è mappare ciò che si vede io non lo considero un > abbellimento, anche se personalmente spezzo la via e inserisco maxspeed > o qualsiasi altra limitazione nel tratto in cui vige quel divieto. > > Alessandro +1 Ricordiamoci che i cartelli stradali sono oggetti

Re: [OSM-talk-be] LiDAR

Indeed, no elevation data in OSM except the ele=* tag. However, I'm using a lot this hillshade layer from the Région Wallonne in JOSM, which is very nice to map

[OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

How about 1) Change "OpenStreetmap Collaborative Mapping" to "OpenStreetmap Distaster Mapping" 2) Link the word "OpenStreetmap" to the OSM web site Regards David -- Original Message -- From: "Blake Girardot HOT/OSM" To: "Christoph Hormann"

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

I suspect Christophs issue is more that HOT seems to be claiming ownership of "OpenStreetMap collaborative mapping". Though I would argue that the rest of OSM has always been about collaborative mapping and it is exactly what HOT doesn't do, but I digress. In any case HOT is clearly not the only

Re: [OSM-talk-be] LiDAR

Marc, I think you might be thinking of SK53's work. I think he wrote several posts about how lidar can help identify buildings, e.g. here: http://sk53-osm.blogspot.be/2016/05/bristol-new-brighton-buildings-from.html There is quite a bit of lidar altitude data available for Flanders, both raw and

Re: [Talk-it] volontari cercasi per organizzazione State of the Map 2018

Il 23/10/2017 10:18, Volker Schmidt ha scritto: Alessandro, in questo momento non so se posso essere all'evento stesso, ma sono certamente disponibile nei preparativi a distanza. In particolare, se ci

Re: [Talk-it] volontari cercasi per organizzazione State of the Map 2018

> > Per domande e chiarimenti sono sempre disponibile. Spero rispondiate > numerosi. > > Un grosso grazie anticipato da me, da WMI e dallo staff della OSM > Foundation che ogni anno lavora dietro le quinte per organizzare SOTM. > Naturalmente grazie anche da POLIMI. Alessandro, come hai detto tu

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

> At the same time it seems (at a > first glance) there is not a single link on the site to OpenStreetMap. At a quick glance the "Learn" page explains the first thing you need is an OpenStreetMap account, and when I clicked "Login" it asked me to allow access to Tasking Manager 3 (probably as I

Re: [OSM-talk] Could we just pause any wikidata edits for a month or two?

On 23/10/2017 12:39, Tomas Straupis wrote: How were the people asked? I can only see very short note in Lithuanian. I can' understand it, but it doesn't seem like "do not touch" request... Have you noticed the title of this thread? ;-) For completeness, I pointed this out 11 months ago,

Re: [Talk-it] Utilità cartelli limiti di velocità

Il 23/10/2017 11:09, emmexx ha scritto: ... A breve probabilmente il routing con realtà aumentata diventerà la norma e l'aver mappato anche i cartelli aiuterà nella rappresentazione che verrà fatta, esattamente come succede con le corsie. Oltre a questo

Re: [Talk-it] volontari cercasi per organizzazione State of the Map 2018

Il 23/10/2017 14:42, Marco Minghini ha scritto: Per domande e chiarimenti sono sempre disponibile. Spero rispondiate numerosi. Un grosso grazie anticipato da me, da WMI e dallo staff della OSM Foundation che ogni anno lavora dietro le quinte per organizzare SOTM. Naturalmente

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

Hi all, The previous thread, IIRC: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2015-November/003556.html Version 2 of the Task Manager had "a perfectly fine choice of name for this kind of tool" [0], but I can't really see how V3 [1] is much different. Cheers, Joseph [0]

Re: [OSM-talk-be] LiDAR

Do you have more information on that algorithm (I assume this is what you mean by special pattern) ? Quite interested in trying to get this from elevation data. Glenn > An interesting thing about raw lidar data is that it can help identify > trees, as they have a special kind of pattern in the

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

Am 23.10.2017 um 15:06 schrieb David Groom: > How about > 1) Change "OpenStreetmap Collaborative Mapping" to "OpenStreetmap > Distaster Mapping" Use of the trademarks shouldn't imply endorsement  and/or affiliation and in the end exclusivity in any form. "A tool to support mapping of disaster

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

On Monday 23 October 2017, Simon Poole wrote: > I suspect Christophs issue is more that HOT seems to be claiming > ownership of "OpenStreetMap collaborative mapping". Yes, this is one of my points. The other is that it fails to connect the visitor to collaboration and communication within the

Re: [Talk-it] Utilità cartelli limiti di velocità

Aproposito, qualcuno ha usato le nuove api mapillary con la segnaletica? Il 23/ott/2017 14:39, "Alessandro" ha scritto: > Il 23/10/2017 11:09, emmexx ha scritto: > > ... > > A breve probabilmente il routing con realtà aumentata diventerà la norma > e l'aver mappato anche i

Wochennotiz Nr. 378 10.10.2017–16.10.2017

Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 378 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap-Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/10/wochennotiz-nr-378/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen! ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > This is a honest question; I would really be interested in the, if I > may, "American version" of what Christoph has written. One that does > express how you're upset while at the same time *not* being "combative" > and

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

Hey Frederik Really good questions.  First off, I don't necessarily see this as an American - European thing .. there are plenty of people with different approaches to communication everywhere.  What does guide me is experience communicating online, in text, with people from a variety of

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

HOT and OSM have slightly different aims but HOT does build on OSM. There are mentions of OpenStreetMap wiki and learnOSM and the O in HOT is OpenStreetMap. Having said that adding something along the lines of "OpenStreetMap is the volunteer-driven open data mapping platform which makes all of

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

On Oct 23, 2017 08:59, "Mikel Maron" wrote: However ... I hope we can also agree that it is counter productive to start off such discussions in such an argumentative pose. I hear a lot of distrust in phrases like "misrepresentation", "claiming ownership", "exactly what

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Ian Dees wrote: > On Oct 23, 2017 08:59, "Mikel Maron" wrote: > > > However ... I hope we can also agree that it is counter productive to > start off such discussions in such an argumentative pose. I hear a lot of >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] LiDAR

Haven't seen it in practice, though I do have an idea whom I could ask. The "pattern" I mean is that there is a special kind of randomness to the data: whereas buildings tend to be high or low according to a regular geometric form, a tree has high points (where the beam touches a high branch or

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

Christoph I see that my message wasn't received as intended. My hope is not to amplify disagreements, but to help set a constructive and friendly tone. Let's take the discussion of how we're communicating "offline" -- I'll connect with you, and I hope set up a time to talk directly. In any

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

On Monday 23 October 2017, Blake Girardot HOT/OSM wrote: > > It clearly says the HOT Tasking Manager, which it is. We were asked > to change it from OSM Tasking Manager because people felt that was > misrepresenting, it was not the OSM Tasking manager, it was HOT's > Tasking Manager, so I changed

Re: [OSM-talk] Could we just pause any wikidata edits for a month or two?

So, to sum up: 1) There was a link to disambiguation page that no one has corrected until it was detected by Yuri's tool. 2) User kartonage has wrongly linked "Žagarės I piliakalnis" to "Žagarės II piliakalnis" in Wikipedia. 3) You have reverted it back to disambiguation link and no wikidata=*

Re: [Talk-it] volontari cercasi per organizzazione State of the Map 2018

Il 22/10/2017 12:46, mbranco2 ha scritto: Io ci sono, mettimi in lista e contattami pure quando vuoi. Ciao, Marco Marco, grazie, grazie come sempre dovrei iniziare a dire, per la tua costante disponibilità. Dimmi tu per quale ruolo ti sentiresti più tagliato. Io ti proporrei 'sponsorship'

Re: [Talk-it] volontari cercasi per organizzazione State of the Map 2018

Alessandro, in questo momento non so se posso essere all'evento stesso, ma sono certamente disponibile nei preparativi a distanza. In particolare, se ci sono traduzioni da fare o da controllare (proofreading), in particolare inglese e tedesco. Volker 2017-10-20 22:38 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Palmas

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

On Monday 23 October 2017, Mikel Maron wrote: > [...] However ... I hope we can > also agree that it is counter productive to start off such > discussions in such an argumentative pose. I hear a lot of distrust > in phrases like "misrepresentation", "claiming ownership", "exactly > what HOT

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

Hi, On 10/23/2017 03:57 PM, Christoph Hormann wrote: > Or they could rework the site to properly present OpenStreetMap and HOT > and how they relate to the visitor. learnosm.org (which i think is > also mainly built by HOT) shows this is possible to do. Missing Maps, which is also a very

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

Hello everyone I think there are some very reasonable ideas and discussion on this thread, about how to describe the tasking manager, OSM, HOT, etc. We all can agree it's complicated, and explaining this right is worthy of our time and energy. (One additional complication to consider is that

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

Hi, On 10/23/2017 05:06 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > On Oct 23, 2017 08:59, "Mikel Maron" > wrote: > > > However ... I hope we can also agree that it is counter productive > to start off such discussions in such an argumentative pose. I

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontri / was ...

sent from a phone > On 23. Oct 2017, at 17:41, Fra Mauro wrote: > > Scusate, ma dunque a che ora sarebbe? Che spero di riuscire a venire... lunedì 30 dalle 19. Ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Calvaires et cadastre

Le 23/10/2017 à 10:00, Nicolas Moyroud a écrit : Salut Fred, Intéressant tout ça, je suis preneur pour une intégration osmose des bornes incendies. :-) Ok. Je vais regarder ce que ça donne. Pour les calvaires je ne saisis pas bien la différence entre les comparaisons mapcontrib et les

Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?

Pro mě jako projektanta je highway to, co se projektuje podle ČSN 73 6101 nebo 73 6110 a track to, co je podle ČSN 73 6108 nebo 73 6109 :-) Hlavní polní nebo lesní cesty jsou leckdy s asfaltovým povrchem, naopak některé obytné ulice jsou jen štěrkové případně s recyklátem. A aby to nebylo ještě

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Calvaires et cadastre

Tu veux dire qu'à cet endroit ou à côté il y a ou il y a eu un objet remarquable, potentiellement un calvaire ? Et qu'un passage sur place est nécessaire pour savoir ce que c'est, et où c'est. Dans ce cas Osmose risque d'inciter les gens à mettre des fausses informations. Ajouter un FIXME

Re: [Talk-cz] nefunguje http://osm.fit.vutbr.cz/OsmHiCheck/gp/?all

opět nefunguje aktualizace souřadnic fotek rozcestníků (GPX, JSON) - poslední je z 21.10. z 8,21 nejsou analyzovány mé fotky rozcestníků s ID mezi 17785 - 18011 -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Zdeněk Pražák Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Calvaires et cadastre

Salut Fred, Intéressant tout ça, je suis preneur pour une intégration osmose des bornes incendies. :-) Pour les calvaires je ne saisis pas bien la différence entre les comparaisons mapcontrib et les comparaisons osmose. Dans la zone à l'ouest de Montpellier, il a beaucoup de calvaires sur

Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?

> Neříkám tak nebo tak, já sám v tom nemám občas jasno. Něco značím residental, > něco service > (driveway) a něco track. Vždy dle situace. Nápodobně. > Na druhou stranu, k čemu vlastně máme tag surface=*? Polňačka může být > asfaltová a > příjezdovka jen štěrkem vysypaná, nebo dokonce jen

Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?

čus, > Mapu chcem uzitecnou, ze? Tak necht je asfaltova vec mezi barakama > znacena jako highway=residential, a bahnita vec mezi barakama jako > highway=track. > > Cely svet to tak znaci, jestli wiki tvrdi neco jineho, necht je > opravena wiki. +1 plně souhlasím, a historicky to tak bylo já

Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?

Otevřená provokace: Jmenovitě "celý svět" mimo celé Afriky, minimálně... Koukněte na HOT-OSM, případně na debaty k mapniku ohledně zobrazení highway=cokoli, surface=unpaved. 2017-10-23 12:36 GMT+02:00 Karel Volný : > c) jak píše Pavel, "celý svět to tak značí",

Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?

> > V praxi se za koncem vesnice setkávám se smíšeným účelem, např. lesní/polní > > cesty, které > jsou zároveň příjezdovky k chatovým oblastem. > > To přece nepopírám a o tyhle cesty nejde. Mě ale zajímá cesta ve > vesnici či městě, nadto v území zdůrazněném jako obytná zóna (tenhle > výklad

Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?

Jsem jednoznačně pro domluvu a vyjasnění mapování. Taky se přidám s kacířským dotazem - co v případě, kdy v místě opravdu není nic jiného, než cesta, na které riskujeme proražení vany nebo utržení kola při jízdě rychleji než krokem, a přitom je to v obytné oblasti a jediná možnost příjezdu k

Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?

Ahoj! On Fri 2017-10-20 09:50:28, majka wrote: > 2017-10-20 9:22 GMT+02:00 Mikoláš Štrajt : > > > > V praxi se za koncem vesnice setkávám se smíšeným účelem, např. lesní/polní > > cesty, které jsou zároveň příjezdovky k chatovým oblastem. > > To přece nepopírám a o tyhle

Re: [Talk-cz] mapovat existenci wifi v metru?

Ahoj! > včera na mě v metru vyskočil hotspot "Metro - Wifi"; podle tohoto článku je > pokryto 6 stanic. > https://zpravy.aktualne.cz/ekonomika/v-metru-chytnete-wi-fi-dopravni-podnik-spustil-pripojeni-na/r~4ef74a5cb33511e79090002590604f2e/ > > Má smysl to uvádět u stanice ("stanice s wifi" podle

Re: [Talk-es] Reunión virtual sobre accesibilidad

Hola, Gracias Carlos y José Luis por mover el asunto! Yo acabo de rellenar el Doodle, lo siento, espero llegar a timepo o, en su defecto, me intento amoldar al día que decidáis. Quizá sería bueno charlar invitar a gente que está haciendo cosas de accesibilidad en la "periferia" de OSM y creo

Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?

-- Původní e-mail -- Od: Pavel Machek Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 23. 10. 2017 11:29:42 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential? "Ahoj! On Fri 2017-10-20 09:50:28, majka wrote: > 2017-10-20 9:22

Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?

> - V rezidenční oblasti na vesnicích jsou poměrně často "polňačky", které které vedou na pole. To bych viděl označit jako residential k poslednímu domu ve vsi. Případně k poslednímu domu kam někdo pravidelně jezdí autem. > - Co s těmi příjezdy do chatových oblastí, které často navazují plynule

[Talk-es] (sin asunto)

Hola Dispongo de unos pocos ejemplares de mapas del Servicio Geográfico del Ejercito de 1959. Respecto a su utilización como fuente de topónimos para incluir en OSM, ¿hay alguna posibilidad de utilización directa (como caducidad de derechos), o habría que solicitar autorización? Un saludo,

Re: [Talk-es] (sin asunto)

A priori y sin tener mención explícita de que una fuente sea libre, esta, al menos en España, tiene los derechos de copia reservados, por lo que me atrevería a decirte que no los usaras. Respecto a la toponimia mira a ver si en las fuentes del IGN no existe ya y puedes de allí copiarla (de

Re: [Talk-cz] nefunguje http://osm.fit.vutbr.cz/OsmHiCheck/gp/?all

Ahoj, ne opet ale stale, byl jsem mimo pocitac, dneska jsem konecne v praci, tak se na to podivam. Byl tam problem s PostGISem, ale ten jsem dneska uz vyresil, tak uvidim jestli to samo pomuze, nebo je tam jeste neco jineho. Bye Dne 23. října 2017 9:32 Zdeněk Pražák

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] OSMGeoWeek et francophonie - Dernière ligne droite !

Bonjour à tous, Des nouvelles alors qu'on est à 3 semaines du lancement de la OSMGeoWeek ! A ce jour, 9 villes en France seront de la partie pour donner de la visibilité et soutenir  les projets des 5 communautés OSM francophones (Mali, Burkina, Sénégal, Madagascar, Niger) que nous (CartONG)

Re: [Talk-es] (sin asunto)

Buenas, A la pregunta de Miguel: en España el tiempo que tiene que pasar son 70-80 años según cuando haya nacido el autor. Cito textualmente una pagina de la Biblioteca Nacional Española[1]: «En el caso de España, los derechos de explotación de una obra subsisten 70 años después de la muerte

Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?

Čau, > highway=service - asfaltka pro veřejnost obvykle nepřístupná (typicky v lese > za závorou) případně vede na nějaké neveřejné místo Tak tenhle příklad prodle mě není highway=service, ale highway=track+tracktype=grade1+access=forestry highway=service jsou obvykle příjezdové cesty k

Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?

Dne 23.10.2017 v 12:07 Marián Kyral napsal(a): > Mapu chcem uzitecnou, ze? Tak necht je asfaltova vec mezi barakama > znacena jako highway=residential, a bahnita vec mezi barakama jako > highway=track. +1 Pokud se nekoho zeptam na cestu a on rekne: "tady touhle polnackou" tak je to

Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?

IHMO záleží na tom, zda se mapuje podle procházky v terénu nebo podle nějakých podkladů (např. samosprávy). Já osobně to (podle terénu) chápu takhle: - highway=residential - ulice ve městě/vesnici (nevede do polí) - highway=unclassified - pro veřejnost dostupná asfaltka neznámé třídy -

Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential?

-- Původní e-mail -- Od: Miroslav Suchy Komu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org Datum: 23. 10. 2017 14:45:21 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] highway=track v landuse=residential? "Dne 23.10.2017 v 12:07 Marián Kyral napsal(a): > Mapu chcem uzitecnou, ze? Tak necht je asfaltova

Re: [Talk-es] (sin asunto)

Gracias por la referencia al IGN y perdón por olvidarme del asunto. El 23 de octubre de 2017, 11:04, Miguel Sevilla-Callejo < msevill...@gmail.com> escribió: > A priori y sin tener mención explícita de que una fuente sea libre, esta, > al menos en España, tiene los derechos de copia reservados,

Re: [Talk-cz] nefunguje http://osm.fit.vutbr.cz/OsmHiCheck/gp/?all

Tak castecne byl na vine PostGIS, castecne prestalo fungovat stahovani novych fotek z api.osm.cz. Oboji jsem predelal/upravil a ted se za, ze funguje. Pokud budete mit nekdo pocit, ze stale neco chybi, dejte prosim vedet. Diky Dne 23. října 2017 11:33 Tom Ka napsal(a):

Wochennotiz Nr. 378 10.10.2017–16.10.2017

Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 378 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap-Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/10/wochennotiz-nr-378/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen! ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-dk] Busstoppesteder

Den 23. oktober 2017 kl. 20.14 skrev : > https://help.rejseplanen.dk/hc/da/articles/213633029-Retningslinjer-for-databrug > > > Ved at oprette en bruger kan du få adgang til Rejseplanens data; > > - Stoppestedsdata, stationsdata og planlagte køreplansdata er tilgængelige > > i

Re: [Talk-dk] Busstoppesteder

Ole Laursen: > Den 23. oktober 2017 kl. 20.14 skrev : >> https://help.rejseplanen.dk/hc/da/articles/213633029-Retningslinjer-for-databrug >> >>> Ved at oprette en bruger kan du få adgang til Rejseplanens data; >>> - Stoppestedsdata, stationsdata og planlagte køreplansdata er

[Talk-lv] izmaiņas jelgavā

tā, jelgavnieki, vai šis ir pareizi un vai kartē jāmaina ? :) http://www.pilsetsaimnieciba.lv/atlautais-brauksanas-atrums-visa-kalnciema-cela-lidz-50-kmh/ -- Rihards ___ Talk-lv mailing list Talk-lv@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-dk] Busstoppesteder

> adgang til data for busstoppesteder? https://help.rejseplanen.dk/hc/da/articles/213633029-Retningslinjer-for-databrug > Ved at oprette en bruger kan du få adgang til Rejseplanens data; > - Stoppestedsdata, stationsdata og planlagte køreplansdata er tilgængelige i GTFS format der kan

Re: [Talk-GB] FHRS/OSM comparison tool now includes graphs

Hi David, On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 04:03:11PM +0100, David Woolley wrote: Is it possible that they were using NPLG data, that is not open? I'm not sure; it seems to be reverse-geocoded from postcode centroids (which is one reason I wouldn't recommend anyone directly copying FHRS data into

[Talk-GB] FHRS/OSM comparison tool now includes graphs

The FHRS/OSM comparison tool (http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs) now includes graphs showing progress for each district (e.g. http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/district-91.html) and for the whole of Great Britain

Re: [Talk-GB] FHRS/OSM comparison tool now includes graphs

On 23/10/17 15:52, Gregrs wrote: Several authorities (Copeland, Middlesborough, Sedgemeoor, Portsmouth and South Tyneside) seem to have removed geocodes for a large number of their FHRS establishments recently, as shown by the sharp dropoff Is it possible that they were using NPLG data,

Re: [Talk-GB] FHRS/OSM comparison tool now includes graphs

On 23 October 2017 at 15:52, Gregrs wrote: > Several authorities (Copeland, Middlesborough, Sedgemeoor, Portsmouth and > South Tyneside) seem to have removed geocodes for a large number of their > FHRS establishments recently, as shown by the sharp dropoff towards the end >

Re: [Talk-GB] FHRS/OSM comparison tool now includes graphs

Hi Robert, On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 04:22:35PM +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: If you still have postcodes for those, you can look up the postcode centroid in Code-Point Open and use that as the lat/lon instead. (In fact, I think that's what the locations you're currently showing

[talk-ph] Marawi City: post war mapping

Hi, The war in Marawi City, Lanao DelNorte started on May 23, 2017 between terrorist groups and Government troops.After 5 months of fighting, the Government has officially announced today theend of all military operations.   This warhas displaced more than thousands of people and has left the

Re: [Talk-GB] Leicester A

Hi Gerv Sorry you had problems, mapping hospital departments is one thing that has been puzzling other mappers and myself. Some mappers have used multiple hospitals, which breaks the one real life object to one osm object. There is only one LRI. I have not lived in Leicestershire for six years

Re: [Talk-GB] FHRS/OSM comparison tool now includes graphs

On 23/10/17 16:23, Gregrs wrote: I'm not sure; it seems to be reverse-geocoded from postcode centroids (which is one reason I wouldn't recommend anyone directly copying FHRS data into OSM without some manual processing). I have contacted the FSA to see what can be done. Using postcode

Re: [Talk-GB] FHRS/OSM comparison tool now includes graphs

Hi David, On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 05:15:25PM +0100, David Woolley wrote: Using postcode centroids is why so many self contributed business POIs on Google Maps are almost useless for finding the business. I hope no-one is adding POIs based on such data. I agree. This is why the comparison

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontri / was ...

Scusate, ma dunque a che ora sarebbe? Che spero di riuscire a venire... Il 18 Ottobre 2017 16:56:48 CEST, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: >Allora vediamoci la sera del 30 Ottobre. Grazie all'intervento di >Ubaldo >possiamo incontrarci al suo Coworking al Pigneto, Piazza

Re: [Talk-GB] FHRS/OSM comparison tool now includes graphs

A lot of authorities exclude up to a third of fhrs records from geocoding.  These seem to largely be people trading from home and many social care establishments e.g. refuges from domestic violence.  It's quite plausible that authority practice on this can change. Paulbiv. Sent from my Samsung