The most common question by LGUs about OSM is whether it is possible
to add parcel data into the db. I always said no primarily because of
legal concerns and I think it would be very difficult to map.
Unitl I saw this,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/14.88074/120.20926
Note that the
A bund is also defined as an embankment to control the flow of water. And
for reference, the English equivalent for the Tagalog term pilapil is
dyke or dike [0] or bund [1].
I am withdrawing my suggestion for the dyke tag, and second Maning's tag
man_made=bund as technically more appropriate in
Bonjour, hallo!
Je me permets de vous informer d'une nouvelle mailing liste dans la monde
d'OpenStreetMap.
La mailing liste HOT
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Teamest la liste qui
permet d'échanger sur le thème d'OSM dans le cadre de l'humanitaire et du
développement. La
Announced in typical Register style:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/08/13/creepy_satellites_will_be_able_to_zoom_in_on_your_face/
I expect it'll be some time before images become available for OSM, though :-(
And I'm not confusing resolution and accuracy!
__John
On Wednesday 13 August 2014, John Sturdy wrote:
Announced in typical Register style:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/08/13/creepy_satellites_will_be_abl
e_to_zoom_in_on_your_face/
Mapbox has some more detailed explanations:
https://www.mapbox.com/blog/worldview-3-launch/
including an
Que legal :D Tenho que refazer aquela e outras postagens em outro lugar,
alguns sites governamentais estão fora do ar no período eleitoral.
Adorei essas ideias para baixo custo
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/malenki/diary/23409, principalmente o
*rack* de madeira.
Encontraram o aplicativo que gera notas erradas.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-August/070434.html Não
disseram quem ainda.
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Estou entendendo que não era SPAM e que os autores do software bugado se
empenharão na reparação. Fica o aprendizado de que a API de Notas está
muito frágil, no sentido de possibilitar degradação intencional ou não
intencional.
Em tempo: o site do Mapillary teve a interface atualizada e eu
Essa madeira é de um tipo relativamente barato. Também é fácil de
trabalhar. Eu sei que o modelo específico
http://f.zz.de/posts/201404181623.mapillary__diy_stretview/ é pouquíssimo
útil de uma forma direta. Mas ele embute várias ideias interessante. As
ferramentas e insumos necessários podem ser
A interpretação de tal política pode ser um problema. A API de Notas
possibilita a criação de uma Nota através de chamada muito simples e pouco
criteriosa
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6#Create_a_new_note:_Create:_POST_.2Fapi.2F0.6.2Fnotes.
Onde está o literal e o contexto de tal
No Seridó http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serid%C3%B3 também tem muito
disso. Em em muitos outros lugares.
E existem balsas e praias que só possuem trânsito com determinado estado de
maré.
Em 13 de agosto de 2014 20:02, Márcio Aguiar Ribeiro
aguiar.mar...@gmail.com escreveu:
Pessoal,
como devo
Parece que já existe uma chave para isto:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:seasonal
Em 13 de agosto de 2014 20:02, Márcio Aguiar Ribeiro
aguiar.mar...@gmail.com escreveu:
Pessoal,
como devo proceder no mapeamento de caminho que não tem periodo certo para
existir? Por exemplo: vejam
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:intermittent
[Possible extension to non water ways]
On 13-08-2014 20:14, Alexandre Magno Brito de Medeiros wrote:
No Seridó http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serid%C3%B3 também tem muito
disso. Em em muitos outros lugares.
E existem balsas e praias que só
Eu achei isso aqui também. Não sei se aplica:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ford
Marcio Aguiar Ribeiro
2014-08-13 20:42 GMT-03:00 John Packer john.pack...@gmail.com:
Parece que já existe uma chave para isto:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:seasonal
Em 13 de agosto de 2014
Pelo que eu entendi, a chave intermittent=* é utilizada somente em fontes,
rios, etc.
A chave ford=* tem a ver com áreas de uma via em que pode ter um rio
passando na mesma altura da via, ao mesmo tempo.
Em 13 de agosto de 2014 20:44, Márcio Aguiar Ribeiro
aguiar.mar...@gmail.com escreveu:
Eu
Eu não lembro agora a página exata mas vi isso quando estava procurando
sobre aplicativos de criação de mapas na wiki em inglês. Acho que tinha a
ver com as pessoas que criam scripts para gerar mapas osm diretamente de
mapas oficiais digitais. Se eu achar de novo eu envio a referência. De
qualquer
*Era: Re: [Talk-br] Coletar fotos para o Mapillary de byke ou moto*
Hoje à noite teve mais atualização de interface, com as seguintes novidades:
Link para a imagem: i.imgur.com/1CmvKmx.png
- Controle remoto do JOSM
- Controle remoto para o ID - sobre isso eu já abri a *issue* #280
Sýnist að það séu 46 manneskjur og einn botti (archive) á póstlistanum.
Ég var ekki búinn að skoða þetta á wiki.
Það væri frábært að fá hjólaleiðahópinn í gang, ef það væri hægt að
setjast niður með hjólafólki (eru ekki samtök hjólafólks nýstofnuð) og
fara yfir hvernig almennt mat allra er á
Hallo,
die Wochennotiz Nr. 212 mit allen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der
OpenStreetMap Welt ist da:
http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2014/08/wochennotiz-nr-212/
Viel Spaß beim Lesen!
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hi!
Am 12. August 2014 17:44 schrieb Christian H. Bruhn br...@arcor.de:
In Lübeck haben wir eine building-Relation erstellt, die als
outline-member die Gebäudehülle mit den Adressinfos enthält und die
einzelnen POIs als contains-member (z.B. [1]) ohne Adressangaben.
Warum sollte man in
Am 13. August 2014 09:14 schrieb Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com:
Am 12. August 2014 17:44 schrieb Christian H. Bruhn br...@arcor.de:
In Lübeck haben wir eine building-Relation erstellt, die als
outline-member die Gebäudehülle mit den Adressinfos enthält und die
einzelnen POIs als
Am 13. August 2014 10:08 schrieb Falk Zscheile falk.zsche...@gmail.com:
Weil es nicht zwingend ist, dass etwas innerhalb eines Polygons auch
eine Beziehung zum Polygon hat.
Doch. Die Beziehung ist: es befindet sich innerhalb des Polygons ;-) Was
genau ist nochmal die Aussage der
Martin Vonwald wrote, on 2014-08-13 10:43:
Am 13. August 2014 10:08 schrieb Falk Zscheile falk.zsche...@gmail.com:
Weil es nicht zwingend ist, dass etwas innerhalb eines Polygons auch
eine Beziehung zum Polygon hat.
Doch. Die Beziehung ist: es befindet sich innerhalb des Polygons ;-) Was
Am 13. August 2014 11:52 schrieb Tom Pfeifer t.pfei...@computer.org:
Martin Vonwald wrote, on 2014-08-13 10:43:
Am 13. August 2014 10:08 schrieb Falk Zscheile falk.zsche...@gmail.com:
Weil es nicht zwingend ist, dass etwas innerhalb eines Polygons auch
eine Beziehung zum Polygon hat.
Am 13.08.2014 11:52, schrieb Tom Pfeifer:
Städte haben viel unterirdische Infrastruktur. Der Imbiss im U-Bahnhof hat
keine Beziehung zu dem Gebäude und insbesondere der Addresse im Haus
obendrüber.
Das sind aber dann eben auch die einzigen Fälle, in denen eine Relation
in Frage kommt.
Bei
Ciao a tutti,
ultimamente sto' sistemando la toponomastica inserita in OSM aiutandomi un
po' con i dati Regionali FVG (un sentito grazie a marco bra per i files
civi_no_match che ci ha messo a disposizione) e un po' con conoscenza
locale. Purtroppo il lavoro e' lungo e ci si arena spesso a causa
2014-08-13 19:31 GMT+02:00 Marco_T toto...@libero.it:
Cio' comporta, purtroppo, che alcune informazioni riportate sul luogo (es.
cartello con strada s. martino) possano essere superate da un
provvedimento esecutivo comunale (es. STRADA DI SAN MARTINO).
divertente.
scopri che dopo 10 anni
Ciao,
Fabrizio sbiri Tambussa ha iniziato a rendere disponibili gli estratti
comunali, provinciali e regionali di tutta italia dei dati OpenStreetMap.
L'intento è quello di renderli disponibili aggiornati ogni 24 ore, a
partire dal dump giornaliero OSM.
attualmente sono forniti in formato
Il giorno 13 agosto 2014 20:05, Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com ha
scritto:
Ciao,
Fabrizio sbiri Tambussa ha iniziato a rendere disponibili gli estratti
comunali, provinciali e regionali di tutta italia dei dati OpenStreetMap.
Le province per ora non le estraggo.
L'intento è quello di
A new user has made some edits on the new development in Wood End, Coventry.
It probably needs someone to drop by and do a new survey to clean up between
new and construction roads as currently both are present following the new
edit.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24706794
Cheers
Andy
Hola.
Poquito a poco me quiero poner a importar los datos de varias pequeñas
poblaciones que conozco bien y he realizado la conversión con Cat2osm2.
Tal como se ha dicho en infinidad de ocasiones, los datos de catastro en
cuestión de nombres de calles y números de policia dejan mucho que desear,
Hola a todos
Ahora que está aquí el verano y hay algo más de tiempo, espero poder
empezar a trabajar con lo datos de catastro para el municipio de Córdoba.
He añadido mi usuario a la lista de los municipios de Córdoba [1] pero me
he dado cuenta de que no existe el usuario OSM catastro para la
Hola.
En principio el responsable de asignar las cuentas de importacion
(import_cordoba en este caso) era Jaime pero he visto que esto ha cambiado
y ahora es Celso Gonzalez, usuario osm PerroVerd [1]. Supongo que deberías
ponerte en contacto con el para que cree la cuenta de importacion y te haga
Gracias Matías. Me pondré en contacto con Celso por correo.
El 13 de agosto de 2014, 20:43, Matías Taborda Barroso
taborda.barr...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola.
En principio el responsable de asignar las cuentas de importacion
(import_cordoba en este caso) era Jaime pero he visto que esto ha
Gracias por desasnarme. Yo particularmente entendí que no iban a tener la
alturas porque los mapas OSM de Garmin estuvieron mucho tiempo sin tenerlas,
algo que uno puede entender como básico pasaron varios meses hasta que me
dieron una respuesta posta (varias veces me dijeron que andaban y no
Parabéns pela iniciativa, estou certo que irá dar muito jeito.
Os dados são actualizados de quanto em quanto tempo?
Obrigado.
Alexandre Neto
Em 13/08/2014 00:25, Marcos Oliveira marcosoliveira.2...@gmail.com
escreveu:
Olá Geocrafter, obrigado pela contribuição!
Contudo estou curioso, onde é
Sim pode ser uma excelente ajuda. Embora seja preciso que as CM (ou os
técnicos) queiram.
Considera colocar o site no planet.osm:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Planet.osm#Downloading
Cumprimentos,
Alexandre Neto
2014-08-13 8:57 GMT+01:00 The Geocrafter geocrafter@gmail.com:
Viva,
Ahoj,
existuje někde WMS vrstva s vrstevnicemi, kterou bych si mohl přidat do
JOSM? Občas by se mi hodilo vidět satelitní snímky ve třetím rozměru.
Něco jsem našel na UHUL, ale ten sám o sobě funguje hodně pomalu, případně
vůbec. A vůbec netuším, jak to mají přesné. Není někde něco lepšího?
Ahoj,
Ahoj,
existuje někde WMS vrstva s vrstevnicemi, kterou bych si mohl přidat do
JOSM? Občas by se mi hodilo vidět satelitní snímky ve třetím rozměru.
Něco jsem našel na UHUL, ale ten sám o sobě funguje hodně pomalu, případně
vůbec. A vůbec netuším, jak to mají přesné. Není někde něco
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 02:08:12PM +0200, Petr Vejsada wrote:
Hodil by se mi nějaký rychlokurz Mapserveru ;-)
... nebo můžu udělat TMS téměř hned.
--
Petr
___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
Ahoj,
pokud si v JOSM zapnete mapy Strava cycling heatmap nebo Strava running
heatmap, tak uvidíte, kde lidé jezdí na kole / běhají. Určitě tak najdete
cesty, které ještě nejsou zmapované.
Zdraví Pavel Kwiecien
___
Talk-cz mailing list
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: Pavel Kwiecien pavel.kwiec...@seznam.cz
Komu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
Datum: 13. 8. 2014 14:25:46
Předmět: [Talk-cz] kde lidé jezdí na kole
Ahoj,
pokud si v JOSM zapnete mapy Strava cycling heatmap nebo Strava running
heatmap, tak uvidíte, kde lidé
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: Pavel Kwiecien pavel.kwiec...@seznam.cz
Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
Datum: 13. 8. 2014 14:00:06
Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] WMS vrstva vrstevnic do JOSM?
Ahoj, v JOSM mám uložené tyto vrstevnice:
Ahoj,
objevil jsem území v Kralupech, kde v OSM nejsou žádné adresy, ačkoli by měly
být. Jedná se o cesty (budovy), které mají ref:ruian:addr, ale vlastní addr:*
jaxi ne.
Seznam na http://pedro.poloha.net/osm/zmizeleadresy.txt
Kromě jednotlivostí i v jiných městech, kde ovšem adresa nechybí,
Ahoj,
když tak nad tím uvažuji, tak to bude potřeba opravit. Tracer kopíruje jen
tagy building a ruian. Ostatních si nevšímá, takže zůstanou na staré budově,
kterou pak následně smaže :-(
To mi nějak nedošlo.
Marián
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: Petr Vejsada o...@propsychology.cz
Beru zpět, já vlastně kopíruji tagy z nové budovy na tu starou :-D
Marián
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz
Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
Datum: 13. 8. 2014 19:27:03
Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Ničení adres tracerem?
Ahoj,
když tak
Ahoj,
Dne St 13. srpna 2014 19:33:30, Marián Kyral napsal(a):
Beru zpět, já vlastně kopíruji tagy z nové budovy na tu starou :-D
jo, vypadá to, že to udělal jen v tom jednom changesetu záměrně. Tedy ne
záměrně ničit, ale záměrně odstranil ty adresy z budov v domnění, že jsou
duplicitní s
Zdravím,
chtěl jsem se zeptat na aktualizaci chráněných území EEA -
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/EEA:Nationally_designated_areas_import .
Psal jsem si s uživatelem Kozuch, který import před dvěma lety prováděl a ten
na aktualizaci nemá vůbec čas. Zmínil ale, že by bylo vhodné provést
Le mardi 12 août 2014 23:35:11 Vincent de Château-Thierry a écrit :
Le 12/08/2014 22:35, Christian Quest a écrit :
Info pas encore passée ici, mais que je vous laisse savourer en
consultant:
http://geoportail.fr/url/7FF1IT http://geoportail.fr/url/7FF1IT
Chouette symbole :)
Le 13/08/2014 08:54, Nicolas Dumoulin a écrit :
Ils marquent des points là
Je ne sais pas s'ils marquent des points car la navigation est toujours
aussi lente et lourde par rapport aux sites d'OSM, MapQuest, etc.
Que c'est pénible de revenir à chaque fois sur le globe quand on change
la
Là je suis d'accord, pour le rendu carto web il est grand temps que le
Géoportail arrête son truc propriétaire et utilise un framework ouvert qui
marche beaucoup mieux et qui permettra toujours de greffer les couches
sélectionnables.
Que c'est pénible à utiliser !
Mais pour être honnètete, je
Génial...
par exemple on peut enfin visualiser la couche parcelles cadastreIGN
superposée aux données IGN... ou l'occupation des sols RPG
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OSM-MapQuest-sur-le-Geoportail-de-l-IGN-tp5814352p581.html
Sent from the France
Il n'existerait pas en layer wms ce calque cadastre ?
Le 13 août 2014 16:58, PierreV belett...@hotmail.fr a écrit :
Génial...
par exemple on peut enfin visualiser la couche parcelles cadastreIGN
superposée aux données IGN... ou l'occupation des sols RPG
--
View this message in
This sounds very sensible. Can/should it be extrapolated to cover other
cases where the signposting (or lack of it) of a road number contradicts
the official version? I am thinking specifically of B-roads which are
still officially classified as such, and indeed frequently rendered as
secondary
On 13/08/14 01:22, Robert Norris wrote:
However I am in favour of this edit, but I think the edit needs to *only*
change 'C' Roads, as some B roads are tagged tertiary.
Ditto.
But it's a bit like the 'name' problem where a few roads have locally
known names, but these are not displayed on signs
On 12/08/14 23:08, Rob Nickerson wrote:
6, The Hollies,
Birmingham Road,
Town,
Cases I've seen are maisonettes and parades of shops.
I've used:
housenumber: 5
street: The Hollies, Birmingham Road
but that is more to ensure the data is captured than because it really
seems right to me.
On 13/08/14 07:37, Lester Caine wrote:
On a slightly different tack, the tertiary road designation is more of a
problem. While not advocating 'tag for routing', this is one that is
making my own use of OSMAND almost impossible, and I can't believe
others don't find the problem. It refuses to
On 12/08/14 20:18, Rob Nickerson wrote:
So... how do people tag UK addresses?
The standard for representing addresses in Britain is BS7666, which
comprises:
* Primary addressable object name (PAON),
* Secondary addressable object name (SAON),
* street,
* postcode,
* locality (if
2014-08-12 23:18 GMT+01:00 Will Phillips wp4...@gmail.com:
On 12/08/2014 22:46, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 12/08/14 20:18, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Example 1
Flat 2
8 Something Road,
Town,
...
addr:flatnumber=2
I actually have used addr:flat here
On 13/08/14 08:20, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 13/08/14 07:37, Lester Caine wrote:
On a slightly different tack, the tertiary road designation is more of a
problem. While not advocating 'tag for routing', this is one that is
making my own use of OSMAND almost impossible, and I can't believe
others
Dan wrote:
addr:flats = 1-5;The Garden Flat;The Penthouse
This one is news to me. It seems a bit quirky to use
addr:flats=3 to
represent Flat 3 but if it's used then I'll use it. Do yall use
it?
(I think I've used addr:unit before, but never been sure)
On 13/08/14 08:58, David Woolley wrote:
On 13/08/14 08:29, Lester Caine wrote:
rest can be cloned from the postcode - or some other unique ID for the
related object.
Only if you have purchased access to the PAF or National Gazeteer.
Capture of the former, on OSM, is patchy, and of the
On 13 August 2014 01:22, Robert Norris rw_nor...@hotmail.com wrote:
AFAIK there are some (but very few) roads where the C number is sign posted
but not that I'm aware of any explicitly.
Whether any of these have ever been captured in OSM is hard to tell.
Near where I used to live there's an
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 07:37 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
On 13/08/14 01:22, Robert Norris wrote:
However I am in favour of this edit, but I think the edit needs to *only*
change 'C' Roads, as some B roads are tagged tertiary.
Ditto.
But it's a bit like the 'name' problem where a few roads
On 13/08/14 10:02, Derick Rethans wrote:
It's not only C roads. When looking at Nairn (because of a reported
storm damage to a road) I noticed lots of U-references. Have a look at:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194703765
and surrounding area. I doubt those are on signs either, and
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 09:51 +0100, Matt Williams wrote:
On 13 August 2014 01:22, Robert Norris rw_nor...@hotmail.com wrote:
AFAIK there are some (but very few) roads where the C number is sign posted
but not that I'm aware of any explicitly.
Whether any of these have ever been captured
On 13/08/2014 10:05, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 07:37 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
But it's a bit like the 'name' problem where a few roads have locally
known names, but these are not displayed on signs :( Need recording but
not necessarily displaying.
I think thats an important
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 01:22 +0100, Robert Norris wrote:
Ignoring the source information for now, but I suspect it is very
similar to rights of way information in that it is probably derived from
OS maps.
The following overpass query highlights the issue, Norfolk standing out
as
On 13/08/2014 09:11, Lester Caine wrote:
On 13/08/14 08:58, David Woolley wrote:
On 13/08/14 08:29, Lester Caine wrote:
rest can be cloned from the postcode - or some other unique ID for the
related object.
Only if you have purchased access to the PAF or National Gazeteer.
Capture of the
On 12 August 2014 20:08, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
I propose that nothing is removed, but the ref tag for tertiary and
unclassified is moved to official_ref. This will retain the data and
allow OSM to be used by those who can make use of this data.
I know we should not tag for
I use addr:flats regularly. I've recently been mapping high density
areas around the city centre where a high proportion of the residential
addresses are flats, often in converted factories. Here it seems
worthwhile to add flat numbers when they are displayed outside the building.
Here's an
On 13/08/14 11:36, Will Phillips wrote:
2. I don't agree that tagging only postcode and 'addressable object' is
a good idea. To convert that into a full address requires access to a
closed database. Surely the whole point about OSM is creating useful
data that is open? At the moment we don't
On 12 August 2014 20:08, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
We have discussed this subject a couple of times and have, I think,
concluded that displaying the ref (generally only known to local
government people) on roads that are unsigned is not helpful to the end
user.
Ignoring the
On 13/08/14 11:54, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
When it comes to U-numbers for unclassified roads, I can see that they
usually add unnecessary clutter to the map. So while they may be
useful to see at times, I'd be in favour of them not being displayed
on the default style. But I think
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 12:01 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, Lester Caine wrote:
On 13/08/14 10:02, Derick Rethans wrote:
It's not only C roads. When looking at Nairn (because of a reported
storm damage to a road) I noticed lots of U-references. Have a look at:
On 13 August 2014 11:32, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
Am I wrong in assuming that all B roads should be tagged as secondary?
other than this famous exception that is.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41891313#map=15/54.5039/-2.6589
There's also
Postcodes simply do not solve address issues.
They may mean that we can somehow handle any place where the Royal Mail
delivers post (given privatisation possible Scottish independence, this
could conceivable be rather fewer places than it is now).
However, addresses have other purposes than
On 13 August 2014 12:19, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 13/08/14 11:54, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
When it comes to U-numbers for unclassified roads, I can see that they
usually add unnecessary clutter to the map. So while they may be
useful to see at times, I'd be in favour of
On 13/08/14 12:15, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
As far as street names and numbers are concerned, it is the council
that is the official authority on these. They have to maintain a
written List of Streets Maintainable at the Public Expense. Again if
you can persuade the council to let
On 13/08/14 12:38, SK53 wrote:
Postcodes simply do not solve address issues.
I'm not saying they do ...
Only that there is no point adding 'University of Nottingham, University
Park, NOTTINGHAM' to every single location on the campus when 'NG7 2RD'
provides the same information? That there are
The NSG is a closed shop run by the OS and other stakeholders for the
management of street works. When the NSG was set up a few years ago I tried
to get access and initially during their pilot I sort of did, but this was
cut off when the system whet fully live and access limited to the LA's and
On 13/08/14 15:40, Andy Robinson wrote:
The NSG is a closed shop run by the OS and other stakeholders for the
management of street works. When the NSG was set up a few years ago I tried
to get access and initially during their pilot I sort of did, but this was
cut off when the system whet
I have carried out a first changeset, can anyone spot anything wrong
before I continue?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24727341#map=8/52.507/-3.796
Thanks
Phil (trigpoint)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On 13 August 2014 12:38, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
I would still maintain that
the benefits of having reference numbers shown to users on
highway=tertiary roads (in terms of allowing them to cross-reference
the map to official documents) outweighs the
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:36:51 +0100
Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
I have carried out a first changeset, can anyone spot anything wrong
before I continue?
If you are changing ref = official_ref then you ought to change
source:ref = source:official_ref as well. Other than that I
Beware you should follow the mechanical edit policy for this.
I would also change the wiki pages for this that currently state we should have
the ref for c roads in ref.
From: p...@trigpoint.me.uk
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:36:51 +0100
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] C
On 13 August 2014 17:36, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
I have carried out a first changeset, can anyone spot anything wrong
before I continue?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24727341#map=8/52.507/-3.796
Someone's already pointed out the need to change any source:ref tags
On 13 August 2014 18:14, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 August 2014 12:38, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
I would still maintain that
the benefits of having reference numbers shown to users on
highway=tertiary roads (in terms of allowing
On 13/08/14 11:36, Will Phillips wrote:
2. I don't agree that tagging only postcode and 'addressable object' is
a good idea. To convert that into a full address requires access to a
closed database. Surely the whole point about OSM is creating useful
It's also a database which is incomplete;
On 13/08/14 12:15, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
They have to maintain a
written List of Streets Maintainable at the Public Expense.
Councils also allocate addresses for streets not maintained at public
expense (and it is my impression that many new residential streets,
including most
On 13/08/14 17:06, Derick Rethans wrote:
On 13/08/14 12:38, SK53 wrote:
Postcodes simply do not solve address issues.
I'm not saying they do ...
Only that there is no point adding 'University of Nottingham,
University Park, NOTTINGHAM' to every single location on the campus
91 matches
Mail list logo
