[OSM-co] Luis Miguel Sánchez Zoque invited you to join Verify.Wiki

Dear talk-co@openstreetmap.org, Luis Miguel Sánchez Zoque (who claims to know you) invited you to join Verify.Wiki. To accept an invitation, please follow this link to create an account:

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] Hunting area tagging

I would use the 'Open Data from official sources' to confirm the 'on the ground' public signage. A conflict should lead to further investigation/thought. On 25-Oct-16 10:45 AM, john whelan wrote: A very interesting comment, considering the lengths we seem to go to to avoid importing Open

[Talk-us] Rail rendering support in our wiki?

As I contribute to our wiki pages, I find it useful in certain circumstances to use this syntax: to display (instead of mapnik/Standard) a bicycle-oriented map (Cycle Map layer, note "layer=cycle" above). See, for example, http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/South_Bay_(SF),_California for Silicon

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Tag pour constructeur de maisons ?

pour moi c'est très bien Le 24 octobre 2016 à 20:38, pepilepi...@ovh.fr a écrit : > Le 24/10/2016 à 00:55, Jérôme Amagat a écrit : > > [...] > Après avoir fait ton choix tu peux aussi ajouter quelque chose sur la page > de discussion de office= https://wiki.openstreetmap. >

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] Hunting area tagging

A very interesting comment, considering the lengths we seem to go to to avoid importing Open Data from official sources. Cheerio John On 24 Oct 2016 7:35 pm, "Pine W" wrote: > Just a comment that I'd be wary of "No hunting", "Hunting allowed", or > "Private property", or

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] Hunting area tagging

Just a comment that I'd be wary of "No hunting", "Hunting allowed", or "Private property", or other signs on the ground that can actually be placed by anyone, whether or not they are legal. A problem that I've encountered more than once is a private property owner putting out what appeared to me

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] Hunting area tagging

sent from a phone > Il giorno 24 ott 2016, alle ore 20:22, yvecai ha scritto: > > Michal, > You're half right IMO. I don't see such problems if > 1) tagging is made by hunters > 2) mapping is made by hunters I'm not a hunter, but I have encountered a lot of "hunting

Re: [OSM-talk-be] JOSM pour tracer les bâtiments

On 2016-10-24 17:26, Sus Verhoeven wrote: 2016-10-24 0:55 GMT+02:00 André Pirard : On 2016-10-23 20:54, Guy Vanvuchelen wrote:

Re: [OSM-co] Carlos Felipe Castillo invited you to join Verify.Wiki

Sorry!, spam El lun., 24 oct. 2016 a las 17:20, Carlos Felipe Castillo () escribió: > Dear OpenStreetMap Colombia, > > Carlos Felipe Castillo (who claims to know you) invited you to join > Verify.Wiki. > To accept an invitation, please follow this link to create an

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

I believe Bjenk was kidding when stating he'd be buying a coffee. On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:16 PM, john whelan wrote: > Both the City of Ottawa and the Canadian Federal Government have rules in > place about bribery and corruption. Buying a civil servant a coffee these >

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

Both the City of Ottawa and the Canadian Federal Government have rules in place about bribery and corruption. Buying a civil servant a coffee these days is one of the forbidden activities. I do trust you are not suggesting that illegal methods were used when the data was obtained. The use of

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

Bjenk(STATS Can) is communicating/pushing with the the city of Ottawa, even may resolve to offering coffee bribes to be able to host the shared file on open.canada.ca. He's been relentless in his effort to move the project forward, but as most Canadian gouvernment entities it moves at a snails

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] Hunting area tagging

On 25-Oct-16 01:01 AM, Michał Brzozowski wrote: I, for one, think that hunting areas don't really belong to OSM. Or at least benefits are outweighed by problems. OSM was initially aimed at mapping streets. Do not limit the development of OSM in any direction! IF someone wants to give an

Re: [Talk-es] Datos libres Gobierno Vasco

Por lo que he visto el trazado de los cauces es parecido en ambas versiones. A parte, cada una de las fuentes tiene sus pros y sus contras: GOBIERNO VASCO A favor: - Tiene dibujadas mas cabeceras de arroyos. - Mas variedad de nombres: en un solo arroyo puede recoger hasta tres nombres diferentes.

Re: [Talk-ca] Ottawa Buildings has the revert finished? Is it safe to add a new Internet cafe yet?

Thanks John On 24 Oct 2016 4:54 pm, "Frederik Ramm" wrote: > John, > >the bulk of the revert has run its course, I'm just sifting through > the remaining incomplete things for a little fixup here and there. I > think normal mapping should be safe now ;) > > Bye >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] TLPE et OSM : coment la publicité extérieure aide à compléter OSM !

Normalement, chaque exploitant/propriétaire de dispositifs publicitaires doit déclarer annuellement ses dispositifs auprès de la commune ou l'EPCI dans lequel ils se trouvent, et la TLPE (Taxe Locale sur la Publicité Extérieure, taxe facultative) est calculée sur cette base déclarative. La

Re: [Talk-ca] Ottawa Buildings has the revert finished? Is it safe to add a new Internet cafe yet?

John, the bulk of the revert has run its course, I'm just sifting through the remaining incomplete things for a little fixup here and there. I think normal mapping should be safe now ;) Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"

Re: [Talk-es] Datos libres Gobierno Vasco

Hola. Estoy de acuerdo en lo de aunar esfuerzos pero quizás no en lo de utilizar una sola fuente, principalmente porque alomejor las fuentes más locales, entiéndase autonomías, pueden tener mejor calidad e información más valiosa y/o certera. Habrá que comparar, en este tema de la hidrografía,

Re: [Talk-es] Datos libres Gobierno Vasco

Santiago, yo diría que el buen trabajo lo estás haciendo tú. Mi idea era importar los cursos de agua de Gipuzkoa pero viendo que Matías y tú estais trabajando en la importación de los mismos datos del IGN me he convencido de que es mas provechoso aunar esfuerzos y utilizar una sola fuente. Al

[Talk-it] tag memorial=*

a parte aver appena scoperto che esistono 2 diversi tag ufficiali ed entrambi in uso praticamente con lo stesso significato: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:memorial http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:memorial:type boh fino ad oggi io ho utilizzato il primo cioè memorial per

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Tag pour constructeur de maisons ?

à écrire ça, tu méconnais le travail des architectes. Leur travail ne s’arrête certainement pas à la production de jolis plans... Ils font presque tous de la coordination de chantier. C'est en général les responsables du déroulé des chantiers. On

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

On 2016-10-24 4:08 PM, James wrote: I've updated the file(I can't delete it without and admin) thanks James, looks good. -jeff -- Jeff McKenna President Emeritus, OSGeo Foundation http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jeff_McKenna ___ Talk-ca

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

I've updated the file(I can't delete it without and admin) On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote: > On 2016-10-24 3:50 PM, James wrote: > >> It was more to prove that the emails are Trusted sources and not made >> up. The emails are public already

Re: [Talk-ca] Ottawa Buildings has the revert finished? Is it safe to add a new Internet cafe yet?

Judging by http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck_repair/history#map=10/45.2996/-75.6981 There hasn't been activity in 24hrs... Frederik Ramm said he'd update us. On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:56 PM, john whelan wrote: > Thanks John > >

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

On 2016-10-24 3:50 PM, James wrote: It was more to prove that the emails are Trusted sources and not made up. The emails are public already in the contact section of the import wiki.If I hide emails/domains then I'm obfuscating the process. These emails are public emails @ottawa.ca

[Talk-ca] Ottawa Buildings has the revert finished? Is it safe to add a new Internet cafe yet?

Thanks John ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

It was more to prove that the emails are Trusted sources and not made up. The emails are public already in the contact section of the import wiki.If I hide emails/domains then I'm obfuscating the process. These emails are public emails @ottawa.ca and @canada.ca. No personal emails are visible On

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

On 2016-10-24 3:28 PM, James wrote: I've received a forwarded email from Bjenk that may settle the debate where the data originates from (I'd forward it to the list, but it would be lost in the mail archive and detach the main thread(:

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Tag pour constructeur de maisons ?

Le 24/10/2016 à 00:55, Jérôme Amagat a écrit : [...] Après avoir fait ton choix tu peux aussi ajouter quelque chose sur la page de discussion de office= https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:office en expliquant un

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

You asked: Could you please clarify what the alleged source of the building data to be imported is? I clarified. I did not change the subject. The source of the data is the city of Ottawa On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Christoph Hormann wrote: > On Monday 24 October

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

As for general availability of the files I have this email chain(which was documented that there was bureaucracy behind the scenes): *From:* Perkins, Stephen M [mailto:stephen.perk...@ottawa.ca] *Sent:* July-26-16 4:15 PM *To:* Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN) *Cc:* Cross,

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

Christoph, At the moment the Ottawa building footprint dataset is not on any official portal other then being shared on a public Amazon S3 Bucket. You can download the file here: https://s3.amazonaws.com/statscan/ottawa-buildings.geojson The data doesn't contain any specific tags, only the

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Appli mobile pour mapper les arrêts de bus

Bonjour, Pour cartographier les arrêts de bus (qui sont l'un de mes TOCs), je me suis faite une petite webapp. Elle est accessible à cette adresse : https://microcosm.5apps.com/poi.html?poi_type=bus_stop#18/48.84885/2.37222 All bugs included ! Elle permet de modifier le nom des arrêts

[Talk-es] Lugares de culto de Madrid

Hola, Estoy preparando la importación manual de los lugares de culto de Madrid. El Ayto. los ha separado en 2 conjuntos de datos: templos católicos y templos no-católicos. En los no-católicos, he añadido las etiquetas "religion" y "denomination" basándome en el nombre. Aquí hay más detalles de

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] Hunting area tagging

Michal, You're half right IMO. I don't see such problems if 1) tagging is made by hunters 2) mapping is made by hunters Yves On 24.10.2016 16:01, Michał Brzozowski wrote: I, for one, think that hunting areas don't really belong to OSM. Or at least benefits are outweighed by problems. Firstly

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

As stated, multiple times on this list already: the city of Ottawa gave data to Statistics Canada. Statistics Canada gave us (amazon cloud link) data, which is just building outlines. In case you are in doubt this project is actually happening or not (and I am just making the whole thing up):

Re: [Talk-es] Datos libres Gobierno Vasco

Enhorabuena, buen trabajo. Lo ideal es una carta de autorización expresa, pero creo que con dejar claro que cumplimos con su cláusula de atribución y que los datos en OSM tienen licencia ODbL es suficiente. Y por si acaso, una vez tengas la aprobación de esta lista para la primera importación,

[Talk-es] Datos libres Gobierno Vasco

Hola, Copiando el método de los usuarios experimentados me he permitido pedir permiso al Gobierno Vasco para el uso en OSM de los datos abiertos disponibles en el portal geoEuskadi [1]. Han dado su aprobación [2] y lo he informado en la wiki de Euskadi [3]. Antes de añadirlo a la lista de

Re: [Talk-ht] Retounen nan Ayiti

welcome Severin, Mwen kontan li mesaj s malgre mwen te deja okouran de prezans ou sou Ayiti... Mwen espere ke tout kontribite OSM pral mete tet ansanm pou pwofite de fomasyon Severin pote pou nou ki pral grandi nou teknikman nan OSM ak lot aktivite ki konekte ak

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

Seems like they may have dumped it on their servers to the public: http://data.ottawa.ca/dataset/cad-topographic-data This would explain why some buildings are outdated: *Update Frequency: Never*as compared to: http://data.ottawa.ca/dataset/addresspoints *Update Frequency: Weekly* On Mon, Oct

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

On 2016-10-24 08:04 AM, James wrote: > I've updated the documentation and incorporated Scruss's findings on the > build source data: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada:Ontario:Ottawa/Import/TopographicMap Cool! I was hoping to be able to show that the geojson data that you were given

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

So to obtain all data for building outlines(from source) (from what scruss has provided) we would need to convert all tiles of the building outline and join them together as it clips on edge of tile: http://i66.tinypic.com/2i1ffpx.png As for additional information from the DWG I have not see any

Re: [Talk-it] Fwd: Re: Mancata attribuzione: il Festival della Scienza ci ricasca a metà

Il 24/10/2016 18:18, Federico Cortese ha scritto: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Andrea Solari wrote: >> >> nel file pdf del programma scaricabile qui >> http://www.festivalscienza.it/site/home/programma.html >> >> alla pagina 60 nella mappa in fondo a sx appare

Re: [Talk-it] Fwd: Re: Mancata attribuzione: il Festival della Scienza ci ricasca a metà

Il 24/10/2016 18:12, Andrea Solari ha scritto: nel file pdf del programma scaricabile qui http://www.festivalscienza.it/site/home/programma.html alla pagina 60 nella mappa in fondo a sx appare openstreetmap contributors www.openstreetmap.org/copyright Ciao Andrea, sugli stampati è ok. Il

Re: [Talk-it] Fwd: Re: Mancata attribuzione: il Festival della Scienza ci ricasca a metà

Il 24/10/2016 18:12, Andrea Solari ha scritto: nel file pdf del programma scaricabile qui http://www.festivalscienza.it/site/home/programma.html alla pagina 60 nella mappa in fondo a sx appare openstreetmap contributors www.openstreetmap.org/copyright Ciao Andrea, sugli stampati è ok. Il

Re: [Talk-it] Fwd: Re: Mancata attribuzione: il Festival della Scienza ci ricasca a metà

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Andrea Solari wrote: > > nel file pdf del programma scaricabile qui > http://www.festivalscienza.it/site/home/programma.html > > alla pagina 60 nella mappa in fondo a sx appare openstreetmap > contributors www.openstreetmap.org/copyright >

Re: [Talk-it] Fwd: Re: Mancata attribuzione: il Festival della Scienza ci ricasca a metà

Il 24/10/2016 17:24, Alessandro ha scritto: > Il 24/10/2016 16:28, Luca Delucchi ha scritto: >> 2016-10-24 15:58 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Palmas >> : > >> >> belin quest'anno non riesco a attaccare adesivi sui cartelloni >> >>> Ora vedremo di passare anche ad

Re: [OSM-ja] 10/29(土) 「近江八幡漫遊マップづくり」開催

堀田さん 坂ノ下@LILOです。 転送ありがとうございます。また機会があればよろしくお願いします。 それでは。 On 2016年10月24日 06:48, HOTTA Sadamichi wrote: 堀田　貞通@滋賀LUGです。 せっかくの地元開催ですので滋賀LUG-Mlに[shigalug-ml 003650]にて転送しました。 私は仕事の都合上参加できませんが。 -- /* * K.Sakanoshita (http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~saka/) * (Phone) barsa...@gmail.com / (PC)

Re: [Talk-ca] Open data in Canada

I've previously documented the Lower Mainland ones here as well: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada:British_Columbia:Vancouver#GIS_sources_by_city Maybe some of this should be moved to your table. Note the OGL-BC which many of these cities are based on seems to have some potential problems

[Talk-ca] Open data in Canada

I've been looking for open data portals for potential future import into OpenStreetMap(why duplicate efforts right?) I've documented the one's I've found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada#Open_Data ___ Talk-ca mailing list

Re: [Talk-it] landuse=meadow o natural=fell

Il Lunedì 24 Ottobre 2016 16:06, demon.box ha scritto: >cioè, per esempio (sparo una ipotesi) da quota 1600m in su è sempre >natural=fell e al di sotto invece è landuse=meadow >che dite? come vi regolate voi? In linea di massimo metto meadow se è un terreno coltivato ad

Re: [Talk-it] Fwd: Re: Mancata attribuzione: il Festival della Scienza ci ricasca a metà

Il 24/10/2016 16:28, Luca Delucchi ha scritto: 2016-10-24 15:58 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Palmas : belin quest'anno non riesco a attaccare adesivi sui cartelloni Ora vedremo di passare anche ad avvertimenti ufficiali. e sarebbe anche il caso che facessero una

Re: [Talk-cz] Francois555 ... ???

On 2016-10-24, 10:04 GMT, Marián Kyral wrote: > Proč se ho nezeptáš pod nějakým changesetem? Pochybuji, že čte @talk-cz. Zeptám, máš pravdu. > A nevím, čemu říkáš tuny. Moc toho není. Nevím jak moc přesné ty informace > jsou v porovnáním se skutečností, ale dle jeho historie editací bych to >

Re: [Talk-it] Fwd: Re: Mancata attribuzione: il Festival della Scienza ci ricasca a metà

2016-10-24 15:58 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Palmas : > > Cara comunità, che ne direste di mandare qualche tweet di protesta? Mi > raccomando rimanete nella civiltà ed educazione ma vediamo di far sapere in > giro che non possono continuare a prenderci per il naso. >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] TLPE et OSM : coment la publicité extérieure aide à compléter OSM !

Les données LTPE des 8 villes françaises sont un plus, mais demandent à être retravaillées comme l'indique la page. La précision "métrique" peut aussi être problématique dans OSM où il faudra recaler les objets par endroit pour qu'ils ne se retrouvent pas au milieu des polygones de batiments ou du

[Talk-it] landuse=meadow o natural=fell

come da oggetto mi ritrovo nell'indecisione sull'utilizzo dei 2 tag: landuse=meadow oppure natural=fell a quote basse ci sta sicuramente landuse=meadow ma a quote più alte dove in pratica non crescono alberi e piante ma c'è solo erba, va bene natural=fell la mia domanda però è (e la rivolgo

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] Hunting area tagging

I, for one, think that hunting areas don't really belong to OSM. Or at least benefits are outweighed by problems. Firstly they may or may not be associated with OSM features. In the latter case, there's no guarantee that someone who edits a forest would understand it and not merge it with other

[Talk-it] Fwd: Re: Mancata attribuzione: il Festival della Scienza ci ricasca a metà

Ahimè, per il TERZO anno consecutivo, il Festival della Scienza inonda Genova di queste mappe di circa 1 metro per 1 metro e non le attribuisce. L'anno scorso si erano scusati e almeno avevano attribuito le mappe nel programma cartaceo. Quest'anno le mappe nel programma sono sempre OK ma quelle

Re: [Talk-dk] Put and Take søer

On 2016-10-24 05:45 AM, Jørgen Elgaard Larsen wrote: Thomas Andersen skrev: Taginfo siger, at der er 4 tilfælde af fishing=put_and_take. Eftersom det begreb svjv. kun bruges i Danmark og Sverige, er det nok ikke den bedste værdi for tagget. Jeg kan se, at det i alle 4 tilfælde er mig, der

Re: [Talk-cz] nahrávání rozcestníků přes old.openstreetmap.cz

2016-10-20 14:20 GMT+02:00 Marián Kyral : > ... > > Jo. Chci to hlavně pro chybějící rozcestníky a poteciálně i pro nějakou > desktopovou aplikaci pro hromadné nahrávání. Jen jsem narážel na to, že tak > jak to máš teď (Phase1, Phase2) a do toho ten perl taky generuje html >

[OSM-talk-fr] Rencontre parisienne 27 octobre 2016

Bonjour, Dans la froideur de l'automne, qui est dispo ce jeudi à 19h30 pour se rencontrer? Nous nous rencontrons jeudi 27 septembre 2016 à partir de 19h30. Les locaux peuvent être ouverts un peu avant je pense. C'est ici: FPH, Fondation Charles-Léopold Mayer pour le Progrès de l'Homme 38 rue

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

I've updated the documentation and incorporated Scruss's findings on the build source data: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada:Ontario:Ottawa/Import/TopographicMap On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Begin Daniel wrote: > Well, only very large buildings can be found as

Re: [Talk-GB] UK Postcode Analysis

On 19 October 2016 at 10:42, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > The OSM data for > http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postcodes/osm-errors.html comes from > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/ and it's currently the latest > available. At the moment, the updates are

Re: [Talk-dk] Put and Take søer

Tak Ole og Jørgen Vi prøver at se på det, og vil prøve med din løsning Jørgen. Det kan være vi vender tilbage, hvis vi får problemer med tags :) -Thomas 2016-10-24 11:45 GMT+02:00 Jørgen Elgaard Larsen : > Thomas Andersen skrev: > >> Så hvad er den bedste fremgangsmåde, er det

Re: [Talk-cz] Francois555 ... ???

Proč se ho nezeptáš pod nějakým changesetem? Pochybuji, že čte @talk-cz. A nevím, čemu říkáš tuny. Moc toho není. Nevím jak moc přesné ty informace jsou v porovnáním se skutečností, ale dle jeho historie editací bych to viděl, že v Praze asi byl a tyhle informace si poznamenal. Možná v Osmand.

Re: [Talk-dk] Put and Take søer

Thomas Andersen skrev: Så hvad er den bedste fremgangsmåde, er det at skrive put and take i navnet, og så lave et ekstra navn med søens navn? Eller skulle man oprette en tag med put and take? Det er i hvert fald forkert (og ubrugeligt for en app) at putte det i navnet. Medmindre søen rent

[Talk-cz] Francois555 ... ???

Dobrý den, mohl bych poprosit o informaci od Francois555, kde bere ty tuny informací, které teď pumpuje do OSM v Praze ... https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Francois555/history ? Všechny jsou určitě z public domain zdrojů, že? Hezký den, Matěj -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber:

Re: [Talk-dk] Put and Take søer

24. oktober 2016 kl. 10.54 skrev Thomas Andersen : > Så hvad er den bedste fremgangsmåde, er det at skrive put and take i navnet, > og så lave et ekstra navn med søens navn? Eller skulle man oprette en tag > med put and take? Helt klart et tag på en eller anden

[Talk-dk] Put and Take søer

Kære alle Jeg skal hjælpe nogle venner med at digitalisere put-and-take søer i Danmark til en fiskeri App. I den forbindelse vil jeg høre jer om den bedste måde at gøre det på (så det bliver gjort rigtigt). Såvidt jeg kan se at der ikke er noget tag for put-and-take søerne, i stedet har man

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] TLPE et OSM : coment la publicité extérieure aide à compléter OSM !

Bonjour, Bravo pour cette démarche d'ouverture. Est-ce prévu d'étendre à d'autres villes (Rennes par exemple) ? Cordialement, PanierAvide. Le 24/10/2016 à 10:14, Pierre Touzard a écrit : Bonjour à tous, Ca y est, c'est "officiellement" diffusé ! *http://www.sogefi-sig.com/ressources/*

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] TLPE et OSM : coment la publicité extérieure aide à compléter OSM !

Bonjour à tous, Ca y est, c'est "officiellement" diffusé ! *http://www.sogefi-sig.com/ressources/* sur la page, sélectionner l'onglet "Données OpenStreetMap TLPE" Pierre T. -- View this message in context:

Re: [OSM-talk] The movie Eye in the Sky credits OpenStreetMap

2016-10-23 14:40 GMT+02:00 Simon Poole : > Yes, but the point is that we don't actually give any guidance as to what > we would consider sufficient notice if a link is not possible (as in your > typical book or film) and we should add some text as to what we are happy > with (I

Re: [Talk-it] Attribuzione in "Inferno" di Ron Howard

sent from a phone > Il giorno 23 ott 2016, alle ore 18:16, Lorenzo Beba Beltrami > ha scritto: > > frase "© OpenStreetMap contributors"!!! sulla lista internazionale ci stanno discutendo per un attribuzione così, perché la licenza in realtà chiede anche di dire

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Tag pour constructeur de maisons ?

Le 24/10/2016 à 00:55, Jérôme Amagat a écrit : > Si il fallait que je choisisse : > je dirais que craft= ça correspond pas, pour moi c'est l'artisanat > donc fabriqué quelque choser de ses mains donc ça va pas dans ce cas > c'est plutôt office= +1 > Si on regarde la page office= sur le wiki ce

Re: [OSM-talk] The movie Eye in the Sky credits OpenStreetMap

My reading of https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright is that, under the current terms, printing the link to that page in addition to printing “© OpenStreetMap contributors” would be sufficient. However, I do wonder whether a credit like "“© OpenStreetMap contributors, licensed under