> Op 28-11-2022 05:18 CET schreef stevea :
> I'll be curious to hear feedback from this, too. Thanks for your efforts,
> Lukas: I genuinely hope they help our map!
I can see a use when you have three consecutive segments of a road, where the
first and the last are named (the same) and the
I forget where but it has been said that it is legal and that is the reason
JOSM is now available via the store.
Cheerio John
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 11:43 PM James, wrote:
> IANAL but GPL v2 does allow to charge for distribution. Is it ethical, lol
> no, would lawyers care? Probably not
>
> On
I have created https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/
which lists OSM objects that have some problems requiring review
There is a report for number of areas, including for Australia:
https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/Australia.html
IANAL but GPL v2 does allow to charge for distribution. Is it ethical, lol
no, would lawyers care? Probably not
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 11:30 PM stevea wrote:
> Yes, thanks much, James! (For linking "Reporting Infringement to
> Microsoft"). I do wonder if simply forking and charging money for
Yes, thanks much, James! (For linking "Reporting Infringement to Microsoft").
I do wonder if simply forking and charging money for existing open-source
software is an egregious slap in the face to OSM (JOSM developers, especially),
although I'm not an attorney. So, I'd urge our LWG /
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/infringement
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 11:15 PM john whelan wrote:
> You can only leave a review if you download the software.
>
> Both are JOSM, one is a fork which costs money which goes to the person
> who created the fork the other is
Without wishing to "diss" (disparage) Lukas's tool (I haven't evaluated it), I
would also urge caution here, for exactly the reasons DaveF outlines. I'm also
a partly-armchair mapper, but not (usually, if ever) using Python tools, rather
knowing that my "armchair-ing" is going to be of high
You can only leave a review if you download the software.
Both are JOSM, one is a fork which costs money which goes to the person who
created the fork the other is normal JOSM which is free.
Cheerio John
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 11:01 PM stevea, wrote:
> If choosing which version is "legitimate"
https://apps.microsoft.com/store/detail/openstreet-map-editor/9MVMVXFPM5SV
https://apps.microsoft.com/store/detail/josm/XPFCG1GV0WWGZX
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 11:01 PM stevea wrote:
> If choosing which version is "legitimate" (or preferred) is important, and
> "leaving a review" is a (one)
If choosing which version is "legitimate" (or preferred) is important, and
"leaving a review" is a (one) method for communicating that, I would underscore
that if you do leave a review, make very clear how one differs from the other.
On Nov 27, 2022, at 5:33 PM, john whelan wrote:
>
> Agreed
Agreed but some do and currently both have one review each so it isn't that
clear which is the official OpenStreetMap editor.
Even a couple more reviews would help.
Thanks
Cheerio John
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 20:27 James wrote:
> not everyone runs winblows
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 8:19 PM
not everyone runs winblows
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022, 8:19 PM John Whelan wrote:
> On a windows machine do a search for Microsoft store. Then search for
> JOSM. Download it then you can leave a review. The more reviews it has
> the more it looks as if it is the legitimate version.
>
> The other
On a windows machine do a search for Microsoft store. Then search for
JOSM. Download it then you can leave a review. The more reviews it has
the more it looks as if it is the legitimate version.
The other version which is a fork of JOSM is called OpenStreetMap
editor and has a JOSM screen
Link(s)?
On 30/10/2022 18:47, john whelan wrote:
There are two versions of JOSM available on the Microsoft store. One
is a fork and costs money the other is the kosher version.
It might be helpful if JOSM had a few reviews to make it stand out
from the other version.
Thanks John
Most roads don't have names.
Any comparison has to be done against an authoritative database or on
ground surveying, for the area in which you're searching.
"where the name can be interpolated from neighbouring ways. This allows
to detect and armchair-fix a (small) subset of these cases with
Hi all
As you might know, OSM data contains a lot of highway=* without name=*. Check
your region using the following query:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=way%0A%20%20%5Bhighway%5D%5B!name%5D%0A%20%20(%7B%7Bbbox%7D%7D)%3B%0Aout%20body%3B%0A%3E%3B%0Aout%20skel%20qt%3B
I wrote a Python tool (using
Bonjour,
Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 644 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître
*en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur :
https://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/16134/
Bonne lecture !
Saviez-vous que vous pouvez vous aussi soumettre des messages pour la note
hebdomadaire sans être
OSM ile ilgili haberlerin derlendiği ve OpenStreetMap dünyasındaki pek çok
gelişmelerin paylaşıldığı haftalık bülten, 644. bölümüyle çevrimiçi ve Türkçe
olarak erişilebilir durumda:
https://www.weeklyosm.eu/tr/archives/16134/
İyi okumalar!
weeklyOSM'e sizin de ekleme yapabileceğinizi
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 644,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of a lot of
things happening in the openstreetmap world:
https://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/16134
Enjoy!
Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 644,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of a lot of
things happening in the openstreetmap world:
https://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/16134
Enjoy!
Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in
20 matches
Mail list logo
