It appears it maybe Leaflet &/or Firefox related. Reports are it doesn't
occur in Chrome/IE.
If your turn off Firefox auto updates & install an older version (I used
v60.0 from FileHippo) it prevents it.
Cheers
DaveF
On 23/09/2018 17:41, François Lacombe wrote:
HI all,
It's been a few
Hi
Ever heard of this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62799981
Given the new user's other fantasy edits in my home city, I suspect this
is similar, but I thought I'd check first, even though I could find no
other online evidence of it.
Cheers
DaveF
is the same & 61.0 works OK & is only 2 months old. Personally
I wouldn't rely on browser security.
I didn't find anything relative to this problem on Leaflet github
All the best
François
Le dim. 23 sept. 2018 à 21:13, Dave F <mailto:davefoxfa...@btinternet.com>> a écrit :
in the public domain?
Similar for Fredrik's web page. The format/decoration that he applied
would be copyrightable, but I could freely copy-paste the Shakespeare
text from it.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http
distributing said specific data under license. Item b) is still open
AFAIK.
If b) is compatible, could you clarify what you mean by it still being open?
Thanks
Dave F.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
it doesn't make for a good argumentative discussion, but I really
would like pain simple facts. (Here's living in hope!)
Cheers
Dave F.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Streetview)
The latter is most definitely 'cared' for 'maintained'. I certainly
don't want to loose the ability to do b) nor loose existing data I've
added that way.
Dave F.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http
unable
to answer.
Your arguments must be very weak if you have to invent pathetic
criticisms. Do not waste my time.
OSSV is a welcome addition to the GB mappers toolbox.
It would be disappointing if it rescinded gauling if it was done by OSMF.
Dave F
It's your comments like mindless rubbish that are putting people
off contributing.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
keep pushing the bounds of crazy to come up with these
conspiracy theories.
OK, show me the light; as you're the man with the contacts.
Will I be able to use any OS Opendata formats if I accept the license
CT's in their current incarnation?
Regards
Dave F
.
The campaign to get OS to release data started long before it happened,
as you well know. I don't know the precise date but would put a small
wager that it was before 01/08
Part of the reason for that campaign was to be able to use the data in
projects such as OSM, as you well know.
Dave F
On 29/09/2010 13:21, Grant Slater wrote:
The legal advice is that OS OpenData _is_ compatible.
My question in the original post couldn't have been clearer so I find it
frustrating that it took this long to answer.
Do you know what date it got recorded in the LWG minutes?
Dave F
On 29/09/2010 13:21, Grant Slater wrote:
The legal advice is that OS OpenData _is_ compatible.
Do you know what date it got recorded in the LWG minutes?
Dave F.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http
, in all it's
forms, that I have added.
Steve, you should take a step back look at the whole scenario.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
it?
regards
Dave F.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
On 03/10/2010 14:12, Rob Myers wrote:
On 10/02/2010 12:18 AM, Dave F. wrote:
Broadcasting the fact you think a contributor, who disagrees with you,
should be banned purely because they have a nickname is:
petty/puerile/childish/insecure/inept/pompous/arrogant
That is not the argument
looking for concrete evidence it would be better if you kept quiet
until you had some
Seriously, the more you post, the more I distrust you.
Frederick:
OSM making it up as you go along is that way
Dave F.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk
with
an explanation.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
On 06/07/2011 18:29, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Dave F. wrote:
I must be missing something, because I believe this discussion is a
complete waste of time.
It is good that you have the modesty to assume that you're missing
something rather than 10 others are completely wasting their time
On 06/07/2011 21:04, Anthony wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Frederik Rammfrede...@remote.org wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
If one of these gets moved then the whole way gets updated,
No.
Substantively, that is what happens, but technically, in the database,
it is not.
In the database, we
is moved then that
way is considered to have been modified should be recorded as such.
Dave F.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
On 28/09/2012 16:15, Stephan Knauss wrote:
Google image search found this picture for sale on this stock photo
agency:
Bleedin' hell! Look at those prices! That has got to be a joke.
Dave F.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
not acceptable to you? I believe NPE
extrapolation are valid.
I've never like historical as a tag or key. It's an adjective is
therefore subjective.
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
*I'm sure this is old news to some of you, but...
**http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8402327.stm
Cheers
Dave F.
*
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
persuasively to rename themselves as they're
not really open, are they?
Fredrick - I think this needs a separate new topic.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
John Smith wrote:
2010/1/2 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
I think it's high time this was done. IMO, OCM should be removed from
the main map options asked persuasively to rename themselves as they're
not really open, are they?
What do you suggest they rename to?
FreeCycleMap
Dave F. wrote:
John Smith wrote:
2010/1/2 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
I think it's high time this was done. IMO, OCM should be removed from
the main map options asked persuasively to rename themselves as they're
not really open, are they?
What do you suggest
it's keeping
hidden.
But, remove it from the main page where it appears comparable with OSM
in the open sense, which it clearly isn't.
My abilities have spent much time mapping over the previous week so I'm
quite happy now, pointing out things that I think are out of proportion.
Cheers
Dave F
Peter Reed wrote:
A few months ago I compared the length of roads on the OSM database
against the figures quoted by the Department for transport, and posted
the results here.
Thank you
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
GPX files not number of users.
Is there a way to find the number of consistent editors say over the
past month or so?
This would give a clearer understanding of who's using OSM.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Hi
I'm aware that bus stop data is being mass imported but are there any
other similar data sets?
Such as post boxes public telephones etc?
cheers
dave f
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
. However, to me that's just plain silly.
Opinions welcomed.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
.
By thoughts will be sent to OS shortly...
Regards
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
, of a charge /or
advertising, printed maps become much cheaper (depending on which
license it's released under after the consultation).
What's not to like!
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
Andy Allan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Though custom cartography is the right answer for many applications, it
will find it difficult to compete with the free, universally-recognised
cartography of the OS.
Are you saying you want
David Earl wrote:
On 14/01/2010 18:27, Dave F. wrote:
Andy, The taxpayers have already paid for it, many times over. I resent
having to pay £7.50 for a map I've already financed to construct.
As I've paid for it, I think it should be given to me free of charge.
For a paper map, I think
sometimes hard to determine exactly
where the boundaries of an estate are!
Indeed. Also if they're not a nice 'circular' shape the name tag can
often fall outside the polygon.
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
saying it is, but
still hiding behind the cloak of a monopoly
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
SteveC wrote:
On Jan 14, 2010, at 11:40 AM, David Earl wrote:
On 14/01/2010 18:27, Dave F. wrote:
Andy, The taxpayers have already paid for it, many times over. I resent
having to pay £7.50 for a map I've already financed to construct.
As I've paid for it, I think it should
of the Thames not showing up on Tube map, am looking into it.
Thanks for those. Is it possible to get the the rail canals to zoom to
the same as the tube? (level 15).
It's hard to check out details like tunnels bridges.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB
roads in those areas.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Grant Slater wrote:
someone ask him first.
+1
But also, Peter, as you appear to have detailed local knowledge,
wouldn't it be better for you to revert back?
If the whole changeset was removed it might erase some correct mapping
that he did.
Cheers
Dave F
)
Others of similar type do display
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
.
Any clues as to what is going on?
Can anyone get a list of the history? Is there a way to view a specific
version?
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hi Steve
Not sure why, but your post's got mixed up in another thread. You might
want to repost so it doesn't get missed by others.
Steve Chilton wrote:
Have submitted mapnik patches to SVN to render locks but unfortunately there
isn't a standard way of tagging that makes it easy to be
Steve Chilton wrote:
Have submitted mapnik patches to SVN to render locks but unfortunately there
isn't a standard way of tagging that makes it easy to be comprehensive.
I have dealt with what I think are the two most logical options, which are:
two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either
on osm.org
http://osm.org).
There is no difference between a logo the name tag. They both promote
those companies equally when displayed on the map.
Whether or not they should have a logo is another matter for discussion.
Regards
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB
been
doing before, tag in caveats using the fixme or notes tag to say we're
uncertain of certain areas.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
!
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
source:OS_OpenData_{Product} is fine for a general warning about
where your data came from, but if there's some entity you're really not
convinced about using the Fixme/note tags will fully clarify.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
of date data.
Please explain why you think we should keep it?
If a footpath gets moved do you think I should still show a way mark
it as 'this is where it used to go'?
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
Lester Caine wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
But well mapped rivers don't have ways down their middle
Really?
Care to expand on that please?
MOST rivers are now being mapped fully and so are areas rather than a line
with
some arbitrary width. So
' the physical condition of the way (am I able to
get down that path)
cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
is why I
feel unsure about amending others traces if I don't know the area,
preferring just to add ways that hadn't previously been mapped.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
keeping an eye on his/her Trowbridge edits can't see
anything destructive, just a couple of minor errors, but we all make
those don't we?
Overall I thinks he's adding to map.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
(into fields/woods ?)
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
it will be good to finally see Bristol streets filled
in a bit more. However that won't make it complete - there will still be
too many large areas of residential grey.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
is intimating is that if
there's two set of data, ground survey always take precedence, which I
think is a wrong assumption.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
or road barriers that
define the area?
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
earlier.
I've tried to do my bit for the 'completeness' by adding a few green
areas such as parks golf courses etc.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I'm interested in so I can then use the bar to
zoom accurately to the specific area I'm interested in.
At the moment If I do that it just brings up details of errors for where
I clicked.
Are there any differences between what you've done ITO?
Cheers
Dave F
Should this be simplified in some way?
Andy
OS Streetview has names labelled for junction 16 (Spittleborough
Roundabout) 18 (Tormarton interchange).
Obviously it the signs on the ground show differences they should take
preference.
Cheers
Dave F
On 08/08/2010 14:01, Craig Wallace wrote:
On 03/01/2006 00:37, Dave F. wrote:
On 07/08/2010 19:34, Richard Moss wrote:
I take data from OS as evidence that there is a name for a
road/track etc.
I'm happy with that where I know a road exists, and I have added names
to the farm tracks
On 05/08/2010 23:05, Robert Scott wrote:
On Wednesday 04 August 2010, Dave F. wrote:
Would it be possible to turn these circles off at lower zoom levels?
Personally I like to double click on the map to zoom in at these levels
as it centres the city I'm interested in so I can then use the bar
On 08/08/2010 19:48, Robert Scott wrote:
On Sunday 08 August 2010, Dave F. wrote:
It's an improvement, but it tries to refresh on every click
By refresh do you mean it tries to load the selected match details?
It redraws all the different colour circles on the map (supposedly
searching
of no use.
And, as Tim F., points outs - there's no need to display correct info
(green) at all.
Sorry to ask again, but what does blue represent?
Regards
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
On 17/08/2010 16:18, Bob Kerr wrote:
Hi, Thanks for the replies,
I have placed a tag
not = Pentlands Gardens
instead of not:name= Pentlands Gardens
Bob
Are you saying you've amended or added a tag just to reduce the
percentage value within ITO?
Cheers
Dave F
by ITO.
Is there a wiki for not:name? I couldn't find one.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
darren39 appears to be responsible. Has anyone contacted him
before? Because as of this morning he appears to still be creating
unjoined ways:
http://osm.org/go/eu2C81oJu--
He's been mapping on OSM for almost two years so it's a bit
disappointing he's not learnt the correct way.
Cheers
Dave F
to implement in Potlatch; it's
basically the opposite of the duplicate node test.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hi
I'm trying to understand the new license Contributor Terms and how
they stand when compared specifically with OS OpenData.
Is there a wiki page? I searched but couldn't find one.
I'm after *facts* about the re-license as they're worded at the moment.
Hope you can help.
Cheers
Dave F
On 14/09/2010 17:56, Martin Lucas-Smith - CycleStreets wrote:
We've brokered a dataset of all 2,500-ish bike shops in the UK...
Thanks.
How old is the database are all bike shops members of this association?
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB
are rendered?
Never a priority for me when I'm out for a ride, but hey, each to their own.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 08/09/2010 12:23, Dave F. wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to understand the new license Contributor Terms...
Thanks to all who replied.
A couple of specific questions:
I signed up to OSM a year ago, so I assume I'm under the old CT's.
1. If I trace/import data from OS Opendata today; will I
Hi
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline
Which is more accurate: the OS Streetview data that shows MHW (spring, I
assume) or the PGS data?
http://os.openstreetmap.org/?zoom=16lat=51.26415lon=-3.01719layers=B0
Cheers
Dave F
the area
that I surveyed recently make sure that it's more accurate than what's
already there (PGS).
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
as the NCN ones, so look
likely to remain much longer):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1066850
I thought we weren't tagging temporary/published in books/leaflets at
tourist information type routes.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
.
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
is legitimate.
Tagging the source as Yahoo implies that it maybe out of date another,
more accurate survey, should be carried out in the future but that
shouldn't hinder adding the data.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On 27/09/2010 17:16, Tom Chance wrote:
On 27 September 2010 16:34, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
mailto:dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Hmm... Mapping from Yahoo without ground knowledge is legitimate.
Tagging the source as Yahoo implies that it maybe out of date
another, more
On 27/09/2010 19:18, Tom Chance wrote:
On 27 September 2010 17:41, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
mailto:dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 27/09/2010 17:16, Tom Chance wrote:
On 27 September 2010 16:34, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
mailto:dave...@madasafish.com wrote
Hi
FYI
It appears a user of a couple of months has accidentally deleted some
county boundaries railway route relations.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5964175
I've emailed him to check. I'll let you know of his response.
Cheers
Dave F
Rail Enquiries.
Using that unique descriptive key clarifies what it is your trying to
describe makes it *easier* for everyone to remember..
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
the lack of definitive answers I can only assume that haven't.
How can they ask us to agree to something that they created yet don't
understand?
Very poor.
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
this email.
I don't have specific alternatives to those, except to say entities
should be primarily tagged with their physical attributes.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 18/11/2010 20:07, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
On 18/11/2010 19:36, Dave F. wrote:
There are too many to list, but whilst this is topical, I have a minor
problem with natural=*. It's far too general. I mean, everything under
the sun is either natural or man made.
Also historical=* is just too
On 23/12/2010 17:39, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
It appears that it could be the volume of entities as when I pan in to
the centre from more rural areas it's fine until it reach densely
tagged areas. If I pan quick enough it's fine until the screen has
displayed the vast majority
of Bristol I should
tell you I've been adding the residential areas to a multi-polygon
(Relation 1277566) Their number complexity (inner outer areas) have
grown considerably; maybe by too much.
Good luck with organ.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing
On 24/12/2010 08:39, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
Hmm.. FYI as the problem seems to occur over most of Bristol I should
tell you I've been adding the residential areas to a multi-polygon
(Relation 1277566) Their number complexity (inner outer areas) have
grown considerably; maybe
?
Any other information or comments welcome?
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
address database, created between Local Councils and
Ordnance Survey. It looks like Royal Mail will be sidelined as they
just make the names up.
Hope this helps
Yes it does, thanks.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
such as rivers. This may have been superseded by Bing,
but I'm not sure if UK coverage of it is fully high-res (zoom 21).
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
had doubts about its validity in the main database.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 10/02/2011 10:30, Peter Miller wrote:
Personally I would prefer a single linear way for streams rather than
the area 'river-bank' approach which the OS use...
Ideally it should be mapped with both:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank
Cheers
Dave F
(Allowed button) in
version 2.
I'm not saying it's correct or not, just pointing it out.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 11/03/2011 12:59, Ed Avis wrote:
It's clear that the simplified Street
View building shapes are inferior to high-res aerial photos that Bing has
let us use.
But only with older buildings. OS SV is much more upto date with new
version being issued every 6 months (?).
Dave F
in reasonably sizes chunks then *checked*
afterwards they bring value to the OSM database.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
,
attempt to infer NSL status
Tags:
FIXME:nsl = inferred single-carriageway NSL - remove this tag once verified
source:maxspeed = UK:nsl_single
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
On 13/03/2011 12:27, Dave F. wrote:
Hi
You've probably seen the numerous edits by chriscf.
Well, after reading up on this, I kind of understand what the
source:maxspeed is used for, but I'm not happy that chriscf has guessed
that value for key tags that were added by other users
.
Is this correct or have I missed something?
Cheers
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
701 - 800 of 1486 matches
Mail list logo
